A nomogram based on nutritional and inflammatory parameters to predict DMFS and identify beneficiaries of adjuvant chemotherapy in IVA-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to develop a nomogram integrating inflammation (NLR), Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI), and EBV DNA (tumor burden) to achieve personalized treatment and prediction for stage IVA NPC. Furthermore, it endeavors to pinpoint specific subgroups that may derive significant benefits from S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: A total of 834 patients diagnosed with stage IVA NPC were enrolled in this study and randomly allocated into training and validation cohorts. Multivariate Cox analyses were conducted to identify independent prognostic factors for constructing the nomogram. The predictive and clinical utility of the nomogram was assessed through measures including the AUC, calibration curve, DCA, and C-indexes. IPTW was employed to balance baseline characteristics across the population. Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank tests were utilized to evaluate the prognostic value. RESULTS: In our study, we examined the clinical features of 557 individuals from the training cohort and 277 from the validation cohort. The median follow-up period was 50.1 and 49.7 months, respectively. For the overall cohort, the median follow-up duration was 53.8 months. The training and validation sets showed 3-year OS rates of 87.7% and 82.5%, respectively. Meanwhile, the 3-year DMFS rates were 95.9% and 84.3%, respectively. We created a nomogram that combined PNI, NRI, and EBV DNA, resulting in high prediction accuracy. Risk stratification demonstrated substantial variations in DMFS and OS between the high and low risk groups. Patients in the high-risk group benefited significantly from the IC + CCRT + S-1 treatment. In contrast, IC + CCRT demonstrated non-inferior 3-year DMFS and OS compared to IC + CCRT + S-1 in the low-risk population, indicating the possibility of reducing treatment intensity. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, our nomogram integrating NLR, PNI, and EBV DNA offers precise prognostication for stage IVA NPC. S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy provides notable benefits for high-risk patients, while treatment intensity reduction may be feasible for low-risk individuals.

Impact of previous S-1 treatment on efficacy of liposomal irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Liposomal irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV) provides survival benefits for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) refractory to gemcitabine-based treatment, mainly gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GA), in current practice. Gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) is another commonly administered first-line regimen before nab-paclitaxel reimbursement; however, the efficacy and safety of nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV for mPDAC after failed GS treatment has not been reported and was therefore explored in this study. METHODS: In total, 177 patients with mPDAC received first-line GS or GA treatment, followed by second-line nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV treatment (identified from a multicenter retrospective cohort in Taiwan from 2018 to 2020); 85 and 92 patients were allocated to the GS and GA groups, respectively. Overall survival (OS), time-to-treatment failure (TTF), and adverse events were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics of the two groups were generally similar; however, a higher median age (67 versus 62 years, p < 0.001) and fewer liver metastases (52% versus 78%, p < 0.001) were observed in the GS versus GA group. The median OS was 15.0 and 15.9 months in the GS and GA groups, respectively (p = 0.58). The TTF (3.1 versus 2.8 months, p = 0.36) and OS (7.6 versus 6.7 months, p = 0.83) after nal-IRI treatment were similar between the two groups. More patients in the GS group developed mucositis during nal-IRI treatment (15% versus 4%, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of second-line nal-IRI +5-FU/LV treatment was unaffected by prior S-1 exposure. GS followed by nal-IRI treatment is an alternative treatment sequence for patients with mPDAC.

Detailed analysis of metastatic colorectal cancer patients who developed cardiotoxicity on another fluoropyrimidine and switched to S-1 treatment (subgroup analysis of the CardioSwitch-study).

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The CardioSwitch-study demonstrated that patients with solid tumors who develop cardiotoxicity on capecitabine or 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) treatment can be safely switched to S-1, an alternative fluoropyrimidine (FP). In light of the European Medicines Agency approval of S-1 in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), this analysis provides more detailed safety and efficacy information, and data regarding metastasectomy and/or local ablative therapy (LAT), on the mCRC patients from the original study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at 12 European centers. The primary endpoint was recurrence of cardiotoxicity after switch. For this analysis, safety data are reported for 78 mCRC patients from the CardioSwitch cohort (N = 200). Detailed efficacy and outcomes data were available for 66 mCRC patients. RESULTS: Data for the safety of S-1 in mCRC patients were similar to the original CardioSwitch cohort and that expected for FP-based treatment, with no new concerns. Recurrent cardiotoxicity (all grade 1) with S-1-based treatment occurred in 4/78 (5%) mCRC patients; all were able to complete FP treatment. Median progression-free survival from initiation of S-1-based treatment was 9.0 months and median overall survival 26.7 months. Metastasectomy and/or LAT was performed in 33/66 (50%) patients, and S-1 was successfully used in recommended neoadjuvant/conversion or adjuvant-like combination regimens and schedules as for standard FPs. INTERPRETATION: S-1 is a safe and effective FP alternative when mCRC patients are forced to discontinue 5-FU or capecitabine due to cardiotoxicity and can be safely used in the standard recommended regimens, settings, and schedules.

Molecular features and prognostic factors of locally advanced microsatellite instability-high gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) tumors are distinct molecular subtypes in gastric cancer. However, a few studies have comprehensively reported the molecular features of MSI-H tumors and their prognostic factors in locally advanced gastric cancer. This study aimed to clarify the molecular features and prognostic factors of locally advanced MSI-H gastric cancer. METHODS: This study included 499 patients with locally advanced gastric cancer who underwent radical gastrectomy. We evaluated the MSI status and compared with previously published whole-exome sequencing, panel sequencing, and gene expression profiling data. Clinicopathological characteristics and molecular profiles were compared between patients with MSI-H and microsatellite stable (MSS) gastric cancer. A subgroup analysis of survival was performed in patients with MSI-H gastric cancer. RESULTS: MSI-H tumors were detected in 79 of 499 patients (15.8%). MSI-H tumors were associated with an increased tumor mutational burden, MLH1 downregulation, CD274 (PD-L1) upregulation, and enrichment of cell cycle pathways. Among patients with MSI-H gastric cancer, the disease-specific survival (DSS) tended to be better in the surgery plus tegafur, gimeracil, and oteracil potassium (S-1) adjuvant chemotherapy group than in the surgery alone group, especially for stage III patients. Furthermore, DSS was better in the T cell-inflamed gene expression signature-high group, and it tended to be worse in the non-solid type poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma group. CONCLUSIONS: The molecular features and prognostic factors of locally advanced MSI-H gastric cancer were clarified. S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy appears to be beneficial, and the T cell-inflamed gene expression signature and histopathological type are prognostic factors in MSI-H tumors.

Adjuvant and post-recurrent treatment patterns in patients with resectable gastric cancer in japan: a retrospective database cohort study.

BACKGROUND: This study examined temporal shifts in adjuvant therapy patterns in Japanese patients with resectable gastric cancer (GC) and treatment patterns of first-line and subsequent therapy among those with recurrent disease. METHODS: This retrospective analysis of hospital-based administrative claims data (April 1, 2008 to March 31, 2022) included adults (aged ≥ 20 years) with GC who started adjuvant therapy on or after October 1, 2008 (adjuvant cohort) and patients in the adjuvant cohort with disease recurrence (recurrent cohort), further defined by the time to recurrence (≤ 180 or > 180 days after adjuvant therapy). RESULTS: In the adjuvant cohort (n = 17,062), the most common regimen during October 2008-May 2016 was tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil potassium (S-1; 95.7%). As new standard adjuvant regimen options were established, adjuvant S-1 use decreased to 65.0% and fluoropyrimidine plus oxaliplatin or docetaxel plus S-1 use increased to 15.0% and 20.0%, respectively, in September 2019-March 2022. In the recurrent cohort with no history of trastuzumab/trastuzumab deruxtecan treatment (n = 1257), the most common first-line regimens were paclitaxel plus ramucirumab (34.0%), capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CapeOX; 17.0%), and nab-paclitaxel plus ramucirumab (10.1%) in patients with early recurrence, and S-1 plus oxaliplatin (26.3%), S-1 plus cisplatin (15.3%), CapeOX (14.0%), S-1 (13.2%), and paclitaxel plus ramucirumab (10.8%) in those with late recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated temporal shifts in adjuvant treatment patterns that followed the establishment of novel regimens, and confirmed that post-recurrent treatment patterns were consistent with the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association guideline recommendations.

Real-world treatment outcomes of metastatic biliary tract cancer patients in Japan: the Tokushukai REAl-world data project 04 (TREAD 04).

OBJECTIVES: To investigate temporal trends in treatment patterns and prognostic factors for overall survival in patients with metastatic biliary tract cancer. METHODS: From the Tokushukai REAl-world Data project, we identified 945 patients with metastatic biliary tract cancer treated with gemcitabine, tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil, gemcitabine plus cisplatin, gemcitabine plus tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil or gemcitabine plus cisplatin and tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil between April 2010 and March 2022. Stratified/conventional Cox regression analyses were conducted to examine the association between overall survival and patient- and tumour-related factors, study period, hospital volume, hospital type and first-line chemotherapy regimen. Using inverse probability of treatment weighting with propensity scores, overall survival was also compared between monotherapy and combination therapy groups. RESULTS: We enrolled 366 patients (199 men; median age, 72 years). Over a median follow-up of 5.2 months, the median overall survival was 7.0 months (95% confidence interval 6.2-9.0), and the median time to treatment failure was 3.5 months (95% confidence interval 3.1-4.5). Median overall survival and time to treatment failure for gemcitabine/tegafur-gimeracil-oteracil/gemcitabine plus cisplatin/gemcitabine plus tegafur-gimeracil-oteracil/gemcitabine plus cisplatin and tegafur-gimeracil-oteracil regimen were 6.2/6.6/7.9/16.2/15.1 and 2.8/3.4/4.1/15.3/7.4 months, respectively. Primary disease site, previous surgery, previous endoscopic procedures and hospital type were identified as significant prognostic factors. Inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis demonstrated that combination therapy had a significantly better prognosis than monotherapy (hazard ratio 0.61, 95% confidence interval 0.43-0.88, P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Our real-world data analysis showed that standard care for metastatic biliary tract cancer is widely used in hospitals throughout Japan and verified the survival benefits of combination therapy over monotherapy observed in prior clinical trials. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: UMIN000050590 (http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm).

Exploratory analysis of serum HER2 extracellular domain for HER2 positive gastric cancer treated with SOX plus trastuzumab.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to explore the clinical utility of serum HER2 extracellular domain (sHER2 ECD) using data from a clinical trial evaluating trastuzumab combined S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) in HER2 positive gastric cancer. METHODS: sHER2 ECD were prospectively measured at baseline and subsequent treatment courses. Based on each quantile point of baseline sHER2 ECD levels and its early changes, patients were divided into two groups and compared clinical outcomes. RESULTS: 43 patients were enrolled, and 17 patients (39.5%) were positive for baseline sHER2 ECD. Higher baseline sHER2 ECD levels tended to have lower hazard ratios (HRs). When divided into two groups by baseline sHER2 ECD of 19.1 ng/ml, median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was longer in the higher group (mPFS: 16.8 vs 8.7 months, p = 0.359. mOS: 35.5 vs 20.6 months, p = 0.270), respectively. After initiation of treatment, sHER2 ECD significantly decreased up until the third cycle. Higher reduction rates of sHER2 ECD within 3 cycles also tended to have lower HRs. When divided into two groups by reduction rate of 42.5%, mPFS and mOS was longer in the higher reduced group (mPFS: 17.2 vs 8.7 months, p = 0.095. mOS: 65.0 vs 17.8 months, p = 0.047), respectively. Furthermore, higher reduction rates could surrogate higher objective response rates (ORR) (ORR: 90% vs 63.2% for 29.5%, p = 0.065. 100% vs 70% for 42.5%, p = 0.085), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline sHER2 ECD levels and its early decline may be useful biomarkers for SOX plus trastuzumab efficacy in HER2 positive gastric cancer.

[A Case of Adenocarcinoma of Pancreatic Head of Liver Disfunction after Pancreaticoduodenectomy with Celiac Artery Stenosis Treated by Urgent Median Arcuate Ligament Release].

This patient visited our hospital for the purpose of detailed examination of prostate cancer in his seventies. Abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography(CT)revealed a low-density mass of 2 cm in the pancreatic head. He was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. Pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed after 2 courses of gemcitabine and S-1 therapy were performed as neoadjuvant chemotherapy. An intraoperative clamp test of the gastroduodenal artery showed that the pulsation of the common hepatic artery and the proper hepatic artery was weak but sufficient, so the gastroduodenal artery was cut and the operation was completed as planned. A blood test on the 1st day after the operation showed elevated levels of AST 537 U/L, ALT 616 U/L, and 7 hours later blood sampling showed further increases in AST 1,455 U/L, ALT 1,314 U/L. After a detailed review of the preoperative CT, celiac artery stenosis due to compression of the arcuate ligament was suspected, and urgent median arcuate ligament release was performed on the same day. Dissection of the arcuate ligament significantly improved the pulsation of the common hepatic artery and proper hepatic artery. Postoperatively, hepatic enzymes improved and ISGPS showed Grade B pancreatic juice leakage, but the patient was discharged from the hospital on the 49th postoperative day without any other complications. He took S-1 as adjuvant chemotherapy, and no signs of recurrence have been observed 9 months after the operation.

Impact of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy longer than 6 months on survival in patients with resected pancreatic cancer: a nationwide survey by the Japan Pancreas Society based on real-world data.

BACKGROUND: Based on the Japan Adjuvant Study Group of Pancreatic Cancer 01 study, the standard duration of adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 (an oral 5-fluorouracil prodrug consisting of tegafur, gimeracil, and oteracil) in patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) was considered to be 6 months, but the impact of increasing its duration on postoperative survival was unknown. Here, the authors investigated this question by reviewing real-world data from a large cohort of patients with PDAC. METHODS: In total, 3949 patients who underwent surgery for PDAC during the study period followed by S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy in board-certified institutions were included. Based on the duration of S-1 chemotherapy, two subgroups were defined: a standard-duration group that included patients who were treated for 180 ± 30 days and a longer duration group that included patients who received treatment for >210 days. RESULTS: The median duration of S-1 chemotherapy was 167 days, with a mean ± standard deviation of 200 ± 193 days. After excluding patients who had a recurrence within 210 days after the initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy, postoperative recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in the standard-duration group (n = 1473) and the longer duration group (n = 975) were compared. RFS and OS did not differ significantly between the standard-duration and longer duration groups (5-year RFS: 37.8% vs. 36.2% respectively; p = .6186; 5-year OS: 52.8% vs. 53.4%, respectively; p = .5850). The insignificant difference was verified by multivariate analysis and propensity-score matching analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The current findings suggest that extending S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy beyond 6 months has no significant additional effect on survival in patients with PDAC. This could be useful in determining whether to extend S-1 chemotherapy in patients who have completed the standard 6-month treatment.

Efficacy and Safety of Additional S-1 Chemotherapy to S-1 Plus Oxaliplatin Regimen Chemotherapy for Stage III Gastric Carcinoma after Radical Resection.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of additional S-1 chemotherapy to S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) regimen chemotherapy for Stage III gastric carcinoma (GC) after radical resection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 161 patients who were pathologically diagnosed as Stage III GC after D2 gastrectomy and received SOX regimen adjuvant chemotherapy between January 2012 and April 2016 were included in this retrospective study. SOX regimen postoperative chemotherapy was composed of Oxaliplatin and S-1, administrated every 3 weeks for 8 scheduled courses. After SOX chemotherapy, 76 patients preferred additional chemotherapy with S-1 (the ACT group), while additional S-1 chemotherapy was not given to the other 85 patients (control group). The ACT with S-1 was administrated every 3 weeks for 8 scheduled courses. Treatment was terminated in case of life-threatening adverse events or tumor progression, or patients' demand for termination. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events were analyzed. RESULTS: ACT group obtained markedly improved 3-year PFS [p = 0.04; hazard ratio (HR) for disease progression, 0.58; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.34-0.98] and OS than the control group (p = 0.0469; HR for death, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.32-0.99). No chemotherapy-related mortality occurred. Patients of the ACT group suffered more common and severer hand-foot syndrome (HFS) (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Additional S-1 chemotherapy may be helpful for improving the disease progression and survival for patients with Stage III GC after radical resection with an acceptable safety profile.

Efficacy of AS versus SOX regimen as first-line chemotherapy for gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis: a real-world study.

BACKGROUND: To compare the prognosis of first-line systemic chemotherapy of AS (Albumin-bound paclitaxel and S-1) versus SOX (S-1 and oxaliplatin) regimen in Chinese gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis. METHODS: This was a real-world study of gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis who have been treated with AS or SOX regimen as first-line chemotherapy. Patients were matched by the method of propensity score matching (PSM). The primary and secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progress-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: A total of 108 gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis were enrolled after PSM analysis. There was no significant difference between AS and SOX regimen based on gender, age, ascites, treatment cycles, gastric cancer resection, received checkpoint inhibitors, and HER-2 expression after PSM analysis. The median OS (14.13 vs. 11.17 months, p = 0.0356) and median PFS (10.30 vs. 6.70 months, p = 0.0003) of patients who received AS regimen were longer than those treated by SOX regimen as first-line systemic chemotherapy. In sub-group analysis, the median OS and median PFS were longer for patients in AS regimen than SOX regimen in Lauren diffuse type. The occurrence of toxicity between the two groups was shown no significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: The results verified that AS regimen was more effective than SOX chemotherapy in gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis, especially in Lauren diffuse type.

A Phase I Trial of Oxaliplatin, Irinotecan, and S-1 Combination Therapy (OX-IRIS) as Chemotherapy for Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer (HGCSG 1403).

LESSONS LEARNED: Because S-1 is orally administered, OX-IRIS does not necessitate the continuous infusion of 5-FU and is more convenient. The recommended dose of OX-IRIS was determined to be level -1 (oxaliplatin, 65 mg/m2 ; irinotecan, 100 mg/m2 ; S-1, 80 mg/m2 ), which has manageable safety and promising anticancer activities. BACKGROUND: OX-IRIS is a new combination therapy of oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and S-1 for unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), which may be beneficial because S-1 is administered orally and continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is not needed. METHODS: Patients who had not received prior therapy for unresectable PDAC were enrolled. Adenocarcinoma or adenosquamous histology was required. Oxaliplatin and irinotecan were administered on days 1 and 15; S-1 was administered orally twice a day on days 1-14, followed by 14 days of rest (one cycle). Primary endpoints were dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Secondary endpoints were safety, overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: In level 0 (oxaliplatin, 85 mg/m2 ; irinotecan, 100 mg/m2 ; S-1, 80 mg/m2 ), two of five patients experienced DLT. In level -1 (oxaliplatin, 65 mg/m2 ; irinotecan, 100 mg/m2 ; S-1, 80 mg/m2 ), DLT could not be evaluated in two of eight patients because one cycle was not completed; one of the remaining six patients experienced DLT. Anemia, thrombocytopenia, fatigue, nausea, anorexia, diarrhea, and peripheral sensory neuropathy were seen frequently in levels 0 and -1. ORR was 30% in levels 0 and -1. Median progression-free survival and median overall survival were 4.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.0-8.9 months) and 13.7 months (95% CI, 4.8-22.6 months), respectively. CONCLUSION: MTD of OX-IRIS therapy was estimated to be level 0, and the recommended dose (RD) for future trial was level -1.

Intraperitoneal Administration of Paclitaxel Combined with S-1 Plus Oxaliplatin as Induction Therapy for Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer with Peritoneal Metastases.

BACKGROUND: Intraperitoneal (IP) administration of paclitaxel (PTX) has a great pharmacokinetic advantage to control peritoneal lesions and can be combined with various systemic chemotherapies. In this study, we evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a combination of IP-PTX and systemic S-1/oxaliplatin (SOX) for induction chemotherapy for patients with peritoneal metastases (PM) from gastric cancer (GC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with GC who were diagnosed as macroscopic PM (P1) or positive peritoneal cytology (CY1) by staging laparoscopy between 2016 and 2019 were enrolled. PTX was IP administered at 40 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8. Oxaliplatin was IV administered at 100 mg/m2 on day 1, and S-1 was administered at 80 mg/m2/day for 14 consecutive days, repeated every 21 days. Survival time and toxicities were retrospectively explored. RESULTS: Forty-four patients received SOX + IP-PTX with a median (range) of 16 (1-48) courses, although oxaliplatin was suspended due to the hematotoxicity or intolerable peripheral neuropathy in many patients. The 1-year overall survival (OS) rate was 79.5% (95% CI 64.4-88.8%) with median survival time of 25.8 months. Gastrectomy was performed in 20 (45%) patients who showed macroscopic shrinkage of PM with a 1-year OS rate of 100% (95% CI 69.5-100%). Grade 2 and 3 histological responses was achieved in four (20%) and one (5%) patients. Grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia (11%), leukopenia (39%), and anemia (14%). There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Combination chemotherapy using SOX + IP-PTX regimen is highly effective and recommended as induction chemotherapy for patients with PM from GC.

Efficacy and safety of S-1 following gemcitabine with cisplatin for advanced biliary tract cancer.

Background Combination therapy of gemcitabine with cisplatin (GC) is a standard first-line therapy for unresectable or recurrent biliary tract cancer (BTC). S-1 is often used as a second-line therapy in clinical practice, based on the results of some clinical studies investigating its efficacy and safety following gemcitabine monotherapy. However, few studies have reported on the clinical outcomes of S-1 following GC. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the efficacy and safety of S-1 following GC for unresectable and recurrent BTC. Methods We retrospectively collected the data of 116 patients (pts) who were treated with S-1 as a second-line therapy following GC for unresectable or recurrent BTC at Shizuoka Cancer Center (November 2009 to July 2019). Results Of these 116 pts., 84 were assessable. Patient characteristics were as follows: intrahepatic bile duct/extrahepatic bile duct/gallbladder cancer, 30/23/31 pts.; metastatic/recurrent/locally advanced, 57/17/10 pts. The median time to treatment failure and overall survival were 2.5 and 6.0 months, respectively. Among 65 pts. with measurable lesions, the overall response rate was 3.1% (2/65 pts) and the disease control rate was 24.6% (19/65 pts). The common grade 3/4 toxicities included anemia (12%), neutropenia (4%), infections (16%), fatigue (6%), and diarrhea (4%). Dose reduction or treatment schedule modification of S-1 was required in 29 pts. (34.5%), and 17 pts. (20%) terminated S-1 due to adverse events. Conclusions The efficacy and safety of S-1 following GC were almost the same as those of S-1 following GEM monotherapy for unresectable or recurrent BTC.

Phase I/II study of erlotinib plus S-1 for patients with previously treated non-small cell lung cancer: Thoracic Oncology Research Group (TORG) 0808/0913.

Introduction In preclinical data, the combination therapy with S-1 and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) had a synergistic antitumor effect on non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), regardless of the EGFR mutation status. Patients and Methods Patients with previously treated NSCLC and adequate organ function regardless of EGFR mutation status were eligible for the phase I study, with wild-type EGFR were eligible for the phase II study. Treatment consisted of erlotinib 150 mg/body orally once every day and S-1 60 mg/m2, 70 mg/m2, or 80 mg/m2 (level 0, level 1, or level 2) orally on days 1-14 every three weeks. The primary endpoint for the phase I study was the determination of the recommended dose (RD), the phase II study was the overall response rate (ORR). Results A total of 7 patients with performance-status (PS) 0 or 1 were enrolled as subjects in phase I. Five of these subjects were EGFR-mutation positive. Four subjects were enrolled at S-1 dose level 1 and 3 were enrolled at S-1 dose level 2. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed in these subjects. The RD was decided as erlotinib 150 mg/body and S-1 80 mg/m2. In phase I, 5 subjects achieved partial response, and the ORR was 71.4%. A total of 10 patients with PS 0, 1, or 2 EGFR-wild type NSCLC were enrolled in phase II. In phase II, the ORR was 10.0%, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 40.0%. After the enrollment of 10 subjects, enrollment was stopped based on two treatment-related deaths. Conclusion The combination therapy of erlotinib plus S-1 was not feasible in the EGFR wild-type NSCLC at least and early stopped. Trial registration: UMIN-CTR Identifier: 000003421 (2010/03/31, phase I), 000003422 (2010/03/31, Phase II).

Clinical Impact of the Prognostic Nutritional Index as a Predictor of Outcomes in Patients with Stage II/III Gastric Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The Japanese Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines recommend S-1 and S-1 plus docetaxel as postoperative chemotherapy for pathological stage II and III gastric cancer (GC). There is currently no strategy for using chemotherapy to treat high-risk recurrent pathological stage II/III. Previous studies reported that the several nutritional, immunological, and inflammatory markers examined the association with clinical outcomes after surgery for GC. METHODS: Ninety patients with GC (stage II, n = 48; stage III, n = 42) for whom gastrectomy was performed at our institution between November 2009 and September 2018 were examined. Nutritional, immunological, and inflammatory markers were calculated from blood samples within 1 week before surgery. RESULTS: The prognostic nutritional index (PNI) status correlated with the pathological stage and disease recurrence after surgery (p = 0.015 and p < 0.0001, respectively). Thirty-three patients had disease recurrence after gastrectomy (stage II, n = 11; stage III, n = 22). The PNI was significantly lower in the recurrent group than in the non-recurrent group (p = 0.0003). The PNI correlated with overall survival and recurrence-free survival after gastrectomy (p = 0.0021 and p = 0.0001, respectively). A multivariate analysis identified the PNI as an independent prognostic factor (p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: The PNI may be useful for predicting the outcomes of patients with pathological stage II/III GC and may contribute to the selection of an appropriate adjuvant chemotherapy regimen.

High L-Type Amino Acid Transporter 1 Levels Are Associated with Chemotherapeutic Resistance in Gastric Cancer Patients.

INTRODUCTION: We investigated whether the expression of L-type amino acid transporter 1 (LAT-1) in clinical gastric cancer (GC) patients could predict patient therapeutic response to postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: Immunohistochemistry was used to investigate LAT-1, CD98, and phosphorylated-mammalian target of rapamycin (p-mTOR) expression in 111 GC patients. To clarify whether LAT-1 influences the therapeutic effects of chemotherapy, the correlation between disease-free survival rates and LAT-1 was determined in 2 groups: 59 patients who did not undergo postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy and 52 patients who did undergo postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS: LAT-1 was significantly correlated with CD98 and p-mTOR expressions. We did not find any statistically significant correlation between LAT-1 and recurrence in the nontreated group. In contrast, a significant association was found between LAT-1 expression and disease-free survival in the chemotherapy group. Moreover, multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that LAT-1 was an independent predictor of disease-free survival in the postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy group (p = 0.012). CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrate that LAT-1 is a useful predictive marker for a successful postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy treatment.

Surgery alone, adjuvant tegafur/gimeracil/octeracil (S-1), or platinum-based chemotherapies for resectable gastric cancer: real-world experience and a propensity score matching analysis.

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant chemotherapy has changed the paradigm in resectable gastric cancer. S-1 is an oral chemotherapeutic with promising efficacy in Asia. However, comparisons with close observation or platinum-based doublets post D2 gastrectomy have been less reported, notably on real-world experiences. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated patients with D2-dissected stage IB-III gastric cancer who received S-1 (S-1, n = 67), platinum-based doublets (P, n = 145) and surgery with close observation (OBS, n = 221) from Jan 2008 to Oct 2018. A propensity score matching was used to compare for recurrence-free (RFS) and overall survivals (OS) in patients who had a locally-advanced disease (T3-4 or lymph node-positive). Adverse reactions, dosage, and associated factors for S-1 are also discussed. RESULTS: In a median follow-up time of 51.9 months, adjuvant S-1 monotherapy was associated with an intermediate survival as compared with P and OBS (median RFS/OS: S-1 vs. P, 20.9/35.8 vs. 31.2/50.5 months, HR = 1.76/2.14, p = 0.021/0.008; S-1 vs. OBS, 24.4/40.2 vs. 20.7/27.0 months, HR = 0.62/0.55, p = 0.041/0.024). The survival differences were more prominent in patients with N2-3 diseases. S-1 was well-tolerated with a relative dose intensity of 73.6%, a median duration of 8.3 months and associated with less adverse reactions as compared with P. S-1 monotherapy was selected by physicians based on age, lymph node stage, serum carcinoembryonic antigen and disease stage. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant S-1 correlated with intermediate survival outcomes between OBS and P but conferred fewer adverse reactions as compared with P. Patients with a moderate risk of recurrence had comparable survivals when treated with S-1 while platinum-based doublets were favored in advanced cases. The study provides additional information about adjuvant S-1 in patients with selected risk of recurrence.

Short-term survival and safety of apatinib combined with oxaliplatin and S-1 in the conversion therapy of unresectable gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: We conducted a single-arm phase II trial to investigate the short-term efficacy and safety of apatinib combined with oxaliplatin and S-1 in the treatment of unresectable gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Previously untreated patients with unresectable HER-2-negative advanced gastric cancer were selected. All the patients received six cycles of S-1 and oxaliplatin and five cycles of apatinib, which were administered at intervals of three weeks. The surgery was performed after six cycles of drug treatment. The primary endpoints were radical resection (R0) rate and safety. This study was registered with the China Trial Register, number ChiCTR-ONC-17010430  (01/12/2016-01/12/2022). RESULTS: A total of 39 patients were enrolled. Efficacy evaluation was feasible for 37 patients. One patient achieved complete response (CR, 2.7%), 26 patients achieved partial response (PR, 70.3%), three patients had stable disease (SD, 8.1%) and seven patients had progressive disease (PD, 18.9%). The objective response rate (ORR) was 73.0% and the disease control rate (DCR) was 81.1%. 22 patients underwent surgery, among which 14 patients underwent radical resection (R0), with a R0 resection rate of 63.6%. The 1-year survival rate of the surgical group (22 patients) was 71.1% and the 2-year survival rate was 41.1%. The median survival time was 21 months. The incidence of adverse events (AEs) was 100%. Leucopenia (65.3%) and granulocytopenia (69.2%) were the most common hematological AEs. The most common non-hematological AEs were fatigue (51.3%) and oral mucositis (35.9%). CONCLUSION: Apatinib combined with oxaliplatin and S-1 showed good short-term survival and acceptable safety in the conversion therapy of unresectable gastric cancer.

Nomogram to predict survival of patients with advanced and metastatic pancreatic Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Nomograms are rarely employed to estimate the survival of patients with advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer (PC). Herein, we developed a comprehensive approach to using a nomogram to predict survival probability in patients with advanced and metastatic PC. METHODS: A total of 323 patients with advanced and metastatic PC were identified from the Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital. A baseline nomogram was constructed using baseline variables of 323 patients. Additionally, 233 patients, whose tumors showed initial responses to first-line chemotherapy, were enrolled in the chemotherapy response-based model. 128 patients and 108 patients with advanced and metastatic PC from January 2019 to April 2021 were selected for external validating baseline model and chemotherapy response-based model. The 1-year and 2-year survival probability was evaluated using multivariate COX regression models. The discrimination and calibration capacity of the nomograms were assessed using C-statistic and calibration plots. The predictive accuracy and net benefit of the nomograms were evaluated using ROC curve and DCA, respectively. RESULTS: In the baseline model, six variables (gender, KPS, baseline TB, baseline N, baseline WBC and baseline CA19-9) were used in the final model. In the chemotherapy response-based model, nine variables (KPS, gender, ascites, baseline N, baseline CA 19-9, baseline CEA, change in CA 19-9 level at week, change in CEA level at week and initial response to chemotherapy) were included in the final model. The C-statistics of the baseline nomogram and the chemotherapy response-based nomogram were 0.67 (95% CI, 0.62-0.71) and 0.74 (95% CI, 0.69-0.77), respectively. CONCLUSION: These nomograms were constructed to predict the survival probability of patients of advanced and metastatic PC. The baseline model and chemotherapy response-based model performed well in survival prediction.