A novel combined approach to placement of a double lumen endobronchial tube using a video laryngoscope and fiberoptic bronchoscope: a retrospective chart review.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate a modern combined video laryngoscopy and flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope approach to placement of a double lumen endobronchial tube and further characterize potential strengths and weaknesses of this approach. METHODS: Retrospective chart review was conducted at our single institution, academic medical center, tertiary-care hospital. Patients aged 18 years of age or older were evaluated who underwent thoracic surgery and one-lung ventilation with placement of a double lumen endobronchial tube using a novel combined video laryngoscopy and flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope approach. No interventions were performed. RESULTS: Demographics and induction and intubation documentation were reviewed for 21 patients who underwent thoracic surgery and one-lung ventilation with placement of a double lumen endobronchial tube using a novel combined video laryngoscopy and flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope approach. First pass success using the combined approach was 86% (18/21). The five patients with an anticipated difficult airway had successful double lumen endobronchial tube placement on the first attempt. There were no instances of desaturation during double lumen endobronchial tube placement. No airway complications related to double lumen endobronchial tube placement were recorded. CONCLUSION: Use of a combined approach employing video laryngoscopy and a flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope may represent a reliable alternative approach to placement of double lumen endobronchial tubes.

Transatlantic Educational Network: An Innovation Born of Necessity.

The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic brought about many changes in the delivery of healthcare, graduate medical education, and collaborative efforts across academic medicine. While there was a temporary disruption in the fluid delivery of services, longer-term benefits emerged with the leveraging of innovative technology and multicenter collaborations. These new opportunities led 14 centers in the United States and Europe to develop a novel, remote, and collaborative educational effort in cardiovascular and thoracic anesthesiology, known as the Transatlantic Educational Network. This paper describes the initial pilot structure and preimplementation data and provides a rationale for the development and expansion of the pilot program in other areas of anesthesiology.

Virtual reality and 3D printing in clinical anesthesia: a case series of two years' experience in a single tertiary medical centre.

PURPOSE: Anatomically correct patient-specific models made from medical imaging can be printed on a three-dimensional (3D) printer or turned into a virtual reality (VR) program. Until recently, use in anesthesia has been limited. In 2019, the anesthesia department at Tel Aviv Medical Center launched a 3D program with the aim of using 3D modelling to assist in preoperative anesthesia planning. METHODS: A retrospective review of all relevant patients between July 2019 and June 2021 referred for preoperative airway planning with 3D modelling. Patient files were reviewed for correlation between the model-based airway plan and the actual airway plan, the type of model used, and any anesthetic complications related to airway management. RESULTS: Twenty patients were referred for 3D modelling. Of these, 15 models were printed, including 12 children requiring one lung ventilation. Five patients had VR reconstructions, including three with mediastinal masses. One patient had both a 3D-printed model and a VR reconstruction. There were two cases (10%) where the model plan did not correlate with the final airway plan and one case where a model could not be created because of poor underlying imaging. For the remaining 17 cases, the plan devised on the model matched the final airway plan. There were no anesthetic complications. CONCLUSIONS: Three-dimensional modelling and subsequent printing or VR reconstruction are feasible in clinical anesthesia. Its routine use for patients with challenging airway anatomy correlated well with the final clinical outcome in most cases. High-quality imaging is essential.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Des modèles anatomiquement corrects spécifiques à un·e patient·e réalisés à partir de l'imagerie médicale peuvent être imprimés sur une imprimante tridimensionnelle (3D) ou transformés en programme de réalité virtuelle (RV). Jusqu'à récemment, l'utilisation de cette modalité était limitée en anesthésie. En 2019, le service d'anesthésie du centre médical de Tel Aviv a lancé un programme 3D dans le but d'utiliser la modélisation 3D pour faciliter la planification préopératoire de l'anesthésie. MéTHODE: Nous avons réalisé un examen rétrospectif de toute la patientèle concernée référée pour une planification préopératoire des voies aériennes avec modélisation 3D entre juillet 2019 et juin 2021. Les dossiers des patient·es ont été examinés pour déterminer la corrélation entre le plan de prise en charge des voies aériennes fondé sur le modèle et le plan fondé sur les voies aériennes réelles, le type de modèle utilisé et toute complication anesthésique liée à la prise en charge des voies aériennes. RéSULTATS: Vingt patient·es ont été référé·es pour la modélisation 3D. À partir de cette cohorte, 15 modèles ont été imprimés, dont 12 pour des enfants nécessitant une ventilation pulmonaire. Cinq patient·es ont bénéficié de reconstructions en RV, dont trois avec des masses médiastinales. Un modèle imprimé en 3D et une reconstruction en RV ont été créés pour une personne. Il y a eu deux cas (10 %) où le plan modèle n'était pas corrélé avec le plan des voies aériennes final et un cas où il n'a pas été possible de créer un modèle en raison d'une mauvaise imagerie sous-jacente. Pour les 17 cas restants, le plan conçu sur le modèle correspondait au plan final de prise en charge des voies aériennes. Il n'y a pas eu de complications anesthésiques. CONCLUSION: La modélisation tridimensionnelle et l'impression ultérieure ou la reconstruction en RV sont réalisables en anesthésie clinique. Leur utilisation systématique pour les patient·es présentant une anatomie difficile au niveau des voies aériennes était bien corrélée avec le résultat clinique final dans la plupart des cas. Une imagerie de haute qualité est essentielle.

Impact of Lower Tidal Volumes During One-Lung Ventilation: A 2022 Update of the Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

OBJECTIVES: To clarify the influence of lower tidal volume (4-7 mL/kg) compared with higher tidal volume (8-15 mL/kg) during one-lung ventilation (OLV) on gas exchange and postoperative clinical outcome. DESIGN: Meta-analysis of randomized trials. SETTING: Thoracic surgery. PARTICIPANTS: Patients receiving OLV. INTERVENTIONS: Lower tidal volume during OLV. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Primary outcome was PaO2-to-the oxygen fraction (PaO2/FIO2) ratio at the end of the surgery, after the reinstitution of two-lung ventilation. Secondary endpoints included perioperative changes in PaO2/FIO2 ratio and carbon dioxide (PaCO2) tension, airway pressure, the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications, arrhythmia, and length of hospital stay. Seventeen randomized controlled trials (1,463 patients) were selected. Overall analysis showed that the use of low tidal volume during OLV was associated with a significantly higher PaO2/FIO2 ratio 15 minutes after the start of OLV and at the end of surgery (mean difference 33.7 mmHg [p = 0.02] and mean difference 18.59 mmHg [p < 0.001], respectively). The low tidal volume also was associated with higher PaCO2 values 15 minutes and 60 minutes after the start of OLV and with lower airway pressure, which was maintained during two-lung ventilation after surgery. Moreover, the application of lower tidal volume was associated with fewer postoperative pulmonary complications (odds ratio 0.50; p < 0.001) and arrhythmias (odds ratio 0.58; p = 0.009), with no difference in length of hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: The use of lower tidal volume, a component of protective OLV, increases the PaO2/FIO2 ratio, reduces the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications, and should be considered strongly in daily practice.

Bilateral Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block for Pectus Excavatum Surgery: A Retrospective Propensity-Score Study.

OBJECTIVE: Pectus excavatum (PE) repair is burdened by severe postoperative pain. This retrospective study aimed to determine whether the analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) plus standard intravenous analgesia (SIVA) might be superior to SIVA alone in pain control after PE surgical repair via Ravitch or Nuss technique. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. SETTING: At a university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: All participants were scheduled for surgical repair of PE. INTERVENTIONS: From January 2017 to December 2019, all patients who received ESPB plus SIVA or SIVA alone were investigated retrospectively. A 2:1 propensity-score matching analysis considering preoperative variables was used to compare analgesia efficacy in 2 groups. All patients received a 24-hour continuous infusion of tramadol, 0.1 mg/kg/h, and ketorolac, 0.05 mg/kg/h, via elastomeric pump, and morphine, 2 mg, intravenously as a rescue drug. The ESPB group received preoperative bilateral ESPB block. Postoperative pain, reported using a numerical rating scale at 1, 12, 24, and 48 hours after surgery; the number of required rescue doses; total postoperative morphine milligram equivalents consumption; and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomit were analyzed. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 105 patients were identified for analysis. Propensity-score matching resulted in 38 patients in the SIVA group and 19 patients in the ESPB group. Postoperative pain, the number of rescue doses, and postoperative nausea and vomit incidences were lower in the ESPB group (p < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Erector spinae plane block may be an effective option for pain management after surgical repair of PE as part of a multimodal approach. This study showed good perioperative analgesia, opioid sparing, and reduced opioid-related adverse effects.

Large Intrathoracic Desmoid Tumor and Re-Expansion Pulmonary Edema: Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Re-expansion pulmonary edema is a potentially life-threatening situation following thoracic surgery of a compromised lung. We report the case of a 24-year-old female scheduled for a resection of a large intrathoracic desmoid tumor that presented with re-expansion pulmonary edema at the conclusion of her surgery and discuss the clinical presentation, mechanism and predictors of this entity and review similar cases reported in the literature.

A Survey of the Practice of Thoracic Anesthesia in India.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the survey was to understand the contemporary thoracic anesthesia practice in India. DESIGN: A prospective questionnaire-based survey. SETTINGS: The survey was conducted at the Annual Conference of the Indian Association of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Anesthesiologists 2018 (IACTACON-2018). After the conference, the questionnaire was distributed again to the conference participants electronically to increase the response rate. PARTICIPANTS: Anesthesiologists from India attending IACTACON-2018. INTERVENTIONS: Hard copies of a validated questionnaire (n = 430) were distributed among Indian anesthesiologists attending IACTACON 2018. The questionnaire included 17 questions pertaining to preanesthesia checkup, lung isolation devices, intraoperative management, postoperative analgesia, and infrastructure available at their institutions. Following the conference, the survey was continued online by sending the link of the online survey to all registered participants (n = 421) from India, taking care to avoid duplication of responses. Collected data were analyzed using frequency distributions and chi-square tests. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Total responses were 166 (110 hardcopies and 56 online responses) of 430, with the response rate being 38.6%. A double-lumen tube (DLT) was the most commonly preferred for lung isolation (160/166: 96.4%). Nearly 55% of anesthesiologists preferred auscultation for confirmation of DLT, as 38% of anesthesiologists reported unavailability of the pediatric bronchoscope. Nearly 80% of anesthesiologists were compliant with the principles of protective one-lung ventilation. Preference for inhalation anesthetic agents during one-lung ventilation, use of restrictive intravenous fluids, and regional blocks for postoperative analgesia commonly were followed by the Indian anesthesiologists. CONCLUSION: Despite the challenges offered by limited resources, the practice of thoracic anesthesia in India is at par with the standards followed across the world.

Thoracic Anesthesia during the COVID-19 Pandemic: 2021 Updated Recommendations by the European Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (EACTAIC) Thoracic Subspecialty Committee.

The novel coronavirus pandemic has radically changed the landscape of normal surgical practice. Lifesaving cancer surgery, however, remains a clinical priority, and there is an increasing need to fully define the optimal oncologic management of patients with varying stages of lung cancer, allowing prioritization of which thoracic procedures should be performed in the current era. Healthcare providers and managers should not ignore the risk of a bimodal peak of mortality in patients with lung cancer; an imminent spike due to mortality from acute coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection, and a secondary peak reflecting an excess of cancer-related mortality among patients whose treatments were deemed less urgent, delayed, or cancelled. The European Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Thoracic Anesthesia Subspecialty group has considered these challenges and developed an updated set of expert recommendations concerning the infectious period, timing of surgery, vaccination, preoperative screening and evaluation, airway management, and ventilation of thoracic surgical patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.

A Randomized Comparison of Positional Stability: The EZ-Blocker Versus Left-Sided Double-Lumen Endobronchial Tubes in Adult Patients Undergoing Thoracic Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To assess if there is a difference in the repositioning rate of the EZ-Blocker versus a left-sided double-lumen endobronchial tube (DLT) in patients undergoing thoracic surgery and one-lung ventilation. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized. SETTING: Single center, university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred sixty-three thoracic surgery patients. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to either EZ-Blocker or a DLT. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was positional stability of either the EZ-Blocker or a left-sided double-lumen endobronchial tube, defined as the number of repositionings per hour of surgery and one-lung ventilation. Secondary outcomes included an ordinal isolation score from 1 to 3, in which 1 was poor, up to 3, which represented excellent isolation, and a visual analog postoperative sore throat score (0-100) on postoperative days (POD) one and two. Rate of repositionings per hour during one-lung ventilation and surgical manipulation in left-sided cases was similar between the two devices: 0.08 ± 0.15 v 0.11 ± 0.3 (p = 0.72). In right-sided cases, the rate of repositioning was higher in the EZ-Blocker group compared with DLT: 0.38 ± 0.65 v 0.09 ± 0.21 (p = 0.03). Overall, mean isolation scores for the EZ-Blocker versus the DLT were 2.76 v 2.92 (p = 0.04) in left-sided cases and 2.70 v 2.83 (p = 0.22) in right-sided cases. Median sore throat scores for left sided cases were 0 v 5 (p = 0.13) POD one and 0 v 5 (p = 0.006) POD two for the EZ-Blocker and left-sided DLT, respectively. CONCLUSION: For right-sided procedures, the positional stability of the EZ-Blocker is inferior to a DLT. In left-sided cases, the rate of repositioning for the EZ-Blocker and DLT are not statistically different.

A nationwide survey of intraoperative management for one-lung ventilation in Taiwan: time to accountable for diversity in protective lung ventilation.

BACKGROUND: There is a major paradigm shift for intraoperative mechanical ventilator support by the introduction of lung protective ventilation strategies to reduce postoperative pulmonary complications and improve overall clinical outcomes in non-thoracic surgeries. However, there is currently a lack of standardized practice guideline for lung protection during thoracic surgeries that require one-lung ventilation (OLV). This study aimed to collect the expert opinions of the thoracic anesthesiologists in perioperative care for OLV surgery in Taiwan. METHODS: This prospective cross-sectional study was undertaken in 16 tertiary hospitals in Taiwan from January to February 2019. A structured survey form was distributed across the participating hospitals and the thoracic anesthesiologists were invited to complete the form voluntarily. The survey form consisted of three parts, including the basic information of the institutional anesthesia care standards, ventilatory settings for a proposed patient receiving OLV surgery and expert opinions on OLV. RESULTS: A total of 71 thoracic anesthesiologists responded to the survey. Double-lumen tubes are the most commonly used (93.8%) airway devices for OLV. The most commonly recommended ventilator setting during OLV is a tidal volume of 6-7 ml/kg PBW (67.6%) and a PEEP level of 4-6 cmH2O (73.5%). Dual controlled ventilator modes are used by 44.1% of the anesthesiologists. During OLV, high oxygen fraction (FiO2 > 0.8) is more commonly supplemented to achieve an oxygen saturation higher than 94%. The consensus of anesthesiologists on the indices for lung protection in thoracic surgery is considerably low. Large majority of the anesthesiologists (91.5%) highly recommend that an international clinical practice guideline on the protective lung ventilation strategy for thoracic anesthesia should be established. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that the thoracic anesthesiologists in Taiwan share certain common practices in ventilator support during OLV. However, they are concerned about the lack of fundamental clinical evidences to support the beneficial outcomes of the current lung protective strategies applicable to OLV. Large-scale trials are needed to form an evidence-based clinical practice guideline for thoracic anesthesia.

The Cutting Edge of Thoracic Anesthesia During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has quickly spread globally, causing a real pandemic. In this critical scenario, lung cancer patients scheduled for surgical treatment need to continue to receive optimal care while protecting them from an eventual severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Adequate use of personal protective equipment (PPE) during aerosol-generating procedures (AGPs) and a COVID-19 specific intraoperative management are paramount in order to prevent cross infections. New suggestions or improvement of existing contagion control guidance are needed, even in case of non-symptomatic patients, possibly responsible for virus spread.

Thoracic Anesthesia of Patients With Suspected or Confirmed 2019 Novel Coronavirus Infection: Preliminary Recommendations for Airway Management by the European Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesiology Thoracic Subspecialty Committee.

The novel coronavirus has caused a pandemic around the world. Management of patients with suspected or confirmed coronavirus infection who have to undergo thoracic surgery will be a challenge for the anesthesiologists. The thoracic subspecialty committee of European Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesiology (EACTA) has conducted a survey of opinion in order to create recommendations for the anesthetic approach to these challenging patients. It should be emphasized that both the management of the infected patient with COVID-19 and the self-protection of the anesthesia team constitute a complicated challenge. The text focuses therefore on both important topics.

The Potential Dangers of Recruitment Maneuvers During One Lung Ventilation Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Existing evidence regarding lung-protective ventilation (LPV) during one-lung ventilation (OLV) focuses on surrogate outcomes. Our objective was to assess whether an LPV protocol during OLV surgery is associated with reduced respiratory complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a matched control retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing pulmonary resection at a tertiary Canadian hospital. The experimental group (n = 50) was derived from primary data of two crossover RCTs, which utilized protocolized LPV strategies with varying levels of positive end-expiratory pressure and recruitment maneuvers. The control group was drawn from a prospectively maintained database; these patients received conventional nonprotocolized ventilation (2000-2010). Each experimental group patient was matched 1:1 with a control group patient with respect to clinically relevant variables (age, sex, diagnosis, smoking status, cardiovascular disease status, comorbidity, BMI, preoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 s, surgery type). Major respiratory complications were defined as composite of acute respiratory distress syndrome, need for new positive-pressure ventilation, and atelectasis requiring bronchoscopy. Paired and unpaired statistical tests were used. RESULTS: Patients appeared well matched. Major respiratory complications occurred in 8% (n = 4) and 2% (n = 1) of patients in experimental and control groups, respectively (P = 0.50). There was a trend toward increased mortality (4 versus 0, P = 0.06) with protocolized LPV. The patients who died had respiratory complications; one had acute respiratory distress syndrome and two had profound hypoxemia. CONCLUSIONS: There was a nonsignificant trend toward increased mortality with LPV during OLV. Although limited by a small sample size, our findings identify a potential danger to excessive recruitment maneuvers. Larger studies, with clinically important outcomes are needed to better define the risk/benefit trade-offs for LPV during OLV.

Feasibility and Impact of Focused Intraoperative Transthoracic Echocardiography on Management in Thoracic Surgery Patients: An Observational Study.

OBJECTIVES: Intraoperative focused transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is feasible and has an effect on the management of hemodynamically unstable surgical patients. Furthermore, in noncardiac thoracic surgery, TTE might provide additional information for hemodynamic treatment. Transthoracic accessibility during thoracic surgical interventions is assumed to be difficult. For patients positioned on their right side, a modified subcostal transthoracic view might be helpful. DESIGN: A prospective observational study. SETTING: Single-center university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: The study comprised 105 consecutive patients undergoing noncardiac thoracic surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Focused TTE was performed during anesthetic induction after intubation for mechanical ventilation. Intraoperative focused TTE, after positioning and draping for surgery, was attempted again for all 105 patients. Changes in patient management due to the results of the TTE were documented and analyzed. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Presurgical TTE with mechanical ventilation was applied successfully in 98.1% of 105 patients. Intraoperative imaging was successful in 90 patients (85.7%). Results of intraoperative TTE led to the modification of perioperative management in 39 patients (37.1%), 20 (22.0%) of these during surgery. CONCLUSIONS: TTE in noncardiac thoracic surgery is feasible using a modified subcostal view and has an effect on hemodynamic management in a considerable number of patients.

A Randomized Controlled Study of the Use of Video Double-Lumen Endobronchial Tubes Versus Double-Lumen Endobronchial Tubes in Thoracic Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the incidence of fiberoptic bronchoscope (FOB) use (1) during verification of initial placement and (2) for reconfirmation of correct placement following repositioning, when either a double-lumen tube (DLT) or video double-lumen tube (VDLT) was used for lung isolation during thoracic surgery. DESIGN: A randomized controlled study. SETTING: Single-center university teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: The study comprised 80 patients who were 18 years or older requiring lung isolation for surgery. INTERVENTIONS: After institutional review board approval, patients were randomized prior to surgery to either DLT or VDLT usage. Attending anesthesiologists placed the Mallinckrodt DLT or Vivasight (ET View Ltd, Misgav, Israel) VDLT with conventional laryngoscopy or video laryngoscopy then verified correct tube position through the view provided with either VDLT external monitor or FOB. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Data collected included: sex, body mass index, successful intubation and endobronchial placement, intubation time, confirmation time of tube position, FOB use, quality of view, dislodgement of tube, and ability to forewarn dislodgement of endobronchial cuff and complications. FOB use for verification of final position of the tube (VDLT 13.2% [5/38] v DLT 100% [42/42], p < 0.0001), need for FOB to correct the dislodgement (VDLT 7.7% [1/13] v DLT 100% [14/14], p < 0.0001), dislodgement during positioning (VDLT 61.5% [8/13] v DLT 64.3% [9/14], p = ns), dislodgement during surgery (VDLT 38.5% [5/13] v DLT 21.4% [3/14], p = ns), and ability to forewarn dislodgement of endobronchial cuff (VDLT 18.4% [7/38] v DLT 4.8% [2/42], p = 0.078). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated a reduction of 86.8% in FOB use, which was a similar reduction found in other published studies.

Intubated Versus Nonintubated General Anesthesia for Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery-A Case-Control Study.

OBJECTIVE: General anesthesia with endobronchial intubation and one-lung positive-pressure ventilation always has been considered mandatory for thoracic surgery. Recently, there has been interest in nonintubated techniques for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) in awake and sedated patients. The authors' center developed a nonintubated technique with spontaneous ventilation with the patient under general anesthesia using a supraglottic airway device. The authors believe that this was the first study to compare a nonintubated general anesthetic technique with an intubated general anesthetic technique for VATS. DESIGN: Retrospective, observational study. SETTING: Specialist cardiothoracic hospital in the United Kingdom. PARTICIPANTS: All patients who underwent elective minor VATS over 8 months (n = 73). INTERVENTIONS: A nonintubated general anesthetic technique with spontaneous ventilation via a supraglottic airway device was used for minor VATS procedures. This was compared with a case-matched intubated group. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Both groups had comparable baseline characteristics and surgical procedures. The anesthetic time was shorter in the nonintubated group (13.6±8.3 v 24.1±10.9 minutes, p<0.001). Surgical operating time and feasibility were similar. Intraoperatively, there were increases in end-tidal carbon dioxide (59.1±12.9 v 41.8±4.6, p<0.001) and respiratory rate (17.8±5.6 v 13.5±2.0, p<0.001) in the nonintubated group. Fewer patients in the nonintubated group had moderate-severe pain during recovery (19.4% v 48.4%, p = 0.02) and pain on discharge to the ward (25.8% v 61.3%, p = 0.004). There was a trend toward shorter recovery times, reduced oxygen requirement, and shorter hospital stays in the nonintubated group. CONCLUSIONS: A nonintubated general anesthetic technique is a feasible alternative to intubated general anesthesia for minor VATS procedures.

New Approaches to Airway Management in Tracheal Resections-A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Although endotracheal intubation, surgical crossfield intubation, and jet ventilation are standard techniques for airway management in tracheal resections, there are also reports of new approaches, ranging from regional anesthesia to extracorporeal support. The objective was to outline the entire spectrum of new airway techniques. DESIGN: The literature databases PubMed/Medline and the Cochrane Library were searched systematically for prospective and retrospective trials as well as case reports on tracheal resections. SETTING: No restrictions applied to hospital types or settings. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients undergoing surgical resections of noncongenital tracheal stenoses with end-to-end anastomoses. INTERVENTIONS: Airway management techniques were divided into conventional and new approaches and analyzed regarding their potential risks and benefits. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 59 publications (n = 797 patients) were included. The majority of publications (71.2%) describe conventional airway techniques. Endotracheal tube placement after induction of general anesthesia and surgical crossfield intubation after incision of the trachea were used most frequently without major complications. A total of 7 new approaches were identified, including 4 different regional anesthetic techniques (25 cases), supraglottic airways (4 cases), and new forms of extracorporeal support (25 cases). Overall failure rates of new techniques were low (1.8%). Details on patient selection and procedural specifics are provided. CONCLUSIONS: New approaches have several theoretical benefits, yet further research is required to establish criteria for patient selection and evaluate procedural safety. Given the low level of evidence, it currently is impossible to compare methods of airway management regarding outcome-related risks and benefits.