Patient preference, efficacy, and compliance with zoledronic acid for glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis in patients with autoimmune diseases.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the preference, patient satisfaction, and efficacy of zoledronic acid compared with oral bisphosphonates (BPs) for glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP) in patients with autoimmune diseases. METHODS: We enrolled 50 patients with new fractures or osteoporosis detected on follow-up bone densitometry after at least 1 year of oral BP use among patients diagnosed with GIOP during treatment for autoimmune diseases. After 1 year of zoledronic acid treatment, patients completed a survey for preference and satisfaction assessment. Treatment efficacy was analysed by comparing bone mineral density changes and fractures with those in a control group of patients who continued oral BP use. RESULTS: Age, sex, treatment duration, and medication history did not differ significantly between the two groups. Among the participants, 86.7% preferred and were more satisfied with intravenous zoledronic acid than with oral BPs, primarily because of the convenience of its administration interval. Only two patients (4%) reported infusion-related adverse events with zoledronic acid. Furthermore, no significant differences were observed in the annualized percentage change in the bone mineral density of the lumbar spine, femur neck, and hip between patients receiving zoledronic acid and those receiving oral BPs. The occurrence of new fractures was consistent across both groups, with two cases in each, showing no significant differences. CONCLUSION: Patients showed a preference for and greater satisfaction with zoledronic acid, and its efficacy in treating osteoporosis was comparable to that of oral BPs. Therefore, zoledronic acid is a suitable treatment option for GIOP in patients with autoimmune diseases.

The impact of acute-phase reaction on mortality and re-fracture after zoledronic acid in hospitalized elderly osteoporotic fracture patients.

This study involving 674 elderly osteoporotic fracture (OPF) patients undergoing orthopedic surgery investigated the long-term outcomes of acute phase reaction (APR) after initial zoledronic acid (ZOL). Those who had an APR had a 97% higher risk of mortality and a 73% lower rate of re-fracture than patients who did not. INTRODUCTION: Annual infusion of ZOL efficiently decreases the risk of fracture. A temporary APR, consisting of flu-like symptoms, myalgia, and fever, is frequently observed within 3 days after the first dose. This work aimed to identify whether the occurrence of APR after initial ZOL infusion is a reliable indicator of drug efficacy for mortality and re-fracture in elderly OPF patients undergoing orthopedic surgery. METHODS: This retrospectively observed work was constructed on a database prospectively collected from the Osteoporotic Fracture Registry System of a tertiary level A hospital in China. Six hundred seventy-four patients 50 years old or older with newly identified hip/morphological vertebral OPF who received ZOL for the first time after orthopedic surgery were included in the final analysis. APR was identified as a maximum axillary body temperature greater than 37.3 °C for the first 3 days after ZOL infusion. We utilized models of multivariate Cox proportional hazards to compare the risk of all-cause mortality in OPF patients with APR (APR+) and without APR (APR-). Competing risks regression analysis was used to examine the association between the occurrence of APR and re-fracture when mortality was taken into account. RESULTS: In a fully adjusted Cox proportional hazards model, APR+ patients had a significantly higher risk of death than APR- patients with a hazard ratio [HR] 1.97 (95% CI, 1.09-3.56; P-value = 0.02). Furthermore, in an adjusted competing risk regression analysis, APR+ patients had a significantly reduced risk of re-fracture compared with APR- patients with a sub-distribution HR, 0.27 (95% CI, 0.11-0.70; P-value = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggested a potential association between the occurrence of APR and increased mortality risk. An initial dose of ZOL following orthopedic surgery was found to be protective against re-fracture in older patients with OPFs.

Zoledronic acid-induced severe lymphopenia.

Although anemia, thrombocytopenia, and mild lymphopenia have been reported in the acute phase response after zoledronic acid, severe lymphopenia has not been reported. This article describes a case of severe lymphopenia following a 5 mg zoledronic acid infusion administered to treat osteoporosis. Zoledronic acid is used to treat osteoporosis, hypercalcemia, Paget's disease, and solid malignancies, including multiple myeloma, breast cancer, and prostate cancer. An acute phase response can be seen in 42% of patients after zoledronic acid treatment. Acute phase response may be accompanied by short-term spontaneously recovered anemia, thrombocytopenia, and severe lymphopenia.

Uveitis, a rare but important complication of adjuvant zoledronic acid for early-stage breast cancer.

Bisphosphonates such as zoledronic acid are an important part of adjuvant therapy to reduce the risk of recurrence in early-stage breast cancer. Uveitis remains one of the lesser-known side effects of zoledronic acid; prompt recognition is essential to ensure patients receive appropriate and timely care to help prevent permanent vision loss. We report a case of anterior uveitis in a postmenopausal woman who presented with visual symptoms after receiving the first dose of zoledronic acid. This case report serves to educate and increase awareness of the risk of uveitis in patients who are given zoledronic acid. This is the first and only reported case of zoledronic acid when used in the adjuvant setting for the treatment of breast cancer.

Safety and effectiveness of once-yearly zoledronic acid in Japanese osteoporosis patients: three-year post-marketing surveillance.

INTRODUCTION: Zoledronic acid (5 mg; ZOL), a once-yearly bisphosphonate, reduces osteoporotic fractures and increases bone mineral density (BMD). This 3-year post-marketing surveillance examined its real-world safety and effectiveness. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective, observational study included patients who started ZOL for osteoporosis. Data were assessed at baseline, 12, 24, and 36 months for safety and effectiveness. Treatment persistence, potentially related factors, and persistence before and after the COVID-19 pandemic started were also investigated. RESULTS: The safety analysis and effectiveness analysis sets included 1406 and 1387 patients, respectively, with mean age of 76.5 years. Adverse reactions (ARs) occurred in 19.35% of patients, with an acute-phase reaction in 10.31, 1.01, and 0.55% after the first, second, and third ZOL infusions. Renal function-related ARs, hypocalcaemia, jaw osteonecrosis, and atypical femoral fracture occurred in 1.71, 0.43, 0.43, and 0.07% of patients, respectively. Three-year cumulative fracture incidences were 4.44% for vertebral, 5.64% for non-vertebral, and 9.56% for clinical fractures. BMD increased by 6.79, 3.14, and 1.78% at the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip, respectively, after 3-year treatment. Bone turnover markers remained within reference ranges. Treatment persistence was 70.34% over 2 years and 51.71% over 3 years. Male, age ≥ 75 years, no previous medicines for osteoporosis, no concomitant medicines for osteoporosis, and inpatient at the first infusion were related to discontinuation. There was no significant difference in the persistence rate between before and after the COVID-19 pandemic (74.7% vs. 69.9%; p = 0.141). CONCLUSION: This 3-year post-marketing surveillance confirmed the real-world safety and effectiveness of ZOL.

Frequency of osteonecrosis in bisphosphonate users submitted to dental procedures: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency of osteonecrosis of the jaw in bisphosphonate users submitted to dental procedures. METHODS: This systematic review searched the sources: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, and Virtual Health Library, with no restriction on language or publication date. Reviewers, in pairs and independently, selected the studies, extracted their data, and assessed the risk of bias. Meta-analyses were pooled using the DerSimonian and Laird random effects model. RESULTS: A total of 27 studies (5391 participants) were included. The most reported bisphosphonates were zoledronate (n = 17 studies) and alendronate (n = 19) for treating cancers (n = 11) and osteoporosis (n = 16), respectively. Twelve studies were of low methodological quality. The frequency of osteonecrosis was 2.7% (95% CI: 0.9-5.2%) and proved higher for intravenous [6.9% (0.7-17.3%)] than oral [0.2% (0.9-5.2%)] bisphosphonate use. No association between longer treatment duration and greater frequency of osteonecrosis was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Higher frequency of osteonecrosis was observed in intravenous bisphosphonate users submitted to dental extraction. Further studies collecting more detailed information on the bisphosphonates used and of greater methodological rigor are warranted to confirm these findings and better inform prescribers, dental surgeons, and other professionals on risks of bisphosphonate use in this patient group.

Prediction of musculoskeletal pain after the first intravenous zoledronic acid injection in patients with primary osteoporosis: development and evaluation of a new nomogram.

OBJECTIVE: To construct a new prediction nomogram to predict the risk of musculoskeletal pain in patients with primary osteoporosis who receive zoledronic acid intravenously for the first time. METHOD: Clinical data of 368 patients with primary osteoporosis who received the first intravenous injection of zoledronic acid in our hospital from December 2019 to December 2022 were studied. Patients were divided into a musculoskeletal pain group (n = 258) and a non-musculoskeletal pain group (n = 110) based on the presence or absence of musculoskeletal pain 3 days after injection. Statistically significant predictors were screened by logistic regression analysis and the minimum absolute contraction and selection operator (LASSO) to construct a nomogram. The nomogram was evaluated by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the calibration curve, the C-index, and the decision curve analysis (DCA) and verified in a validation cohort. RESULTS: The independent predictors of the nomogram were age, serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D, NSAIDs, prior Vitamin D intake, and BMI. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.980 (95% CI, 0.915-0.987), showing excellent predictive performance. The nomogram c index was 0.980, and the nomogram c index for internal verification remained high at 0.979. Moreover, calibration curves show that the nomogram has good consistency. Finally, the DCA showed that the net benefit of the nomogram was 0.20-0.49. CONCLUSION: Musculoskeletal pain is a common symptom of APR in OP patients treated with intravenous zoledronic acid. Risk factors for musculoskeletal pain after zoledronic acid injection in OP patients were: non-use of NSAIDs, youth (<80 years old), serum 25 (OH) D<30ng /mL, no prior intake of vitamin D, BMI<24 kg /m2. A nomogram constructed from the above predictors can be used to predict musculoskeletal pain after the first zoledronic acid injection.

Use of Leukocyte-rich and Platelet-rich Fibrin (L-PRF) Adjunct to Surgical Debridement in the Treatment of Stage 2 and 3 Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw.

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is characterized by exposed necrotic bone persisting for more than 8 weeks in the maxillofacial region in patients using antiresorptive or antiangiogenetic drugs for several treatment options like bone metastasis or osteoporosis. There are several treatment options studied in scientific literature, and one of them with promising results is using platelet concentrates adjunct to surgical therapy. The aim of this study is to examine the therapeutic effect of leukocyte and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) on patients with MRONJ. This 2-centered study investigated patients referred to oral and maxillofacial surgery departments of 2 university clinics between the years 2014 and 2020 with the diagnosis of MRONJ. Demographic data, the indication of the drug usage, drug type, duration, administration route, and systemic comorbidities of the patients were recorded. L-PRF was applied to 20 osteonecrotic lesions of 19 patients following surgical debridement. The male/female ratio was 5/14. Except 1 of the patients, all of the indications of medication were neoplasia-related. The mean follow-up period of patients was 27.9±9.2 months. Most common antirezorptive drug was zoledronate (84.2%). Complete resolution was observed in 16 necrosis sites (80%). It could be concluded that the use of L-PRF may represent an important adjunct in the surgical management of MRONJ.

Correlations between Immune Response and Etiopathogenic Factors of Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw in Cancer Patients Treated with Zoledronic Acid.

Impairment of the immune response in MRONJ (medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws) is one of the still unclear etiopathogenic mechanisms of this condition encountered in cancer patients treated with bisphosphonates, with negative effects on the patient's quality of life. The aim of the present study was to correlate the immune response with etiopathogenic factors via immunohistochemical evaluation of the maxillary tissues in zoledronic acid osteonecrosis. The retrospective study included a group of 51 patients with various types of cancers, diagnosed with stage 2 or 3 MRONJ at zoledronic acid and treated surgically. Immunohistochemical expressions of αSMA, CD3, CD4, CD8, CD20, CD79α, CD68, CD204, and tryptase were evaluated. Immunohistochemical markers expressions were statistically analyzed according to the duration of the treatment, the trigger factor, the location of the MRONJ, and the healing status. Analysis of the immune response included T lymphocytes, B lymphocytes, plasma cells, macrophages, and mast cells. The duration of treatment significantly influenced the immunohistochemical expression of most markers (p < 0.05). For an increasing trend in treatment duration, a decreasing trend in marker score was observed, suggesting an inverse correlation. The expression of the markers was different depending on the trigger factor, on MRONJ localization (maxilla/mandible), and the healing status, being more intense in patients cured per primam compared to those who had relapses. The patient's immune response was negatively influenced by the duration of the treatment, the trigger factor, the location of the lesion in the mandible, and the recurrence of MRONJ.

Low-level laser therapy prevents medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw-like lesions via IL-1RA-mediated primary gingival wound healing.

BACKGROUND: Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a serious debilitating disease caused by anti-resorption and anti-angiogenesis drugs, significantly affecting patients' quality of life. Recent studies suggested that primary gingival wound healing may effectively prevent the development of MRONJ. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of low-level light therapy (LLLT) on promoting gingival wound healing in extraction sockets of MRONJ-like mice and preventing the occurrence of MRONJ. Furthermore, we explored underlying mechanisms. METHODS: Mice were randomly divided into the Ctrl, Zol, and Zol + LLLT groups. Administration of zoledronate and tooth extraction of bilateral maxillary second molars were used to build the MRONJ model, and LLLT was locally administered into the tooth sockets to examine the effect of LLLT. Next, to explore the function of IL-1RA, we performed LLLT with interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1RA) neutralizing antibody (named Zol + LLLT + IL-1RA NAb group) or negative control antibodies for tooth extraction in subsequent rescue animal experiments. Stereoscope observations, micro-computed tomography, and histological examination were conducted to evaluate gingival wound healing and bone regeneration in tooth sockets. The effects of LLLT on the migration capacities of zoledronate-treated epithelial cells were assessed in vitro. RESULTS: LLLT promoted primary gingival wound healing without exposed necrotic bone. Micro-computed tomography results showed higher bone volume and mineral density of the tooth sockets after LLLT. Histology analysis showed complete gingival coverage, obvious bone regeneration, and reduced soft tissue inflammation, with down-regulated pro-inflammation cytokines, like interleukin-1 beta (IL-1ß) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and up-regulated IL-1RA expression in the gingival tissue in the LLLT group. The rescue assay further showed that the effects of LLLT promoting gingival wound healing and preventing MRONJ might be partially abolished by IL-1RA neutralizing antibodies. In vitro studies demonstrated that LLLT accelerated zoledronate-treated epithelial cell migration. CONCLUSIONS: LLLT might promote primary gingival wound healing and contribute to subsequent bone regeneration of the tooth extractions in MRONJ-like lesions via IL-1RA-mediated pro-inflammation signaling suppression.

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw using periodontitis-induced rat before tooth extraction.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the occurrence of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) after tooth extraction due to periodontitis in ovariectomized rats. METHODS: Twenty-four osteoporosis-induced rats were administered with zoledronic acid (ZA; ZA group) or saline (CONT group). In both groups, tooth extraction was performed after inducing periodontitis, and all animals were sacrificed 8-week after tooth extraction. RESULTS: Micro-CT of the tibia showed that the bone volume fraction, bone surface density, trabecular number, and bone mineral density were significantly higher in the ZA group than in the CONT group. Histologically, the proliferative zone on the growth plate was thicker in the ZA group than in the CONT group. Micro-CT of the extraction sites revealed that the bone volume fraction was significantly higher in the ZA group than in the CONT group. Radiologically, the ZA group showed partial healing and delayed healing. Histological analysis revealed normal bone healing status with completely healed epithelium in the extraction sites of the CONT group, whereas abnormal empty osteocytes in the necrotic bone and inflammatory infiltration were observed in the ZA group. CONCLUSION: The incidence of MRONJ increased in the rats administered with ZA.

Anti-angiogenic drug aggravates the degree of anti-resorptive drug-based medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw by impairing the proliferation and migration function of gingival fibroblasts.

BACKGROUND: Long-term use of anti-resorptive or anti-angiogenic drugs in cancer patients with odontogenic infections may lead to medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ). This study investigated whether anti-angiogenic agents aggravate MRONJ occurrence in anti-resorptive-treated patients. METHODS: The clinical stage and jawbone exposure of MRONJ patients caused by different drug regimens were analyzed to ascertain the aggravation effect of anti-angiogenic drugs on anti-resorptive drug-based MRONJ. Next, a periodontitis mice model was established, and tooth extraction was performed after administering anti-resorptive and/or anti-angiogenic drugs; the imaging and histological change of the extraction socket were observed. Moreover, the cell function of gingival fibroblasts was analyzed after the treatment with anti-resorptive and/or anti-angiogenic drugs in order to evaluate their effect on the gingival tissue healing of the extraction socket. RESULTS: Patients treated with anti-angiogenic and anti-resorptive drugs had an advanced clinical stage and a bigger proportion of necrotic jawbone exposure compared to patients treated with anti-resorptive drugs alone. In vivo study further indicated a greater loss of mucosa tissue coverage above the tooth extraction in mice treated with sunitinib (Suti) + zoledronate (Zole) group (7/10) vs. Zole group (3/10) and Suti group (1/10). Micro-computed tomography (CT) and histological data showed that the new bone formation in the extraction socket was lower in Suti + Zole and Zole groups vs. Suti and control groups. In vitro data showed that the anti-angiogenic drugs had a stronger inhibitory ability on the proliferation and migration function of gingival fibroblasts than anti-resorptive drugs, and the inhibitory effect was obviously enhanced after combining zoledronate and sunitinib. CONCLUSION: Our findings provided support for a synergistic contribution of anti-angiogenic drugs to anti-resorptive drugs-based MRONJ. Importantly, the present study revealed that anti-angiogenic drugs alone do not induce severe MRONJ but aggravate the degree of MRONJ via the enhanced inhibitory function of gingival fibroblasts based on anti-resorptive drugs.

Chronic Periodontal Infection and Not Iatrogenic Interference Is the Trigger of Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw: Insights from a Large Animal Study (PerioBRONJ Pig Model).

Background and Objectives: Antiresorptive drugs are widely used in osteology and oncology. An important adverse effect of these drugs is medication-induced osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ). There is scientific uncertainty about the underlying pathomechanism of MRONJ. A promising theory suspects infectious stimuli and local acidification with adverse effects on osteoclastic activity as crucial steps of MRONJ etiology. Clinical evidence showing a direct association between MRONJ and oral infections, such as periodontitis, without preceding surgical interventions is limited. Large animal models investigating the relationship between periodontitis and MRONJ have not been implemented. It is unclear whether the presence of infectious processes without surgical manipulation can trigger MRONJ. The following research question was formulated: is there a link between chronic oral infectious processes (periodontitis) and the occurrence of MRONJ in the absence of oral surgical procedures? Materials and Methods: A minipig large animal model for bisphosphonate-related ONJ (BRONJ) using 16 Göttingen minipigs divided into 2 groups (intervention/control) was designed and implemented. The intervention group included animals receiving i.v. bisphosphonates (zoledronate, n = 8, 0.05 mg/kg/week: ZOL group). The control group received no antiresorptive drug (n = 8: NON-ZOL group). Periodontitis lesions were induced by established procedures after 3 months of pretreatment (for the maxilla: the creation of an artificial gingival crevice and placement of a periodontal silk suture; for the mandible: the placement of a periodontal silk suture only). The outcomes were evaluated clinically and radiologically for 3 months postoperatively. After euthanasia a detailed histological evaluation was performed. Results: Periodontitis lesions could be induced successfully in all animals (both ZOL and NON-ZOL animals). MRONJ lesions of various stages developed around all periodontitis induction sites in the ZOL animals. The presence of MRONJ and periodontitis was proven clinically, radiologically and histologically. Conclusions: The results of this study provide further evidence that the infectious processes without prior dentoalveolar surgical interventions can trigger MRONJ. Therefore, iatrogenic disruption of the oral mucosa cannot be the decisive step in the pathogenesis of MRONJ.

[Risk Factors of Antiresorptive Agent-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw in Prostate Cancer Patients with Bone Metastases].

Antiresorptive agent-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (ARONJ) is a severe adverse event associated with use of bone resorption inhibitors (BRIs), such as zoledronic acid and denosumab. Based on the results of phase 3 clinical trials for BRIs, the frequency of ARONJ is reported to be 1 to 2%, but the actual frequency could be higher. We investigated 173 patients with prostate cancer with bone metastases who were treated either with zoledronic acid or denosumab at our hospital between July 2006 and June 2020. ARONJ occurred in 13 patients (8%); i.e., ten out of 159 patients (6%) who were treated with zoledronic acid, and three out of 14 patients (21%) who were treated with denosumab. Multivariate analysis showed that longer duration of BRI exposure and dental treatment before the initiation of BRI are associated with risk of ARONJ. ARONJ is associated with decreased mortality but the association is not significant. Generally, the occurrence of ARONJ may be underestimated; therefore, further studies are warranted to determine the actual frequency of ARONJ.

Antiresorptive treatments for corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis (CIO) is the most common type of secondary osteoporosis, leading to fractures, and increased morbidity and mortality. SOURCE OF DATA: Pubmed, EMBASE, Scopus and Google Scholar databases. AREAS OF AGREEMENT: Prolonged glucocorticoids administration leads to secondary osteoporosis. AREAS OF CONTROVERSY: The optimal management for CIO is controversial. GROWING POINTS: The present study compared bone mineral density, fractures and adverse events in patients undergoing treatment with risedronate, alendronate, zoledronate, denosumab or etidronate for CIO. AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH: For selected patients with CIO, alendronate performed better overall. These results must be interpreted within the limitations of the present study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I, Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Zoledronic Acid-Associated Fanconi Syndrome in Patients With Cancer.

Zoledronic acid (ZA) is an antiresorptive agent typically used for fracture prevention in postmenopausal osteoporosis, malignancy-associated metastatic bone lesions, and as a treatment for hypercalcemia. ZA is excreted almost entirely by the kidney; as a result, a reduction in renal clearance can lead to its accumulation and potential renal toxicity. Although uncommon, acute kidney injury (AKI) from intravenous bisphosphonates has been described, with different patterns including tubulointerstitial nephritis, acute tubular necrosis, as well as focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Here we present 4 patients with an underlying malignancy who each developed evidence of generalized proximal tubular dysfunction, also known as Fanconi syndrome, approximately 1 week after receiving treatment with ZA. On presentation, all patients had AKI, low serum bicarbonate levels, abnormal urinary acidification, hypophosphatemia, hypokalemia, and increased urine amino acid excretion or renal glycosuria. Based on the temporal association between ZA infusion and the development of these electrolyte abnormalities, each case is highly suggestive of ZA-associated Fanconi syndrome. Due to the severity of presentation, all required discontinuation of ZA and ongoing electrolyte repletion. Nephrologists and oncologists should be aware of this complication and consider ZA as a possible trigger of new-onset Fanconi syndrome.

Renal safety of zoledronic acid for osteoporosis in adults 75 years and older.

Our study examined renal function change in older adults with osteoporosis, treated with zoledronic acid. Risk of nephrotoxicity was low. Future studies are needed to evaluate use of zoledronic acid in patients with a CCr < 35 mL/min, as patients may be inappropriately excluded from its use. INTRODUCTION: Zoledronic acid (ZA) is used for the treatment of osteoporosis (OP). Renal impairment is a known risk factor for the rare occurrence of nephrotoxicity after ZA infusions, leading to use being contraindicated below creatinine clearance (CCr) of 35 mL/min. Our aims are to examine changes in serum creatinine (SCr) after infusions, capture frequency of acute kidney injury (AKI), and describe baseline kidney function estimates in adults 75 years and older being treated for OP. METHODS: This was a retrospective, cross-sectional, pre-post analysis that examined change in SCr before and after ZA infusions. The primary outcome was assessed using a paired Student t-test. Incidence of AKI within 1 year following infusions was noted and patient-specific factors were collected. RESULTS: Five hundred fifty-eight ZA infusions in 327 patients met criteria. Mean SCr decreased by 0.01 mg/dL in the year following ZA infusions (p = 0.005). AKI occurred in 1.4% of patients and all had CCr > 45 mL/min. 4.5% of patients had CCr < 35 mL/min and none experienced an AKI. CONCLUSION: There was no clinically relevant change in SCr after ZA infusions. Risk of nephrotoxicity was low and similar to risk seen in randomized trials occurring in younger patients. Kidney function estimates were dramatically lower using the Cockcroft-Gault (CG) equation in comparison to CKD-EPI. We believe use of the CG equation in this population may be inappropriately limiting our ability to use ZA for treatment of OP in older adults but more evidence is necessary.

Zoledronic acid-induced oxidative damage and endoplasmic reticulum stress-mediated apoptosis in human embryonic kidney (HEK-293) cells.

Zoledronic acid, a nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate drug, is used for the treatment of osteoporosis, Paget's disease of bone, and tumor-induced osteolysis. Zoledronic acid has also gained a place in cancer treatment due to its cytotoxic and antiproliferative effects in many cancer cells. Although zoledronic acid is considered safe, kidney damage is still one of the concerns in therapeutic doses. In the study, the aim was to assess the nephrotoxic profiles of zoledronic acid in the human embryonic kidney (HEK-293) cells. Cytotoxicity evaluation was performed by 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyl-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) and neutral red uptake tests, while oxidative stress was performed by reactive oxygen species (ROS) production via flow cytometry, and the incomprehensible evaluation of ROS-related genes by RT-PCR and apoptosis was performed with Annexin-PI analysis in flow cytometry. The obtained result showed that zoledronic acid inhibited cell viability (IC50 values were determined as 273.16  by MTT) and cell proliferation in a concentration-dependent manner, induced ROS production, caused glutathione depletion, and increased oxidative stress index and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, indicating severe cellular stress. The expression levels of oxidative damage (L-fabp, α-GST, Nrf2, and HMOX1), ER stress (CASP4, IRE1-α, GADD153, and GRP78), and apoptosis (Bcl-2, Bax, Cyt-c, p53, CASP9, CASP3, NF-κB, TNF-α, and JNK) related genes were altered as well as IRE1-α protein levels. Herein, we were the first to show that increased oxidative stress and ER stress resulting in apoptosis are the key molecular pathways in zoledronic acid-induced nephrotoxicity equivalent to clinically administered concentrations.

Risk evaluation of denosumab and zoledronic acid for medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw in patients with bone metastases: a propensity score-matched analysis.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the risk of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) in patients with cancer who received denosumab or zoledronic acid (ZA) for treating bone metastasis. METHODS: The medical records of patients were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who did not undergo a dental examination at baseline were excluded. The primary endpoint was a comparison of the risk of developing MRONJ between the denosumab and ZA groups. Propensity score matching was used to control for baseline differences between patient characteristics and compare outcomes for both groups. RESULTS: Among the 799 patients enrolled, 58 (7.3%) developed MRONJ. The incidence of MRONJ was significantly higher in the denosumab group than in the ZA group (9.6% [39/406] vs. 4.8% [19/393], p = 0.009). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis revealed that denosumab treatment (hazard ratio [HR], 2.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.65-5.25; p < 0.001) and tooth extraction after starting ZA or denosumab (HR, 4.26; 95% CI, 2.38-7.44; p < 0.001) were significant risk factors for MRONJ. Propensity score-matched analysis confirmed that the risk of developing MRONJ was significantly higher in the denosumab group than in the ZA group (HR, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.17-5.01; p = 0.016). CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that denosumab poses a significant risk for developing MRONJ in patients treated for bone metastasis, and thus these patients require close monitoring.

Prognosis by cancer type and incidence of zoledronic acid-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: a single-center retrospective study.

PURPOSE: Survival time after bisphosphonate use has been increasingly recognized to be associated with the incidence of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ); however, this has not been elucidated sufficiently in the literature. This study aimed to clarify the incidence of MRONJ and the corresponding survival rate of patients treated with zoledronic acid (ZA) for each type of cancer and obtain useful information for the oral/dental supportive care of cancer patients. METHODS: We evaluated 988 patients who were administered ZA at our hospital; among them, 862 patients with metastatic bone tumors or myeloma were included. RESULTS: The median survival time (MST) after ZA initiation was 35, 34, 8, 41, 12, and 6 months for patients with breast, prostrate, lung, myeloma, renal, and other cancers, respectively. Patients with cancers that had a short survival time (lung and other cancers [MST = 8 and 6 months, respectively] and cancers with MST < 10 months) did not develop MRONJ; this could be attributed to the shorter duration of ZA administration. The cumulative incidence of MRONJ in breast cancer, prostate cancer, and multiple myeloma was related to the frequency of anti-resorptive drug use and the increased risk over time. In renal cancer, the cumulative incidence of MRONJ increased early, although the MST was 12 months. CONCLUSION: For the dentists in charge of dental management, it is essential to be aware of prognosis-related factors, predict MRONJ risk for each cancer treatment, and use risk prediction in dental management planning, particularly for cancers with non-poor prognosis.