A validated HPLC-MS/MS method for determination of simmitecan and its metabolite chimmitecan in human plasma and its application to a pharmacokinetic study in Chinese patients with advanced solid tumor.

Simmitecan is a new ester anticancer prodrug which can exert the antiproliferation activity through its active metabolite, chimmitecan. In the current study, a simple and reliable liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method was developed and validated for simultaneous determination of simmitecan and chimmitecan in human plasma. Both irinotecan and 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin were used as the internal standards. Plasma samples were protein precipitated by acetonitrile (0.2% formic acid, v/v) and processed samples were chromatographed on a Hypersil GOLDTM C18 column (100 × 4.6 mm, i.d. 3.0 µm) with acetonitrile and 10 mM ammonium acetate (0.1% formic acid, v/v) as the mobile phase. The calibration curves showed good linearity (R ≥ 0.99) over the concentration range of 1-500 ng/mL and 0.25-125 ng/mL for simmitecan and chimmitecan, respectively. Intra- and inter-run precisions (CV%) were ≤10.2% for simmitecan and ≤12.1% for chimmitecan. The accuracies were 99.4-103.5% for simmitecan and 95.4-103.5% for chimmitecan. This method was further successfully applied to a pharmacokinetic study of simmitecan in Chinese advanced solid cancer patients after administration of simmitecan hydrochloride injection.

A Phase Ib Study of the Simmitecan Single Agent and in Combination With 5-Fluorouracil/Leucovorin or Thalidomide in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumor.

Background: Simmitecan is a potent inhibitor of topoisomerase I with anti-tumor activity. This phase Ib trial was conducted to investigate the safety and anti-tumor effect of simmitecan alone or in combination with other drugs. Methods: Eligible patients with advanced solid tumor had no further standard treatment options. Patients were allocated to receive simmitecan alone, simmitecan in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV), or simmitecan in combination with thalidomide, 14 days a cycle, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. Results: A total of 41 patients were enrolled, with a median age of 55 (range 29-69) years. Among them, 13 patients received simmitecan monotherapy, 10 received simmitecan + 5-FU/LV, and 18 received simmitecan + thalidomide. No dose-limiting toxicity occurred. Overall, the most common grade 3/4 adverse event (AE) was neutropenia (46.2, 70.0, and 88.9%, respectively, in simmitecan, simmitecan + 5-FU/LV, and simmitecan + thalidomide cohorts), and treatment-related severe AEs included anemia and febrile neutropenia (7.7% each in simmitecan cohort), diarrhea (10% in simmitecan +5-FU/LV cohort), and febrile neutropenia (5.6% in simmitecan + thalidomide cohort). The majority of patients (24/41, 58.3%) had progressed on prior irinotecan; nevertheless, partial response was achieved in one colorectal cancer patients treated with simmitecan + thalidomide. The disease control rates of simmitecan, simmitecan + 5-FU/LV, and simmitecan + thalidomide cohorts were 46.2, 80.0, and 61.1%, respectively. Conclusion: This study demonstrated a manageable safety profile of simmitecan as a single agent or as part of a combination therapy. There have not been any safety concerns with simmitecan in combination when compared to simmitecan alone. Simmitecan + 5-FU/LV regimen seemed to have a better efficacy. Nonetheless, the efficacy of this regimen needs to be further explored in the subsequent study.