Post-transplantation cyclophosphamide and cyclosporine A versus methotrexate and cyclosporine A for graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis after allogeneic peripheral stem cell transplantation in adult acute myeloid leukemia patients.

BACKGROUND: Different prophylactic protocols are available for preventing graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after matched sibling donor (MSD) allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of post-transplantation cyclophosphamide plus cyclosporine A (PT-CY/CSA) versus methotrexate plus CSA (MTX/CSA) as GVHD prophylaxis protocols in adult acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients who received peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) from fully matched donors. METHODS: The 1-year outcomes of 89 patients treated with PT-CY/CSA and 90 patients treated with MTX/CSA who had MSD allo-HCT for AML using unmanipulated mobilized PBSC were examined and compared. RESULTS: The cumulative incidence of acute GVHD at 100 days was considerably lower in the PT-CY/CSA group (4% vs 19.3%, p = 0.002), however there were no statistically significant difference in the cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD at 1-year (19.6% vs 37.4%, p = 0.053). Significant delays in neutrophil and platelet engraftments were reported in the PT-CY/CSA group (17 vs 12 days) and (13 vs 12 days), respectively (p < 0.001). The cumulative incidences of relapse (19.1% vs 13.7%, p = 0.470), overall survival (79.1% vs 77.3%, p = 0.986), non-relapse mortality (16.5% vs 16.8%, p = 0.837), and the GVHD and relapse-free survival (GRFS) (53.7% vs 46.6%, p = 0.478) did not differ statistically at 1-year. CONCLUSION: PT-CY/CSA demonstrated a significant decrease in the rate of acute GVHD. However, it was associated with engraftment delay.

Pilot trial of risk-adapted cyclophosphamide intensity based conditioning and HLA matched sibling and unrelated cord blood stem cell transplantation in newly diagnosed pediatric and adolescent recipients with acquired severe aplastic anemia.

BACKGROUND: Cyclophosphamide-based conditioning regimens and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AlloHSCT) from matched related donors (MRD) has resulted in the highest survival rates in children and adolescents with acquired severe aplastic anemia (SAA). Time to transplant has consistently been associated with decreased overall survival. Reduced toxicity conditioning and AlloHSCT has been used successfully in other pediatric non-malignant diseases. PROCEDURE: We piloted a risk-adapted AlloHSCT approach, using fludarabine and anti-thymocyte globulin based conditioning with high (200 mg/kg) and low (60 mg/kg) dose cyclophosphamide as upfront treatment in newly diagnosed pediatric patients with acquired SAA incorporating alternative donor sources, including cord blood. Average risk for non-engraftment patients with <10 transfusions received low dose cyclophosphamide (60 mg/kg); High Risk, those with ≥10 transfusions received conditioning regimen with higher intensity cyclophosphamide (200 mg/kg). RESULTS: Seventeen patients were enrolled and underwent AlloHSCT including 12 males and 5 females with mean age of 8 years (range 3-16), and median follow-up time of 39 months (range 1-135). Donor sources included MRD BM (6/6 [n = 9], 5/6 [n = 2]) and unrelated CB (5/6 [n = 4], 4/6 [n = 2]). Five year OS was 67.6% (37.9-85.4). Three secondary graft failures (17.6%) occurred in the low dose cyclophosphamide arm. CONCLUSIONS: Upfront treatment with risk-adapted cyclophosphamide conditioning AlloSCT is well tolerated for the management of newly diagnosed pediatric and adolescent patients with acquired SAA. However, the increased risk of graft rejection in the lower dose arm warrants additional research regarding the optimal intensity of cyclophosphamide-based conditioning regimen to reduce toxicity without increasing graft failure.

Cyclophosphamide with cyclosporine A for graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis in adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from human leucocyte antigen-matched donors.

BACKGROUND: Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is one of the most severe complications in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who underwent allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). This study addressed the effectiveness and safety outcomes of high dose post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PT-CY) followed by cyclosporine A (CSA) as a GVHD prophylaxis protocol. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2019 to March 2021, AML patients who underwent HSCT, and received high-dose PT-CY followed by CSA were prospectively recruited, assessed, and followed up for one-year post-transplantation (PT). The cumulative incidences of both acute GVHD (aGVHD) at 100 days PT, and chronic GVHD (cGVHD) at one-year PT were assessed. RESULTS: This study included 52 patients. The cumulative incidence (95% CIs) of aGVHD was 2.3% (0.3 - 15.4%), while the cumulative incidence of cGVHD was 23.2% (12.2-41.5%). The cumulative incidence of relapse and non-relapse mortality were 15.6%, and 7.9%, respectively. The median duration to reach neutrophil and platelet engraftment was 17 and 13 days, respectively. The overall, progression-free, and GVHD-free/relapse-free survival rates (95% CIs) were 89.6% (76.6 - 95.6%), 77.7% (62.1-87.5%), and 58.2% (41.6 - 71.7%) respectively. The cumulative incidences of the main transplant-related complications were; neutropenic sepsis (48.3%), cytomegalovirus reactivation (21.7%), pneumonia (13.8%), hemorrhagic cystitis (17.8%), septic shock (4.9%), and CSA toxicity (48.9%). CONCLUSION: PT-CY followed by CSA was associated with low cumulative incidences of both aGVHD and cGVHD without increase in either the relapse or transplant-related complications; so, considered as a promising protocol to be widely applied in the settings of HLA-matched donors.

When to recommend allogeneic transplant in multiple myeloma.

Utilization of allogeneic transplant in the management of multiple myeloma has been actively pursued for nearly 30 years. In this paper, the existing data for use of transplant is reviewed as primary therapy, as salvage and for genetic high-risk disease. The relative merits of using a matched-unrelated donor vs. an HLA-matched donor and what impact the introduction of the novel agents has on the decision to transplant will be covered.

Which donor or graft source should you choose for the strongest GVL? Is there really any difference.

Patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) face relapse of their malignancy as the most frequent cause of treatment failure. It has been postulated that the allogeneic neoplastic potency of different donor or graft sources may differ and in some situations, a particular graft source might be preferred. Data on this supposition has been reviewed here to consider HLA-matched siblings, HLA-matched or partially matched unrelated donors (URD), unrelated umbilical cord blood (UCB), and haploidentical as well as blood or marrow grafts.