A Possible Protective Effect of the 'Cam Deformity' on Femoral Neck Fracture: The Relationship between Hip Morphology and the Types of Hip Fracture.

We retrospectively evaluated the cases of 169 hip fracture patients, their previous fractures, and the contralateral hip joint's morphology. A history of contralateral hip fracture was present in 23 patients (Contra group). The other patients had a unilateral hip fracture: a trochanteric fracture (Troch group, n=73) or a femoral neck fracture (Neck group, n=73). In the Troch and Neck groups, we used anteroposterior and cross-table axialview radiographs of the contralateral hip to evaluate the proximal femur's anatomy. In the Contra group, the concordance rate between the first and second types of hip fracture was 65.2%, and the second hip fracture's morphology indicated that the trochanteric fracture had a cam deformity in terms of the femoral head-neck ratio. The average alpha angle and femoral head-neck offset in the Troch group were significantly larger than those in the Neck group. In the Neck group, pistol-grip deformities of Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen types B1 (subcapital), B2 (transcervical), and B3 (displaced) were observed in 42.1%, 75%, and 6% of cases, respectively. There was a smaller alpha angle and a larger femoral head-neck offset in the contralateral hip of femoral neck fractures; thus, the "cam deformity" may protect against femoral neck fractures.

Proof of concept: hip joint damage occurs at the zone of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) in an experimental FAI sheep model.

OBJECTIVE: In ovine hips chondrolabral damage as seen in cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) can be induced via an intertrochanteric varus osteotomy. However, it is yet to proven whether the observed cartilage damage is caused by a dynamic cam type impingement. Thus we asked, (1) whether actual cartilage damage observed after FAI induction in ovine hips occurs at the predicted, computed zone of FAI; (2) whether the extent of cartilage damage increases with ambulation time in this animal model? DESIGN: In this experimental, controlled, comparative study 20 sheep underwent unilateral FAI induction through an intertrochanteric varus osteotomy. Preoperatively sheep underwent computed tomography to generate three-dimensional models of the osseous pelvis and femur. The models were used to predict impingement zones before and after simulated varus osteotomy using range of motion (ROM) analysis. Sheep were sacrificed after 14-40 weeks of ambulation. At sacrifice cartilage was inspected and (1) location of actual damage and computed impingement zones were compared; (2) Cartilage damage was compared between short- and long ambulation groups. RESULTS: (1) The average location and the extent of peripheral and central cartilage lesions did not differ with the computed impingement zones (all P > 0.05). (2) Grades of central, posterior cartilage damage were more severe in the long-compared to the short ambulation group (2.2 ± 1.8 vs 0.4 ± 0.5; P = 0.030). CONCLUSIONS: In this experimental ovine FAI model the surgical induction of an osseous impingement conflict between the femur and acetabulum causes cartilage damage at the zone of simulated FAI.

Similar femoral growth and deformity with one screw versus two smooth pins for slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

PURPOSE: To compare longitudinal growth and cam deformity of the proximal femur after treatment for slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) with one screw versus two smooth pins. METHODS: We studied 43 patients (29 males, 14 females; mean age, 12.1 years; range, 9.5-14 years) with idiopathic unilateral SCFE treated with in situ fixation with one cannulated screw (group A, n = 23) or two smooth pins (group B, n = 20). Anteroposterior and frog-leg radiographs of the pelvis were evaluated for each patient at initial presentation, post-operatively and at physeal closure. Longitudinal growth was evaluated using the femoral neck length (FNL), the caput-collum-diaphyseal (CCD) angle, and the articulo-trochanteric distance (ATD). Cam deformity was assessed using the anterior offset α-angle and the head-neck offset ratio (HNOR). The mean follow-up was 5.1 years (range, 4-7 years). RESULTS: Postoperatively, the mean CCD angle was 138.3°, the mean α-angle was 66.1° and the mean HNOR was - 0.030. At physeal closure, mean CCD angle significantly decreased to 133.6°, mean α-angle significantly reduced to 52.1°, and mean HNOR significantly improved to + 0.039. CCD, FNL, ATD, α-angle, and HNOR were not different between groups. CONCLUSIONS: One screw or two smooth pins result in similar longitudinal growth and deformity of the proximal femur after SCFE. The femoral head-neck junction remarkably improves until physeal closure; however, residual cam deformity is not avoided after in situ pinning. The complication rate with smooth pins is higher.

Morphological variation of the anterior inferior iliac spine affects hip range of motion in flexion after rotational acetabular osteotomy.

PURPOSE: Reduced range of motion (ROM) in flexion and internal rotation are associated with impaired activities of daily living (ADL) after rotational acetabular osteotomy (RAO). This study focused on the morphological variation of the anterior inferior iliac spine in developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) and its impact on post-operative bony ROM after RAO. This study aimed to investigate the association between bony ROM after RAO and pre-operative morphological factors of the pelvis and femur, including a positional variation of the anterior inferior iliac spine. METHODS: Bony ROM in 52 patients with DDH was assessed after virtual RAO using computed tomography (CT). Post-operative acetabular coverage was set at lateral and anterior centre-edge angles of 30° and 55°, respectively. The position of the anterior inferior iliac spine was classified as higher or lower. RESULTS: Multiple regression analysis revealed that the lower anterior inferior iliac spine and higher femoral neck shaft angle were significantly associated with the lower flexion angle after RAO. Lower femoral anteversion, higher femoral neck shaft angle and higher alpha angle at the anterosuperior part were significantly associated with lower internal rotation angle at 90° flexion after RAO. CONCLUSION: Therefore, morphological variation of the anterior inferior iliac spine affected bony ROM in flexion and that of the femoral neck affected bony ROM in internal rotation at flexion after RAO.

Visualization of a cam-type femoroacetabular impingement while squatting using image-matching techniques: a case report.

The in vivo assessment of the three-dimensional (3D) kinematics of the hip in patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) under weight-bearing conditions has not been previously reported. We evaluated the pre- and postoperative hip kinematics of a 34-year-old man, with a cam-type FAI while squatting, using image-matching techniques with measurement of the rim-neck distance. Post-osteochondroplasty, the α-angle improved from 51.0° to 35.5° and the head-neck offset ratio from 0.04 to 0.23. Coxalgia during squatting disappeared, and the Harris Hip Score improved from 79 to 92 at 1 year post-surgery. Postoperative hip kinematic values (3.8° of posterior pelvic tilt and 101.2° of femoral flexion at 96.8° of maximum hip flexion) were similar to the preoperative values (2.9° of posterior pelvic tilt and 102.7° of femoral flexion at 98.8° of maximum hip flexion). Meanwhile, osteochondroplasty improved the minimum rim-neck distance at maximum hip flexion from 2.0 to 10.4 mm. In vivo 3D visualization of the clearance between the femoral head-neck junction and the acetabulum could assist surgeons in adequately identifying the location of impingement and confirming sufficient resection post-operatively.

Detecting cam-type deformities on plain radiographs: what is the optimal lateral view?

PURPOSE: Radial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the most accurate diagnostic tool in assessing cam-type femoroacetabular impingement. Plain radiographs, however, are useful for the initial diagnosis in the daily practice and there is still debate regarding the optimal lateral view. The purpose of this study was to investigate the reliability of detecting cam deformities using the frog-leg view or the 45° Dunn view by comparison with radial MRI. MATERIAL: 66 consecutive hips with plain radiographs (36 with AP and frog-leg views, 30 with AP and 45° Dunn views) and radial MRI were assessed. Alpha angle measurements were obtained both for radiographs and for radial MRI reformats by two investigators. Statistics included frequency analysis, bivariate linear correlation analyses, and cross-table analyses testing the sensitivity and specificity of the radiographic projections for detecting an alpha angle larger than 55°. RESULTS: The intra-class correlation revealed excellent agreement between the two raters [ICC = 0.959, CI (0.943; 0.972)]. 50% (33/66) had the maximum alpha angle in the superior-anterior aspect of the femoral head-neck junction. Cam deformity was found in 40/66 cases (61%) in radial MRI. Pearson correlation demonstrated that the 45° Dunn view was most accurate for the superior-anterior aspect (0.730, p < 0.05). The frog-leg view was best suited for the anterior aspect (0.703, p < 0.05). The sensitivity for detecting cam deformities in the 45° Dunn view was 84 vs 62% in the frog-leg view. CONCLUSION: The frog-leg lateral radiograph does not provide reliable measurements of the alpha angle. This study highlights the importance of the 45° Dunn view for early detection of femoroacetabular cam-type impingement.

Femoral Morphology in Patients Undergoing Periacetabular Osteotomy for Classic or Borderline Acetabular Dysplasia: Are Cam Deformities Common?

BACKGROUND: The primary purpose of our study was to determine the prevalence of Cam deformity in patients with symptomatic acetabular dysplasia (SAD) who underwent periacetabular osteotomy (PAO). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 164 SAD PAO patients from 2 institutions. Preoperative anteroposterior and frog-lateral radiographs were analyzed for lateral center edge angle (LCEA), retroversion, alpha angles, and anterior femoral head-neck offset. Hips were classified as dysplastic (LCEA <20°, group A, n = 142) and borderline dysplastic (LCEA 20°-25°, group B, n = 22). There were 128 females and 36 males with an average age of 29 years (range 13-56). RESULTS: The overall prevalence of Cam deformity was 10% (17 of 164) in SAD patients. There was no difference in the prevalence of Cam deformity between the groups (P > .99). CONCLUSION: Prevalence of Cam deformities in our series of SAD patients having undergone PAO is less than prior reports. Careful radiographic measurement should be performed to avoid overtreating these hips with unnecessary osteochondroplasty procedures.

Associations of markers of matrix metabolism, inflammation markers, and adipokines with superior cam deformity of the hip and their relation with future hip osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: First, to study how markers of matrix metabolism, inflammation markers, and adipokines relate to (superior) cam deformity and (possible) cam impingement of the hip. Second, to investigate whether they can identify subjects with cam deformity that are at risk of future hip osteoarthritis (OA). METHOD: In a cohort of 1002 subjects (CHECK), (superior) cam deformity was defined by an alpha angle >60° on anteroposterior pelvic radiographs and (possible) cam impingement by a cam deformity together with internal hip rotation ≤20°. Hip OA at 5-year follow-up was defined by Kellgren and Lawrence grade ≥2 or total hip replacement. RESULTS: Subjects with (superior) cam deformity and (possible) cam impingement showed lower levels of bone turnover markers (uCTX-I, uNTX-I, sPINP, sOC) than those without. Cam deformity was positively associated with future hip OA, but associations were weaker at high levels of bone turnover. sCOMP and sHA levels were higher in subjects with cam deformity, while other cartilage and synovium markers were not. Some markers of inflammation (pLeptin, pAdiponectin, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate) were lower in presence of cam deformity and cam impingement, but high-sensitivity C-reactive protein was not. Most associations depended largely on gender differences. CONCLUSION: Bone metabolism may be relevant in the pathogenesis of (superior) cam deformity and in the development of (superior) cam deformity into hip OA. Subjects with cam deformity and cam impingement surprisingly showed lower levels of inflammation markers and adipokines. Associations of cartilage turnover markers with cam deformity and cam impingement were less obvious.

Cam impingement: defining the presence of a cam deformity by the alpha angle: data from the CHECK cohort and Chingford cohort.

INTRODUCTION: Cam impingement is characterized by abnormal contact between the proximal femur and acetabulum caused by a non-spherical femoral head, known as a cam deformity. A cam deformity is usually quantified by the alpha angle; greater alpha angles substantially increase the risk for osteoarthritis (OA). However, there is no consensus on which alpha angle threshold to use to define the presence of a cam deformity. AIM: To determine alpha angle thresholds that define the presence of a cam deformity and a pathological cam deformity based on development of OA. METHODS: Data from both the prospective CHECK cohort of 1002 individuals (45-65 years) and the prospective population-based Chingford cohort of 1003 women (45-64 years) with respective follow-up times of 5 and 19 years were combined. The alpha angle was measured at baseline on anteroposterior radiographs, from which a threshold for the presence of a cam deformity was determined based on its distribution. Further, a pathological alpha angle threshold was determined based on the highest discriminative ability for development of end-stage OA at follow-up. RESULTS: A definite bimodal distribution of the alpha angle was found in both cohorts with a normal distribution up to 60°, indicating a clear distinction between normal and abnormal alpha angles. A pathological threshold of 78° resulted in the maximum area under the ROC curve. CONCLUSION: Epidemiological data of two large cohorts shows a bimodal distribution of the alpha angle. Alpha angle thresholds of 60° to define the presence of a cam deformity and 78° for a pathological cam deformity are proposed.

Association of Idiopathic Cam Morphology With Femoral and Acetabular Version: Analysis of 986 Cadaveric Hips.

Background: Studies have correlated symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) with femoral retroversion and cam lesions. Purpose: To investigate any association between femoral and acetabular versions with cam deformity in a largely asymptomatic population. Study Design: Descriptive laboratory study. Methods: A total of 986 cadaveric hips were selected from a historical osteologic collection. Each hip was assessed to determine the femoral and acetabular versions, anterior offset, and alpha angle. Cam morphology was defined as an alpha angle >60°. Multiple regression analysis was performed to determine the relationship between age, femoral version, acetabular version, and either alpha angle or anterior femoral offset. Results: The mean alpha angle and anterior offset for the sample population were 48.1°± 10.4° and 0.77 ± 0.17 cm, respectively, with cam morphology in 149 of the 986 (15.1%) specimens. No significant difference was observed between hips with and without cam morphology with respect to the femoral (10.8°± 10° vs 10.3°± 9.6°; P = .58) or acetabular versions (17.4°± 6° vs 18.2°± 6.3°; P = .14). Multiple regression analysis did not demonstrate an association between the femoral or acetabular versions and the alpha angle, and it showed a small association between the increasing femoral and acetabular versions and a decreased anterior femoral offset (both P < .01). Conclusion: In a large random sample of cadaveric hips, cam morphology was not associated with femoral or acetabular retroversion. Combined with the existing literature, these findings suggest that retroversion is not associated with cam development. Clinical Relevance: This study provides insight into the development of cam morphology, which may eventually aid in the evaluation and treatment of FAI.

Survivorship Rate and Clinical Outcomes 10 Years After Arthroscopic Correction of Symptomatic Femoroacetabular Impingement.

BACKGROUND: Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is a common mechanical hip condition, prevalent in both the athletic and the general population. Surgical intervention is an effective treatment option that improves both symptoms and function in short- to medium-term follow-up. Few studies within the literature have reported the longer-term success of arthroscopic surgery. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to quantify the 10-year survivorship and clinical outcome for patients treated arthroscopically for symptomatic FAI. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: Patients from our hip registry (n = 119) completed patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) including the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) activity scale, 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) at a minimum of 10 years after arthroscopy (range, 10-12 years). Results were compared with baseline scores using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. The associations among several prognostic factors, which included age, sex, Tönnis grade, and labral treatment, and subsequent conversion to total hip replacement (THR) or repeat hip arthroscopy (RHA) were analyzed using the chi-square analysis. Relationships between range of motion and radiological findings with clinical outcome were also examined using Pearson correlation analysis. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was calculated using a distribution method (0.5 standard deviation of the change score), and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) was determined using an anchor method. Finally, receiver operating characteristic curves with subsequent Youden index were used to determine cutoffs for PROMs, which equated to a Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS). RESULTS: A total of 8.4% of cases required conversion to THR, and 5.9% required RHA. Statistically significant improvements in mHHS, SF-36, and WOMAC scores, with high satisfaction (90%), were observed 10 years after surgery. No significant change was seen in activity level (UCLA score) despite patients being 10 years older. A high percentage of patients achieved MCID for mHHS (88%), SF-36 (84%), and WOMAC (60%). The majority of patients also achieved PASS (62% for mHHS, 85% for UCLA, 78% for SF-36, and 84% for WOMAC) and SCB (74% for mHHS, 58% for UCLA, 52% for SF-36, and 56% for WOMAC). CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic intervention is a safe and viable treatment option for patients with symptomatic FAI, and patients can expect long-term improvements and high satisfaction. Results indicated a high satisfaction (90%) and survivorship rate (91.6%), with excellent clinical outcome, 10 years after the initial procedure.

Association of Cam Deformity on Anteroposterior Pelvic Radiographs and More Severe Chondral Damage in Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Abnormal proximal femoral morphology in femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) identifiable on the anteroposterior (AP) pelvic radiograph has been described as the "pistol grip" deformity. The effect of a superior cam deformity identified on this radiographic view remains unknown. PURPOSES: To assess the relationship between AP cam deformity (AP alpha angle [AP AA] >55°) and cartilage injury; to assess the relationship between AP cam deformity and labral injury; and to determine if patient factors are correlated with cartilage and labral injury. STUDY DESIGN: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Patients undergoing osteochondroplasty and labral repair for FAIS with a single surgeon were identified retrospectively. Intraoperative size, location, and severity of cartilage and labral damage were prospectively collected. Chondrolabral and femoral/acetabular cartilage damage were graded with the Beck labral and cartilage injury criteria. Radiographic data included the AP AA, lateral center-edge angle (LCEA), and maximum femoral alpha angle (MF AA). Patients with hip dysplasia (LCEA <18°; LCEA 18°-25° with acetabular index >10°) were excluded. Outcomes were compared across cartilage and labral severity grades. We report odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals and P values from multivariable logistic regressions. RESULTS: Of the 158 included hips (154 patients), 69% were female and the mean (± standard deviation [SD]) age was 30.3 ± 9.7 years. Increase in age, increase in body mass index (BMI), and male sex were associated with increasing severity of cartilage and labral injury. More severe cartilage damage was associated with increasing AP AA (P < .001) and MF AA (P < .001). The odds of developing a higher category of cartilage injury severity (grade ≥3) were 119% higher (OR, 2.19 [95% CI, 1.36-3.64]; P = .002) for every SD increase (16.7°) in AP AA, adjusting for age, sex, and BMI. The odds of developing a severe labral injury (grade ≥3) were 118% higher (OR, 2.18 [95% CI 1.17-4.32]; P = .018) for every SD increase (10.5°) in MF AA, adjusting for age, sex, BMI, and AP AA. CONCLUSION: Increasing age and BMI, and male sex are associated with increasing severity of cartilage and labral injury in FAIS. The odds of developing a cartilage injury are significantly higher with independent increases in AP AA and MF AA.

Extent of Cam Resection Relative to Epiphyseal Line and Its Association With Clinical Outcomes After Arthroscopic Treatment for Femoroacetabular Syndrome.

Background: Inadequate resection of cam lesions can cause inferior outcomes after hip arthroscopy and result in revision surgery for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS). Purpose: To evaluate the association between postoperative cam lesions measured using the proximal boundaries of resection area (PBRE) relative to the epiphyseal line and 2-year outcomes after hip arthroscopy. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Included were patients with FAIS who had undergone primary hip arthroscopy between 2016 and 2018. The PBRE was calculated by measuring the linear distance from the PBRE to the epiphyseal line, dividing it by the diameter of the femoral head, and multiplying by 100; PBRE measurements were made at the 12-, 1-, and 2-o'clock positions on postoperative hip computed tomography. Within each clockface position, patients were divided into subgroups depending on whether their postoperative PBRE was greater than a half standard deviation above the mean (adequate resection) or less than or equal to a half standard deviation above the mean (inadequate resection). Patient-reported outcomes (PROs; Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living [HOS-ADL], International Hip Outcome Tool-Short Form [iHOT-12], modified Harris Hip Score [mHHS], and pain visual analog scale [VAS]) and rates of achieving the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient-acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) were compared among the subgroups. Results: Included were 80 pairs of hips at 12 o'clock, 81 pairs of hips at 1 o'clock, and 80 pairs of hips at 2 o'clock. All subgroups demonstrated significant improvements in PRO scores at a minimum 2-year follow-up compared with preoperatively. At the 12-o'clock position, the subgroup with adequate resection had significantly superior HOS-ADL (P = .004), iHOT-12 (P < .001), and mHHS (P < .001) scores and were more likely to achieve the MCID for the iHOT-12 score (P = .035) and the PASS for the HOS-ADL (P = .003), iHOT-12 (P = .007), and mHHS (P < .001) scores compared with the matched subgroup. There were no significant differences in PRO scores or rates of MCID and PASS for the 1- or 2-o'clock groups. Conclusion: The epiphyseal line may be a useful and reproducible landmark measurement for cam-type deformity. Patients considered to have inadequate resection at 12 o'clock had lower outcome scores at a minimum 2-year follow-up.

Evaluation of Cam Deformity on 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography With the Best-Fit Sphere Technique and the Alpha Angle Marking Method.

BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) is commonly used for the evaluation of cam deformity; however, it does not display the cam border directly. PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of the best-fit sphere (BFS) method and the alpha angle marking (AAM) method in 3D-CT evaluation for the cam border. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study (Diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Twenty-six cases of cam deformity, confirmed during hip arthroscopy, were included in this study. All patients underwent a CT scan before surgery. Using multiplanar reconstruction, we obtained reformatted CT images of oblique axial, oblique coronal, and radial views. The alpha angle and femoral head-neck offset ratio (hnoR) were measured on the reformatted CT images. The cam area on 3D-CT was displayed in 4 different ways: by importing the markers from the reformatted CT images of the oblique axial view (cam-oa), the oblique coronal view (cam-oc), or the radial view (cam-r) using the AAM method, or by using the BFS method (cam-bfs). The sizes and locations of the displayed cams were compared. RESULTS: All hips in this study had an alpha angle greater than 60° and an hnoR smaller than 0.17. The radial view measured a larger alpha angle and smaller hnoR than the oblique axial and coronal views (P < .05). The areas of cam-oa, cam-oc, cam-r, and cam-bfs were 161.47 ± 27.96, 89.78 ± 19.23, 241.73 ± 34.55, and 329.75 ± 42.73 mm2, respectively, and their medial-to-lateral ranges along the acetabulum (clockface referents) were 12:30 to 03:00, 11:30 to 01:30, 11:30 to 03:00, and 11:00 to 03:30, respectively. Among the 4 displays, cam-bfs had the largest area and medial-to-lateral range (P < .05), and cam-r had the second largest area and range (P < .05). No significant difference in the mean distances from the acetabular rim to the superior border was detected among the 4 displays (P > .05). CONCLUSION: The cam area displayed by the BFS method on 3D-CT was larger than those evaluated by the AAM method. In the reformatted CT, the sizes and locations of cam deformity differed among the oblique axial, oblique coronal, and radial views, with the radial view showing the greatest area.

Femoral Head Chondrocyte Viability at the Cam Deformity in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Patients with hip pathology, such as femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) or hip dysplasia, are known to sustain chondral delamination injuries identifiable during hip arthroscopy, with an incidence of 44% to 75%. There are studies focused on understanding acetabular chondral flap viability, but there is a dearth of research regarding the viability of femoral head cartilage overlying the cam deformity in FAI. PURPOSE: To describe the viability and immunohistochemistry staining patterns of femoral head cartilage in the setting of FAI. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive laboratory study. METHODS: Between September 2018 and August 2019, a single surgeon prospectively collected full-thickness femoral cartilage from cam deformities in 14 patients with FAI undergoing osteoplasty. Samples were assessed for viability and underwent immunohistochemistry staining for collagen type I, collagen type II, and aggrecan. RESULTS: The data set included 14 patients. Twelve samples were assessed for viability and 14 for immunohistochemistry straining. The mean patient age was 34.1 years, and the mean body mass index was 24.69. Mean ± SD chondrocyte viability per patient was 52% ± 11%. At the time of cell isolation, 8 of the 12 patients had viability >50%, with a maximum of 68.2%. This viability increased after a primary culture period, varying from 9 to 13 days, with 10 of 12 samples having viability >90%. The viability mean after the culture period was 94.54% ± 4.89%. Harvested cartilage showed expressions of type I cartilage, type II collagen, and aggrecan in a pattern that is predictable for native cartilage. CONCLUSION: These data reveal that the cartilage in femoral head cartilage overlying cam deformity-much like that from acetabular chondral flaps-not only has baseline viability >50% (51.99% ± 10.83%) but the ability to increase in viability >90% after a culture period. There may be a role for use of femoral head cartilage as autograft to repair full-thickness cartilage defects of the acetabulum and femoral head, either at the time of osteochondroplasty or after a period of cell culture to improve cell viability. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: A dearth of information is available regarding the viability of femoral head cartilage. This study provides insight into the cartilage viability and response to culture.

Reported Prevalence of Radiographic Cam Deformity Based on Sport: A Systematic Review of the Current Literature.

BACKGROUND: Repetitive loading and shear stress across the proximal femur account for the high prevalence of cam deformity in athletes. PURPOSE: To systematically review the literature to identify the reported number, age, mean alpha angle measurements, and differences between male and female athletes with radiographic cam deformity based on sport. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted of studies in the literature between January 1990 and March 2018 that reported on athletes with radiographic cam deformity based on sport. PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were followed, and PubMed, Biosis Previews, SPORTDiscus, PEDro, and EMBASE databases were used. Inclusion criteria included studies documenting radiographic cam deformity based on alpha angle measurements categorized according to the athlete's primary sport and according to sex. Exclusion criteria were (1) studies not documenting primary sport, (2) studies not reporting total number of athletes with radiographic cam deformity, and (3) studies not separating cam deformity based on sex or using alpha angle measurements. Statistical analysis was used to compare mean reported age and alpha angle measurements between males and females. RESULTS: A total of 28 studies consisting of 1160 male and 53 female athletes with radiographic cam deformity were identified. Cam lesions were most commonly reported in soccer athletes among both males and females, followed by hockey and American football. Male athletes had significantly higher mean alpha angle measurements (59.9° ± 5.5°) compared with female athletes (48.3° ± 6.9°) (P = .001). No significant difference in age was appreciated between males (21.1 ± 4.0 years) and females (21.7 ± 3.0 years) (P = .62). CONCLUSION: Radiographic cam deformity is most commonly reported in athletes participating in soccer and hockey. Males possessed significantly greater mean alpha angle measurements compared with females, whereas no significant difference in mean age at the time of diagnosis was appreciated between sexes.

Prevalence of CAM deformity and its influence on therapy success in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) and CAM-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) present two different pathologies of the hip joint. The aim of this study is to describe the prevalence of CAM-FAI in a collective of ONFH hips and to evaluate its influence on ONFH therapy outcome. A cohort of 86 ONFH hips with a mean follow-up of 46.7 months (±20.5) after advanced core decompression (ACD) was evaluated regarding CAM deformity by measuring the alpha angle (α) and head-neck offset. The influence of CAM-type FAI was investigated using the Kaplan-Meier estimator and the Cox regression model. The mean α was 60.4° (±13.8) with 41 hips (47.7%) being ≥60°. The mean head-neck offset was 4.5 mm (±3.2), with 78 hips (90.7%) being ≤9 mm. Survival analysis indicated noticeably better ACD results for α < 60° versus α ≥ 60° (p = 0.07). Treatment failure within the first 2 years was statistically estimated as 27.7% for α < 60° versus 40.7% for α ≥ 60°: The hazard ratio for α ≥ 60° was 1.94. Head-neck offset-dependent survival showed better, though not significant, results for offset >9 mm (p = 0.38, hazard ratio 1.89 for offsets ≤9 mm). The prevalence of CAM-type deformity is greatly increased in patients with concomitant ONFH. There is a strong indication that CAM-type FAI has a negative influence on ONFH therapy outcome. The risk that ONFH treatment will fail seems to be twice as high for α ≥ 60° as for α < 60°. We recommend cotreatment of pathological head-neck offset in patients with ONFH.

Characterization and Correction of Symptomatic Hip Impingement in American Football Linemen.

BACKGROUND: Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) morphology can lead to range-of-motion deficits in football players. It is therefore important for physicians treating these players to be aware of the location and implications of FAI morphology. PURPOSE/QUESTIONS: We sought to characterize the radiographic deformity and dynamic impingement observed in a consecutive series of American football linemen with symptomatic, mechanical hip pain who underwent surgical treatment for FAI and to use software analysis to identify the location of impingement and terminal range of motion and the effects of simulated correction. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted of 17 hips in 13 football linemen who underwent arthroscopic correction for symptomatic FAI. Computed tomography (CT) scans were used to generate preoperative three-dimensional models of the hips. Femoral and acetabular measurements, maximum hip flexion, abduction, internal rotation at 90° flexion (IR90), and flexion/adduction/internal rotation (FADIR) were determined, and areas of bony collision were defined. Simulated femoral correction was performed and motion analysis was repeated. RESULTS: Mean femoral version was 13.1° (range, 0 to 26°), while mean femoral neck-shaft angle was 132.1° (range, 123 to 145°). Mean maximum alpha angle on the radial reformatted CT was 69.2° (range, 48 to 95°) and was located at the 12:45 clock-face position (range, 11:30 to 2:15). Mean acetabular version values at 1:30 and 3:00 were 1.1° (range, - 11 to 11°) and 12.7° (range, 2 to 20°), respectively. Fifty-three percent of hips showed a "crossover" sign. Mean lateral center-edge angle was 31.7° (range, 25 to 44°). CT-derived motion analysis demonstrated a mean preoperative flexion of 108.2° (range, 73 to 127°), IR90 of 20.5° (range, 0 to 52°), and FADIR of 12.3° (range, 0 to 39°). Simulated correction resulted in significant improvements in flexion (6.6°), IR90 (11.3°), and FADIR (10.6°). CONCLUSIONS: While cephalad retroversion was observed in approximately half of the hips, a significant cam deformity was seen maximally at 12:45, a more posterior cam location than that of the general population. Managing this pathology required obtaining preoperative and intraoperative images to characterize lesions and allow for their complete correction. With complete correction of the deformity, simulated range of motion demonstrated significant improvement in flexion, IR90, and FADIR maneuvers.

Asymptomatic Participants With a Femoroacetabular Deformity Demonstrate Stronger Hip Extensors and Greater Pelvis Mobility During the Deep Squat Task.

BACKGROUND: Cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is a femoral head-neck deformity that causes abnormal contact between the femoral head and acetabular rim, leading to pain. However, some individuals with the deformity do not experience pain and are referred to as having a femoroacetabular deformity (FAD). To date, only a few studies have examined muscle activity in patients with FAI, which were limited to gait, isometric and isokinetic hip flexion, and extension tasks. PURPOSE: To compare (1) hip muscle strength during isometric contraction and (2) lower limb kinematics and muscle activity of patients with FAI and FAD participants with body mass index-matched healthy controls during a deep squat task. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Three groups of participants were recruited: 16 patients with FAI (14 male, 2 female; mean age, 38.5 ± 8.0 years), 18 participants with FAD (15 male, 3 female; mean age, 32.5 ± 7.1 years), and 18 control participants (16 male, 2 female; mean age, 32.8 ± 7.0 years). Participants were outfitted with electromyography electrodes on 6 muscles and reflective markers for motion capture. The participants completed maximal strength tests and performed 5 deep squat trials. Muscle activity and biomechanical variables were extrapolated and compared between the 3 groups using 1-way analysis of variance. RESULTS: The FAD group was significantly stronger than the FAI and control groups during hip extension, and the FAD group had greater sagittal pelvic range of motion and could squat to a greater depth than the FAI group. The FAI group activated their hip extensors to a greater extent and for a longer period of time compared with the FAD group to achieve the squat task. CONCLUSION: The stronger hip extensors of the FAD group are associated with greater pelvic range of motion, allowing for greater posterior pelvic tilt, possibly reducing the risk of impingement while performing the squat, and resulting in a greater squat depth compared with those with symptomatic FAI. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The increased strength of the hip extensors in the FAD group allowed these participants to achieve greater pelvic mobility and a greater squat depth by preventing the painful impingement position. Improving hip extensor strength and pelvic mobility may affect symptoms for patients with FAI.