Evolution and long­term respiratory sequelae after severe COVID-19 pneumonia: nitric oxide diffusion measurement value.

INTRODUCTION: There are no published studies assessing the evolution of combined determination of the lung diffusing capacity for both nitric oxide and carbon monoxide (DLNO and DLCO) 12 months after the discharge of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. METHODS: Prospective cohort study which included patients who were assessed both 3 and 12 months after an episode of SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. Their clinical status, health condition, lung function testings (LFTs) results (spirometry, DLNO-DLCO analysis, and six-minute walk test), and chest X-ray/computed tomography scan images were compared. RESULTS: 194 patients, age 62 years (P25-75, 51.5-71), 59% men, completed the study. 17% required admission to the intensive care unit. An improvement in the patients' exercise tolerance, the extent of the areas of ground-glass opacity, and the LFTs between 3 and 12 months following their hospital discharge were found, but without a decrease in their degree of dyspnea or their self-perceived health condition. DLNO was the most significantly altered parameter at 12 months (19.3%). The improvement in DLNO-DLCO mainly occurred at the expense of the recovery of alveolar units and their vascular component, with the membrane factor only improving in patients with more severe infections. CONCLUSIONS: The combined measurement of DLNO-DLCO is the most sensitive LFT for the detection of the long-term sequelae of COVID-19 pneumonia and it explain better their pathophysiology.

[Design and Verification of Lung Diffusion Function Detection System].

A lung diffusion function detection system is designed. Firstly, the controllable collection of air, test gas source and calibration gas source was based on single-breath method measurement principle. Secondly, pulmonary diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DlCO) was calculated by gas concentration measured by the non-dispersive infrared sensor to measure, the gas flow measured by the differential pressure sensor, and the temperature, humidity and atmospheric pressure sensors to test and evaluate the quantitative detection and evaluation of lung diffusion function. Moreover, a preliminary verification of the lung diffusion function detection system was implemented, and the results showed that the error of the lung carbon monoxide diffusion and the alveolar volume did not exceed 5%. Therefore, the system has high accuracy and is of great value for early screening and accurate assessment of COPD.

Impact of diffusing lung capacity before and after neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiation on postoperative pulmonary complications among patients with stage IIIA/N2 non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the impact of diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLco) before and after neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) on postoperative pulmonary complication (PPC) among stage IIIA/N2 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 324 patients with stage IIIA/N2 NSCLC between 2009 and 2016. Patients were classified into 4 groups according to DLco before and after neoadjuvant CCRT; normal-to-normal (NN), normal-to-low (NL), low-to-low (LL), and low-to-very low (LVL). Low DLco and very low DLco were defined as DLco < 80% predicted and DLco < 60% predicted, respectively. RESULTS: On average, DLco was decreased by 12.3% (±10.5) after CCRT. In multivariable-adjusted analyses, the incidence rate ratio (IRR) for any PPC comparing patients with low DLco to those with normal DLco before CCRT was 2.14 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.36-3.36). Moreover, the IRR for any PPC was 3.78 (95% CI = 1.68-8.49) in LVL group compared to NN group. The significant change of DLco after neoadjuvant CCRT had an additional impact on PPC, particularly after bilobectomy or pneumonectomy with low baseline DLco. CONCLUSIONS: The DLco before CCRT was significantly associated with risk of PPC, and repeated test of DLco after CCRT would be helpful for risk assessment, particularly in patients with low DLco before neoadjuvant CCRT.

Unexpected radiation pneumonitis after SIRT with significant decrease in DLCO with internal radiation exposure: a case report.

BACKGROUND: In the last years, Selective Internal Radiation Therapy (SIRT), using biocompatible Yttrium-90 (90Y) labeled microspheres have emerged for the treatment of malignant hepatic tumors. Unfortunately, a significant part of 90Y-labeled microspheres may shunt to the lungs after intraarterial injection. It can be predictable by infusing technetium-99 m-labeled macro-aggregated albumin particles through a catheter placed in the proper hepatic artery depending on the lobe to be treated with performing a quantitative lung scintigraphy. Radiation pneumonitis (RP) can occur 1 to 6 months after the therapy, which is a rare but severe complication of SIRT. Prompt timing of steroid treatment is important due to its high mortality rate. On the other hand, pulmonary diffusion capacity measured by carbon monoxide (DLCO) is an excellent way to measure the diffusing capacity because carbon monoxide is present in minimal amount in venous blood and binds to hemoglobin in the same manner as oxygen. Some authors reported that the most consistent changes after radiation therapy (RT) are recorded with this quantitative reproducible test. The relationship between the proportional reductions in DLCO and the severity of RP developing after this therapy may prove to be clinically significant. CASE PRESENTATION: We herein present a patient who developed RP after SIRT that could be quantified using DLCO. To the best of our knowledge, this case is the first who developed unexpected RP after SIRT with significant decrease in DLCO with internal radiation exposure. CONCLUSIONS: RP is a very rare complication and may lead to a fatal outcome. Decline in DLCO could be a valuable parameter for follow-up and to identify potential candidates for RP and could be also another trigger for administration of steroid therapy with prompt timing in this patient group.

A carbon monoxide poisoning case due to lung diffusion test.

Carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning occurs due to CO gas which is produced by the incomplete combustion of hydrocarbons. Several causes of CO poisoning have been defined in the literature. The most frequent causes are defective heaters, fires and exposure to exhaust gas in closed areas. The lung diffusion test is a method used to detect alveolar membrane diffusion capacity. The standart gas used in the diffusion test is CO. The case is here presented of a patient who was poisoned by CO during a DLCO test. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report defining CO poisoning during a DLCO test and treated at the Emergency Department.

Hyperpolarised xenon magnetic resonance spectroscopy for the longitudinal assessment of changes in gas diffusion in IPF.

Prognosticating idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is challenging, in part due to a lack of sensitive biomarkers. A recent article in Thorax described how hyperpolarised xenon magnetic resonance spectroscopy may quantify regional gas exchange in IPF lungs. In a population of patients with IPF, we find that the xenon signal from red blood cells diminishes relative to the tissue/plasma signal over a 12-month time period, even when the diffusion factor for carbon monoxide is static over the same time period. We conclude that hyperpolarised 129Xe MR spectroscopy may be sensitive to short-term changes in interstitial gas diffusion in IPF.

Independent Prognostic Value of Pulmonary Diffusing Capacity in Nonsmoking Patients with Chronic Heart Failure.

The diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) is indicative of the alveolar-capillary membrane function. A reduced DLCO is associated with poor prognosis in chronic heart failure (HF). However, the significance of DLCO as an independent prognostic predictor has not been established. Here, we aimed to determine the prognostic value of DLCO in patients with chronic HF.We enrolled 214 patients (139 females, mean age: 63 ± 16 years, left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF]: 45 ± 21%) with stable chronic HF who underwent pulmonary function tests. Only never smokers were included in the analysis because smoking can decrease DLCO.During a median follow-up period of 2.1 years, 52 patients (24.3%) experienced cardiac events, including unplanned HF admissions, left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantations, all-cause deaths, and cardiopulmonary arrests (CPAs). The median percent predicted DLCO (%DLCO) was 87.3%. In a Cox regression analysis, a %DLCO of ≤87.3% was independently associated with the cardiac events, even after adjusting for age, sex, systolic blood pressure (SBP), LVEF, anemia, brain natriuretic peptide, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and prior HF admission (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.87, 95% confidence interval: 1.03-3.53, P = 0.030).A reduced DLCO is an independent predictor of poor prognosis in nonsmoking patients with chronic HF.

Combined diffusing capacity for nitric oxide and carbon monoxide as predictor of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome following lung transplantation.

BACKGROUND: There is a need for non-invasive parameters that are sensitive to the development of the bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) in lung transplantation (LTx) patients. We studied whether the pulmonary diffusing capacity for inhaled nitric oxide is capable of detecting BOS stages. METHODS: Sixty-one LTx patients were included into this cross-sectional study (19/29/7/3/3 in BOS stages 0/0-p/1/2/3). For analysis stages 0/0-p versus 1/2/3 ("BOS binary-early"), and stages 0/0-p/1 versus 2/3 ("BOS binary-late") were summarized. Measurements of the combined diffusing capacity for nitric oxide (DLNO) and carbon monoxide (DLCO) were compared with spirometry and bodyplethysmography, and their relative importance was evaluated by discriminant analysis. RESULTS: Regarding the recognition of "BOS binary-early", among spirometric parameters forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) was best, among bodyplethysmographic parameters airway resistance, and among diffusing parameters DLNO. Regarding "BOS binary-late", DLNO was inferior to bodyplethysmographic parameters. CONCLUSION: Although the study comprised only measurements at a single time point and no follow-up, DLNO outperformed FEV1, the time course of which is used in detecting BOS. Together with its pathophysiological plausibility, this result suggests that the measurement of DLNO, possibly over time, could be an easily applicable tool for the monitoring of LTx patients and should be evaluated in larger studies.

Acute effects of combined exercise and oscillatory positive expiratory pressure therapy on sputum properties and lung diffusing capacity in cystic fibrosis: a randomized, controlled, crossover trial.

BACKGROUND: Regular airway clearance by chest physiotherapy and/or exercise is critical to lung health in cystic fibrosis (CF). Combination of cycling exercise and chest physiotherapy using the Flutter® device on sputum properties has not yet been investigated. METHODS: This prospective, randomized crossover study compared a single bout of continuous cycling exercise at moderate intensity (experiment A, control condition) vs a combination of interval cycling exercise plus Flutter® (experiment B). Sputum properties (viscoelasticity, yield stress, solids content, spinnability, and ease of sputum expectoration), pulmonary diffusing capacity for nitric oxide (DLNO) and carbon monoxide (DLCO) were assessed at rest, directly and 45 min post-exercise (recovery) at 2 consecutive visits. Primary outcome was change in sputum viscoelasticity (G', storage modulus; G", loss modulus) over a broad frequency range (0.1-100 rad.s- 1). RESULTS: 15 adults with CF (FEV1range 24-94% predicted) completed all experiments. No consistent differences between experiments were observed for G' and G" and other sputum properties, except for ease of sputum expectoration during recovery favoring experiment A. DLNO, DLCO, alveolar volume (VA) and pulmonary capillary blood volume (Vcap) increased during experiment A, while DLCO and Vcap increased during experiment B (all P < 0.05). We found no differences in absolute changes in pulmonary diffusing capacity and its components between experiments, except a higher VA immediately post-exercise favoring experiment A (P = 0.032). CONCLUSIONS: The additional use of the Flutter® to moderate intensity interval cycling exercise has no measurable effect on the viscoelastic properties of sputum compared to moderate intensity continuous cycling alone. Elevations in diffusing capacity represent an acute exercise-induced effect not sustained post-exercise. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT02750722 ; URL: clinical.trials.gov; Registration date: April 25th, 2016.

2017 ERS/ATS standards for single-breath carbon monoxide uptake in the lung.

This document provides an update to the European Respiratory Society (ERS)/American Thoracic Society (ATS) technical standards for single-breath carbon monoxide uptake in the lung that was last updated in 2005. Although both DLCO (diffusing capacity) and TLCO (transfer factor) are valid terms to describe the uptake of carbon monoxide in the lung, the term DLCO is used in this document. A joint taskforce appointed by the ERS and ATS reviewed the recent literature on the measurement of DLCO and surveyed the current technical capabilities of instrumentation being manufactured around the world. The recommendations in this document represent the consensus of the taskforce members in regard to the evidence available for various aspects of DLCO measurement. Furthermore, it reflects the expert opinion of the taskforce members on areas in which peer-reviewed evidence was either not available or was incomplete. The major changes in these technical standards relate to DLCO measurement with systems using rapidly responding gas analysers for carbon monoxide and the tracer gas, which are now the most common type of DLCO instrumentation being manufactured. Technical improvements and the increased capability afforded by these new systems permit enhanced measurement of DLCO and the opportunity to include other optional measures of lung function.

Combined measurement of carbon monoxide and nitric oxide lung transfer does not improve the identification of pulmonary hypertension in systemic sclerosis.

Screening is important to determine whether patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) have pulmonary hypertension because earlier pulmonary hypertension treatment can improve survival in these patients. Although decreased transfer factor of the lung for carbon monoxide (TLCO) is currently considered the best pulmonary function test for screening for pulmonary hypertension in SSc, small series have suggested that partitioning TLCO into membrane conductance (diffusing capacity) for carbon monoxide (DMCO) and alveolar capillary blood volume (VC) through combined measurement of TLCO and transfer factor of the lung for nitric oxide (TLNO) is more effective to identify pulmonary hypertension in SSc patients compared with TLCO alone. Here, the objective was to determine whether combined TLCO-TLNO partitioned with recently refined equations could more accurately detect pulmonary hypertension than TLCO alone in SSc.For that purpose, 572 unselected consecutive SSc patients were retrospectively recruited in seven French centres.Pulmonary hypertension was diagnosed with right heart catheterisation in 58 patients. TLCO, TLNO and VC were all lower in SSc patients with pulmonary hypertension than in SSc patients without pulmonary hypertension. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the presence of pulmonary hypertension was equivalent for TLCO (0.82, 95% CI 0.79-0.85) and TLNO (0.80, 95% CI 0.76-0.83), but lower for VC (0.75, 95% CI 0.71-0.78) and DMCO (0.66, 95% CI 0.62-0.70).Compared with TLCO alone, combined TLCO-TLNO does not add capability to detect pulmonary hypertension in unselected SSc patients.

Pulmonary artery to aorta ratio and risk of all-cause mortality in the general population: the Rotterdam Study.

A pulmonary artery to aorta ratio (PA:A) >1 is a proxy of pulmonary hypertension. It is not known whether this measure carries prognostic information in the general population and in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).Between 2003 and 2006, 2197 participants from the population-based Rotterdam Study (mean±sd age 69.7±6.7 years; 51.3% female), underwent cardiac computed tomography (CT) scanning with PA:A quantification, defined as the ratio between the diameters of the pulmonary artery and the aorta. COPD was diagnosed based on spirometry or clinical presentation and obstructive lung function measured by a treating physician. Cox regression was used to investigate the risk of mortality.We observed no association between 1-sd increase of PA:A and mortality in the general population. Larger PA:A was associated with an increased risk of mortality in individuals with COPD, particularly in moderate-to-severe COPD (hazard ratio 1.36, 95% CI 1.03-1.79). We demonstrated that the risk of mortality in COPD was driven by severe COPD, and that this risk increased with decreasing diffusing capacity.Larger PA:A is not associated with mortality in an older general population, but is an independent determinant of mortality in moderate-to-severe COPD. Measuring PA:A in CT scans obtained for other indications may yield important prognostic information in individuals with COPD.

Decreased diffusion capacity on lung function testing in asymptomatic patients with systemic lupus erythematosus does not predict future lung disease.

BACKGROUND: In a previous study performed 9 ± 3.6 years ago, 74 asymptomatic patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and/or antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) underwent lung function testing. A significantly low diffusion capacity (DLCO) ranging from 45% to 70% was recorded in 28 of the 74 (37.8%) patients who were all free of respiratory symptoms. AIM: The aim of this report is to assess the clinical importance and the predictive value of a low DLCO in asymptomatic patients with SLE or APS. METHODS: Asymptomatic patients with SLE and/or APS who were found to have a low DLCO in the previous study were contacted. Of the 28 patients, 15 were recruited and reevaluated in the current study (SLE with APS (n = 7), SLE without APS (n = 7); primary APS (n = 1)). A full history, physical examination, nail bed capillaroscopy, current laboratory tests and full lung function tests including DLCO were performed. RESULTS: During a surveillance period of 9 ± 3.6 years, none of the patients developed lung disease. Diffusion capacity corrected for alveolar volume (DLCO/VA) improved in the study group during this period from 60.4% ± 7.0 to 76.1% ± 11.2 (p < 0.0001). Lung function tests including total lung capacity (TLC) and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) remained within normal limits. Capillaroscopy studies did not reveal changes compatible with scleroderma in any of the patients. CONCLUSION: Low DLCO findings on lung function testing does not have a positive predictive value for the development of future lung disease in patients with SLE, with or without APS, who are free of respiratory symptoms. Our results suggest that a finding of low DLCO in asymptomatic patients with SLE, with or without APS, does not necessarily require further evaluation and imaging and may improve spontaneously over time. Further studies in a larger group of patients are needed to validate these findings.

Functional respiratory assessment in interstitial lung disease.

Interstitial lung diseases are a heterogeneous group of disorders that affect, to a greater or lesser degree, the alveolus, peripheral airway, and septal interstitium. Functional assessment in patients suspected of having an interstitial lung disease has implications for diagnosis and makes it possible to objectively analyze both response to treatment and prognosis. Recently the clinical value of lung-diffusing capacity and the six-minute walking test has been confirmed, and these are now important additions to the traditional assessment of lung function that is based on spirometry. Here we review the state-of-the-art methods for the assessment of patients with interstitial lung disease.

Effect of barometric pressure on single-breath carbon monoxide diffusing capacity.

BACKGROUND: Single-breath diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) quantifies gas transfer in the lungs. DLCO measurement is affected by barometric pressure (Pb) and alveolar partial pressure of oxygen (PAO2). The current equations for adjusting DLCO for Pb and PAO2 may not be accurate given advances in test performance and technology. We quantify changes in DLCO with alterations in Pb in normal and COPD subjects, determine the accuracy of the current Pb and PAO2 adjustment equations and develop updated adjustment equations. METHODS: We measured DLCO in 13 normal and 10 COPD subjects at 1330 m altitude and in a hypobaric/hyperbaric chamber at altitudes of sea-level and 2500 m; six normal subjects were tested at 3600 m. We determined if there were significant differences in DLCO between altitudes. We developed an equation for adjusting DLCO for changes in Pb from sea-level. We compared this equation with the existing Pb adjustment equation in normal and COPD subjects. We determined the accuracy of the current PAO2 adjustment equation and developed a new PAO2 adjustment equation. RESULTS: DLCO significantly increased with decreasing Pb. We developed a Pb adjustment equation that adjusts DLCO measured at altitudes between 1330 m and 3600 m to sea-level values. This Pb adjustment equation yields DLCO results that are not significantly different than the currently recommended equation. We developed a more accurate PAO2 adjustment equation. CONCLUSION: DLCO measurement is significantly affected by altitude. We developed equations that accurately adjust DLCO for changes in Pb and PAO2 in normal and COPD subjects.

Facing the noise: addressing the endemic variability in D(LCO) testing.

Single-breath diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (D(LCO)) is a common pulmonary function test that measures the ability of the lung to exchange gas across the alveolar-capillary interface. D(LCO) testing is used to narrow the differential diagnosis of obstructive and restrictive lung disease, to aid in disability and transplant assessment, and to monitor medication toxicity. The variability in the measurement limits the utility of the test. Variability is attributable to differences in equipment, testing conditions, patient factors, and reference equations. Laboratories can minimize variability by ensuring that equipment meets recommended standards, implementing effective quality control programs, standardizing testing conditions and testing procedures, and accounting for pertinent patient characteristics.

Computed tomography score and pulmonary function in infants with chronic lung disease of infancy.

Chronic lung disease of infancy (CLDI) remains a common outcome among infants born extremely prematurely. In older children and adults with lung disease, pulmonary function and computed tomography (CT) scores are used to follow up respiratory disease and assess disease severity. For infants and toddlers, however, these outcomes have been used very infrequently and most often, a dichotomous respiratory outcome (presence or absence of CLDI) is employed. We evaluated the performance of CT score and pulmonary function to differentiate infants and toddlers with CLDI from a control group. CT scans, forced expiratory flows and pulmonary diffusing capacity were obtained in 39 CLDI patients and 41 controls (aged 4-33 months). CT scans were quantified using a scoring system, while pulmonary function was expressed as Z-scores. CT score outperformed pulmonary function in identifying those with CLDI. There were no significant correlations between CT score and pulmonary function. CT score had a better performance than pulmonary function in differentiating individuals with CLDI; however, these outcomes may reflect differing components of the pulmonary pathophysiology of CLDI. This new information on pulmonary outcomes can assist in designing studies with these parameters. Future studies will be required to evaluate which of the outcomes can better detect improvement with therapeutic intervention and/or lung growth.

Lung diffusing capacity relates better to short-term progression on HRCT abnormalities than spirometry in mild asbestosis.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary function tests (PFT), particularly spirometry and lung diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DL(CO) ), have been considered useful methods for the detection of the progression of interstitial asbestos abnormalities as indicated by high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT). However, it is currently unknown which of these two tests correlates best with anatomical changes over time. METHODS: In this study, we contrasted longitudinal changes (3-9 years follow-up) in PFTs at rest and during exercise with interstitial abnormalities evaluated by HRCT in 63 ex-workers with mild-to-moderate asbestosis. RESULTS: At baseline, patients presented with low-grade asbestosis (Huuskonen classes I-II), and most PFT results were within the limits of normality. In the follow-up, most subjects had normal spirometry, static lung volumes and arterial blood gases. In contrast, frequency of DL(CO) abnormalities almost doubled (P < 0.05). Twenty-three (36.5%) subjects increased the interstitial marks on HRCT. These had significantly larger declines in DL(CO) compared to patients who remained stable (0.88 vs. 0.31 ml/min/mm Hg/year and 3.5 vs. 1.2%/year, respectively; P < 0.05). In contrast, no between-group differences were found for the other functional tests, including spirometry (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that the functional consequences of progression of HRCT abnormalities in mild-to-moderate asbestosis are better reflected by decrements in DL(CO) than by spirometric changes. These results might have important practical implications for medico-legal evaluation of this patient population.

Assessing the applicability of the new Global Lung Function Initiative reference values for the diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide in a large population set.

BACKGROUND: The single-breath diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) interpretation needs the comparison of measured values to reference values. In 2017, the Global Lung Function Initiative published new reference values (GLI-2017) for DLCO, alveolar volume (VA) and transfer coefficient of the lung for carbon monoxide (KCO). We aimed to assess the applicability of GLI-2017 reference values for DLCO on a large population by comparing them to the European Community of Steel and Coal equations of 1993 (ECSC-93) widely used. METHODS: In this retrospective study, spirometric indices, total lung capacity, DLCO, VA and KCO were measured in adults classified in 5 groups (controls, asthma, chronic bronchitis, cystic fibrosis, and interstitial lung diseases (ILD)). Statistical analysis comparing the 2 equations sets were stratified by sex. RESULTS: 4180 tests were included. GLI-2017 z-scores of the 3 DLCO indices of the controls (n = 150) are nearer to 0 (expected value in a normal population) than ECSC-93 z-scores. All groups combined, in both genders, DLCO GLI-2017 z-scores and %predicted are significantly higher than ECSC z-scores and %predicted. In the ILD group, differences between the 2 equation sets depend on the DLCO impairment severity: GLI-2017 z-scores are higher than ECSC z-scores in patients with no or "mild" decrease in DLCO, but are lower in "moderate" or "severe" decrease. CONCLUSION: GLI-2017 reference values for DLCO are more suitable to our population and influence the diagnostic criteria and severity definition of several lung diseases.

Lung diffusing capacity for nitric oxide and carbon monoxide following mild-to-severe COVID-19.

A decreased lung diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO ) has been reported in a variable proportion of subjects over the first 3 months of recovery from severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). In this study, we investigated whether measurement of lung diffusing capacity for nitric oxide (DLNO ) offers additional insights on the presence and mechanisms of gas transport abnormalities. In 94 subjects, recovering from mild-to-severe COVID-19 pneumonia, we measured DLNO and DLCO between 10 and 266 days after each patient was tested negative for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. In 38 subjects, a chest computed tomography (CT) was available for semiquantitative analysis at six axial levels and automatic quantitative analysis of entire lungs. DLNO was abnormal in 57% of subjects, independent of time of lung function testing and severity of COVID-19, whereas standard DLCO was reduced in only 20% and mostly within the first 3 months. These differences were not associated with changes of simultaneous DLNO /DLCO ratio, while DLCO /VA and DLNO /VA were within normal range or slightly decreased. DLCO but not DLNO positively correlated with recovery time and DLCO was within the normal range in about 90% of cases after 3 months, while DLNO was reduced in more than half of subjects. Both DLNO and DLCO inversely correlated with persisting CT ground glass opacities and mean lung attenuation, but these were more frequently associated with DLNO than DLCO decrease. These data show that an impairment of DLNO exceeding standard DLCO may be present during the recovery from COVID-19, possibly due to loss of alveolar units with alveolar membrane damage, but relatively preserved capillary volume. Alterations of gas transport may be present even in subjects who had mild COVID-19 pneumonia and no or minimal persisting CT abnormalities. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov PRS: No.: NCT04610554 Unique Protocol ID: SARS-CoV-2_DLNO 2020.