Lack of efficacy of aprotinin over tranexamic acid in type A aortic dissection repair.

BACKGROUND: The role of aprotinin in modern cardiac surgery is not well defined. While licensed for use in isolated coronary artery bypass grafting it is more commonly used for cases deemed to be at an increased risk of bleeding. The relative efficacy, and safety profile, of aprotinin as compared to other antifibrinolytics in these high-risk cases is uncertain. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A retrospective observational study with propensity matching to determine whether aprotinin versus tranexamic acid reduced bleeding or transfusion requirements in patients presenting for surgical repair of type A aortic dissection (TAD). RESULTS: Between 2016 and 2022, 250 patients presented for repair of TAD. A total of 231 patients were included in the final analysis. Bleeding and transfusion were similar between both groups in both propensity matched and unmatched cohorts. Compared to tranexamic acid, aprotinin use did not reduce transfusion requirements for any product. Rates of bleeding in the first 12 h, return to theater and return to intensive care unit with an open packed chest were similar between groups. There was no difference in rates of renal failure, stroke, or death. CONCLUSION: Aprotinin did not reduce the risk of bleeding or transfusion requirements in patients undergoing repair of type A aortic dissections. Efficacy of aprotinin may vary depending on the type of surgery performed and the underlying pathology.

Pharmacological interventions for the prevention of bleeding in people undergoing elective hip or knee surgery: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Hip and knee replacement surgery is a well-established means of improving quality of life, but is associated with a significant risk of bleeding. One-third of people are estimated to be anaemic before hip or knee replacement surgery; coupled with the blood lost during surgery, up to 90% of individuals are anaemic postoperatively. As a result, people undergoing orthopaedic surgery receive 3.9% of all packed red blood cell transfusions in the UK. Bleeding and the need for allogeneic blood transfusions has been shown to increase the risk of surgical site infection and mortality, and is associated with an increased duration of hospital stay and costs associated with surgery. Reducing blood loss during surgery may reduce the risk of allogeneic blood transfusion, reduce costs and improve outcomes following surgery. Several pharmacological interventions are available and currently employed as part of routine clinical care. OBJECTIVES: To determine the relative efficacy of pharmacological interventions for preventing blood loss in elective primary or revision hip or knee replacement, and to identify optimal administration of interventions regarding timing, dose and route, using network meta-analysis (NMA) methodology. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the following databases for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews, from inception to 18 October 2022: CENTRAL (the Cochrane Library), MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Transfusion Evidence Library (Evidentia), ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). SELECTION CRITERIA: We included RCTs of people undergoing elective hip or knee surgery only. We excluded non-elective or emergency procedures, and studies published since 2010 that had not been prospectively registered (Cochrane Injuries policy). There were no restrictions on gender, ethnicity or age (adults only). We excluded studies that used standard of care as the comparator. Eligible interventions included: antifibrinolytics (tranexamic acid (TXA), aprotinin, epsilon-aminocaproic acid (EACA)), desmopressin, factor VIIa and XIII, fibrinogen, fibrin sealants and non-fibrin sealants. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We performed the review according to standard Cochrane methodology. Two authors independently assessed trial eligibility and risk of bias, and extracted data. We assessed the certainty of the evidence using CINeMA. We presented direct (pairwise) results using RevMan Web and performed the NMA using BUGSnet. We were interested in the following primary outcomes: need for allogenic blood transfusion (up to 30 days) and all-cause mortality (deaths occurring up to 30 days after the operation), and the following secondary outcomes: mean number of transfusion episodes per person (up to 30 days), re-operation due to bleeding (within seven days), length of hospital stay and adverse events related to the intervention received. MAIN RESULTS: We included a total of 102 studies. Twelve studies did not report the number of included participants; the other 90 studies included 8418 participants. Trials included more women (64%) than men (36%). In the NMA for allogeneic blood transfusion, we included 47 studies (4398 participants). Most studies examined TXA (58 arms, 56%). We found that TXA, given intra-articularly and orally at a total dose of greater than 3 g pre-incision, intraoperatively and postoperatively, ranked the highest, with an anticipated absolute effect of 147 fewer blood transfusions per 1000 people (150 fewer to 104 fewer) (53% chance of ranking 1st) within the NMA (risk ratio (RR) 0.02, 95% credible interval (CrI) 0 to 0.31; moderate-certainty evidence). This was followed by TXA given orally at a total dose of 3 g pre-incision and postoperatively (RR 0.06, 95% CrI 0.00 to 1.34; low-certainty evidence) and TXA given intravenously and orally at a total dose of greater than 3 g intraoperatively and postoperatively (RR 0.10, 95% CrI 0.02 to 0.55; low-certainty evidence). Aprotinin (RR 0.59, 95% CrI 0.36 to 0.96; low-certainty evidence), topical fibrin (RR 0.86, CrI 0.25 to 2.93; very low-certainty evidence) and EACA (RR 0.60, 95% CrI 0.29 to 1.27; very low-certainty evidence) were not shown to be as effective compared with TXA at reducing the risk of blood transfusion. We were unable to perform an NMA for our primary outcome all-cause mortality within 30 days of surgery due to the large number of studies with zero events, or because the outcome was not reported. In the NMA for deep vein thrombosis (DVT), we included 19 studies (2395 participants). Most studies examined TXA (27 arms, 64%). No studies assessed desmopressin, EACA or topical fibrin. We found that TXA given intravenously and orally at a total dose of greater than 3 g intraoperatively and postoperatively ranked the highest, with an anticipated absolute effect of 67 fewer DVTs per 1000 people (67 fewer to 34 more) (26% chance of ranking first) within the NMA (RR 0.16, 95% CrI 0.02 to 1.43; low-certainty evidence). This was followed by TXA given intravenously and intra-articularly at a total dose of 2 g pre-incision and intraoperatively (RR 0.21, 95% CrI 0.00 to 9.12; low-certainty evidence) and TXA given intravenously and intra-articularly, total dose greater than 3 g pre-incision, intraoperatively and postoperatively (RR 0.13, 95% CrI 0.01 to 3.11; low-certainty evidence). Aprotinin was not shown to be as effective compared with TXA (RR 0.67, 95% CrI 0.28 to 1.62; very low-certainty evidence). We were unable to perform an NMA for our secondary outcomes pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction and CVA (stroke) within 30 days, mean number of transfusion episodes per person (up to 30 days), re-operation due to bleeding (within seven days), or length of hospital stay, due to the large number of studies with zero events, or because the outcome was not reported by enough studies to build a network. There are 30 ongoing trials planning to recruit 3776 participants, the majority examining TXA (26 trials). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We found that of all the interventions studied, TXA is probably the most effective intervention for preventing bleeding in people undergoing hip or knee replacement surgery. Aprotinin and EACA may not be as effective as TXA at preventing the need for allogeneic blood transfusion. We were not able to draw strong conclusions on the optimal dose, route and timing of administration of TXA. We found that TXA given at higher doses tended to rank higher in the treatment hierarchy, and we also found that it may be more beneficial to use a mixed route of administration (oral and intra-articular, oral and intravenous, or intravenous and intra-articular). Oral administration may be as effective as intravenous administration of TXA. We found little to no evidence of harm associated with higher doses of tranexamic acid in the risk of DVT. However, we are not able to definitively draw these conclusions based on the trials included within this review.

Aprotinin (II): Inhalational Administration for the Treatment of COVID-19 and Other Viral Conditions.

Aprotinin is a broad-spectrum inhibitor of human proteases that has been approved for the treatment of bleeding in single coronary artery bypass surgery because of its potent antifibrinolytic actions. Following the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, there was an urgent need to find new antiviral drugs. Aprotinin is a good candidate for therapeutic repositioning as a broad-spectrum antiviral drug and for treating the symptomatic processes that characterise viral respiratory diseases, including COVID-19. This is due to its strong pharmacological ability to inhibit a plethora of host proteases used by respiratory viruses in their infective mechanisms. The proteases allow the cleavage and conformational change of proteins that make up their viral capsid, and thus enable them to anchor themselves by recognition of their target in the epithelial cell. In addition, the activation of these proteases initiates the inflammatory process that triggers the infection. The attraction of the drug is not only its pharmacodynamic characteristics but also the possibility of administration by the inhalation route, avoiding unwanted systemic effects. This, together with the low cost of treatment (≈2 Euro/dose), makes it a good candidate to reach countries with lower economic means. In this article, we will discuss the pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic, and toxicological characteristics of aprotinin administered by the inhalation route; analyse the main advances in our knowledge of this medication; and the future directions that should be taken in research in order to reposition this medication in therapeutics.

Aprotinin (I): Understanding the Role of Host Proteases in COVID-19 and the Importance of Pharmacologically Regulating Their Function.

Proteases are produced and released in the mucosal cells of the respiratory tract and have important physiological functions, for example, maintaining airway humidification to allow proper gas exchange. The infectious mechanism of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), takes advantage of host proteases in two ways: to change the spatial conformation of the spike (S) protein via endoproteolysis (e.g., transmembrane serine protease type 2 (TMPRSS2)) and as a target to anchor to epithelial cells (e.g., angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2)). This infectious process leads to an imbalance in the mucosa between the release and action of proteases versus regulation by anti-proteases, which contributes to the exacerbation of the inflammatory and prothrombotic response in COVID-19. In this article, we describe the most important proteases that are affected in COVID-19, and how their overactivation affects the three main physiological systems in which they participate: the complement system and the kinin-kallikrein system (KKS), which both form part of the contact system of innate immunity, and the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS). We aim to elucidate the pathophysiological bases of COVID-19 in the context of the imbalance between the action of proteases and anti-proteases to understand the mechanism of aprotinin action (a panprotease inhibitor). In a second-part review, titled "Aprotinin (II): Inhalational Administration for the Treatment of COVID-19 and Other Viral Conditions", we explain in depth the pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, toxicity, and use of aprotinin as an antiviral drug.

Aprotinin-Drug against Respiratory Diseases.

Aprotinin (APR) was discovered in 1930. APR is an effective pan-protease inhibitor, a typical "magic shotgun". Until 2007, APR was widely used as an antithrombotic and anti-inflammatory drug in cardiac and noncardiac surgeries for reduction of bleeding and thus limiting the need for blood transfusion. The ability of APR to inhibit proteolytic activation of some viruses leads to its use as an antiviral drug for the prevention and treatment of acute respiratory virus infections. However, due to incompetent interpretation of several clinical trials followed by incredible controversy in the literature, the usage of APR was nearly stopped for a decade worldwide. In 2015-2020, after re-analysis of these clinical trials' data the restrictions in APR usage were lifted worldwide. This review discusses antiviral mechanisms of APR action and summarizes current knowledge and prospective regarding the use of APR treatment for diseases caused by RNA-containing viruses, including influenza and SARS-CoV-2 viruses, or as a part of combination antiviral treatment.

Aprotinin treatment against SARS-CoV-2: A randomized phase III study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a pan-protease inhibitor for moderate COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 virus requires host proteases to cleave its spike protein to bind to its ACE2 target through a two-step furin-mediated entry mechanism. Aprotinin is a broad-spectrum protease inhibitor that has been employed as antiviral drug for other human respiratory viruses. Also, it has important anti-inflammatory properties for inhibiting the innate immunity contact system. METHODS: This was a multicentre, double-blind, randomized trial performed in four Spanish hospitals comparing standard treatment versus standard treatment + aprotinin for patients with COVID-19 between 20 May 2020 and 20 October 2021. The primary efficacy outcomes were length of hospital stay and ICU admission. The secondary endpoints were each of the primary efficacy outcomes and a composite of oxygen therapy, analytical parameters and death. Safety outcomes included adverse reactions to treatment during a 30-day follow-up period. Treatment was given for 11 days or till discharge. RESULTS: With almost identical analytical profiles, significant differences were observed in treatment time, which was 2 days lower in the aprotinin group (p = .002), and length of hospital admission, which was 5 days shorter in the aprotinin group (p = .003). The incidence of discharge was 2.19 times higher (HR: 2.188 [1.182-4.047]) in the aprotinin group than in the placebo group (p = .013). In addition, the aprotinin-treated group required less oxygen therapy and had no adverse reactions or side effects. CONCLUSION: Inhaled aprotinin may improve standard treatment and clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients with COVID-19, resulting in a shorter treatment time and hospitalization compared with the placebo group. The administration of aprotinin was safe.

Prophylactic Use of Antifibrinolytics During Pediatric Cardiac Surgery With Cardiopulmonary Bypass on Postoperative Bleeding and Transfusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of intraoperative antifibrinolytics, including tranexamic acid (TXA), aminocaproic acid (EACA), or aprotinin, on bleeding in children undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). DATA SOURCES: Relevant articles were systematically searched from Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science to November 15, 2021. STUDY SELECTION: Abstracts were screened, and full texts were reviewed using predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses reporting guideline. DATA EXTRACTION: A standardized data extraction tool was used. DATA SYNTHESIS: Sixty-eight studies including 28,735 patients were analyzed. TXA compared with placebo resulted in a mean decrease in chest tube output of 9.1 mL/kg (95% CI, 6.0-12.3 mL/kg), I2 equals to 65.2%, p value of less than 0.001, platelet requirement of 2.9 mL/kg (95% CI, 0.1-5.8 mL/kg), I2 =72.5%, p value less than 0.001 and plasma requirement of 4.0 mL/kg (95% CI, 0.6-7.2 mL/kg), I2 equals to 94.5%, p value less than0.001. Aprotinin compared with placebo resulted in a mean decrease in chest tube output of 4.3 mL/kg (2.4-6.2 mL/kg), I2 equals to 66.3%, p value of less than 0.001, platelet transfusion of 4.6 mL/kg (95% CI, 0.6-8.6 mL/kg), I2 equals to 93.6%, p value of less than 0.001, and plasma transfusion of 7.7 mL/kg (95% CI, 2.1-13.2 mL/kg), I2 equals to 95.3%, p value of less than 0.001. EACA compared with placebo resulted in a mean decrease in chest tube output of 9.2 mL/kg (2.3-21.0 mL/kg), I2 equals to 96.4%, p value of less than 0.001, RBC transfusion of 7.2 mL/kg (95% CI, 2.4-12.1 mL/kg), I2 equals to 94.5%, p value equals to 0.002, and platelet transfusion of 10.7 mL/kg (95% CI, 2.9-18.5 mL/kg), I2 equals to 0%, p value of less than 0.001. No statistical difference was observed in chest tube output when TXA was compared with aprotinin. Subgroup analysis of cyanotic patients showed a significant decrease in chest tube output, platelet requirement, and plasma requirement for patients receiving aprotinin. Overall, the quality of evidence was moderate. CONCLUSIONS: Antifibrinolytics are effective at decreasing blood loss and blood product requirement in children undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB although the quality of evidence is only moderate.

The Efficacy of Aprotinin Combinations with Selected Antiviral Drugs in Mouse Models of Influenza Pneumonia and Coronavirus Infection Caused by SARS-CoV-2.

The efficacy of aprotinin combinations with selected antiviral-drugs treatment of influenza virus and coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) infection was studied in mice models of influenza pneumonia and COVID-19. The high efficacy of the combinations in reducing virus titer in lungs and body weight loss and in increasing the survival rate were demonstrated. This preclinical study can be considered a confirmatory step before introducing the combinations into clinical assessment.

Synergistic Effect of ß-alanine and Aprotinin on Mesenteric Ischemia.

BACKGROUND: Acute mesenteric ischemia arises through sudden interruption of mesenteric blood flow, mostly due to an occlusion of the superior mesenteric artery and is associated with a high mortality of approximately 50% to 90%. In previous studies, the single application of ß-alanine or aprotinin caused an ameliorated intestinal damage but without any systemic effects. METHODS: To analyze the combined effect of ß-alanine and aprotinin on acute ischemia and reperfusion of the small intestine, a model with anesthetized rats was used. Ischemia and reperfusion were initiated by occluding and reopening the superior mesenteric artery. After 120 min of ischemia and 180 min of reperfusion, the intestine was analyzed for tissue damage, the activity of the saccharase, and accumulation of granulocytes. In addition, systemic and metabolic as well as inflammatory parameters were measured in blood at certain points in time. RESULTS: The combination of ß-alanine and aprotinin resulted in a clearly stabilized mean arterial blood pressure and blood glucose level during the reperfusion period. Furthermore, the combined administration resulted in significantly reduced tissue damage parameters, cytokine and cell-free hemoglobin concentrations in blood plasma. In addition, the damage to the small intestine was significantly attenuated, so that the animals ultimately survived the entire test period because of the administration of both substances. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the simultaneous application of both substances leads to a synergistic protection without the occurrence of undesirable side effects. The combined usage of ß-alanine and aprotinin can be seen as a promising approach to inhibit the onset of acute mesenteric ischemia.

Comparison of botulinum toxin type A and aprotinin monotherapy with combination therapy in healing of burn wounds in an animal model.

Burns are one of the most common injuries that are complicated by many challenges including infection, severe inflammatory response, excessive expression of proteases, and scar formation. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of botulinum toxin type A (BO) and aprotinin (AP) separately or in combination (BO-AP) in healing process. Four burn wounds were created in each rat and randomly filled with silver sulfadiazine (SSD), BO, AP and BO-AP. The rats were euthanized after 7, 14, and 28 days, and their harvested wound samples were evaluated by gross pathology, histopathology, gene expression, biochemical testing, and scanning electron microscopy. Both BO and AP significantly reduced expression of interleukin-1ß (IL-1ß) and transforming growth factor-ß1 (TGF-ß1) at the 7th post wounding day. Moreover, they inhibited scar formation by reducing the TGF-ß1 level and increasing basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) at the 28th day. AP by decreasing protease production showed more effective role than BO in wound regeneration. AP increased tissue organization and maturation and improved cosmetic appearance of wounds, at 28 days. The best results gained when combination of BO and AP were used in healing of burn wounds. Treatment by BO-AP significantly subsided inflammation compared to the BO, AP, and SSD treated wounds. Treatment with BO-AP also reduced collagen density and led to minimal scar formation. Combination of botulinum toxin type A and aprotinin considerably increased structural and functional properties of the healing wounds by reducing scar formation and decreasing production of proteases.

Use of antifibrinolytics in pediatric cardiac surgery: Where are we now?

Fibrinolytic activation is a major and preventable source of bleeding in neonates and children undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Based on the existing literature (adult and pediatric; cardiac and noncardiac), prophylactic administration of antifibrinolytic agents can help reduce fibrinolytic activation, and consequently reduces perioperative bleeding and the requirement for blood product transfusion. Due to the increased risk of renal failure and mortality reported in adults undergoing cardiac surgery, aprotinin should not be considered as a safe option in neonates and children. Further well-designed studies would be required before the prophylactic administration of aprotinin could be considered in pediatric cardiac surgery. The lysine analogs, tranexamic acid and ϵ-aminocaproic acid,, should be considered as safe and effective antifibrinolytic agents. Although no major side effects have been reported following the administration of lysine analogs in children undergoing cardiac surgery, high-dose tranexamic acid should not be recommended in order to avoid the increased risk of clinical seizures. Despite the recent advances made in our understanding of the pharmacokinetics of tranexamic acid and ϵ-aminocaproic acid,, the optimal plasmatic concentration to be targeted remains unknown. Further studies are therefore urgently needed to better define the optimal dose regimen to be used in neonates and children. In the meantime, the dose regimen published in the most recent pharmacokinetic studies can be used. Although no studies have assessed the effect of massive bleeding and transfusion on the plasmatic concentrations of the lysine analogs, additional boluses might be considered in the presence of bleeding and/or when signs of fibrinolytic activations are observed on viscoelastic hemostatic assays.

Effectiveness and Safety of Aprotinin Use in Thoracic Aortic Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness and safety of aprotinin use in adult patients undergoing thoracic aortic surgery. DESIGN: Single-center, retrospective study. SETTING: All cases performed at a single university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Between January 2004 and December 2014, 846 adult patients underwent thoracic aortic surgery. Due to missing or duplicated data on primary outcomes, 314 patients were excluded. The final sample of 532 patients underwent surgery on the thoracic aorta. INTERVENTIONS: The patients were divided in the following 2 groups: 107 patients (20.1%) received aprotinin during the surgery, which represented the study group, whereas the remaining 425 patients (79.9%) underwent surgery without the use of aprotinin. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: To adjust for patient selection and preoperative characteristics, a propensity score-matched analysis was conducted. Mean total blood loss at 12 hours after surgery was similar between the 2 groups. The blood product transfusion rates did not differ in the 2 groups, except for the rate of fresh frozen plasma transfusion being significantly higher in the aprotinin group. Re-exploration for bleeding and the incidence of a major postoperative bleeding event were similar between the groups. Rates of in-hospital mortality, renal failure, and cerebrovascular accidents did not show any statistically significant difference. Aprotinin did not represent a risk factor for mortality over the long term (hazard ratio 1.14, 95% confidence interval 0.62-2.08, p = 0.66). CONCLUSIONS: The use of aprotinin demonstrated a limited effect in reducing postoperative bleeding and prevention of major bleeding events. Aprotinin did not adversely affect early outcomes and long-term survival.

Autodigestion by migrated trypsin is a major factor in small intestinal ischemia-reperfusion injury.

BACKGROUND: The pathophysiological role of pancreatic digestive hydrolases in intestinal ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury is still not clear. Here, we studied whether ischemia-induced injury to the small intestine can be explained by the autodigestion hypothesis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Mesenteric I/R was induced in rats by superior mesenteric artery occlusion (90 min) and reopening (120 min). Thirty minutes before superior mesenteric artery occlusion, aprotinin (14.7 mg/kg), orlistat (5 mg/kg), and their combination or α1-proteinase inhibitor (60 mg/kg) were injected into the lumen of the small intestine. Systemic and vital parameters, intestinal microcirculation, and mucosal barrier function were monitored during the observation phase; markers of small intestinal injury, as well as trypsin-, chymotrypsin-, elastase-, and lipase-like activities in intestinal effluates were assessed at the end. RESULTS: The pattern of small intestinal injury correlated inversely with the local alterations in microvascular tissue perfusion and corresponded with the intestinal distribution of trypsin-like activity. Aprotinin almost completely inhibited trypsin-like activity (P < 0.05) and significantly reduced intestinal tissue injury. Combined with orlistat, it also increased the postischemic blood pressure (P < 0.05) but not the intestinal barrier function. Macroscopic as well as the histologic alterations were decreased by α1-proteinase inhibitor, which significantly improved postischemic blood pressure (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The I/R-induced pattern of small intestinal injury is likely to result from both local differences in tissue ischemia and the digestive activity of migrated pancreatic trypsin. Therefore, administration of aprotinin and orlistat into ischemic small intestines may be a therapeutic option in patients with a poor diagnosis.

Pulmonary vascular resistance index during coronary artery bypass surgery with aprotinin.

Low pulmonary vascular resistance index (PVRI) reflects favorable redundant pulmonary circulation following coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass surgery (CPB). This randomized study investigated whether aprotinin given in different modalities impacts PVRI after coronary artery bypass grafting. A total of 40 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting were randomized to four groups according to aprotinin dose: (1) high dose, (2) early low dose, (3) late low dose, and (4) without aprotinin. Oxygenation index, pulmonary shunt, alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient and PVRI were determined. PVRI was calculated as the transpulmonary pressure gradient divided by cardiac index multiplied by 80. The results showed that PVRI remained relative low in all patients provided aprotinin regardless of treatment dosage; PVRI increased at 4 h after restarting ventilation after CPB in patients without aprotinin as compared with aprotinin (266 ± 137, 266 ± 115, 244 ± 86 vs. 386 ± 121, dynes-s-cm-5, respectively, p = .047). Elevated postoperative PVRI was predictive for patients without aprotinin (AUC 0.668; SE 0.40; p < .0001; CI 0.590-0.746). There were no statistical differences in oxygenation index, pulmonary shunt or alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient between the groups. In conclusion, aprotinin maintains a low PVRI in elective patients with healthy lungs during CPB. We suggest that aprotinin maintains pulmonary arterial endothelial integrity.

Comparison of TachoSil and TachoComb in patients undergoing liver resection-a randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to demonstrate the noninferior efficacy of TachoSil vs. TachoComb in Japanese patients undergoing liver resection and to assess the safety of TachoSil vs. TachoComb in these patients. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, noninferiority study (JapicCTI-090684) involved participants scheduled for liver resection/living donors (age ≥ 20 years). TachoSil or TachoComb (1:1 allocation ratio) was applied to control persistent exudative bleeding after primary hemostasis during liver resection/removal for donation. The primary outcome was hemostasis 5 min after study treatment application. The 95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference in the proportion of participants with hemostasis 5 min after application of TachoSil/TachoComb was determined; noninferiority of TachoSil was indicated if the lower limit of the CI was ≥-14%. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded. RESULTS: All participants in the efficacy analysis (TachoSil: 54/54, 100%; TachoComb: 54/54, 100%) achieved hemostasis 5 min after study treatment application. Therefore, TachoSil was noninferior to TachoComb. All participants experienced ≥1 AE; however, none discontinued because of an AE. Most (≥97.8%) AEs were mild or moderate in severity. CONCLUSIONS: These findings confirm the safety profile and noninferior hemostatic efficacy of TachoSil compared with TachoComb.

An Aprotinin Containing Fibrin Sealant Does Not Reduce Blood Loss in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Fibrin sealants are topical agents used to reduce perioperative blood loss; however, their efficacy in total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains uncertain. The purpose of this study was to determine if a fibrin sealant containing aprotinin as an antifibrinolytic agent, TISSEEL (Baxter, Deerfield, IL), reduces postoperative blood loss and transfusion during THA when compared with intravenous (IV) tranexamic acid (TXA) and control groups. METHODS: Three retrospective uniform cohorts of primary THA procedures were identified, from a prospectively maintained database: 1 group who received TISSEEL, 1 group who received 1 g IV TXA, and 1 group who received neither (control). There were 80 patients in each group. Outcome measures included the lowest measured hemoglobin during postoperative hospitalization, greatest decrease in hemoglobin from preoperative to postoperative values, and blood transfusion rates. RESULTS: The minimum postoperative hemoglobin level was significantly lower for TISSEEL patients compared with that of IV TXA patients (P = .021) and no different when compared with that of control patients (P = .134). Patients receiving fibrin sealant had a greater hemoglobin level decrease compared with that of IV TXA (P = .029) and control (P = .036). Postoperative transfusion rates were no different for the group receiving TISSEEL compared with those of control (P = .375) and were statistically greater when compared with those of IV TXA (P = .002). CONCLUSION: TISSEEL fibrin sealant does not reduce postoperative blood loss or transfusions; however, IV TXA reduced postoperative transfusions compared with TISSEEL and control. Therefore, TXA is recommended to reduce perioperative blood loss, while, utilization of a fibrin sealant requires further refinements before being adopted for routine use in THA.

Major transfusions remain frequent despite the generalized use of tranexamic acid: an audit of 3322 patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND: Aprotinin has been reapproved for use in Europe and in Canada. We sought to determine if its reintroduction was still pertinent given the widespread administration of tranexamic acid, another antifibrinolytic shown to reduce bleeding and transfusions. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: After institutional review board approval, we examined the cardiac surgery database (2012-2015; 3322 patients). Major transfusion was defined as 4 or more red blood cell units. A stratified multivariate logistic regression analysis identified predictors of major transfusion; 1064 patients were matched by propensity score to compare outcomes of patients with or without major transfusion. RESULTS: Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) was used in 2342 patients; 98.9% received tranexamic acid versus 15.2% (149/980) in off-pump coronary artery bypass graft patients. Major transfusion was required in 758 patients (23%). Age, low body mass index, low preoperative hemoglobin or platelet count, recent use of P2Y12 receptor blockers, chronic kidney disease, NYHA functional class, left ventricular ejection fraction of less than 30%, prior cardiac surgery, urgency, type of cardiac surgery, and duration of CPB were all independent predictors of major transfusions (all p < 0.05). Major transfusion was associated with a more than threefold increase in mortality (7.1% vs. 2.1%; p < 0.001) and increases in major adverse events (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the use of tranexamic acid, 23% of cardiac surgery patients require a major transfusion. We identified predictors of major transfusion and showed that major transfusion is associated with important increases in mortality and morbidity. We conclude that there is still a need for an effective and safe blood-sparing drug in cardiac surgery.

[TREATMENT OF THROMBOTIC COMPLICATIONS IN THE INJURED PERSONS IN POLYTRAUMA].

Comparative results of treatment of thrombotic complications in the injured persons with combined trauma of trunk in two groups were adduced. The scheme of prophylax3 is and treatment of thrombotic complications was proposed; application of this scheme have permitted to reduce their rate in 5 times, from 54.5 to 11.2%.

Antifibrinolytic drugs for acute traumatic injury.

BACKGROUND: Uncontrolled bleeding is an important cause of death in trauma victims. Antifibrinolytic treatment has been shown to reduce blood loss following surgery and may also be effective in reducing blood loss following trauma. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of antifibrinolytic drugs in patients with acute traumatic injury. SEARCH METHODS: We ran the most recent search in January 2015. We searched the Cochrane Injuries Group's Specialised Register, The Cochrane Library, Ovid MEDLINE(R), Ovid MEDLINE(R) In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE(R) Daily and Ovid OLDMEDLINE(R), Embase Classic+Embase (OvidSP), PubMed and clinical trials registries. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials of antifibrinolytic agents (aprotinin, tranexamic acid [TXA], epsilon-aminocaproic acid and aminomethylbenzoic acid) following acute traumatic injury. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: From the results of the screened electronic searches, bibliographic searches, and contacts with experts, two authors independently selected trials meeting the inclusion criteria, and extracted data. One review author assessed the risk of bias for key domains.Outcome measures included: mortality at end of follow-up (all-cause); adverse events (specifically vascular occlusive events [myocardial infarction, stroke, deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism] and renal failure); number of patients undergoing surgical intervention or receiving blood transfusion; volume of blood transfused; volume of intracranial bleeding; brain ischaemic lesions; death or disability.We rated the quality of the evidence as 'high', 'moderate', 'low' or 'very low' according to the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS: Three trials met the inclusion criteria.Two trials (n = 20,451) assessed the effect of TXA. The larger of these (CRASH-2, n = 20,211) was conducted in 40 countries and included patients with a variety of types of trauma; the other (n = 240) restricted itself to those with traumatic brain injury (TBI) only.One trial (n = 77) assessed aprotinin in participants with major bony trauma and shock.The pooled data show that antifibrinolytic drugs reduce the risk of death from any cause by 10% (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.85 to 0.96; P = 0.002) (quality of evidence: high). This estimate is based primarily on data from the CRASH-2 trial of TXA, which contributed 99% of the data.There is no evidence that antifibrinolytics have an effect on the risk of vascular occlusive events (quality of evidence: moderate), need for surgical intervention or receipt of blood transfusion (quality of evidence: high). There is no evidence for a difference in the effect by type of antifibrinolytic (TXA versus aprotinin) however, as the pooled analyses were based predominantly on trial data concerning the effects of TXA, the results can only be confidently applied to the effects of TXA. The effects of aprotinin in this patient group remain uncertain.There is some evidence from pooling data from one study (n = 240) and a subset of data from CRASH-2 (n = 270) in patients with TBI which suggest that TXA may reduce mortality although the estimates are imprecise, the quality of evidence is low, and uncertainty remains. Stronger evidence exists for the possibility of TXA reducing intracranial bleeding in this population. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: TXA safely reduces mortality in trauma patients with bleeding without increasing the risk of adverse events.  TXA should be given as early as possible and within three hours of injury, as further analysis of the CRASH-2 trial showed that treatment later than this is unlikely to be effective and may be harmful. Although there is some promising evidence for the effect of TXA in patients with TBI, substantial uncertainty remains.Two ongoing trials being conducted in patients with isolated TBI should resolve these remaining uncertainties.

The current place of aprotinin in the management of bleeding.

There is a considerable difference between the mechanism of action of the lysine analogues, tranexamic acid and epsilon-aminocaproic acid, and the serine protease inhibitor aprotinin. Aprotinin acts to inactivate free plasmin, but with little effect on bound plasmin, whereas the lysine analogues are designed to prevent excessive plasmin formation by fitting into plasminogen's lysine-binding site to prevent the binding of plasminogen to fibrin. Aprotinin is associated with a reduction in bleeding and transfusion requirements following major surgery, and has a dose-response profile, compared with no dose-response effect in the one study investigating tranexamic acid in cardiac surgical patients. Following its withdrawal in 2007, which is explained in detail in this review, the regulators have now licensed aprotinin for myocardial revascularisation only, which is relatively low-risk for bleeding.