Enfortumab Vedotin and Pembrolizumab in Untreated Advanced Urothelial Cancer.

BACKGROUND: No treatment has surpassed platinum-based chemotherapy in improving overall survival in patients with previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. METHODS: We conducted a phase 3, global, open-label, randomized trial to compare the efficacy and safety of enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab with the efficacy and safety of platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive 3-week cycles of enfortumab vedotin (at a dose of 1.25 mg per kilogram of body weight intravenously on days 1 and 8) and pembrolizumab (at a dose of 200 mg intravenously on day 1) (enfortumab vedotin-pembrolizumab group) or gemcitabine and either cisplatin or carboplatin (determined on the basis of eligibility to receive cisplatin) (chemotherapy group). The primary end points were progression-free survival as assessed by blinded independent central review and overall survival. RESULTS: A total of 886 patients underwent randomization: 442 to the enfortumab vedotin-pembrolizumab group and 444 to the chemotherapy group. As of August 8, 2023, the median duration of follow-up for survival was 17.2 months. Progression-free survival was longer in the enfortumab vedotin-pembrolizumab group than in the chemotherapy group (median, 12.5 months vs. 6.3 months; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38 to 0.54; P<0.001), as was overall survival (median, 31.5 months vs. 16.1 months; hazard ratio for death, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.58; P<0.001). The median number of cycles was 12 (range, 1 to 46) in the enfortumab vedotin-pembrolizumab group and 6 (range, 1 to 6) in the chemotherapy group. Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in 55.9% of the patients in the enfortumab vedotin-pembrolizumab group and in 69.5% of those in the chemotherapy group. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab resulted in significantly better outcomes than chemotherapy in patients with untreated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma, with a safety profile consistent with that in previous reports. (Funded by Astellas Pharma US and others; EV-302 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04223856.).

Nivolumab plus Gemcitabine-Cisplatin in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: No new agent has improved overall survival in patients with unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma when added to first-line cisplatin-based chemotherapy. METHODS: In this phase 3, multinational, open-label trial, we randomly assigned patients with previously untreated unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma either to receive intravenous nivolumab (at a dose of 360 mg) plus gemcitabine-cisplatin (nivolumab combination) every 3 weeks for up to six cycles, followed by nivolumab (at a dose of 480 mg) every 4 weeks for a maximum of 2 years, or to receive gemcitabine-cisplatin alone every 3 weeks for up to six cycles. The primary outcomes were overall and progression-free survival. The objective response and safety were exploratory outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 608 patients underwent randomization (304 to each group). At a median follow-up of 33.6 months, overall survival was longer with nivolumab-combination therapy than with gemcitabine-cisplatin alone (hazard ratio for death, 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63 to 0.96; P = 0.02); the median survival was 21.7 months (95% CI, 18.6 to 26.4) as compared with 18.9 months (95% CI, 14.7 to 22.4), respectively. Progression-free survival was also longer with nivolumab-combination therapy than with gemcitabine-cisplatin alone (hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.88; P = 0.001). The median progression-free survival was 7.9 months and 7.6 months, respectively. At 12 months, progression-free survival was 34.2% and 21.8%, respectively. The overall objective response was 57.6% (complete response, 21.7%) with nivolumab-combination therapy and 43.1% (complete response, 11.8%) with gemcitabine-cisplatin alone. The median duration of complete response was 37.1 months with nivolumab-combination therapy and 13.2 months with gemcitabine-cisplatin alone. Grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 61.8% and 51.7% of the patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy with nivolumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin resulted in significantly better outcomes in patients with previously untreated advanced urothelial carcinoma than gemcitabine-cisplatin alone. (Funded by Bristol Myers Squibb and Ono Pharmaceutical; CheckMate 901 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03036098.).

Erdafitinib or Chemotherapy in Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Erdafitinib is a pan-fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitor approved for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma in adults with susceptible FGFR3/2 alterations who have progression after platinum-containing chemotherapy. The effects of erdafitinib in patients with FGFR-altered metastatic urothelial carcinoma who have progression during or after treatment with checkpoint inhibitors (anti-programmed cell death protein 1 [PD-1] or anti-programmed death ligand 1 [PD-L1] agents) are unclear. METHODS: We conducted a global phase 3 trial of erdafitinib as compared with chemotherapy in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma with susceptible FGFR3/2 alterations who had progression after one or two previous treatments that included an anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive erdafitinib or the investigator's choice of chemotherapy (docetaxel or vinflunine). The primary end point was overall survival. RESULTS: A total of 266 patients underwent randomization: 136 to the erdafitinib group and 130 to the chemotherapy group. The median follow-up was 15.9 months. The median overall survival was significantly longer with erdafitinib than with chemotherapy (12.1 months vs. 7.8 months; hazard ratio for death, 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.47 to 0.88; P = 0.005). The median progression-free survival was also longer with erdafitinib than with chemotherapy (5.6 months vs. 2.7 months; hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.78; P<0.001). The incidence of grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events was similar in the two groups (45.9% in the erdafitinib group and 46.4% in the chemotherapy group). Treatment-related adverse events that led to death were less common with erdafitinib than with chemotherapy (in 0.7% vs. 5.4% of patients). CONCLUSIONS: Erdafitinib therapy resulted in significantly longer overall survival than chemotherapy among patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma and FGFR alterations after previous anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 treatment. (Funded by Janssen Research and Development; THOR ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03390504.).

TP53 disruptive mutation predicts platinum-based chemotherapy and PD-1/PD-L1 blockade response in urothelial carcinoma.

TP53 mutation is one of the most common genetic alterations in urothelial carcinoma (UrCa), and heterogeneity of TP53 mutants leads to heterogeneous clinical outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the clinical relevance of specific TP53 mutations in UrCa. In this study, a total of eight cohorts were enrolled, along with matched clinical annotation. TP53 mutations were classified as disruptive and nondisruptive according to the degree of disturbance of p53 protein function and structure. We evaluated the clinical significance of TP53 mutations in our local datasets and publicly available datasets. The co-occurring events of TP53 mutations in UrCa, along with their therapeutic indications, functional effects, and the tumor immune microenvironment, were also investigated. TP53 mutations were identified in 49.7% of the UrCa patients. Within this group, 25.1% of patients carried TP53Disruptive mutations, a genetic alteration correlated with a significantly poorer overall survival (OS) when compared to individuals with TP53Nondisruptive mutations and those with wild-type TP53. Significantly, patients with TP53Disruptive mutations exhibit an increased probability of responding favorably to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade and chemoimmunotherapy. Meanwhile, there was no noteworthy distinction in OS among patients with varying TP53 mutation status who underwent chemotherapy. Samples with TP53Disruptive mutations showed an enriched APOBEC- and POLE-related mutational signature, as well as an elevated tumor mutation burden. The sensitivity to immunotherapy in tumors carrying TP53Disruptive mutation may be attributed to the inflamed tumor microenvironment characterized by increased CD8+T cell infiltration and interferon-gamma signaling activation. In conclusion, UrCa patients with TP53Disruptive mutations have shown reduced survival rates, yet they may respond well to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapy and chemoimmunotherapy. By distinguishing specific TP53 mutations, we can improve risk stratification and offer personalized genomics-guided therapy to UrCa patients. © 2024 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Systemic anticancer therapy for urothelial carcinoma: UK oncologists' perspective.

Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is a common cancer associated with a poor prognosis in patients with advanced disease. Platinum-based chemotherapy has remained the cornerstone of systemic anticancer treatment for many years, and recent developments in the treatment landscape have improved outcomes. In this review, we provide an overview of systemic treatment for UC, including clinical data supporting the current standard of care at each point in the treatment pathway and author interpretations from a UK perspective. Neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy is recommended for eligible patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer and is preferable to adjuvant treatment. For first-line treatment of advanced UC, platinum-eligible patients should receive cisplatin- or carboplatin-based chemotherapy, followed by avelumab maintenance in those without disease progression. Among patients unable to receive platinum-based chemotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment is an option for those with programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive tumours. Second-line or later treatment options depend on prior treatment, and enfortumab vedotin is preferred after prior ICI and chemotherapy, although availability varies between countries. Additional options include rechallenge with platinum-based chemotherapy, an ICI, or non-platinum-based chemotherapy. Areas of uncertainty include the optimal number of first-line chemotherapy cycles for advanced UC and the value of PD-L1 testing for UC.

Presence, Subtypes, and Prognostic Significance of Tertiary Lymphoid Structures in Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the presence and subtypes of tertiary lymphatic structures (TLSs) in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB) and to analyze their associated clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic significance. METHODS: The study enrolled 580 patients with surgically treated UCB, including 313 non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) and 267 muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). The presence and subtypes of TLSs were identified by immunohistochemistry (CD20, CD3, Bcl-6, and CD21). TLSs were classified into non-GC (nGC) TLS and GC TLS subtypes based on germinal center (GC) formation. Disease-free survival (DFS) was used as an endpoint outcome to evaluate the prognostic significance of TLS and its subtypes in UCB. RESULTS: TLSs were more common in MIBC than in NMIBC (67.8% vs 48.2%, P < .001), and the tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) mean density was significantly higher in MIBC than in NMIBC (24.0% vs 17.5%, P < .001). Moreover, a positive correlation was found between TLS presence and GC structure formation and TIL infiltration in UCB. Endpoint events occurred in 191 patients. Compared to patients with endpoint events, patients without disease progression exhibited higher TIL density and more TLSs (P < .05). Kaplan-Meier curves showed that TLS was associated with better DFS in NMIBC (P = .041) and MIBC (P = .049). However, the Cox multivariate analysis did not demonstrate the prognostic significance of TLS. CONCLUSIONS: TLS is heterogeneous in UCB, and that TLS and GC structures are related to TIL density and prognostic events. However, TLS as a prognostic indicator remains unclear, warranting further investigation.

Adjuvant Nivolumab versus Placebo in Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The role of adjuvant treatment in high-risk muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma after radical surgery is not clear. METHODS: In a phase 3, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial, we assigned patients with muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma who had undergone radical surgery to receive, in a 1:1 ratio, either nivolumab (240 mg intravenously) or placebo every 2 weeks for up to 1 year. Neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy before trial entry was allowed. The primary end points were disease-free survival among all the patients (intention-to-treat population) and among patients with a tumor programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression level of 1% or more. Survival free from recurrence outside the urothelial tract was a secondary end point. RESULTS: A total of 353 patients were assigned to receive nivolumab and 356 to receive placebo. The median disease-free survival in the intention-to-treat population was 20.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 16.5 to 27.6) with nivolumab and 10.8 months (95% CI, 8.3 to 13.9) with placebo. The percentage of patients who were alive and disease-free at 6 months was 74.9% with nivolumab and 60.3% with placebo (hazard ratio for disease recurrence or death, 0.70; 98.22% CI, 0.55 to 0.90; P<0.001). Among patients with a PD-L1 expression level of 1% or more, the percentage of patients was 74.5% and 55.7%, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.55; 98.72% CI, 0.35 to 0.85; P<0.001). The median survival free from recurrence outside the urothelial tract in the intention-to-treat population was 22.9 months (95% CI, 19.2 to 33.4) with nivolumab and 13.7 months (95% CI, 8.4 to 20.3) with placebo. The percentage of patients who were alive and free from recurrence outside the urothelial tract at 6 months was 77.0% with nivolumab and 62.7% with placebo (hazard ratio for recurrence outside the urothelial tract or death, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.89). Among patients with a PD-L1 expression level of 1% or more, the percentage of patients was 75.3% and 56.7%, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.79). Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in 17.9% of the nivolumab group and 7.2% of the placebo group. Two treatment-related deaths due to pneumonitis were noted in the nivolumab group. CONCLUSIONS: In this trial involving patients with high-risk muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma who had undergone radical surgery, disease-free survival was longer with adjuvant nivolumab than with placebo in the intention-to-treat population and among patients with a PD-L1 expression level of 1% or more. (Funded by Bristol Myers Squibb and Ono Pharmaceutical; CheckMate 274 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02632409.).

Erdafitinib versus pembrolizumab in pretreated patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer with select FGFR alterations: cohort 2 of the randomized phase III THOR trial.

BACKGROUND: Erdafitinib is an oral pan-fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved to treat locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) in patients with susceptible FGFR3/2 alterations (FGFRalt) who progressed after platinum-containing chemotherapy. FGFR-altered tumours are enriched in luminal 1 subtype and may have limited clinical benefit from anti-programmed death-(ligand) 1 [PD-(L)1] treatment. This cohort in the randomized, open-label phase III THOR study assessed erdafitinib versus pembrolizumab in anti-PD-(L)1-naive patients with mUC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients ≥18 years with unresectable advanced/mUC, with select FGFRalt, disease progression on one prior treatment, and who were anti-PD-(L)1-naive were randomized 1 : 1 to receive erdafitinib 8 mg once daily with pharmacodynamically guided uptitration to 9 mg or pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety. RESULTS: The intent-to-treat population (median follow-up 33 months) comprised 175 and 176 patients in the erdafitinib and pembrolizumab arms, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in OS between erdafitinib and pembrolizumab [median 10.9 versus 11.1 months, respectively; hazard ratio (HR) 1.18; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.92-1.51; P = 0.18]. Median PFS for erdafitinib and pembrolizumab was 4.4 and 2.7 months, respectively (HR 0.88; 95% CI 0.70-1.10). ORR was 40.0% and 21.6% (relative risk 1.85; 95% CI 1.32-2.59) and median duration of response was 4.3 and 14.4 months for erdafitinib and pembrolizumab, respectively. 64.7% and 50.9% of patients in the erdafitinib and pembrolizumab arms had ≥1 grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs); 5 (2.9%) and 12 (6.9%) patients, respectively, had AEs that led to death. CONCLUSIONS: Erdafitinib and pembrolizumab had similar median OS in this anti-PD-(L)1-naive, FGFR-altered mUC population. Outcomes with pembrolizumab were better than assumed and aligned with previous reports in non- FGFR-altered populations. Safety results were consistent with the known profiles for erdafitinib and pembrolizumab in this patient population.

KLHDC7B as a novel diagnostic biomarker in urine exosomal mRNA promotes bladder urothelial carcinoma cell proliferation and migration, inhibits apoptosis.

Bladder cancer is a common kind of urinary system cancer, in which bladder urothelial carcinoma (BLCA) comprises approximately 90% of all bladder cancer types. In our previous study, we discovered KLHDC7B in urine exosomal messenger RNA (mRNA) as a prospective molecular marker for bladder cancer detection. To systematically study the role and mechanism of KLHDC7B in BLCA, we focused on the most common type of BLCA in this study. First, we used RNA sequencing to discover that KLHDC7B was considerably increased in BLCA patients' urine exosomes compared to healthy controls. Then, we validated this result in an independent cohort and identified it as an effective tool for diagnosing and distinguishing high-grade and low-grade BLCA. Finally, we studied the role and mechanism of KLHDC7B in BLCA at the cellular level, providing a functional basis for its expression as a novel laboratory diagnostic biomarker for BLCA exosomal mRNA, which has important theoretical and clinical significance.

Characterizing the Genomic Landscape of the Micropapillary Subtype of Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder Harboring Activating Extracellular Mutations of ERBB2.

The micropapillary subtype of urothelial carcinoma (MPUC) of the bladder is a very aggressive histological variant of urothelial bladder cancer (UBC). A high frequency of MPUC contains activating mutations in the extracellular domain (ECD) of ERBB2. We sought to further characterize ERBB2 ECD-mutated MPUC to identify additional genomic alterations that have been associated with tumor progression and therapeutic response. In total, 5,485 cases of archived formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded UBC underwent comprehensive genomic profiling to identify ERBB2 ECD-mutated MPUC and evaluate the frequencies of genomic co-alterations. We identified 219 cases of UBC with ERBB2 ECD mutations (74% S310F and 26% S310Y), of which 63 (28.8%) were MPUC. Genomic analysis revealed that TERT, TP53, and ARID1A were the most common co-altered genes in ERBB2-mutant MPUC (82.5%, 58.7%, and 39.7%, respectively) and did not differ from ERBB2-mutant non-MPUC (86.5%, 51.9%, and 35.3%). The main differences between ERBB2 ECD-mutated MPUC compared with non-MPUC were KMT2D, RB1, and MTAP alterations. KMT2D and RB1 are tumor-suppressor genes. KMT2D frequency was significantly decreased in ERBB2 ECD-mutated MPUC (6.3%) in contrast to non-MPUC (27.6%; P < .001). RB1 mutations were more frequent in ERBB2 ECD-mutated MPUC (33.3%) than in non-MPUC (17.3%; P = .012). Finally, MTAP loss, an emerging biomarker for new synthetic lethality-based anticancer drugs, was less frequent in ERBB2 ECD-mutated MPUC (11.1%) than in non-MPUC (26.9%; P = .018). Characterizing the genomic landscape of MPUC may not only improve our fundamental knowledge about this aggressive morphological variant of UBC but also has the potential to identify possible prognostic and predictive biomarkers that may drive tumor progression and dictate treatment response to therapeutic approaches.

Loss of MTAP Expression by Immunohistochemistry Is a Surrogate Marker for Homozygous 9p21.3 Deletion in Urothelial Carcinoma.

Homozygous deletion of the chromosomal region 9p21.3 is common in urothelial carcinoma (UC) and leads to loss of several genes, including CDKN2A and MTAP, resulting in loss of MTAP protein expression. Here, we aimed to explore the diagnostic potential of MTAP immunohistochemistry (IHC) as a surrogate marker for homozygous 9p21.3 deletion (9p21 homozygous deletion [HD]) in UC. MTAP status was determined by IHC on 27 UC tissue specimens with known 9p21.3 status as defined by fluorescence in situ hybridization in matched cytological specimens, by IHC and fluorescence in situ hybridization on a tissue microarray (TMA) containing 359 UC at different stages, and by IHC on 729 consecutive UC from routine practice. Moreover, we analyzed a longitudinal series of matched specimens from 38 patients with MTAP-negative recurrent UC. MTAP loss by IHC was found in all 17 patients with 9p21 HD and in 2/8 cases without 9p21 HD. In the TMA, MTAP loss was more common in metastases (53%) than in muscle-invasive (33%) and non-muscle-invasive UC (29%) (P = .03). In the consecutive series, 164/729 (22%) cases showed loss of MTAP expression. In 41 of these 164 cases (25%), loss of MTAP expression was heterogenous. We also discovered loss of MTAP expression in flat urothelium adjacent to MTAP-negative low-grade UC, suggesting true flat low-grade neoplasia that could not be diagnosed by morphology alone. Longitudinal analysis of recurrences showed persistent negative MTAP status over time in 37/38 (97%) patients. MTAP IHC can serve as a surrogate marker for 9p21 HD in UC and as a diagnostic tool to differentiate reactive urothelium from urothelial neoplasia. It also provides a unique opportunity to study clinicopathological associations and the heterogeneity of 9p21 HD across the whole spectrum of UC manifestations.

Use of Artificial Intelligence for the Interpretable Prediction of the Pathologic Diagnosis and Molecular Abnormalities of Flat Urothelial Lesions.

Flat urothelial lesions are important because of their potential for carcinogenesis and development into invasive urothelial carcinomas. However, it is difficult for pathologists to detect early flat urothelial changes and accurately diagnose flat urothelial lesions. To predict the pathologic diagnosis and molecular abnormalities of flat urothelial lesions from pathologic images, artificial intelligence with an interpretable method was used. Next-generation sequencing on 110 hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides of normal urothelium and flat urothelial lesions, including atypical urothelium, dysplasia, and carcinoma in situ, detected 17 types of molecular abnormalities. To generate an interpretable prediction, a new method for segmenting urothelium and a new pathologic criteria-based artificial intelligence (PCB-AI) model was developed. κ Statistics and accuracy measurements were used to evaluate the ability of the model to predict the pathologic diagnosis. The likelihood ratio test was performed to evaluate the logistic regression models for predicting molecular abnormalities. The diagnostic prediction of the PCB-AI model was almost in perfect agreement with the pathologists' diagnoses (weighted κ = 0.98). PCB-AI significantly predicted some molecular abnormalities in an interpretable manner, including abnormalities of TP53 (P = 0.02), RB1 (P = 0.04), and ERCC2 (P = 0.04). Thus, this study developed a new method of obtaining accurate urothelial segmentation, interpretable prediction of pathologic diagnosis, and interpretable prediction of molecular abnormalities.

Impact of Divergent Differentiation and/or Histological Subtype of Urothelial Carcinoma on Patient Outcomes in the GETUG-AFU V05 VESPER Trial.

PURPOSE: Variant histology or divergent differentiation (VH/DD) of urothelial carcinoma (UC) may impact outcomes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Our aim was to assess the pathological response and progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with VH/DD in the prospective VESPER clinical trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This post hoc study included 300 NAC-treated patients with available transurethral diagnostic slides. Presence and percentage of VH/DDs were reviewed. For pathological response, logistic regression models were computed to measure association with VH/DD. For PFS, the associations were estimated in Cox proportional hazard regression model. All models were adjusted for randomization arm. RESULTS: VH/DD was identified in 177/300 patients (59%) and was predominant (≥50%) in 85/177. Compared to pure UC, VH/DD (≥10% or ≥50%) was not associated with a difference in proportion of complete pathological response (ypT0N0; OR adjusted: 0.79, 95% CI 0.49-1.29), downstaging (≤ypT1N0; OR adjusted: 0.62, 95% CI 0.37-1.02), or with an increased hazard of PFS (HR adjusted: 1.24, 95% CI 0.83-1.85). However, comparing specific VH/DD to pure UC, nested subtype was associated with decreased odds of complete pathological response (OR adjusted: 0.33, 95% CI 0.12-0.88) and downstaging (OR adjusted: 0.30, 95% CI 0.13-0.74), and an increased hazard of PFS was observed for UC with ≥ 50% squamous differentiation (HR adjusted: 2.11, 95% CI 1.01-4.38) or micropapillary subtype (HR adjusted: 2.03, 95% CI 0.98-4.22). CONCLUSIONS: In the VESPER trial, we did not observe evidence for association of VH/DD with outcomes after NAC, but the specific presence of a predominant squamous differentiation or micropapillary subtype may be associated with shorter PFS.

Treatment of Non-Metastatic Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: AUA/ASCO/SUO Guideline (2017; Amended 2020, 2024).

PURPOSE: Although representing approximately 25% of patients diagnosed with bladder cancer, muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) carries a significant risk of death that has not significantly changed in decades. Increasingly, clinicians and patients recognize the importance of multidisciplinary collaborative efforts that take into account survival and quality of life concerns. This guideline provides a risk-stratified, clinical framework for the management of muscle-invasive urothelial bladder cancer. METHODOLOGY/METHODS: In 2024, the MIBC guideline was updated through the AUA amendment process in which newly published literature is reviewed and integrated into previously published guidelines in an effort to maintain currency. The amendment allowed for the incorporation of additional literature released since the previous 2020 amendment. The updated search gathered literature from May 2020 to November 2023. This review identified 3739 abstracts, of which 46 met inclusion criteria.When sufficient evidence existed, the body of evidence was assigned a strength rating of A (high), B (moderate), or C (low) for support of Strong, Moderate, or Conditional Recommendations. In the absence of sufficient evidence, additional information is provided as Clinical Principles and Expert Opinions. RESULTS: Updates were made regarding neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy, radical cystectomy, pelvic lymphadenectomy, multi-modal bladder preserving therapy, and future directions. Further revisions were made to the methodology and reference sections as appropriate. CONCLUSIONS: This guideline seeks to improve clinicians' ability to evaluate and treat patients with MIBC based on currently available evidence. Future studies will be essential to further support or refine these statements to improve patient care.

Phase 1b Trial Evaluating Tolerability and Activity of Targeted Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor Inhibition in Localized Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.

PURPOSE: We initiated a biomarker-informed preoperative study of infigratinib, a fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitor, in patients with localized upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), a population with high unmet needs and tumor with a high frequency of FGFR3 alterations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with localized UTUC undergoing ureteroscopy or nephroureterectomy/ureterectomy were enrolled on a phase 1b trial (NCT04228042). Once-daily infigratinib 125 mg by mouth × 21 days (28-day cycle) was given for 2 cycles. Tolerability was monitored by Bayesian design and predefined stopping boundaries. The primary endpoint was tolerability, and the secondary endpoint was objective response based on tumor mapping, done after endoscopic biopsy and post-trial surgery. Total planned enrollment: 20 patients. Targeted sequencing performed using a NovaSeq 6000 solid tumor panel. RESULTS: From May 2021 to November 2022, 14 patients were enrolled, at which point the trial was closed due to termination of all infigratinib oncology trials. Two patients (14.3%) had treatment-terminating toxicities, well below the stopping threshold. Responses occurred in 6 (66.7%) of 9 patients with FGFR3 alterations. Responders had median tumor size reduction of 67%, with 3 of 5 patients initially planned for nephroureterectomy/ureterectomy converted to ureteroscopy. Median follow-up in responders was 24.7 months (14.9-28.9). CONCLUSIONS: In this first trial of targeted therapy for localized UTUC, FGFR inhibition was well tolerated and had significant activity in FGFR3 altered tumors. Renal preservation was enabled in a substantial proportion of participants. These data support the design of a biomarker-driven phase 2 trial of FGFR3 inhibition in this population with significant unmet clinical needs.

Grade Heterogeneity in High-Grade Urothelial Carcinomas: Does It Have an Impact on the Survival of Patients With Intermediate/High-Risk Nonmuscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Who Received Adequate Adjuvant Bacillus Calmette-Guérin Therapy?

PURPOSE: We aimed to compare recurrence-free survival (RFS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of the patients with pure high-grade (HG) vs mixed-grade (MG) nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer who received adequate bacillus Calmette-Guérin therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis using data from an institutional database. The study included patients diagnosed with HG nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer at the initial transurethral resection specimen between 2010 and 2020. The initial transurethral resection specimens of all patients were reevaluated by a dedicated uropathologist. The percentage of low-grade tumor areas accompanying HG areas was determined for each case. Time-to-event analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. RFS and PFS rates were compared between groups. RESULTS: Of the 203 patients enrolled in the study, 69 (34%) had MG tumors. Recurrence was observed in 41 out of 134 patients (30.6%) in the HG group and in 19 out of 69 patients (27.5%) in the MG group. The 36-month RFS rates were 69% (CI: 62-77) and 72% (CI: 62-83) for the HG-urothelial carcinoma (UC) and MG-UC groups, respectively. The RFS rates were similar between groups (log-rank, P = .58). Progression was observed in 22 out of 134 patients (16.4%) in the HG group and in 4 out of 69 patients (5.8%) in the MG group. The 36-month PFS rates were 84% (CI: 77-90) and 94% (CI: 89-100) for the HG-UC and MG-UC groups, respectively. The pure HG-UC group had a worse PFS than the MG-UC group (log-rank, P = .042). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that age and tumor grade were significant risk factors for the development of progression. CONCLUSIONS: The indication of MG-UC category separately from pure HG carcinomas in the pathology report seems to be an important issue that can guide patient management. In this way, both more accurate risk classification and more accurate patient counseling can be performed. More importantly, the treatment plan can be made more accurately. For more precise conclusions, our results should be supported by prospective studies with larger sample size.

A Phase 2 Trial of Intravesical Gemcitabine and Docetaxel in the Treatment of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin‒Naïve Nonmuscle-Invasive Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder.

PURPOSE: Combination intravesical gemcitabine and docetaxel (GemDoce) has demonstrated efficacy as second-line therapy for patients with bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG)‒unresponsive nonmuscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (NMIBC). In the context of widespread BCG shortages, we performed a phase 2 prospective trial to assess GemDoce for BCG-naïve NMIBC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study is a prospective, single-arm, open-label phase 2 trial for patients with BCG-naïve high-risk NMIBC. Intravesical GemDoce was given weekly for 6 weeks as induction followed by monthly maintenance therapy for 2 years among responders. The primary end point was 3-month complete response, and key secondary end points included adverse events (AEs) and 12-month recurrence-free survival. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were enrolled between August 2020 and August 2022 with median follow-up of 19.6 months. The pretreatment pathologic stages were high-grade (HG) T1 with carcinoma in situ (CIS; n = 7), HGT1 without CIS (n = 6), HGTa (n = 9), and CIS alone (n = 3). The 3-month complete response rate was 100% and recurrence-free survival at 12 months was 92%. Two patients with pretreatment HGT1 had HGT1 recurrences at 9 and 12 months. No patients progressed to T2 disease, underwent radical cystectomy, or had any radiographic evidence of progressive disease. Grade 1 AEs were common (23/25 patients) including hematuria, urinary frequency, urgency, and fatigue. Five patients (20%) experienced a grade 3 AE including hematuria and UTI. CONCLUSIONS: In this single-arm phase 2 trial, GemDoce was well tolerated with promising efficacy for patients with BCG-naïve high-risk NMIBC.

Development and Validation of a Preoperative Nomogram for Endoscopic Management Decision Making in Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to develop and validate a preoperative nomogram that predicts low-grade, non-muscle invasive upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (LG-NMI UTUC), thereby aiding in the accurate selection of endoscopic management (EM) candidates. METHODS: This was a retrospective study that included 454 patients who underwent radical surgery (Cohort 1 and Cohort 2), and 26 patients who received EM (Cohort 3). Utilizing a multivariate logistic regression model, a nomogram predicting LG-NMI UTUC was developed based on data from Cohort 1. The nomogram's accuracy was compared with conventional European Association of Urology (EAU) and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) models. External validation was performed using Cohort 2 data, and the nomogram's prognostic value was evaluated via disease progression metrics in Cohort 3. RESULTS: In Cohort 1, multivariate analyses highlighted the absence of invasive disease on imaging (odds ratio [OR] 7.04; p = 0.011), absence of hydronephrosis (OR 2.06; p = 0.027), papillary architecture (OR 24.9; p < 0.001), and lack of high-grade urine cytology (OR 0.22; p < 0.001) as independent predictive factors for LG-NMI disease. The nomogram outperformed the two conventional models in predictive accuracy (0.869 vs. 0.759-0.821) and exhibited a higher net benefit in decision curve analysis. The model's clinical efficacy was corroborated in Cohort 2. Moreover, the nomogram stratified disease progression-free survival rates in Cohort 3. CONCLUSION: Our nomogram ( https://kmur.shinyapps.io/UTUC_URS/ ) accurately predicts LG-NMI UTUC, thereby identifying suitable candidates for EM. Additionally, the model serves as a useful tool for prognostic stratification in patients undergoing EM.

Recent Advances of Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy for Urothelial Bladder Cancer.

Urothelial bladder cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors of the urinary system, which accounts for 90~95% of urothelial carcinoma. Despite the current standard neoadjuvant management for localized urothelial MIBC (T2-4cN0M0) is cisplatin-based chemotherapy before radical cystectomy, there still had poor performances and less overall survival benefits in patients with localized urothelial MIBC. Moreover, nearly half of MIBC patients were ineligible for receiving cisplatin because of chronic kidney disease and performance status. Although immunotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has been identified as first or second-line treatments for localized and metastasis bladder cancer based on less adverse reactions and favorable outcomes, neoadjuvant immunotherapy had rarely used for the treatment of these patients because of less large-scale clinical randomized studies and limited outcomes. Therefore, we reviewed the advances of efficacy and safety with neoadjuvant immunotherapy for urothelial bladder cancer depended on published articles and clinical studies, which could provide more theoretical evidences and promising strategy for clinical therapeutic development.

Head-to-head: how many categories for grading urothelial carcinoma?

Tumour grade is a critical prognostic parameter for guiding the management of patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. In 2004, the World Health Organisation (WHO) adopted a binary (low-grade/high-grade) grading system to replace the three-tier (grades 1-3) system used to grade urothelial carcinoma since 1973. However, there is significant global variation in the grading of urothelial carcinoma. Some pathology and clinical guidelines recommend reporting of the WHO 1973 and 2004 grades in parallel, while others require reporting only of the WHO 2004 grade. This variation in pathology practice is clinically significant, because the two grading systems are not readily translatable. Some experts have proposed novel systems for grading urothelial carcinoma that involve splitting of the WHO 1973 and 2004 grade categories. The arguments for and against splitting urothelial carcinomas into two-, three- and four-grade categories are independently discussed by the three authors.