Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int Arch Allergy Immunol ; 181(2): 94-102, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31865326

RESUMO

Only few data on safety during high-dose, accelerated escalation schedules during subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy (AIT) are available. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and tolerability of an accelerated dose escalation schedule of AIT in adult patients with moderate to severe seasonal rhinoconjunctivitis in a multicenter, open-label, randomized phase II trial. The dose escalation scheme for patients in Group I (1 strength) included 3 injections with 1 strength, B (10,000 TU/mL), whereas the dose escalation scheme for Group II (standard) included 7 injections with 2 strengths, A (1,000 TU/mL) and B (10,000 TU/mL), of an aluminum hydroxide-adsorbed allergoid grass pollen preparation. Overall, 72 of 87 randomized patients (83.7%) reported at least 1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE; 82.2 [Group I] vs. 85.4% [Group II]); 58.8% of all reported TEAEs were assessed as being related to AIT (60.0 vs. 48.8%). The most frequently reported AIT-related TEAEs were swelling (46.7 vs. 34.1%), erythema (28.9 vs. 36.6%), and pruritus (31.1 vs. 17.1%) at the site of the injection. Systemic allergic reactions occurred in 5 (5.8%) patients overall, with more being reported in the 1-strength group (4 [8.9%] vs. 1 [2.4%]). All systemic allergic reactions were classified as World Allergy Organization (WAO) Grade 1 or Grade 2 reactions. Accelerated high-dose escalation with an aluminum hydroxide-adsorbed grass pollen allergoid can be initiated with a safety and tolerability profile comparable to the standard dose escalation schedule in patients with allergic rhinitis with or without asthma.


Assuntos
Alergoides/química , Alergoides/imunologia , Hidróxido de Alumínio/química , Poaceae/imunologia , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/imunologia , Rinite Alérgica/imunologia , Adulto , Alérgenos/imunologia , Alergoides/administração & dosagem , Hidróxido de Alumínio/administração & dosagem , Hidróxido de Alumínio/imunologia , Antígenos de Plantas/imunologia , Asma/imunologia , Conjuntivite Alérgica/imunologia , Dessensibilização Imunológica/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pólen/imunologia
2.
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) ; 48(6): 612-618, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32446784

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The chemical modification of allergens with glutaraldehyde improves safety while maintaining clinical efficacy, which permits the administration of higher doses of immunotherapy, reducing the risk of adverse reactions. The aim of this study is to evaluate the immunogenic capacity of a new cat dander polymer by immunizing mice and quantifying immunoglobulins in serum, in comparison with the non-modified allergen. METHODS: The study consists of the immunization of three mice groups with the polymerized and the native extract, together with a negative control group. The immunoglobulin levels in serum have been measured by indirect ELISA. By means of the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test, it was determined if there were significant differences in the values of specific antibodies between groups. RESULTS: The group immunized with the allergoid showed significantly higher specific IgG and IgG1 values to dander allergens and specific IgG to the major allergen Fel d 1, while there were no significant changes in IgG2a and IgE values. These results could be due to a higher immunization dose. The vaccine formulation was based on the optimal defined dose for clinical efficacy of allergen immunotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: This preclinical study carried out with the present assay has established that the allergoid of cat dander extract, as designed for its optimal use in allergen immunotherapy, produces a higher specific IgG than the native extract, in addition to showing significantly higher specific IgG1 levels, evidencing a greater effectiveness in immunization.


Assuntos
Alergoides/imunologia , Alérgenos Animais/imunologia , Dessensibilização Imunológica/métodos , Glicoproteínas/imunologia , Hipersensibilidade/terapia , Alergoides/administração & dosagem , Alergoides/química , Animais , Gatos , Alérgenos Animais/efeitos adversos , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Feminino , Humanos , Hipersensibilidade/sangue , Hipersensibilidade/imunologia , Imunogenicidade da Vacina , Imunoglobulina E/sangue , Imunoglobulina E/imunologia , Imunoglobulina G/sangue , Imunoglobulina G/imunologia , Injeções Subcutâneas , Camundongos , Testes Cutâneos
3.
Immunotherapy ; 12(3): 195-202, 2020 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31969034

RESUMO

Aim: Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) is significantly less concerned by systemic reactions than subcutaneous immunotherapy. Allergoids were introduced to reduce systemic reaction to subcutaneous immunotherapy, but may also be used for SLIT. Methods: This pharmacovigilance study evaluated the post-marketing reports collected in a safety database, including the number and the type (serious or not serious) of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in Italy by SLIT with the carbamylated monomeric allergoid (CMA). Results: More than 15,000,000 CMA tablets were administered, with 25 spontaneous reports of ADRs, only two being serious. Conclusion: The rate of ADRs to CMA we found in this pharmacovigilance survey, corresponding to 0.0004% of all administered doses, is far lower than the rates commonly reported for allergen SLIT products.


Assuntos
Alergoides/efeitos adversos , Imunoterapia Sublingual/efeitos adversos , Alérgenos/química , Alergoides/administração & dosagem , Alergoides/química , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/epidemiologia , Humanos , Itália/epidemiologia , Farmacovigilância , Carbamilação de Proteínas , Segurança , Imunoterapia Sublingual/estatística & dados numéricos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA