Acute epicardial pulmonary vein reconnection: Nondurable transmural lesion or late manifestation of conduction through intercaval bundle.

INTRODUCTION: Acute pulmonary vein reconnection (PVR) via epicardial fibers can be found during observation period after PV isolation, the characteristics and related factors have not been fully studied. We aimed to investigate the prevalence, locations, electrogram characteristics, and ablation parameters related to acute epicardial pulmonary vein reconnection (AEPVR). METHODS: Acute PVR was monitored during observation period after PV isolation. AEPVRs were mapped and distinguished from endocardial conduction gaps. The clinical, electrophysiological characteristics and lesion set parameters were compared between patients with and without PVR. They were also compared among AEPVR, gap-related reconnection, and epicardial PVR in repeat procedures. RESULTS: A total of 56.1% acute PVR were AEPVR, which required a longer waiting period (p < .001) than endocardial gap. The majority of AEPVR were connections from the posterior PV carina to the left atrial posterior wall, followed by late manifestation of intercaval bundle conduction from the right anterior carina to right atrium. AEPVR was similar to epicardial PVR in redo procedures in distribution and electrogram characteristics. Smaller atrium (p < .001), lower impedance drop (p = .039), and ablation index (p = .028) on the posterior wall were independently associated with presence of AEPVR, while lower interlesion distance (p = .043) was the only predictor for AEPVR in acute PVR. An integrated model containing multiple lesion set parameters had the highest predictive ability for AEPVR in receiver operating characteristics analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Epicardial reconduction accounted for the majority of acute PVR. AEPVR was associated with anatomic characteristics and multiple ablation-related parameters, which could be explained by nondurable transmural lesion or late manifestation of conduction through intercaval bundle.

Pulmonary vein reconnection and repeat ablation characteristics following cryoballoon-compared to radiofrequency-based pulmonary vein isolation.

BACKGROUND: Despite advances in efficacy and safety of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after PVI remains common. PV-reconnection is the main finding during repeat PVI procedures performed to treat recurrent AF. OBJECTIVE: To analyze pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection patterns during repeat ablation procedures in a large cohort of consecutive patients undergoing radio frequency or cryoballoon-based PVI. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of PV-reconnection patterns and analysis of re-ablation strategies in consecutive index RF- and CB-based PVI and their respective re-ablation procedures during concomitant usage of both energy sources at a single high-volume center in Germany. RESULTS: A total of 610 first (06/2015-10/2022) and 133 s (01/2016-11/2022) repeat ablation procedures after 363 (60%) RF- and 247 (40%) CB-based index PVIs between 01/2015 and 12/2021 were analyzed. PV-reconnection was found in 509/610 (83%) patients at first and 74/133 (56%) patients at second repeat procedure. 465 of 968 (48%) initially via CB isolated PVs were reconnected at first re-ablation but 796 of 1422 initially RF-isolated PV (56%) were reconnected (OR: 0.73 [95% CI: 0.62-0.86]; p < .001). This was driven by fewer reconnections of the left PVs (LSPV: OR: 0.60 [95% CI: 0.42-0.86]; p = .005 and LSPV: 0.67 [0.47-0.95]; p = .026). PV-reconnection was more likely after longer, RF-based index PVI and in older females. Repeat procedures were shorter after CB-compared to after RF-PVI. CONCLUSIONS: Reconnection remains the most common reason for repeat AF ablation procedures after PVI. Our data suggest to preferentially use of the cryoballoon during index PVI, especially in older women.

Outcomes of hybrid surgical ablation and concomitant left atrial appendage exclusion in long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation.

INTRODUCTION: Management of patients with long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (LSPAF) presents a clinical challenge. Hybrid convergent ablation has been shown to have superior efficacy compared to endocardial-only ablation. However, data on concomitant left atrial appendage (LAA) management along with hybrid ablation is sparse. METHODS: We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of concomitant hybrid convergent ablation and LAA clipping in patients with LSPAF. We conducted a retrospective analysis of all patients with LSPAF who underwent hybrid surgical ablation with LAA clipping at our institution. The primary endpoint was a recurrence of atrial arrhythmias at 12 months. Further, the durability of surgical left atrial posterior wall ablation was examined during the endocardial catheter ablation using standing electrophysiological criteria. RESULTS: A total of 79 patients were included. Mean age was 63.5 ± 9.6 years, and 71% were males. LAA clipping was performed in 99% of patients. The mean time between the surgical and endocardial stages of the procedure was 2.6 ± 1.7 months. Persistent posterior wall activity was observed in 34.2% (n = 27/79) patients during the endocardial phase of the procedure. Cardiac implantable electronic device was used in 74% of patients for monitoring of recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF). The primary effectiveness of AF freedom at 12 months was 73.8% (45/61). Over a 12-month follow-up period, 11.4% (9/79) of patients required repeat catheter ablation, of which 88.9% (8/9) had evidence of persistent posterior wall activity. CONCLUSION: Concomitant hybrid convergent ablation and LAA exclusion with an atrial clip provides reasonable long-term AF-free survival in patients with LSPAF. Persistent posterior wall activity is seen commonly in patients presenting with recurrent AF following hybrid convergent AF ablation.

P-wave terminal force is related to left pulmonary vein reconnection in patients with atrial fibrillation recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation.

In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after pulmonary vein (PV) isolation, noninvasive markers predicting PV reconnection or PV reconnection sites have not been fully elucidated. This study investigated the relationship between the P-wave terminal force in lead V1 (PTFV1) and the PV reconnection or reconnection site in patients with AF recurrence. We retrospectively studied consecutive patients who underwent second AF ablation between April 1, 2018, and June 1, 2023. PTFV1 was investigated before the first AF ablation (pre-ablation PTFV1) and before the second AF ablation (post-ablation PTFV1). In addition, we examined the ratio of the post-ablation to pre-ablation PTFV1 (PTFV1 ratio). These values were compared between patients with and without PV reconnection, with and without left PV (LPV) reconnection, and with and without right PV (RPV) reconnection. The analysis included 56 patients. PTFV1 was reduced because of the first AF ablation. In addition, the values were more decreased in patients without PV reconnection than with PV reconnection. The PTFV1 ratio was significantly smaller in the patients without LPV reconnection than with LPV reconnection; no significant difference was observed between the patients with and without RPV reconnection. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that a PTFV1 ratio > 0.69 predicted LPV reconnection with 70.0% sensitivity and 66.7% specificity. In conclusion, the PTFV1 ratio may be a noninvasive marker predicting LPV reconnection in patients with AF recurrence.

Predictors of pulmonary vein non-reconnection in the second procedure after ablation index-guided pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation and its impact on the outcome.

INTRODUCTION: Although first-pass isolation (FPI) of the pulmonary vein (PV) has been suggested as a marker for PV isolation (PVI) durability, it has not been confirmed. Non-PV atrial fibrillation (AF) triggers were the main target in patients without PV reconnection in the second ablation procedure, but the outcome was unclear. We aimed to validate FPI as a marker of PVI durability and evaluate the outcome after the second procedure in patients without PV reconnection by comparing it to those with reconnection. METHODS: Among the 2087 patients undergoing the first ablation index-guided radiofrequency AF ablation, 309 with atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATs) recurrence and undergoing the second procedure were studied. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were compared between the patients without PV reconnection (PV non-reconnection group, n = 142) and with reconnection (PV reconnection group, n = 167). RESULTS: FPI in both PV sides in the first ablation procedure was significantly more frequent in the PV non-reconnection group (77.5%) than in the PV reconnection group (45.5%) (p < .001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that FPI (odds ratio, 3.71 [95% confidence interval, 2.23-6.19], p < .001) was the only predictor of PV non-reconnection. Radiofrequency applications for non-PV AF triggers were more frequently performed in the PV non-reconnection group (40.8% vs. 24.6%, respectively, p < .001). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that AT recurrence-free rate was significantly lower in the PV non-reconnection group (1-year recurrence-free rate, 62.7% vs. 75.4%, respectively; p = .01 by log-rank test). CONCLUSION: FPI was the only independent predictor of PV non-reconnection. Despite aggressive ablation for non-PV triggers, AT recurrence was more frequent in patients with PV non-reconnection.

Non-invasive assessment of pulmonary vein isolation durability using late gadolinium enhancement magnetic resonance imaging.

AIMS: Electrical reconnection of pulmonary veins (PVs) is considered an important determinant of recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF) after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). To date, AF recurrences almost automatically trigger invasive repeat procedures, required to assess PVI durability. With recent technical advances, it is becoming increasingly common to find all PVs isolated in those repeat procedures. Thus, as ablation of extra-PV targets has failed to show benefit in randomized trials, more and more often these highly invasive procedures are performed only to rule out PV reconnection. Here we aim to define the ability of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE)-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to rule out PV reconnection non-invasively. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study is based on a prospective registry in which all patients receive an LGE-MRI after AF ablation. Included were all patients that-after an initial PVI and post-ablation LGE-MRI-underwent an invasive repeat procedure, which served as a reference to determine the predictive value of non-invasive lesion assessment by LGE-MRI.: 152 patients and 304 PV pairs were analysed. LGE-MRI predicted electrical PV reconnection with high sensitivity (98.9%) but rather low specificity (55.6%). Of note, LGE lesions without discontinuation ruled out reconnection of the respective PV pair with a negative predictive value of 96.9%, and patients with complete LGE lesion sets encircling all PVs were highly unlikely to show any PV reconnection (negative predictive value: 94.4%). CONCLUSION: LGE-MRI has the potential to guide selection of appropriate candidates and planning of the ablation strategy for repeat procedures and may help to identify patients that will not benefit from a redo-procedure if no ablation of extra-PV targets is intended.

Real-world trends in atrial fibrillation ablation indicate increasing durability of pulmonary vein isolation at repeat ablation.

BACKGROUND: Durable electrical isolation of pulmonary veins (PVs) is associated with better outcomes after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, but previous studies of AF recurrence have reported high rates of reconnection despite successful acute isolation. This study aims to quantify historical trends in the durability of PV isolation (PVI) as radiofrequency (RF) ablation catheters, additional ablation technologies, and associated workflows have evolved. METHODS: The study population included adult patients receiving a first repeat ablation for AF between September 2013 and July 2019 at the study site. All index ablations were performed at the same site with an RF catheter and included PVI. Three generations of irrigated RF catheters based on the same technology platform were used by the site during the timeframe of this study. RESULTS: A total of 224 patients were included in the analysis. At repeat ablation, the mean number of patients with at least one reconnected PV dropped significantly with subsequent catheter generation, from 78.3% to 56.7% to 27.0% (p < .0001). Moreover, the mean number of reconnected PVs were significantly reduced from 1.48 to 0.92 to 0.47 (p < .0001), representing a 68.3% reduction across the 3 generations of devices. CONCLUSION: Significant improvement in durable PVI was seen with successive generations of RF catheter over a 6-year period. In addition to catheter technology, ancillary advances in ablation technologies, workflows, and operator experience likely contributed to these improvements.

Reconnection patterns after CLOSE-guided 50 W high-power-short-duration circumferential pulmonary vein isolation and substrate modification-PV reconnection might no longer be an issue.

INTRODUCTION: Ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) with high-power-short-duration (HPSD) radiofrequency (RF) technology is emerging as a new standard of care in many electrophysiology laboratories. While procedural short-term efficacy and efficiency is very promising, little is known about mid- to long-term effects of HPSD ablation for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and left atrial substrate modification. METHODS: In a single-center registry, 412 AF procedures were performed in 400 individual patients using a standardized CLOSE protocol-guided fixed 50 W HPSD ablation, aiming for an ablation index (AI) of 400 on the posterior and 550 on the anterior wall. Additional substrate-tailored lines were performed when required. RESULTS: After a mean clinical follow-up of 337 ± 134 days, 15 patients suffered from AF recurrence beyond the blinding period. Twelve gave consent to the indicated reablation. Here, 11 of 12 patients had chronic isolation of all four pulmonary veins (PV). In three of six patients, a reconnection of additional left atrial ablation lines was revealed. Ten out of 12 patients showed progressive fibrous atrial cardiomyopathy and required additional left atrial substrate modification or reisolation of left-atrial lines. During the follow-up no clinical case of atrioesophageal fistula was registered. No PV stenosis after initial HPSD PVI was documented. CONCLUSIONS: Patients requiring reablation of AF or other atrial tachycardia after a fixed 50 W HPSD circumferential PVI and substrate modification predominantly suffer from progressive fibrous atrial cardiomyopathy, while PV reconnection appears to be a rare cause of AF recurrence.

Impact of very early recurrence of atrial fibrillation after cryoballoon ablation.

BACKGROUND: Although much has been discussed about the early recurrence of atrial fibrillation (ERAF) after cryoballoon ablation (CBA), the clinical impact of very early recurrence of atrial fibrillation (VERAF) after CBA remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the impact of VERAF after CBA. METHODS: We enrolled 236 consecutive patients who underwent an initial CBA for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation between February 2017 and December 2020 in our hospital. These patients were categorized into three groups: VERAF group who experienced an initial recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia within 48 h after CBA, late-ERAF (LERAF) group who experienced an initial recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia between 48 h and 3 months after CBA, and non-ERAF (NERAF) group who did not experience a recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia within 3 months after CBA. We investigated the late recurrence of AF (LRAF, defined as recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia more than 3 months after CBA), and the incidence of non-pulmonary vein (PV) triggers in the patients who experienced a repeat ablation procedure due to LRAF. RESULTS: VERAF group had a higher incidence of freedom from LRAF than LERAF group (p = 0.032) and a lower incidence of freedom from LRAF than NERAF group (p = 0.002). Moreover, VERAF group had the highest incidence of non-PV triggers at repeat ablation procedure among the three groups (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: While ERAF was a predictor of LRAF, VERAF was less related to LRAF among the patients with ERAF after CBA. Furthermore, VERAF might be associated with non-PV triggers.

Impact of cryoballoon contact angle and acute myocardial injury on pulmonary vein reconnection.

At present, it remains unclear whether the effect on cryoinjury can be strongly exerted by contact of the balloon with the pulmonary vein (PV) ostium. The present study included 204 paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) patients who underwent an initial pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using a cryoballoon from the Osaka Rosai Atrial Fibrillation ablation (ORAF) registry. The total balloon contact angle was measured from the equator line (sum of the angles of the upper side and bottom side in all PVs) under fluoroscopic imaging. The patients were stratified into three tertile groups according to the total balloon contact angle. We evaluated the relationship between the total balloon contact angle and clinical outcomes, including the value of acute myocardial injury marker (high-sensitive cardiac troponin I [hs-TnI]), arrhythmia recurrence, and PV reconnections in the repeated ablation. The total balloon contact angle was significantly associated with the hs-TnI value among the tertile groups (p < 0.001) and a multiple regression analysis showed that the total balloon contact angle significantly correlated with the hs-TnI value (standardized beta-coefficient = 0.572, p < 0.001). The balloon contact angle in PVs with PV reconnections was significantly lower than in those without (p = 0.044), while no significant differences in the recurrence of atrial fibrillation among the tertile groups were observed in the enrolled patients. The total balloon contact angle was significantly associated with the acute myocardial injury marker, hs-TnI. The total balloon contact angle was significantly associated with PV reconnections after cryoballoon ablation in patients who underwent a repeat ablation.

Acute myocardial injury after radiofrequency catheter ablation: impact on pulmonary vein reconnection and relevant factors.

Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) causes myocardial injury and induces high-sensitive cardiac troponin I (hs-TnI) release into the systemic circulation. Several factors are considered to be associated with myocardial injury after ablation, but few studies showed the relationship between the value of myocardial injury marker after the RFCA and relevant factors. AF patients who underwent primary RFCA were enrolled from the Osaka Rosai Atrial Fibrillation ablation (ORAF) registry. The relationship between hs-TnI after the RFCA and PV reconnection (PVR) was evaluated. The impact of relevant factors, including baseline patient characteristics, detail of procedure on myocardial injury was investigated. This study included 407 patients (median age was 71 years, the ratio of female was 30.7%). Late arrhythmia recurrence was observed in 111 patients (27.3%) and 66 patients were underwent repeated ablation. PVR was observed in 33 patients (50.0%). The hs-TnI level was significantly lower in the patients with PVR than those without PVR (1.150 ng/ml vs 1.921 ng/ml, p = 0.040). Paroxysmal AF and age were significantly associated with acute myocardial injury after the RFCA (standardized beta coefficient = 0.206 and p < 0.001, standardized beta coefficient = - 0.114 and p = 0.043, respectively). The hs-TnI after RFCA was significantly higher in PAF patients than PerAF (p < 0.001), even if application number and total application time were taken into consideration. Acute myocardial injury after RFCA was significantly lower in the patients with PVR than those without PVR. Age and AF type were significantly and strongly associated with acute myocardial injury after the RFCA.

High-power, short-duration atrial fibrillation ablation compared with a conventional approach: Outcomes and reconnection patterns.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness, safety, and pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection patterns of point-by-point high-power, short-duration (HPSD) ablation relative to conventional force-time integral (FTI)-guided strategies for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation are unknown. OBJECTIVES: To compare 1-year freedom from atrial arrhythmia (AA), complication rates, procedural times, and PV reconnection patterns with HPSD AF AF ablation versus an FTI-guided low-power, long-duration (LPLD) strategy. METHODS: We compared consecutive patients undergoing a first ablation procedure for paroxysmal or persistent AF. The HPSD protocol utilized a power of 50 W and durations of 6-8 s posteriorly and 8-10 s anteriorly. The LPLD protocol was FTI-guided with a power of ≤25 W posteriorly (FTI ≥ 300g·s) and ≤35 W anteriorly (FTI ≥ 400g·s). RESULTS: In total, 214 patients were prospectively included (107 HPSD, 107 LPLD). Freedom from AA at 1 year was achieved in 79% in the HPSD group versus 73% in the LPLD group (p = .339; adjusted hazard ratio with HPSD, 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.36-1.23; p < .004 for non-inferiority). Procedure duration was shorter in the HPSD group (229 ± 60 vs. 309 ± 77 min; p < .005). Patients undergoing repeat ablation had a higher propensity for reconnection at the right PV carina in the HPSD group compared with the LPLD group (14/30 = 46.7% vs. 7/34 = 20.6%; p = .035). There were no differences in complication rates. CONCLUSION: HPSD AF ablation resulted in similar freedom from AAs at 1 year, shorter procedure times, and a similar safety profile when compared with an LPLD ablation strategy. Patients undergoing HPSD ablation required more applications at the right carina to achieve isolation, and had a significantly higher rate of right carinal reconnections at redo procedures.

High vagal tone predicts pulmonary vein reconnection after cryoballoon ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary vein (PV) isolation is an established treatment for paroxysmal drug-refractory atrial fibrillation (AF). High parasympathetic tone and reconnection of PVs have demonstrated to be possible culprits of AF recurrence after ablation. Our aim was to investigate the association between parasympathetic tone and reconnected PVs in patients with paroxysmal AF. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent a redo catheter ablation procedure for atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence by means of 3D electroanatomic mapping with documentation of presence or absence of PVs reconnection following an initial procedure of cryoballoon (CB) ablation for symptomatic drug-refractory paroxysmal AF were screened for the study. RESULTS: A total of 92 patients were included, of whom 50 (54.35%) were males. Reconnected PVs were found in 64 (69%) patients. PVs reconnection could be predicted by DC (C-statistic = .770), by SDNNI (C-statistic = .714) and by absolute VLF power (C-statistic = .722), while right-sided PVs reconnection could be better predicted by DC (C-statistic = .848) and by SDNNI (C-statistic = .761). In multivariate binary logistic regression analysis, a DC value ≥6.45 ms and an absolute VLF power value ≥160 ms2 were associated with three times and five times higher odds of PVs reconnection, respectively. On a vein-per-vein analysis, absolute VLF power ≥160 ms2 was associated with three times higher odds, while reaching of -40°C within 60 s was associated with three times lower odds of PVs reconnection. CONCLUSION: High parasympathetic tonus accurately predicts PVs reconnection. On a vein-per-vein analysis, parasympathetic markers along with biophysical parameters predicted PVs reconnection. On a case-by-case analysis, parasympathetic markers were the only predictors of PVs reconnection, thus being a robust PVs reconnection prediction tool.

Predictors of durable electrical isolation in the setting of second-generation cryoballoon ablation: A comparison between left superior, left inferior, right superior, and right inferior pulmonary veins.

AIM: The aim of this study is to assess specific per-vein procedural predictors of pulmonary vein (PV) late reconnection in cryoballoon ablation (CbA) METHODS AND RESULTS: We enrolled 148 consecutive patients undergoing a redo procedure after a previous index CbA in our center. A reconnection in at least one PV was found in 80 patients (54.1%) and the most frequently reconnected PV was the right inferior pulmonary vein (RIPV). Overall, pulmonary vein reconnection (PVr) was associated with longer time to -40°C (Tt-40°C) (54.4 ± 21.7 vs 67.6 ± 27.6 seconds; P < .001), warmer nadir temperature (NT) (-49.7°C ± 5.4°C vs -46.5°C ± 5.8°C; P < .001) and temperature at 60 seconds (-41.8°C ± 4.5°C vs -39.8°C ± 4.2°C; P < .001). The performance of these predictors differed between the veins. In particular, a comparable behavior was observed for left superior pulmonary vein (LSPV) and right superior pulmonary vein (RSPV), where NT ≤ -48°C showed a sensibility and a specificity, respectively, of 62% and 65% and 71% and 72% in predicting durable PV isolation. For RIPV, NT ≤ -48°C showed a sensitivity of 74% but low specificity (53%). Tt -40°C less than 60 seconds showed good negative predictive values, respectively, 83.9% for LSPV, 94.9% for left inferior pulmonary vein (LIPV), 90.2% for RSPV, and 82.7% for RIPV. Previous predictors cannot be used for LIPV. CONCLUSIONS: Freezing behavior and reconnection rates differ significantly among the four PVs. Freezing temperature parameters strongly predict late PVr in superior PVs and are slightly different in RIPV but can be applied as well. LIPV freezing behavior is the most different. Its reconnection is uncommon even in the subset of worse freezing temperatures and specific CB predictors cannot be identified.

Intraprocedural endpoints to predict durable pulmonary vein isolation: a randomized trial of four post-ablation techniques.

AIMS: The optimal procedural endpoint to achieve permanent pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) during ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) remains unknown. We aimed to compare the impact of prolonged waiting periods and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) testing after PVI on long-term freedom from AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: In total, 538 patients (median age 61 years, 62% male) undergoing first-time radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal AF were randomized into four groups: Group 1 [PVI (no testing), n = 121], Group 2 (PVI + 30min waiting phase, n = 151), Group 3 (PVI+ATP, n = 131), and Group 4 (PVI + 30min+ATP, n = 135). The primary endpoint was freedom from AF. Repeat mapping to assess for late pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection was performed in patients who remained AF-free for >3 years (n = 46) and in those who had repeat ablation for AF recurrence (n = 82). During initial procedure, acute PV reconnection was observed in 33%, 26%, and 42% of patients in Groups 2, 3, and 4, respectively. At 36 months, no significant differences in freedom from AF recurrence were observed among all four groups (55%, 61%, 50%, and 62% for Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively; P = 0.258). Late PV reconnection was commonly observed, with a similar incidence between patients with and without AF recurrence (74% vs. 83%; P = 0.224). CONCLUSION: Although PVI remains the cornerstone for AF ablation, intraprocedural techniques to assess for PV reconnection did not improve long-term success. Patients without AF recurrence after 3 years exhibited similarly high rates of PV reconnection as those that underwent repeat ablation for AF recurrence. The therapeutic mechanisms of AF ablation may not be solely predicated upon durable PVI.

Magnetic resonance-guided re-ablation for atrial fibrillation is associated with a lower recurrence rate: a case-control study.

AIMS: Our aim was to analyse whether using delayed enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (DE-CMR) to localize veno-atrial gaps in atrial fibrillation (AF) redo ablation procedures improves outcomes during follow-up. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a case-control study with 35 consecutive patients undergoing a DE-CMR-guided Repeat-pulmonary vein isolation (Re-PVI) procedure. Those with more extensive ablations (e.g. roof lines, box) were excluded. Patients were matched for age, sex, AF pattern, and left atrial dimension with 35 patients who had undergone a conventional Re-PVI procedure guided with a three dimensional (3D)-navigation system. Procedural characteristics were recorded, and patients were followed for 24 months in a specialized outpatient clinic. The primary endpoint was freedom from recurrent AF, atrial tachycardia, or flutter. The duration of CMR-guided procedures was shorter compared to the conventional group (161 ± 52 vs. 195 ± 72 min, respectively, P = 0.049), with no significant differences in fluoroscopy or total radiofrequency time. At the 2-year follow-up, more patients in the DE-CMR-guided group remained free from recurrences compared with the conventional group (70% vs. 39%, respectively, P = 0.007). In univariate Cox-regression analyses, AF pattern [persistent AF, hazard ratio (HR) 2.66 (1.27-5.46), P = 0.006] and the use of DE-CMR [HR 0.36 (0.17-0.79), P = 0.009] predicted recurrences during follow-up; both factors remained independent predictors in multivariate analyses. CONCLUSION: The substrate characterization provided by DE-CMR facilitates the identification of anatomical veno-atrial gaps and associates with shorter procedures and better clinical outcomes in repeated AF ablation procedures.

Comparison of pulmonary vein reconnection patterns after multielectrode phased radiofrequency- and cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using phased radiofrequency (RF) energy has been shown to be effective in the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: We characterize and compare pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection at repeat ablation in patients with AF after initially successful PVI using phased RF technology (PVAC) or 2nd generation cryoballoon (CB). Eighty five patients undergoing redo PVI using multielectrode PVAC phased RF catheter and 66 patients after CB PVI were enrolled 9.7 ± 3.4 months after the initial ablation procedure. RESULTS: The percentage of patients with PV reconnection(s) was comparably high between both groups (93% PVAC and 92% CB). However, 75% of all PVs and left common trunks (CTs) isolated with PVAC were reconnected, compared with 52% reconnections after CB PVI (p < 0.001). A mean of 2.79 ± 1.2 PVs and CTs/patient were reconnected after PVAC PVI compared with 1.97 ± 0.8 in CB patients, p < 0.0001. No patients in the CB group had 4 reconnected PVs, while this pattern of reconnection was observed in 33% in the PVAC group (p < 0.0001). The percentage of patients in the PVAC group with ≥3 reconnected PVs was significantly higher compared with CB patients (56 patients (66%) vs. 17 patients (26%), p < 0.0001), while the percentage of patients with no PV reconnection was comparably low in PVAC and CB patients (7 and 8%, respectively). CTs were most frequently reconnected after PVAC PVI (94%) and left superior PVs after CB ablation (67%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The number of patients with recurrent AF and PV reconnection(s) at redo PVI was comparably high between both groups. However, the extent and distribution of PV reconnections was different in many aspects, indicating more stable atrial lesions after CB PVI compared with PVAC technology.

Relationship between atrial scar on cardiac magnetic resonance and pulmonary vein reconnection after catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

INTRODUCTION: Pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection is frequent in patients showing atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after PV isolation (PVI). Its detection with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) may help predict outcome and guide redo procedures. We assessed the relationship between scar on CMR and PV reconnection after catheter ablation for paroxysmal AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty-one patients with paroxysmal AF underwent CMR before PVI using either a conventional single-electrode catheter (N = 28) or a circular multielectrode catheter (N = 23). At 3 months, a second CMR study was performed, followed by a systematic electrophysiological procedure to look for PV reconnection, regardless of AF recurrence. Preablation fibrosis and postablation scar were quantified and mapped from late gadolinium-enhanced CMR. CMR results were compared to the distribution and extent of PV reconnection. CMR and electrophysiological findings were compared between catheter types. Three months after successful PVI, scar gaps were found in 39 (76%) patients, and 78 (39%) veins. Electrical PV reconnection was detected in 45 (88%) patients, and 99 (50%) veins. The extent of PV reconnection related closely to the number of gaps (R = 0.55; P < .001), and to scar burden (R = -0.63; P < .001). However, the agreement was only fair for the localization of PV reconnection (k = 0.37; P < .001), scar gaps particularly lacking sensitivity in areas of pre-existing fibrosis. The circular catheter was associated with shorter procedures (P < .001), more scar (P = .01), less gaps (P = .01), and less reconnected veins (P = .03). CONCLUSION: PV reconnection is extremely frequent after PVI. CMR scar imaging accurately predicts its extent, but poorly predicts its location. Multielectrode circular catheters induce more complete ablation.

Differences in the electrophysiological findings of repeat ablation between patients who first underwent cryoballoon ablation and radiofrequency catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

INTRODUCTION: Several studies have revealed that second-generation cryoballoon (CB)-based pulmonary vein (PV) isolation is noninferior to radiofrequency (RF)-based PV isolation for patients with drug-refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). However, electrophysiological differences in repeat ablation remain unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study examined electrophysiological differences during the repeat ablation between patients who first underwent RF catheter ablation and CB ablation; PV durability and non-PV AF foci were assessed for these patients. We enrolled 919 and 491 patients who underwent CB ablation (CB group) and RF catheter ablation (RF group), respectively, for paroxysmal AF between January 2013 and June 2017 at our institution. PV isolation using RF ablation involved the left atrium (LA) antrum and part of the LA posterior wall. After 2 years of follow-up, 62 and 80 patients in the CB and RF groups, respectively, underwent repeat ablation. PV reconnections were more frequent in the RF group than in the CB group (left superior PV: 46.2% and 14.5%, P < .001; left inferior PV: 35.0% and 11.2%, P = .001; right superior PV: 40.0% and 22.6%, P = .031; right inferior PV: 36.2% and 19.4%, P = .039; PVs: 39.8% and 16.9%, P < .001). LA AF foci were more frequent in the CB group than in the RF group (27.4% and 7.5%; P = .002). Other non-PV foci were prevalent in both groups. CONCLUSION: Fewer LA-PV reconnections occurred with CB ablation. However, extensive PV isolation may eliminate many LA AF foci.

Second-generation cryoballoon ablation for recurrent atrial fibrillation after an index procedure with radiofrequency versus cryo: Different pulmonary vein reconnection patterns but similar long-term outcome-Results of a multicenter analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Repeated procedures are often needed for long-term success of atrial fibrillation ablation. There are scarce data regarding cryoballoon use for such procedure. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed acute effect and long-term follow-up of second-generation cryoballoon ablation, performed as a repeat procedure after an index radiofrequency vs cryoballoon ablation. Sixty-one patients from three centers were included. In 36 cases radiofrequency (RF-I) and in 25 cryoballoon ablation (CB-I) was the index procedure. During redo procedure, pulmonary vein reconnection was less frequent in CB-I vs RF-I (51.5% vs 66.9%; P = 0.017). After cryoballoon, left inferior (P = 0.027) and right superior (P = 0.06) pulmonary veins were less likely to exhibit reconnection. Moreover, patients after initial RF ablation frequently presented multiple-vein reconnection (P = 0.018), while patients after cryoablation more often had only one vein reconnected (P = 0.008). During reablation procedures, all 149 reconnected veins in both groups were isolated, with no differences in procedural parameters, except for procedure time, shorter in CB-I group (65.5 vs 71.1 minutes; P = 0.04). Transient phrenic nerve palsy was the only complication in both groups (5.6% and 8.0%; ns). After mean follow-up of 15 ± 9 months, 70.3% of patients were free from atrial fibrillation (AF), with no differences between the groups (P = 0.71). In multivariate Cox-regression analysis, the persistent form of arrhythmia (P = 0.009) and relapse in the blanking period (P = 0.0004) were the only independent predictors of AF recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: The use of second-generation cryoballoon is associated with less frequent pulmonary vein reconnection compared with RF ablation. Cryoballoon is safe and effective for repeated AF ablation, regardless of the technique used for the initial procedure.