Clonally expanded EOMES+ Tr1-like cells in primary and metastatic tumors are associated with disease progression.

Regulatory T (Treg) cells are a barrier for tumor immunity and a target for immunotherapy. Using single-cell transcriptomics, we found that CD4+ T cells infiltrating primary and metastatic colorectal cancer and non-small-cell lung cancer are highly enriched for two subsets of comparable size and suppressor function comprising forkhead box protein P3+ Treg and eomesodermin homolog (EOMES)+ type 1 regulatory T (Tr1)-like cells also expressing granzyme K and chitinase-3-like protein 2. EOMES+ Tr1-like cells, but not Treg cells, were clonally related to effector T cells and were clonally expanded in primary and metastatic tumors, which is consistent with their proliferation and differentiation in situ. Using chitinase-3-like protein 2 as a subset signature, we found that the EOMES+ Tr1-like subset correlates with disease progression but is also associated with response to programmed cell death protein 1-targeted immunotherapy. Collectively, these findings highlight the heterogeneity of Treg cells that accumulate in primary tumors and metastases and identify a new prospective target for cancer immunotherapy.

Dual-Region Computed Tomography Radiomics-Based Machine Learning Predicts Subcarinal Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Noninvasively and accurately predicting subcarinal lymph node metastasis (SLNM) for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains challenging. This study was designed to develop and validate a tumor and subcarinal lymph nodes (tumor-SLNs) dual-region computed tomography (CT) radiomics model for predicting SLNM in NSCLC. METHODS: This retrospective study included NSCLC patients who underwent lung resection and SLNs dissection between January 2017 and December 2020. The radiomic features of the tumor and SLNs were extracted from preoperative CT, respectively. Ninety machine learning (ML) models were developed based on tumor region, SLNs region, and tumor-SLNs dual-region. The model performance was assessed by the area under the curve (AUC) and validated internally by fivefold cross-validation. RESULTS: In total, 202 patients were included in this study. ML models based on dual-region radiomics showed good performance for SLNM prediction, with a median AUC of 0.794 (range, 0.686-0.880), which was superior to those of models based on tumor region (median AUC, 0.746; range, 0.630-0.811) and SLNs region (median AUC, 0.700; range, 0.610-0.842). The ML model, which is developed by using the naive Bayes algorithm and dual-region features, had the highest AUC of 0.880 (range of cross-validation, 0.825-0.937) among all ML models. The optimal logistic regression model was inferior to the optimal ML model for predicting SLNM, with an AUC of 0.727. CONCLUSIONS: The CT radiomics showed the potential for accurately predicting SLNM in NSCLC patients. The ML model with dual-region radiomic features has better performance than the logistic regression or single-region models.

Bone metastasis prediction in non-small-cell lung cancer: primary CT-based radiomics signature and clinical feature.

BACKGROUND: Radiomics provided opportunities to quantify the tumor phenotype non-invasively. This study extracted contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) radiomic signatures and evaluated clinical features of bone metastasis in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). With the combination of the revealed radiomics and clinical features, the predictive modeling on bone metastasis in NSCLC was established. METHODS: A total of 318 patients with NSCLC at the Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital was enrolled between January 2009 and December 2019, which included a feature-learning cohort (n = 223) and a validation cohort (n = 95). We trained a radiomics model in 318 CECT images from feature-learning cohort to extract the radiomics features of bone metastasis in NSCLC. The Kruskal-Wallis and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression (LASSO) were used to select bone metastasis-related features and construct the CT radiomics score (Rad-score). Multivariate logistic regression was performed with the combination of the Rad-score and clinical data. A predictive nomogram was subsequently developed. RESULTS: Radiomics models using CECT scans were significant on bone metastasis prediction in NSCLC. Model performance was enhanced with each information into the model. The radiomics nomogram achieved an AUC of 0.745 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.68,0.80) on predicting bone metastasis in the training set and an AUC of 0.808(95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.71,0.88) in the validation set. CONCLUSION: The revealed invisible image features were of significance on guiding bone metastasis prediction in NSCLC. Based on the combination of the image features and clinical characteristics, the predictive nomogram was established. Such nomogram can be used for the auxiliary screening of bone metastasis in NSCLC.

Short-term predictors of stereotactic radiosurgery outcome for untreated single non-small cell lung cancer brain metastases: a restrospective cohort study.

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an option for brain metastases (BM) not eligible for surgical resection, however, predictors of SRS outcomes are poorly known. The aim of this study is to investigate predictors of SRS outcome in patients with BM secondary to non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The secondary objective is to analyze the value of volumetric criteria in identifying BM progression. This retrospective cohort study included patients >18 years of age with a single untreated BM secondary to NSCLC. Demographic, clinical, and radiological data were assessed. The primary outcome was treatment failure, defined as a BM volumetric increase 12 months after SRS. The unidimensional measurement of the BM at follow-up was also assessed. One hundred thirty-five patients were included, with a median BM volume at baseline of 1.1 cm3 (IQR 0.4-2.3). Fifty-two (38.5%) patients had SRS failure at follow-up. Only right BM laterality was associated with SRS failure (p=0.039). Using the volumetric definition of SRS failure, the unidimensional criteria demonstrated a sensibility of 60.78% (46.11%-74.16%), specificity of 89.02% (80.18%-94.86%), positive LR of 5.54 (2.88-10.66) and negative LR of 0.44 (0.31-0.63). SRS demonstrated a 61.5% local control rate 12 months after treatment. Among the potential predictors of treatment outcome analyzed, only the right BM laterality had a significant association with SRS failure. The volumetric criteria were able to identify more subtle signs of BM increase than the unidimensional criteria, which may allow earlier diagnosis of disease progression and use of appropriate therapies.

[Management of bone metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer]. / Prise en charge des métastases osseuses du cancer pulmonaire non à petites cellules.

Lung cancer is notoriously known for its predisposition to metastasize to the bones. Diagnostic tools, including positron emission tomography coupled with computed tomography, offer increased sensitivity in detecting bone infiltration. Management strategies encompass a multidisciplinary approach, including pharmacological pain management, anti-resorptive therapy, radiotherapy, interventional techniques, and surgery. This article provides an in-depth analysis of the incidence and distribution of bone metastases, skeletal-related events (SRE), diagnostic imaging techniques, and contemporary therapeutic strategies to prevent SRE. Systemic anticancer therapy and pain management, although crucial for treating BM, are not discussed in this article.

Le cancer du poumon est notoirement connu pour sa prédisposition à métastaser dans les os. Les outils diagnostiques, notamment la tomographie par émission de positrons couplée à la tomodensitométrie, offrent une sensibilité accrue pour détecter l'infiltration osseuse. Les stratégies de prise en charge englobent une approche multidisciplinaire, comprenant le traitement médicamenteux de la douleur, la thérapie antirésorptive, la radiothérapie, les techniques interventionnelles ainsi que la chirurgie. Cet article propose une analyse approfondie de l'incidence et de la distribution des métastases osseuses (MO), des événements liés au squelette (SRE), des techniques d'imagerie diagnostique et des stratégies thérapeutiques contemporaines pour prévenir les SRE. Le traitement systémique anticancéreux et la gestion de la douleur, bien que cruciaux pour traiter les MO, ne sont pas discutés dans cet article.

Immune checkpoint inhibition and single fraction stereotactic radiosurgery in brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer: an international multicenter study of 395 patients.

PURPOSE: Approximately 80% of brain metastases originate from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) are frequently utilized in this setting. However, concerns remain regarding the risk of radiation necrosis (RN) when SRS and ICI are administered concurrently. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted through the International Radiosurgery Research Foundation. Logistic regression models and competing risks analyses were utilized to identify predictors of any grade RN and symptomatic RN (SRN). RESULTS: The study included 395 patients with 2,540 brain metastases treated with single fraction SRS and ICI across 11 institutions in four countries with a median follow-up of 14.2 months. The median age was 67 years. The median margin SRS dose was 19 Gy; 36.5% of patients had a V12 Gy ≥ 10 cm3. On multivariable analysis, V12 Gy ≥ 10 cm3 was a significant predictor of developing any grade RN (OR: 2.18) and SRN (OR: 3.95). At 1-year, the cumulative incidence of any grade and SRN for all patients was 4.8% and 3.8%, respectively. For concurrent and non-concurrent groups, the cumulative incidence of any grade RN was 3.8% versus 5.3%, respectively (p = 0.35); and for SRN was 3.8% vs. 3.6%, respectively (p = 0.95). CONCLUSION: The risk of any grade RN and symptomatic RN following single fraction SRS and ICI for NSCLC brain metastases increases as V12 Gy exceeds 10 cm3. Concurrent ICI and SRS do not appear to increase this risk. Radiosurgical planning techniques should aim to minimize V12 Gy.

Efficacy of neoadjuvant stereotactic radiotherapy in brain metastases from solid cancer: a systematic review of literature and meta-analysis.

Neoadjuvant stereotactic radiotherapy (NaSRT) is a novel strategy for brain metastasis (BM) treatment, promising to achieve good local control, improved survival, and low toxicity. This is a systematic review of available literature and meta-analysis of 8 articles eligible for inclusion after searching MEDLINE via PubMed, Web-of-science, Cochrane Wiley, and Embase databases up to March 2023. A total of 484 patients undergoing NaSRT to treat 507 lesions were included. The median age was 60.9 (IQR 57-63) years, with a median tumor volume of 12.1 (IQR 9-14) cm3. The most frequent histology was non-small-cell lung cancer (41.3%), followed by breast (18.8%), and melanoma (14.3%). Lesions had a preferred supratentorial location (77.4%). Most of the studies used a single fraction schedule (91% of patients, n = 440). Treatment parameters were homogeneous and showed a median dose of 18 (IQR 15.5-20.5) Gy at a median of 80% isodose. Surgery was performed after a median of 1.5 (IQR 1-2.4) days and achieved gross-total extent in 94% of cases. Median follow-up was 12.9 (IQR 10-15.7) months. NaSRT showed an overall mortality rate of 58% (95% CI 43-73) at the last follow-up. Actuarial outcomes rates were 60% (95% CI 55-64) for 1-year overall survival (1y-OS), 38% (95% CI 33-43) for 2y-OS, 29% (95% CI 24-34) for 3y-OS; overall 15% (95% CI 11-19) for local failure, 46% (95% CI 37-55) for distant brain failure, 6% (95% CI 3-8) for radionecrosis, and 5% (95% CI 3-8) for leptomeningeal dissemination. The median local progression-free survival time was 10.4 (IQR 9.5-11.4) months, while the median survival without distant failure was 7.4 (IQR 6.9-8) months. The median OS time for the entire cohort was 17 (IQR 14.9-17.9) months. Existing data suggest that NaSRT is effective and safe in the treatment of BMs, achieving good local control on BMs with and low incidence of radionecrosis and leptomeningeal dissemination. Distant control appears limited compared to other radiation regimens.

Comparison of preoperative versus postoperative treatment dosimetry plans of single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery for surgically resected brain metastases.

OBJECTIVE: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for operative brain metastasis (BrM) is usually administered 1 to 6 weeks after resection. Preoperative versus postoperative timing of SRS delivery related to surgery remains a critical question, as a pattern of failure is the development of leptomeningeal disease (LMD) in as many as 35% of patients who undergo postoperative SRS or the occurrence of radiation necrosis. As they await level I clinical data from ongoing trials, the authors aimed to bridge the gap by comparing postoperative with simulated preoperative single-fraction SRS dosimetry plans for patients with surgically resected BrM. METHODS: The authors queried their institutional database to retrospectively identify patients who underwent postoperative Gamma Knife SRS (GKSRS) after resection of BrM between January 2014 and January 2021. Exclusion criteria were prior radiation delivered to the lesion, age < 18 years, and prior diagnosis of LMD. Once identified, a simulated preoperative SRS plan was designed to treat the unresected BrM and compared with the standard postoperative treatment delivered to the resection cavity per Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 90-05 guidelines. Numerous comparisons between preoperative and postoperative GKSRS treatment parameters were then made using paired statistical analyses. RESULTS: The authors' cohort included 45 patients with a median age of 59 years who were treated with GKSRS after resection of a BrM. Primary cancer origins included colorectal cancer (27%), non-small cell lung cancer (22%), breast cancer (11%), melanoma (11%), and others (29%). The mean tumor and cavity volumes were 15.06 cm3 and 12.61 cm3, respectively. In a paired comparison, there was no significant difference in the planned treatment volumes between the two groups. When the authors compared the volume of surrounding brain that received 12 Gy or more (V12Gy), an important predictor of radiation necrosis, 64% of patient plans in the postoperative SRS group (29/45, p = 0.008) recorded greater V12 volumes. Preoperative plans were more conformal (p < 0.001) and exhibited sharper dose drop-off at the lesion margins (p = 0.0018) when compared with postoperative plans. CONCLUSIONS: Comparison of simulated preoperative and delivered postoperative SRS plans administered to the BrM or resection cavity suggested that preoperative SRS allows for more highly conformal lesional coverage and sharper dose drop-off compared with postoperative plans. Furthermore, V12Gy was lower in the presurgical GKSRS plans, which may account for the decreased incidence of radiation necrosis seen in prior retrospective studies.

Current uses and applications of stereotactic body radiation therapy.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a modality that delivers high doses of radiation to a well-defined tumor target in a single or a few fractions and with high precision, which significantly reduces the dose received by surrounding normal tissues. SBRT is indicated for inoperable, early stage (T1 and T2) primary non-small cell lung cancer, lung metastases with a controlled primary tumor, prostate tumors and oligometastatic disease. Despite the lack of long-term or phase III studies, efficacy results in local control are higher than 90%, with similar toxicity to that reported with conventional fractionated radiotherapy. This article describes SBRT technology and technique, along with clinical applications, indications and limitations of this therapeutic modality.

La radioterapia corporal estereotáctica es una modalidad que con alta precisión administra dosis alta de radiación a un objetivo tumoral bien definido, en una o en pocas fracciones, y reduce significativamente la dosis que reciben los tejidos sanos circundantes. Está indicada en cáncer primario de pulmón de células no pequeñas en estadios tempranos (T1 y T2) no operable, metástasis pulmonares con un tumor primario controlado, tumores prostáticos y enfermedad oligometastásica. A pesar de la falta de estudios a largo plazo o fase III, los resultados de su eficacia en el control local es superior a 90 %, con toxicidad similar a la reportada con fraccionamientos convencionales de radioterapia. Este artículo describe la tecnología y la técnica de radioterapia corporal estereotáctica, con las aplicaciones clínicas, indicaciones y limitaciones de esta modalidad terapéutica.

Efficacy and safety of recombinant human endostatin during peri-radiotherapy period in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Background: This study aimed to retrospectively investigate the efficacy and safety of recombinant human endostatin (Rh-endostatin) combined with radiotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: Patients with unresectable stage III and IV NSCLC who treated with radiotherapy were enrolled. Patients who received Rh-endostatin infusion throughout the whole peri-radiotherapy period formed the Endostar group, and those who received no Rh-endostatin infusion were the control group. Results: The median progression-free survival was 8.0 and 4.4 months (hazard ratio: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.32-0.90; p = 0.019) and median overall survival was 40.0 and 13.1 months (hazard ratio: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.28-0.98; p = 0.045) for the Endostar and control groups, respectively. The Endostar group exhibited a numerically lower rate of radiation pneumonitis relapse, radiation pneumonitis death and pulmonary fibrosis. Conclusion: Rh-endostatin infusion throughout the peri-radiotherapy period enhanced radiosensitivity and showed better survival outcomes and a tendency toward fewer radiation-related pulmonary events in patients with NSCLC.

Recombinant human endostatin (Rh-endostatin/Endostar) combined with chemotherapy has been approved as first-line standard treatment in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in China. This study aimed to retrospectively investigate the efficacy and safety of Rh-endostatin combined with radiotherapy in advanced NSCLC. Patients with unresectable stage III and IV NSCLC who treated with radiotherapy were enrolled. Patients who received Rh-endostatin infusion throughout the whole peri-radiotherapy period were the Endostar group, and those receiving no Rh-endostatin infusion were the control group. Results showed that the median progression-free survival was 8.0 and 4.4 months, and median overall survival was 40.0 and 13.1 months, for the Endostar and control groups, respectively. The Endostar group had a lower rate of radiation pneumonitis relapse, radiation pneumonitis death and pulmonary fibrosis. In conclusion, Rh-endostatin infusion throughout the peri-radiotherapy period enhanced radiosensitivity and showed better survival outcomes and a tendency toward fewer radiation-related pulmonary events in patients with NSCLC.

INSIGHT 2: a phase II study of tepotinib plus osimertinib in MET-amplified NSCLC and first-line osimertinib resistance.

MET amplification (METamp), a mechanism of acquired resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors, occurs in up to 30% of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) progressing on first-line osimertinib. Combining osimertinib with a MET inhibitor, such as tepotinib, an oral, highly selective, potent MET tyrosine kinase inhibitor, may overcome METamp-driven resistance. INSIGHT 2 (NCT03940703), an international, open-label, multicenter phase II trial, assesses tepotinib plus osimertinib in patients with advanced/metastatic EGFR-mutant NSCLC and acquired resistance to first-line osimertinib and METamp, determined centrally by fluorescence in situ hybridization (gene copy number ≥5 and/or MET/CEP7 ≥2) at time of progression. Patients will receive tepotinib 500 mg (450 mg active moiety) plus osimertinib 80 mg once-a-day. The primary end point is objective response, and secondary end points include duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival and safety. Trial registration number: NCT03940703 (clinicaltrials.gov).

Osimertinib is used to treat a type of lung cancer that has specific changes (mutations) in a gene called EGFR. Although tumors will usually shrink (respond) during treatment with osimertinib, they can stop responding, or become resistant, to osimertinib. A common cause of resistance is 'MET amplification', which describes when extra copies of a gene called MET are present. Lung cancer that is resistant to osimertinib due to MET amplification could be treated by combining osimertinib with a treatment that blocks MET, such as tepotinib. INSIGHT 2 is an ongoing study that is designed to learn about the effects and safety of tepotinib combined with osimertinib, in patients with lung cancer that has stopped responding to osimertinib because of MET amplification. A plain language version of this article is available and is published alongside the paper online: www.futuremedicine.com/doi/suppl/10.2217/fon-2021-1406.

Efficacy of PD-1/L1 inhibitors in brain metastases of non-small-cell lung cancer: pooled analysis from seven randomized controlled trials.

Background: The efficacy of PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors in patients with brain metastases of non-small-cell lung cancer (BM-NSCLC) is inconclusive. Materials & methods: An electronic search was performed. Randomized controlled trials RCTs that compared the efficacy of PD-1- or PD-L1-inhibitor-based regimens with non-PD-1/L1 inhibitor regimens in patients with NSCLC and reported the data of subgroup patients with brain metastases were eligible for inclusion. The hazard ratios (HRs) for progression-free survival and overall survival were pooled in BM-NSCLC. Results: Seven RCTs with 472 BM-NSCLC cases are included. The pooled HRs indicated that PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitor-based regimens reduced risk of disease progression by 44% and reduced risk of death of BM-NSCLC patients by 29% compared with non-PD-1/L1 inhibitor regimens. Conclusion: This meta-analysis indicates that PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors can reduce risk of both disease progression and death of patients with brain metastases of NSCLC, who have been pretreated with local therapies and/or are asymptomatic for the brain lesions.

Lay abstracts The efficacy of PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors in patients with brain metastases of non-small-cell lung cancer (BM-NSCLC) is still inconclusive. We searched the electronic database of PubMed, Web of Science and Embase. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the effectiveness of PD-1- or PD-L1-inhibitor-based treatment with non-PD-1/L1 inhibitor-based regimens in patients with NSCLC and reported the data of subgroup patients with brain metastases were eligible for inclusion. Finally, seven RCTs with 472 BM-NSCLC cases are included. All of these patients have been pretreated with local therapies and/or are asymptomatic for the brain lesions before joining the clinical trials. The pooled data of all trials indicated that PD-1- or PD-L1-inhibitor-based treatments reduced risk of disease progression of BM-NSCLC patients by 44% compared with non-PD-1/L1 inhibitor-based treatments. The results also showed that PD-1- or PD-L1-inhibitor-based treatments reduced risk of death of BM-NSCLC patients by 29% compared with non-PD-1/L1-inhibitor-based treatments. Our meta-analysis indicated that PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors can reduce risk of both disease progression and death in patients with brain metastases of NSCLC who have been pretreated with local therapies and/or are asymptomatic for the brain lesions.

CEBPγ facilitates lamellipodia formation and cancer cell migration through CERS6 upregulation.

Ceramide synthase 6 (CERS6) promotes lung cancer metastasis by stimulating cancer cell migration. To examine the underlying mechanisms, we performed luciferase analysis of the CERS6 promoter region and identified the Y-box as a cis-acting element. As a parallel analysis of database records for 149 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cancer patients, we screened for trans-acting factors with an expression level showing a correlation with CERS6 expression. Among the candidates noted, silencing of either CCAAT enhancer-binding protein γ (CEBPγ) or Y-box binding protein 1 (YBX1) reduced the CERS6 expression level. Following knockdown, CEBPγ and YBX1 were found to be independently associated with reductions in ceramide-dependent lamellipodia formation as well as migration activity, while only CEBPγ may have induced CERS6 expression through specific binding to the Y-box. The mRNA expression levels of CERS6, CEBPγ, and YBX1 were positively correlated with adenocarcinoma invasiveness. YBX1 expression was observed in all 20 examined clinical lung cancer specimens, while 6 of those showed a staining pattern similar to that of CERS6. The present findings suggest promotion of lung cancer migration by possible involvement of the transcription factors CEBPγ and YBX1.

LncRNA AC020978 facilitates non-small cell lung cancer progression by interacting with malate dehydrogenase 2 and activating the AKT pathway.

Long non-coding RNA AC020978 (lncRNA AC020978) is an oncogenic regulator of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the function of AC020978 in regulating NSCLC metastasis and the potential molecular mechanism remains largely unknown. In this study, we evaluated the expression levels of AC020978 in a series of NSCLC tissues using FISH assays and found that higher AC020978 expression levels were closely associated with metastasis and unfavorable prognosis. Functional studies showed that AC020978 promoted NSCLC migration and invasion both in vitro and in vivo. Further investigation demonstrated that AC020978 interacted with malate dehydrogenase 2 (MDH2) and maintained MDH2 stability. Knockdown of MDH2 weakened the facilitating effect on cell metastasis and 2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG) metabolism in AC020978-overexpressed NSCLC cells. RNA sequencing, bioinformatic analysis, and western blotting revealed that AC020978 was associated with the AKT signaling pathway. Taken together, our findings revealed that AC020978 might serve as a prognostic biomarker and activate the AKT pathway by stabilizing MDH2, leading to metastasis and progression of NSCLC.

N-glycosylated GPNMB ligand independently activates mutated EGFR signaling and promotes metastasis in NSCLC.

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. As well as the identified role of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), its association with driver mutations has improved the therapeutics for patients with lung cancer harboring EGFR mutations. These patients usually display shorter overall survival and a higher tendency to develop distant metastasis compared with those carrying the wild-type EGFR. Nevertheless, the way to control mutated EGFR signaling remains unclear. Here, we performed membrane proteomic analysis to determine potential components that may act with EGFR mutations to promote lung cancer malignancy. Expression of transmembrane glycoprotein non-metastatic melanoma protein B (GPNMB) was positively correlated with the status of mutated EGFR in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This protein was not only overexpressed but also highly glycosylated in EGFR-mutated, especially EGFR-L858R mutated, NSCLC cells. Further examination showed that GPNMB could activate mutated EGFR without ligand stimulation and could bind to the C-terminus of EGFR, assist phosphorylation at Y845, turn on downstream STAT3 signaling, and promote cancer metastasis. Moreover, we also found that Asn134 (N134) glycosylation of GPNMB played a crucial role in this ligand-independent regulation. Depleting N134-glycosylation on GPNMB could dramatically inhibit binding of GPNMB to mutated EGFR, blocking its downstream signaling, and ultimately inhibiting cancer metastasis in NSCLC. Clarifying the role of N-glycosylated GPNMB in regulating the ligand-independent activation of mutated EGFR may soon give new insight into the development of novel therapeutics for NSCLC.

Pembrolizumab plus Chemotherapy for Squamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Standard first-line therapy for metastatic, squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is platinum-based chemotherapy or pembrolizumab (for patients with programmed death ligand 1 [PD-L1] expression on ≥50% of tumor cells). More recently, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy was shown to significantly prolong overall survival among patients with nonsquamous NSCLC. METHODS: In this double-blind, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, 559 patients with untreated metastatic, squamous NSCLC to receive 200 mg of pembrolizumab or saline placebo for up to 35 cycles; all the patients also received carboplatin and either paclitaxel or nanoparticle albumin-bound [nab]-paclitaxel for the first 4 cycles. Primary end points were overall survival and progression-free survival. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 7.8 months, the median overall survival was 15.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 13.2 to not reached) in the pembrolizumab-combination group and 11.3 months (95% CI, 9.5 to 14.8) in the placebo-combination group (hazard ratio for death, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.85; P<0.001). The overall survival benefit was consistent regardless of the level of PD-L1 expression. The median progression-free survival was 6.4 months (95% CI, 6.2 to 8.3) in the pembrolizumab-combination group and 4.8 months (95% CI, 4.3 to 5.7) in the placebo-combination group (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.70; P<0.001). Adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in 69.8% of the patients in the pembrolizumab-combination group and in 68.2% of the patients in the placebo-combination group. Discontinuation of treatment because of adverse events was more frequent in the pembrolizumab-combination group than in the placebo-combination group (13.3% vs. 6.4%). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with previously untreated metastatic, squamous NSCLC, the addition of pembrolizumab to chemotherapy with carboplatin plus paclitaxel or nab-paclitaxel resulted in significantly longer overall survival and progression-free survival than chemotherapy alone. (Funded by Merck Sharp & Dohme; KEYNOTE-407 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02775435 .).

Brigatinib versus Crizotinib in ALK-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Brigatinib, a next-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor, has robust efficacy in patients with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that is refractory to crizotinib. The efficacy of brigatinib, as compared with crizotinib, in patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC who have not previously received an ALK inhibitor is unclear. METHODS: In an open-label, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC who had not previously received ALK inhibitors to receive brigatinib at a dose of 180 mg once daily (with a 7-day lead-in period at 90 mg) or crizotinib at a dose of 250 mg twice daily. The primary end point was progression-free survival as assessed by blinded independent central review. Secondary end points included the objective response rate and intracranial response. The first interim analysis was planned when approximately 50% of 198 expected events of disease progression or death had occurred. RESULTS: A total of 275 patients underwent randomization; 137 were assigned to brigatinib and 138 to crizotinib. At the first interim analysis (99 events), the median follow-up was 11.0 months in the brigatinib group and 9.3 months in the crizotinib group. The rate of progression-free survival was higher with brigatinib than with crizotinib (estimated 12-month progression-free survival, 67% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 56 to 75] vs. 43% [95% CI, 32 to 53]; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.33 to 0.74]; P<0.001 by the log-rank test). The confirmed objective response rate was 71% (95% CI, 62 to 78) with brigatinib and 60% (95% CI, 51 to 68) with crizotinib; the confirmed rate of intracranial response among patients with measurable lesions was 78% (95% CI, 52 to 94) and 29% (95% CI, 11 to 52), respectively. No new safety concerns were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with ALK-positive NSCLC who had not previously received an ALK inhibitor, progression-free survival was significantly longer among patients who received brigatinib than among those who received crizotinib. (Funded by Ariad Pharmaceuticals; ALTA-1L ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02737501 .).

Pembrolizumab plus Chemotherapy in Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: First-line therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that lacks targetable mutations is platinum-based chemotherapy. Among patients with a tumor proportion score for programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) of 50% or greater, pembrolizumab has replaced cytotoxic chemotherapy as the first-line treatment of choice. The addition of pembrolizumab to chemotherapy resulted in significantly higher rates of response and longer progression-free survival than chemotherapy alone in a phase 2 trial. METHODS: In this double-blind, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned (in a 2:1 ratio) 616 patients with metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC without sensitizing EGFR or ALK mutations who had received no previous treatment for metastatic disease to receive pemetrexed and a platinum-based drug plus either 200 mg of pembrolizumab or placebo every 3 weeks for 4 cycles, followed by pembrolizumab or placebo for up to a total of 35 cycles plus pemetrexed maintenance therapy. Crossover to pembrolizumab monotherapy was permitted among the patients in the placebo-combination group who had verified disease progression. The primary end points were overall survival and progression-free survival, as assessed by blinded, independent central radiologic review. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 10.5 months, the estimated rate of overall survival at 12 months was 69.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 64.1 to 73.8) in the pembrolizumab-combination group versus 49.4% (95% CI, 42.1 to 56.2) in the placebo-combination group (hazard ratio for death, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.64; P<0.001). Improvement in overall survival was seen across all PD-L1 categories that were evaluated. Median progression-free survival was 8.8 months (95% CI, 7.6 to 9.2) in the pembrolizumab-combination group and 4.9 months (95% CI, 4.7 to 5.5) in the placebo-combination group (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.64; P<0.001). Adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in 67.2% of the patients in the pembrolizumab-combination group and in 65.8% of those in the placebo-combination group. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with previously untreated metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC without EGFR or ALK mutations, the addition of pembrolizumab to standard chemotherapy of pemetrexed and a platinum-based drug resulted in significantly longer overall survival and progression-free survival than chemotherapy alone. (Funded by Merck; KEYNOTE-189 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02578680 .).

Atezolizumab for First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Nonsquamous NSCLC.

BACKGROUND: The cancer-cell-killing property of atezolizumab may be enhanced by the blockade of vascular endothelial growth factor-mediated immunosuppression with bevacizumab. This open-label, phase 3 study evaluated atezolizumab plus bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in patients with metastatic nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had not previously received chemotherapy. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients to receive atezolizumab plus carboplatin plus paclitaxel (ACP), bevacizumab plus carboplatin plus paclitaxel (BCP), or atezolizumab plus BCP (ABCP) every 3 weeks for four or six cycles, followed by maintenance therapy with atezolizumab, bevacizumab, or both. The two primary end points were investigator-assessed progression-free survival both among patients in the intention-to-treat population who had a wild-type genotype (WT population; patients with EGFR or ALK genetic alterations were excluded) and among patients in the WT population who had high expression of an effector T-cell (Teff) gene signature in the tumor (Teff-high WT population) and overall survival in the WT population. The ABCP group was compared with the BCP group before the ACP group was compared with the BCP group. RESULTS: In the WT population, 356 patients were assigned to the ABCP group, and 336 to the BCP group. The median progression-free survival was longer in the ABCP group than in the BCP group (8.3 months vs. 6.8 months; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52 to 0.74; P<0.001); the corresponding values in the Teff-high WT population were 11.3 months and 6.8 months (hazard ratio, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.38 to 0.68]; P<0.001). Progression-free survival was also longer in the ABCP group than in the BCP group in the entire intention-to-treat population (including those with EGFR or ALK genetic alterations) and among patients with low or negative programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, those with low Teff gene-signature expression, and those with liver metastases. Median overall survival among the patients in the WT population was longer in the ABCP group than in the BCP group (19.2 months vs. 14.7 months; hazard ratio for death, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.96; P=0.02). The safety profile of ABCP was consistent with previously reported safety risks of the individual medicines. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of atezolizumab to bevacizumab plus chemotherapy significantly improved progression-free survival and overall survival among patients with metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC, regardless of PD-L1 expression and EGFR or ALK genetic alteration status. (Funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche/Genentech; IMpower150 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02366143 .).

A multiparametric approach to improve the prediction of response to immunotherapy in patients with metastatic NSCLC.

BACKGROUND: It is still unclear how to combine biomarkers to identify patients who will truly benefit from anti-PD-1 agents in NSCLC. This study investigates exosomal mRNA expression of PD-L1 and IFN-γ, PD-L1 polymorphisms, tumor mutational load (TML) in circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and radiomic features as possible predictive markers of response to nivolumab and pembrolizumab in metastatic NSCLC patients. METHODS: Patients were enrolled and blood (12 ml) was collected at baseline before receiving anti-PD-1 therapy. Exosome-derived mRNA and cfDNA were extracted to analyse PD-L1 and IFN-γ expression and tumor mutational load (TML) by digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) and next-generation sequencing (NGS), respectively. The PD-L1 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) c.-14-368 T > C and c.*395G > C, were analysed on genomic DNA by Real-Time PCR. A radiomic analysis was performed on the QUIBIM Precision® V3.0 platform. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were enrolled. High baseline IFN-γ was independently associated with shorter median PFS (5.6 months vs. not reached p = 0.0057), and levels of PD-L1 showed an increase at 3 months vs. baseline in patients who progressed (p = 0.01). PD-L1 baseline levels showed significant direct and inverse relationships with radiomic features. Radiomic features also inversely correlated with PD-L1 expression in tumor tissue. In subjects receiving nivolumab, median PFS was shorter in carriers of c.*395GG vs. c.*395GC/CC genotype (2.3 months vs. not reached, p = 0.041). Lastly, responders had higher non-synonymous mutations and more links between co-occurring genetic somatic mutations and ARID1A alterations as well. CONCLUSIONS: A combined multiparametric approach may provide a better understanding of the molecular determinants of response to immunotherapy.