Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intravenous delafloxacin in healthy subjects: model-based dose optimization.

Delafloxacin, a fluoroquinolone antibiotic to treat skin infections, exhibits a broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity. The first randomized, open-label phase I clinical trial was conducted to assess the safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of intravenous delafloxacin in the Chinese population. A population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model based on the clinical trial was conducted by NONMEM software. Monte Carlo simulation was performed to evaluate the antibacterial effects of delafloxacin at different doses in different Chinese populations. The PK characteristics of delafloxacin were best described by a three-compartment model with mixed linear and nonlinear clearance. Body weight was included as a covariate in the model. We simulated the AUC0-24h in a steady state at five doses in patient groups of various weights. The results indicated that for patients weighing 70 kg and treated with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections, a minimum dose of 300 mg achieved a PTA > 90% at MIC90 of 0.25 µg/mL, suggesting an ideal bactericidal effect. For patients weighing less than 60 kg, a dose of 200 mg achieved a PTA > 90% at MIC90 of 0.25 µg/mL, also suggesting an ideal bactericidal effect. Additionally, this trial demonstrated the high safety of delafloxacin in single-dose and multiple-dose groups of Chinese. Delafloxacin (300 mg, q12h, iv) was recommended for achieving optimal efficacy in Chinese bacterial skin infections patients. To ensure optimal efficacy, an individualized dose of 200 mg (q12h, iv) could be advised for patients weighing less than 60 kg, and 300 mg (q12h, iv) for those weighing more than 60 kg.

Agar and agarose used for Staphylococcus aureus biofilm cultivation impact fluoroquinolone tolerance.

AIMS: Staphylococcus aureus is an opportunistic pathogen whose treatment is further complicated by its ability to form biofilms. In this study, we examine the impact of growing S. aureus biofilms on different polymerizing surfaces, specifically agar and agarose, on the pathogen's tolerance to fluoroquinolones. METHODS AND RESULTS: Biofilms of two methicillin-resistant strains of S. aureus were grown on agar or agarose in the presence of the same added nutrients, and their antibiotic susceptibility to two fluoroquinolones, moxifloxacin (MXF) and delafloxacin (DLX), were measured. We also compared the metabolism and extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) production of biofilms that were grown on agar and agarose. CONCLUSIONS: Biofilms that were grown on agarose were consistently more susceptible to antibiotics than those grown on agar. We found that in biofilms that were grown on agar, extracellular protein composition was higher, and adding EPS to agarose-grown biofilms increased their tolerance to DLX to levels that were comparable to agar-grown biofilms.

In vitro activity of delafloxacin against anaerobic bacteria compared with other antimicrobials.

The aim of this study was to describe the in vitro activity of delafloxacin against 230 anaerobic isolates and compare it with the activity of other antimicrobials used against infections caused by anaerobic microorganisms. Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were lower for delafloxacin than for all other antibiotics tested with the exception of piperacillin-tazobactam and meropenem against Gram-positive anaerobic cocci. Only two (0.8 %) isolates of Bacteroides spp. showed a MIC ≥4 µg/mL. With some exceptions, the present results show lower MICs for delafloxacin in comparison to the other antibiotics used against anaerobes.

Resistance development in Escherichia coli to delafloxacin at pHs 6.0 and 7.3 compared to ciprofloxacin.

Understanding the resistance mechanisms of antibiotics in the micro-environment of the infection is important to assess their clinical applicability and potentially prevent resistance development. We compared the laboratory resistance evolution of Escherichia coli to delafloxacin (DLX) compared to ciprofloxacin (CIP), the co-resistance evolution, and underlying resistance mechanisms at different pHs. Three clones from each of the eight clinical E. coli isolates were subjected to subinhibitory concentrations of DLX or CIP in parallel at either pH 7.3 or 6.0. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were regularly tested (at respective pHs), and the antibiotic concentration was adjusted accordingly. After 30 passages, MICs were determined in the presence of the efflux pump inhibitor phenylalanine-arginine-ß-naphthylamide. Whole genome sequencing of the parental isolates and their resistant derivatives (n = 54) was performed. Complementation assays were carried out for selected mutations. Quantitative PCR and efflux experiments were carried out for selected derivatives. For DLX-challenged strains, resistance to DLX evolved much slower in acidic than in neutral pH, whereas for CIP-challenged strains, the opposite was the case. Mutations in the quinolone resistance-determining region were mainly seen in CIP-challenged E. coli, whereas a multifactorial mechanism including mutations in efflux-related genes played a role in DLX resistance evolution (predominantly at pH 6.0). This work provides novel insights into the resistance mechanisms of E. coli to delafloxacin and highlights the importance of understanding micro-environmental conditions at the infection site that might affect the true clinical efficacy of antibiotics and challenges our current antibiotic susceptibility-testing paradigm.

A novel liquid chromatography-fluorescence method for the determination of delafloxacin in human plasma.

Delafloxacin is a novel fluoroquinolone antibiotic that was approved by the European Medicine Agency to treat bacterial infections of the skin and underlying tissues, and community-acquired pneumonia. Despite being in the market since 2019 in the European Union, there is no published liquid chromatography-fluorescence method for delafloxacin quantification in biological samples. A novel, rapid, and sensitive high-performance liquid chromatographic method was developed to determine delafloxacin in human plasma using its native fluorescence. Plasma delafloxacin concentrations were determined by reverse-phase chromatography with fluorescence detection at 405/450 nm of excitation/emission wavelengths. Delafloxacin was separated on a Kromasil C18 column 250 × 4.6 mm id, 5 µm using isocratic elution. The mobile phase was a mixture of 0.05% trifluoroacetic acid/acetonitrile (52/48). Retention times were 5.4 and 11.6 min for delafloxacin and valsartan (internal standard), respectively. Regression calibration curves were linear over the range of 0.1-2.5 µg/mL. The lower limit of detection was 0.05 µg/mL, and the lower limit of quantification was 0.1 µg/mL. Accuracy and precision were always <11%, and the limit of quantification was <16%. Mean recovery was 98.3%. This method can be applied to determine delafloxacin in human plasma and could be useful to perform pharmacokinetic studies.

[In vitro activity of delafloxacin against bacterial isolates from osteoarticular and skin infections in Buenos Aires, Argentina]. / Actividad in vitro de delafloxacina frente a microorganismos aislados de infecciones osteoarticulares y de piel y partes blandas en Buenos Aires, Argentina.

In vitro activities of delafloxacin, ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin were evaluated by epsilometric and disk diffusion methods against 181 bacterial isolates recovered from bone and skin infections. Isolates included were 84 Staphylococcus aureus (40 MRSA and 44 MSSA), 46 coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS), 23 Klebsiella pneumoniae and 28 Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The MIC50/MIC90 (mg/l) for delafloxacin, ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin, respectively, were: MRSA, 0.004/0.064, 0.25/16 and 0.125/4; MSSA, 0.002/0.004, 0.125/0.25 and 0.125/0.25; CNS, 0.008/0.25, 0.125/>32 and 0.25/>32; K. pneumoniae, 4/>32,>32/>32 and 16/>32; P. aeruginosa, 1/>32, 0,5/>32 and 4/>32. Susceptibilities for delafloxacin, ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin, respectively, were: MRSA, 97.5%, 82.5% and 82.5%; MSSA, 97.7%, 95.5% and 95.5%; CNS, 93.5%, 63.0% and 60.9%; K. pneumoniae, 21.7%, 26.1% and 43.5%; P aeruginosa, 35.7%, 53.6% and 42.8%. The disk diffusion and epsilometric methods were concordant for evaluating in vitro susceptibility in staphylococci (categorical concordance of 98.8% for S. aureus and 91.3% for CNS).

Comparison of In Vitro Susceptibility of Delafloxacin with Ciprofloxacin, Moxifloxacin, and Other Comparator Antimicrobials against Isolates of Nontuberculous Mycobacteria.

Nontuberculous mycobacterial (NTM) infections are increasing globally. Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) and M. abscessus complex are the most commonly reported NTM. Oral treatment options are limited, especially for the M. abscessus complex. We tested delafloxacin, a new oral fluoroquinolone, against 131 isolates of NTM. Delafloxacin microdilution MICs were performed as recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute using cation adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth. The rapidly growing mycobacteria tested included M. abscessus subsp. abscessus (n = 16) and subsp. massiliense (n = 5), M. chelonae (n = 11), M. immunogenum (n = 5), M. fortuitum group (n = 13), M. porcinum (n = 7), M. senegalense (n = 7), M. mucogenicum group (n = 5), and M. goodii (n = 1). For the slowly growing NTM (SGM), M. avium (n = 16), M. intracellulare (n = 13), M. chimaera (n = 9), M. arupense (n = 5), M. simiae (n = 5), M. lentiflavum (n = 4), M. kansasii (n = 6), and M. marinum (n = 3) were tested. Delafloxacin was most active in vitro against the M. fortuitum and M. mucogenicum groups and M. kansasii, with MIC50 values of 0.12 to 0.5 µg/ml (MIC range, 0.001 to 4 µg/ml) compared to ≤0.06 to >4 µg/ml for ciprofloxacin and ≤0.06 to >8 µg/ml for moxifloxacin. For other SGM (including MAC), and the M. abscessus/M. chelonae, the delafloxacin MIC range was 8 to >16 µg/ml compared to ciprofloxacin and moxifloxacin of 0.5 to >4 µg/ml and ≤0.06 to 8 µg/ml, respectively. To our knowledge, this is the first MIC study with delafloxacin to use Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) recommended methods. This study illustrates the potential utility of delafloxacin in treatment of infections due to some NTM.

Efficacy of Delafloxacin against the Biothreat Pathogen Burkholderia pseudomallei.

The in vitro activity and in vivo efficacy of delafloxacin were evaluated against the causative pathogen of melioidosis, Burkholderia pseudomallei. Delafloxacin MICs were determined by broth microdilution according to CLSI guidelines for 30 isolates of B. pseudomallei. The in vivo efficacy of delafloxacin was studied at a range of doses in a postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) murine model of melioidosis. Delafloxacin was active in vitro against B. pseudomallei (MIC90, 1 µg/ml). When the mice were dosed with 50 mg/kg body weight and 80 mg/kg body weight delafloxacin at both 16 and 24 h, greater survival was observed (90% to 100% survival) than with the 30-mg/kg-dosed mice (70% survival). All delafloxacin-treated cohorts contained no detectable B. pseudomallei in the spleens at the end of the study. This contrasts with ceftazidime 16- and 24-h administration, which had 40% and 20% survival, respectively. Complete clearance of infection was observed for most but not all surviving cohorts administered ceftazidime. In the mouse model of infection, survival curves for delafloxacin- and ceftazidime-treated animals at treatment start times of 16 and 24 h were statistically significant (P values of <0.0001). Estimated daily delafloxacin exposures in the B. pseudomallei murine aerosol study were similar to daily human exposures with the approved twice a day (BID) intravenous (i.v.) (300 mg) or oral (450 mg) dosing regimens. Based on its in vitro and in vivo activity, its safety, and its tolerability profile, delafloxacin may offer an attractive treatment option as PEP or eradication therapy for B. pseudomallei. Evaluation in other in vivo infection models for B. pseudomallei should be considered.

Comparative efficacy of delafloxacin for complicated and acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections: results from a network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Delafloxacin is a novel fluoroquinolone with broad antibacterial activity against pathogens causing acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI). This network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted to evaluate the relative efficacy of delafloxacin versus other comparators used for managing patients with ABSSSI. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating adults (≥ 18 years) with ABSSSI, complicated SSSI (cSSSI), complicated skin and soft tissue infections (cSSTI) or severe cellulitis with pathogen of gram-positive, gram-negative, or mixed aetiology. OVID MEDLINE®, Embase, Epub Ahead of Print, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched from inception through 12 April 2019. A feasibility assessment was conducted, followed by an NMA, which was run in a Bayesian framework. The interventions included in the NMA encompassed monotherapy or combination therapies of amoxicillin/clavulanate, ampicillin/sulbactam, ceftaroline, ceftobiprole, dalbavancin, daptomycin, delafloxacin, fusidic acid, iclaprim, linezolid, omadacycline, oxacillin + dicloxacillin, standard therapy, tedizolid, telavancin, tigecycline, vancomycin, vancomycin + aztreonam and vancomycin + linezolid. RESULTS: A feasibility assessment was performed and evidence networks were established for composite clinical response (n = 34 studies), early clinical response (n = 16 studies) and microbiological response (n = 14 studies) in the overall study population, composite clinical response (n = 4 studies) in obese subpopulation and for composite clinical response (n = 18 studies) and microbiological response (n = 14 studies) in patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection. Delafloxacin performed significantly better than fusidic acid, iclaprim, vancomycin, and ceftobiprole for composite clinical response. Delafloxacin was comparable to dalbavancin, daptomycin, fusidic acid, iclaprim, linezolid, omadacycline, tedizolid, vancomycin, vancomycin + aztreonam and vancomycin + linezolid in the analysis of early clinical response, whereas for microbiological response, delafloxacin was comparable to all interventions. In the obese subpopulation, the results favoured delafloxacin in comparison to vancomycin, whilst the results were comparable with other interventions among the MRSA subpopulation. CONCLUSIONS: Delafloxacin is a promising new antibiotic for ABSSSI demonstrating greater improvement (composite clinical response) compared to ceftobiprole, fusidic acid, iclaprim, telavancin and vancomycin and comparable effectiveness versus standard of care for all outcomes considered in the study.

Solubilization, Hansen solubility parameters, and thermodynamic studies of delafloxacin in (transcutol + 1-butyl-3-methyl imidazolium hexafluorophosphate) mixtures.

The solubilization, Hansen solubility parameters (HSPs), and thermodynamic properties of delafloxacin (DLN) in various unique combination of Transcutol-HP® (THP) and 1-butyl-3-methyl imidazolium hexafluorophosphate ionic liquid (BMIM-PF6) mixtures were evaluated for the first time in this research. The 'mole fraction solubilities (x3)' of DLN in different (THP + BMIM-PF6) compositions were determined at 'T = 298.2-318.2 K' and 'p = 0.1 MPa'. The HSPs of DLN, neat THP, neat BMIM-PF6, and binary (THP + BMIM-PF6) compositions free of DLN were also determined. The x3 data of DLN was regressed using 'van't Hoff, Apelblat, Yalkowsky-Roseman, Jouyban-Acree and Jouyban-Acree-van't Hoff models' with overall error values of less than 3.0%. The highest and lowest x3 value of DLN was recorded in neat THP (5.48 × 10-3 at T = 318.2 K) and neat BMIM-PF6 (6.50 × 10-4 at T = 298.2 K), respectively. The solubility of DLN was found to be enhanced significantly with an arise in temperature in all (THP + BMIM-PF6) compositions including pure THP and pure BMIM-PF6. However, there was slight increase in DLN solubility with increase in THP mass fraction in all (THP + BMIM-PF6) mixtures. The HSP of pure THP and pure BMIM-PF6 were found very close to each other, suggesting the great potential of both solvents in DLN solubilization. The maximum solute-solvent interactions at molecular level were recorded in DLN-THP compared to DLN-BMIM-PF6. An 'apparent thermodynamic analysis' study indicated an 'endothermic and entropy-driven dissolution' of DLN in all (THP + BMIM-PF6) compositions including neat THP and BMIM-PF6.

Emergence of Delafloxacin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Brooklyn, New York.

Delafloxacin is an option for infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. In 2017, 22% of isolates from 7 hospitals in Brooklyn, New York, were nonsusceptible to delafloxacin. Isolates belonging to ST105, a strain associated with healthcare-related infections, predominated. Resistance was also found in ST8, a strain (USA300) associated with community-associated infections.

Efficacy of Delafloxacin versus Moxifloxacin against Bacterial Respiratory Pathogens in Adults with Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia (CABP): Microbiology Results from the Delafloxacin Phase 3 CABP Trial.

Delafloxacin is a novel fluoroquinolone with activity against Gram-positive, Gram-negative, and atypical pathogens, including fluoroquinolone-nonsusceptible methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The microbiological results of a phase 3 clinical trial in adults with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) comparing delafloxacin (300 mg intravenously [i.v.] with the option to switch to 450 mg orally every 12 h) to moxifloxacin (400 mg i.v. with the option to switch to 400 mg orally once a day [QD]) were determined. Patients from 4 continents, predominately Europe but also South America and Asia, were enrolled. The microbiological intent-to-treat (MITT) population included 520 patients, and 60.5% of these patients had a bacterial pathogen identified. Multiple diagnostic methods were employed, including culture, serology, PCR, and urinary antigen tests. Based on baseline MIC90 values, delafloxacin exhibited at least 16-fold greater activity than moxifloxacin for Gram-positive and fastidious Gram-negative pathogens. Delafloxacin retained activity against resistant phenotypes found in Streptococcus pneumoniae (penicillin-, macrolide-, and multiple-drug resistant), Haemophilus species (ß-lactamase producing and macrolide nonsusceptible), and S. aureus (MRSA and fluoroquinolone-nonsusceptible methicillin-susceptible S. aureus [MSSA]). The microbiological success rates were 92.7% for S. pneumoniae (87.5% for penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae [PRSP]), 92.6% for S. aureus (100% for MRSA), 100% for Escherichia coli, 82.4% for Klebsiella pneumoniae, 100% for Klebsiella oxytoca, 100% for Moraxella catarrhalis, 91.7% for Haemophilus influenzae, 88.6% for Haemophilus parainfluenzae, 96.7% for Mycoplasma pneumoniae, 93.1% for Legionella pneumophila, and 100% for Chlamydia pneumoniae There was little correlation between MICs and outcomes, with a high proportion of favorable outcomes observed across all delafloxacin baseline MIC values. Delafloxacin may be considered a treatment option as monotherapy for CAP in adults, where broad-spectrum coverage including MRSA activity is desirable.

Activity of Potential Alternative Treatment Agents for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Isolates Nonsusceptible to Levofloxacin and/or Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole.

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is difficult to treat due to the production of multiple intrinsic and acquired mechanisms of resistance. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMZ) and the fluoroquinolones have traditionally been considered the drugs of choice but are plagued by increasing resistance and adverse drug effects. The objective of this study was to evaluate the in vitro activities of 12 clinically relevant antimicrobials against clinical S. maltophilia isolates nonsusceptible to levofloxacin and/or TMP-SMZ. A diverse panel of 41 clinical S. maltophilia isolates collected through the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program from 2008 to 2018 was evaluated against ceftazidime, ceftazidime-avibactam, chloramphenicol, delafloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, eravacycline, minocycline, omadacycline, polymyxin B, and tigecycline. MICs were determined in triplicate via reference broth microdilution and interpreted according to CLSI guidelines where available. MIC distributions and susceptibilities were also compared across infection type, acquisition setting, and geographic origin. Susceptibilities to levofloxacin and TMP-SMZ were 29.3% and 36.6%, respectively. Minocycline displayed the highest susceptibility rate overall (92.7%) and the lowest MIC90 value (4 mg/liter) of any of the 12 agents tested. Only 3 isolates were resistant to levofloxacin, TMP-SMZ, and minocycline. Polymyxin B and tigecycline were the second most active agents. No significant differences were observed in MIC distributions across the 3 strata evaluated. These data demonstrate that few antimicrobials, old or new, maintain reliable activity against resistant S. maltophilia The role of minocycline in the treatment of infections due to S. maltophilia warrants further clinical investigation given its potent in vitro activity and favorable adverse effect profile.

Activity of delafloxacin versus that of levofloxacin against anaerobic and microaerophilic isolates.

The aim of the study was to comparatively assess delafloxacin and levofloxacin activities against 96 anaerobic and some microaerophilic isolates. Delafloxacin minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were strikingly lower than those of levofloxacin. Delafloxacin MIC90 against clostridia, other Gram-positive rods, anaerobic/microaerophilic cocci and Gram-negative rods were 0.75, 0.032, 0.38 and 0.5 µg/mL, respectively. The highest (≥4 µg/mL) MICs of the newer fluoroquinolone were found in only 4.2% of isolates versus 46.9% by levofloxacin. The present results and the potency in acidic conditions showed delafloxacin advantages over levofloxacin in terms of usefulness for treatment of mixed anaerobic-aerobic infections and activity against Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile.

Delafloxacin: A New Anti-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Fluoroquinolone.

Delafloxacin (ABT 492) is a new fluoroquinolone available in both oral and parenteral formulations. It has recently been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the management of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections. When compared to combination therapy of vancomycin and aztreonam, delafloxacin was not inferior and had a favorable adverse event profile. Furthermore, its anti-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) activity and favorable clinical response in MRSA infections distinguishes it from other fluoroquinolones. This review focuses on the mode of action, antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, clinical indications, and safety profile of this drug. Considerations for formulary addition and its place in therapy are also discussed.

Profile of a Novel Anionic Fluoroquinolone-Delafloxacin.

Fluoroquinolones have been in clinical use for over 50 years with significant efficacy. However, increasing resistance and emergence of some marked adverse events have limited their usage. The most recently approved class member, delafloxacin, is the only available anionic (non-zwitterionic) fluoroquinolone. Its unique molecular structure provides improved in vitro activity against most Gram-positive pathogens, including quinolone-resistant strains, which is further enhanced at acid pH. Delafloxacin shows favorable pharmacological properties, with about 60% bioavailability after oral administration, only mild inhibition of cytochrome P450 3A, and no evidence of cardiac- or phototoxicity in healthy volunteers (tested against positive controls). Its twice daily dosing, suitability for intravenous, oral, or switch dosing, the lack of many clinically significant drug-drug interactions, and acceptable adverse event profile in registration clinical trials supports its use in the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, and potentially in other infections, where resistance to other agents, safety, and/or the need for early discharge is of concern.

Analysis of Pooled Phase III Efficacy Data for Delafloxacin in Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections.

BACKGROUND: Delafloxacin is an oral or intravenous (IV) antibiotic indicated for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI), including both gram-positive (including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus [MRSA]) and gram-negative organisms. Chemically distinct from other quinolones, delafloxacin exhibits enhanced potency, particularly against gram-positive pathogens. The integration of efficacy data across the Phase III ABSSSI studies is presented here and allows for additional examination of results across subgroups. METHODS: Results of 2 multicenter, randomized, double-blind trials of 1510 adults with ABSSSI were pooled for this analysis. Subjects in the vancomycin arm received 15 mg/kg, plus 1-2 g of aztreonam every 12 hours. Delafloxacin was dosed at 300 mg IV every 12 hours in Study 302; dosing in Study 303 was 300 mg IV every 12 hours for 3 days, with a mandatory, blinded switch to delafloxacin at 450 mg orally every 12 hours. The primary endpoint was objective response (OR), defined as a ≥20% reduction of lesion spread of erythema area at the primary infection site at 48 to 72 hours (±2 hours), in the absence of clinical failure. Investigator-assessed response, based on the resolution of signs and symptoms at follow-up (FU; Day 14 ± 1) and late follow-up (LFU; Day 21- 28), were secondary endpoints. RESULTS: In the intent-to-treat analysis set, the OR was 81.3% in the delafloxacin arm and 80.7% in the comparator arm (mean treatment difference 0.8%, 95% confidence interval -3.2% to 4.7). Results for OR in the defined subgroups showed delafloxacin to be comparable to vancomycin/aztreonam. Investigator-assessed success was similar at FU (84.7% versus 84.1%) and LFU (82.0% versus 81.7%). Delafloxacin was comparable to vancomycin/aztreonam in the eradication of MRSA, at 98.1% versus 98.0%, respectively, at FU. The frequencies of treatment-emergent adverse events between the groups were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, IV/oral delafloxacin fixed-dose monotherapy was non-inferior to IV vancomycin/aztreonam combination therapy and was well tolerated in each Phase III study, as well as in the pooled analysis, regardless of endpoint or analysis population.

Analysis of Pooled Phase 3 Safety Data for Delafloxacin in Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections.

BACKGROUND: Through improved understanding of the structure-activity relationship attributes of fluoroquinolones, molecule development has improved efficacy, safety, and tolerability of the class. Adverse events (AEs) associated with the fluoroquinolones are well defined and a prospective part of the development process. However, not all fluoroquinolones have the same AE profile with different substitutions on the core molecule resulting in differences in side effects and spectrum of activity. Unique structural attributes of delafloxacin (DLX) may differentiate its AE profile compared to other fluoroquinolones. This analysis compared the incidence of AEs between DLX and vancomycin/aztreonam across two phase 3 ABSSSI studies in order to provide a broader overview of DLX safety. METHODS: Safety events occurring in all subjects in the pivotal phase 3 trials were pooled to provide a broad overview of DLX safety. RESULTS: DLX was safe and well-tolerated in the pooled phase 3 ABSSSI trial population of 741 subjects. Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were seen in the DLX group versus the comparator group at 45.1% and 47.7%, respectively. Most were mild or moderate in severity. Treatment-related TEAEs were reported in the DLX group versus the comparator group at rates of 22.1% and 26.1%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Available data show DLX is well tolerated in both intravenous and oral formulation for the treatment of ABSSSI and does not appear to be associated with increased risk of AEs associated with other fluoroquinolones. It remains important to monitor for potential AEs that have been observed with other fluoroquinolones.

Comparative In Vitro Activities of New Antibiotics for the Treatment of Skin Infections.

Bacterial skin infections result in significant morbidity and have contributed to enhanced health-care resource utilization. The problem is heightened by emerging antimicrobial resistance. Multiple novel agents active against resistant pathogens that cause skin infections-including dalbavancin, tedizolid phosphate, oritavancin, and delafloxacin-have been approved over the past 5 years. Common features of these agents include gram-positive activity and favorable safety. Of these agents, delafloxacin is unique in being active against both gram-positive and gram-negative pathogens that cause skin infections, including those resistant to other antimicrobial agents. It is, therefore, an effective option for the treatment of skin infections.

In Vivo Pharmacodynamic Target Determination for Delafloxacin against Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the Neutropenic Murine Pneumonia Model.

Delafloxacin is a broad-spectrum anionic fluoroquinolone that has completed a phase 3 study for community-acquired bacterial pneumonia. We investigated the pharmacodynamic target for delafloxacin against 12 Klebsiella pneumoniae and 5 Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains in the neutropenic murine lung infection model. The median 24-h free-drug area under the curve (fAUC)/MIC values associated with net stasis and 1-log kill were 28.6 and 64.1 for K. pneumoniae, respectively. The 24-h fAUC/MIC values associated with net stasis and 1-log kill for P. aeruginosa were 5.66 and 14.3, respectively.