RESUMO
Skeletal metastases are frequent complications of many cancers, causing bone complications (fractures, bone pain, disability) that negatively affect the patient's quality of life. Here, we first discuss the burden of skeletal complications in cancer bone metastasis. We then describe the pathophysiology of bone metastasis. Bone metastasis is a multistage process: long before the development of clinically detectable metastases, circulating tumor cells settle and enter a dormant state in normal vascular and endosteal niches present in the bone marrow, which provide immediate attachment and shelter, and only become active years later as they proliferate and alter the functions of bone-resorbing (osteoclasts) and bone-forming (osteoblasts) cells, promoting skeletal destruction. The molecular mechanisms involved in mediating each of these steps are described, and we also explain how tumor cells interact with a myriad of interconnected cell populations in the bone marrow, including a rich vascular network, immune cells, adipocytes, and nerves. We discuss metabolic programs that tumor cells could engage with to specifically grow in bone. We also describe the progress and future directions of existing bone-targeted agents and report emerging therapies that have arisen from recent advances in our understanding of the pathophysiology of bone metastases. Finally, we discuss the value of bone turnover biomarkers in detection and monitoring of progression and therapeutic effects in patients with bone metastasis.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Ósseas/secundário , Osso e Ossos/patologia , Animais , Biomarcadores/metabolismo , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Ósseas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ósseas/metabolismo , Osso e Ossos/metabolismo , Denosumab/uso terapêutico , HumanosRESUMO
Postmenopausal osteoporosis arises from imbalanced osteoclast and osteoblast activity, and mounting evidence suggests a role for the osteoimmune system in bone homeostasis. Bisphosphonate (BP) is an antiresorptive agent, but its treatment failure rate can be as high as 40%. Here, we performed single-cell RNA sequencing on peripheral immune cells from carefully selected postmenopausal women: non-osteoporotic, osteoporosis improved after BP treatment, and BP-failed cases. We found an increase in myeloid cells in patients with osteoporosis (specifically, T cell receptor+ macrophages). Furthermore, lymphoid lineage cells varied significantly, notably elevated natural killer cells (NKs) in the BP-failed group. Moreover, we provide fruitful lists of biomarkers within the immune cells that exhibit condition-dependent differences. The existence of osteoporotic- and BP-failure-specific cellular information flows was revealed by cell-cell interaction analysis. These findings deepen our insight of the osteoporosis pathology enhancing comprehension of the role of immune heterogeneity in postmenopausal osteoporosis and BP treatment failure.
Assuntos
Conservadores da Densidade Óssea , Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa , Osteoporose , Humanos , Feminino , Difosfonatos/farmacologia , Difosfonatos/uso terapêutico , Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa/tratamento farmacológico , Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa/genética , Densidade Óssea , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/farmacologia , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Osteoporose/tratamento farmacológico , Osteoporose/genética , Perfilação da Expressão GênicaRESUMO
We assessed the prevalence of hypocalcemia after denosumab injections in a real-world cohort routinely monitored for calcium during up to 7.5 years of treatment. Among 1096 injections in 242 patients, 6.3% resulted in hypocalcemia, and was independent of the injection number. Severe hypocalcemia was rare (1%). PURPOSE: To assess the prevalence of and risk factors for hypocalcemia after administration of denosumab in a patient cohort routinely monitored for ionized calcium after each dose. METHODS: In this retrospective observational study, we analyzed denosumab-induced hypocalcemia in a real-world cohort who were routinely followed up with ionized calcium pre- and post-injection (within 31 days after injection) during the period 2011 to 2020. RESULTS: In total, we included data from 1096 denosumab injections in 242 individuals (1-15 injections per patient). The mean age for the first injection was 74 ± 10 years, and 88% were female. Post-injection hypocalcemia occurred after 6.3% of all injections (4.6% mild, 0.6% moderate, and 1.1% severe) and was independent of the number of injections (rate of hypocalcemia varied from 3-8%). Risk factors for hypocalcemia were male sex, severe renal failure, pre-injection hypocalcemia, hypomagnesemia, hypophosphatemia, and vitamin D insufficiency. Furthermore, older age was not associated with an increased hypocalcemia risk. CONCLUSIONS: Denosumab-induced hypocalcemia is a prevalent adverse event, which occurs independently of the number of injections. However, severe hypocalcemia is a rare occurrence, and severe renal failure and nutritional status appear to be important predictive factors. Magnesium and phosphate might add value in the pre-injection risk assessment; however, this observation needs to be confirmed in larger cohorts.
Assuntos
Conservadores da Densidade Óssea , Hipocalcemia , Insuficiência Renal , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Hipocalcemia/induzido quimicamente , Hipocalcemia/epidemiologia , Cálcio/uso terapêutico , Denosumab/uso terapêutico , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Prevalência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Insuficiência Renal/complicaçõesRESUMO
COVID-19 infection has resulted in significant morbidity and mortality globally, especially among older adults. Repurposed drugs have demonstrated activity in respiratory illnesses, including nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates. In this retrospective longitudinal study at 4 academic medical centers, we show no benefit of nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates regarding ICU admission, ventilator use, and mortality among older adults with COVID-19 infection. We specifically evaluated the intravenous bisphosphonate zoledronic acid and found no difference compared to oral bisphosphonates. BACKGROUND: Widely used in osteoporosis treatment, nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates (N-BP) have been associated with reduced mortality and morbidity among older adults. Based on prior studies, we hypothesized that prior treatment with N-BP might reduce intensive care unit (ICU) admission, ventilator use, and death among older adults diagnosed with COVID-19. METHODS: This retrospective analysis of the PCORnet Common Data Model across 4 academic medical centers through 1 September 2021 identified individuals age >50 years with a diagnosis of COVID-19. The composite outcome included ICU admission, ventilator use, or death within 15, 30, and 180 days of COVID-19 diagnosis. Use of N-BP was defined as a prescription within 3 years prior. ICU admission and ventilator use were determined using administrative codes. Death included both in-hospital and out-of-hospital events. Patients treated with N-BP were matched 1:1 by propensity score to patients without prior N-BP use. Secondary analysis compared outcomes among those prescribed zoledronic acid (ZOL) to those prescribed oral N-BPs. RESULTS: Of 76,223 COVID-19 patients identified, 1,853 were previously prescribed N-BP, among whom 559 were prescribed ZOL. After propensity score matching, there were no significant differences in the composite outcome at 15 days (HR 1.22, 95% CI: 0.89-1.67), 30 days (HR 1.24, 95% CI: 0.93-1.66), or 180 days (HR 1.17, 95% CI: 0.93-1.48), comparing those prescribed and not prescribed N-BP. Compared to those prescribed oral N-BP, there were no significant differences in outcomes among those prescribed ZOL. CONCLUSION: Among older COVID-19 patients, prior exposure to N-BP including ZOL was not associated with a reduction in ICU admission, ventilator use, or death.
Assuntos
Conservadores da Densidade Óssea , COVID-19 , Humanos , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Difosfonatos/uso terapêutico , Ácido Zoledrônico/uso terapêutico , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Teste para COVID-19 , Estudos LongitudinaisRESUMO
Evidence on the management of rebound-associated vertebral fractures after denosumab discontinuation is scarce. This study describes seven patients retreated with denosumab, teriparatide or zoledronate for 24 months. Their bone mineral density remained stable or improved and no new fractures occurred suggesting that all three options might be adequate for their treatment. PURPOSE: To describe the densitometric and biochemical changes achieved with osteoactive treatment after 24 months of follow-up in patients who suffered rebound-associated vertebral fractures (RAVFs) after Dmab discontinuation, and to report the occurrence of new vertebral and non-vertebral fractures. METHODS: Patients with RAVFs who received retreatment (RT) for 24 months were included. Bone mineral density (BMD) was assessed by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry at the lumbar spine (LS), femoral neck (FN) and total hip (TH), along with C-terminal cross-linked telopeptide of type I collagen, osteocalcin, and bone alkaline phosphatase. Data were collected at the start of the RT and after 24 months. RESULTS: Seven female patients were included. RT consisted in Dmab (n = 3), teriparatide (TPT) (n = 3) and zoledronate (Zol) (n = 1). At 24 months, the mean BMD change was 2.2% at LS, 6.8% at FN and 3.8% at TH in the Dmab group, 7.5% at LS, 1.4% at FN and 3.7% at TH in the TPT group and, 5.0% at LS, 0.6% at FN and 3.9% at TH in the patient with Zol. After 24 months of follow-up, no patient suffered new fractures. CONCLUSION: In this series of patients with RAVFs, we did not observe any new fractures and the BMD remained stable after 24 months of RT. Future studies are needed to evaluate the most suitable treatment approach after RAVFs but these preliminary data suggest that all denosumab, zoledronate and teriparatide might be adequate options.
Assuntos
Conservadores da Densidade Óssea , Fraturas Ósseas , Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral , Feminino , Humanos , Denosumab/efeitos adversos , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Teriparatida/uso terapêutico , Ácido Zoledrônico/uso terapêutico , Seguimentos , Fraturas Ósseas/epidemiologia , Densidade Óssea , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/complicações , Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa/complicações , Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
We examined the performance of an intelligent fracture liaison service (FLS) assisted by digital health (DH) to reduce all-cause mortality (ACM) risk. According to our findings, the new FLS reduced ACM by 36%. INTRODUCTION: A well-designed secondary prevention program known as FLS enhances the bone densitometry-based assessment rate as well as osteoporosis (OP) medication usage following a fracture. However, there are only a few reports on FLS incorporating DH, and it remains unclear whether this integration has influenced patient ACM, which refers to the overall death rate from any cause during the study period. METHODS: This retrospective observational study was conducted on data from the Fragility Fracture Registration System database linked to the Regional Health Registration Platform of Kunshan City and the Population Death Registration System of Jiangsu Province for one tertiary-level A hospital in China. Patients aged ≥ 50 years, who experienced an OP fracture between January 1, 2017, and July 27, 2022, requiring hospitalization, were selected for analysis. We compared the outcomes of patients who received routine fragility fracture management (the no-FLS group) or FLS (the FLS group). We employed multivariable Cox regression with inverse probability weighting based on the propensity score (PS). RESULTS: Of 2317 patients, 756 (32.6%) received FLS and 1561 (67.4%) did not. Using PS matching, we minimized the baseline characteristic differences between the two groups in the propensity score-matched samples, relative to the unmatched samples. Based on our analysis, the new FLS reduced ACM by 36% (hazard ratio [HR], 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.47 to 0.87; P-value = 0.004). Moreover, FLS patients experienced further reductions in fall-related mortality, refracture rate, and total refracture-related hospital costs, and had increased dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) testing and treatment initiation rates, relative to the no-FLS patients. CONCLUSIONS: A new FLS model implementation assisted by DH can effectively reduce ACM among elderly patients with OP fractures requiring surgery. In future investigations, we recommend examining the scalability of this model.
Assuntos
Conservadores da Densidade Óssea , Osteoporose , Fraturas por Osteoporose , Idoso , Humanos , Fraturas por Osteoporose/epidemiologia , Saúde Digital , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Osteoporose/tratamento farmacológico , Osteoporose/epidemiologia , Absorciometria de Fóton , Prevenção SecundáriaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Transient hypercalcaemia due to teriparatide occurs in up to 11% of patients though delayed hypercalcaemia (> 24 h post injection) is rare. We report the case of a female who developed significant delayed hypercalcaemia after teriparatide treatment for osteoporosis and review other cases in the literature to date. CASE REPORT: A 72-year-old female on teriparatide for the treatment of osteoporosis was found to have hypercalcaemia (3.30 mmol/l) on routine testing approximately 3 months after starting therapy. Serum calcium pretreatment was normal at 2.39 mmol/l. She was admitted to the hospital for investigations which identified a serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D of 94 nmol/l, a low parathyroid hormone of 6.0 pg/ml, and normal test results for 1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D (115 pmol/l), parathyroid hormone-related peptide (< 1.4 pmol/ml), serum electrophoresis and angiotensin-converting enzyme (39 IU/l). CT abdomen, pelvis, and thorax revealed no evidence of malignancy and an isotope bone scan ruled out skeletal metastases. Serum calcium normalised (2.34 mmol/l) several days after stopping teriparatide and calcium supplements and administering intravenous fluid. On restarting teriparatide, delayed hypercalcaemia reoccurred and treatment was switched to denosumab. DISCUSSION: Delayed moderate to severe hypercalcaemia (serum calcium > 3.0 mmol/l) due to teriparatide is rare but may lead to therapy withdrawal. The underlying predisposing risk factors remain unclear and highlight the importance of a routine serum calcium assessment on therapy.
Assuntos
Conservadores da Densidade Óssea , Hipercalcemia , Teriparatida , Humanos , Hipercalcemia/induzido quimicamente , Hipercalcemia/tratamento farmacológico , Hipercalcemia/sangue , Teriparatida/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Idoso , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/efeitos adversos , Cálcio/sangue , Osteoporose/tratamento farmacológico , Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
Vitamin D is important for musculoskeletal health. Concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D, the most commonly measured metabolite, vary markedly around the world and are influenced by many factors including sun exposure, skin pigmentation, covering, season and supplement use. Whilst overt vitamin D deficiency with biochemical consequences presents an increased risk of severe sequelae such as rickets, osteomalacia or cardiomyopathy and usually warrants prompt replacement treatment, the role of vitamin D supplementation in the population presents a different set of considerations. Here the issue is to keep, on average, the population at a level whereby the risk of adverse health outcomes in the population is minimised. This position paper, which complements recently published work from the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases, addresses key considerations regarding vitamin D assessment and intervention from the population perspective. This position paper, on behalf of the International Osteoporosis Foundation Vitamin D Working Group, summarises the burden and possible amelioration of vitamin D deficiency in global populations. It addresses key issues including screening, supplementation and food fortification.
Assuntos
Suplementos Nutricionais , Saúde Global , Deficiência de Vitamina D , Vitamina D , Humanos , Deficiência de Vitamina D/complicações , Deficiência de Vitamina D/epidemiologia , Deficiência de Vitamina D/tratamento farmacológico , Vitamina D/sangue , Vitamina D/análogos & derivados , Vitamina D/uso terapêutico , Alimentos Fortificados , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
The global burden of osteoporosis continues to rise with an ageing population. Untreated osteoporotic fractures not only heighten the risk of subsequent fractures but are associated with excess mortality. Although primary care guidelines consistently stress the importance of secondary fracture prevention, fewer than 20% of patients are appropriately treated for osteoporosis following an initial osteoporotic fracture. This worldwide phenomenon is known as the osteoporosis care gap. This literature review examines the barriers to secondary fracture prevention in primary care and evaluates the effectiveness of targeted primary care interventions. Common themes emerged from the majority of qualitative studies, including a need for improved communication between the hospital team and primary care, better defined responsibilities and osteoporosis-directed education for the primary care physicians. Quantitative studies demonstrated that most targeted, intensive interventions aimed at educating patients and their primary care physician about osteoporosis treatment significantly increased rates of investigation and treatment. Greater uptake of models of secondary fracture prevention in primary care is urgently needed to address the osteoporosis care gap.
Assuntos
Osteoporose , Fraturas por Osteoporose , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Prevenção Secundária , Humanos , Fraturas por Osteoporose/prevenção & controle , Prevenção Secundária/métodos , Prevenção Secundária/organização & administração , Osteoporose/prevenção & controle , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/métodos , Guias de Prática Clínica como AssuntoRESUMO
Denosumab and bisphosphonates for primary osteoporosis are generally well-tolerated, but their comparative safety remains unclear. We aimed to explore the comparative safety of denosumab and bisphosphonates in primary osteoporosis. Databases such as PubMed and Google Scholar were searched for relevant peer-reviewed randomized controlled trials published in English (as of December 2023). Trials comparing adverse events (AE) between denosumab and bisphosphonates in patients with primary osteoporosis were investigated. Data were pooled using a fixed- or random-effects model to determine the risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for various AEs in patients treated with denosumab in comparison to patients treated with bisphosphonates. Eleven trials (5,545 patients; follow-up period: 12-24 months) were included in this meta-analysis. All trials had a risk of bias (e.g., reporting bias linked to secondary endpoints and selection bias linked to random allocation). In comparison to bisphosphonates, denosumab was significantly associated with less withdrawal due to AEs (RR = 0.49; 95% CI 0.34-0.71), more five-point major adverse cardiovascular events (RR = 2.05; 95% CI 1.03-4.09), more cardiovascular AEs (RR = 1.61; 95% CI 1.07-2.41), more infections (RR = 1.14; 95% CI 1.02-1.27), more upper respiratory tract infections (RR = 1.56; 95% CI 1.08-2.25), less vertebral fractures (RR = 0.54; 95% CI 0.31-0.93), and less abdominal pain (RR = 0.44;95% CI 0.22-0.87). We explored the comparative safety of denosumab and bisphosphonates for primary osteoporosis, some of which could be attributed to their beneficial effects. However, all trials had a risk of bias. Further investigations are required to confirm our results.
Assuntos
Conservadores da Densidade Óssea , Denosumab , Difosfonatos , Osteoporose , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Humanos , Denosumab/uso terapêutico , Denosumab/efeitos adversos , Difosfonatos/uso terapêutico , Difosfonatos/efeitos adversos , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/efeitos adversos , Osteoporose/tratamento farmacológico , Fraturas por Osteoporose/prevenção & controleRESUMO
The impact of ROMO on the width of anabolic windows and the increase in BMD was reduced in the RA group compared to the non-RA group, and this reduction was associated with correlations to RA-related factors. PURPOSE: To investigate the effects of romosozumab (ROMO) in postmenopausal osteoporosis, with and without comorbid rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: In this retrospective, case-controlled, multicenter study, 171 postmenopausal patients who did not receive oral glucocorticoid, comprising 59 in the RA group and 121 in the non-RA group, received uninterrupted ROMO treatment for 12 months. Propensity score matching was employed to ensure comparability in clinical backgrounds, resulting in 41 patients in each group. Baseline characteristics were as follows: overall (mean age, 76.3 years; T-score of lumbar spine (LS), - 3.0; 45.1% were treatment-naive for osteoporosis); RA group (anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody (ACPA) positivity, 80.5%; titer, 206.2 U/ml; clinical disease activity index (CDAI), 13.6; health assessment questionnaire disability index (HAQ-DI), 0.9). Bone mineral density (BMD) and serum bone turnover markers were monitored over a 12-month period. RESULTS: The rate of increase in the bone formation marker, PINP, and the rates of decrease in the bone resorption marker, TRACP-5b, exhibited a trend toward smaller changes in the RA group compared to the non-RA group, implying a smaller anabolic window. After 12 months, the RA group displayed lower BMD increases in the LS (9.1% vs. 12.6%; P = 0.013) and total hip (2.4% vs. 4.8%; P = 0.025) compared to the non-RA group. Multiple regression analysis in the all RA group (n = 59) for the association between RA-specific factors and 12-month BMD changes revealed negative correlations between ACPA titer and LS BMD and between HAQ-DI and femoral neck BMD. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of ROMO may be attenuated by RA-related factors.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais , Artrite Reumatoide , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea , Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa , Feminino , Humanos , Idoso , Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa/complicações , Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Estudos Retrospectivos , Densidade Óssea , Artrite Reumatoide/complicações , Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/farmacologia , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Fator Reumatoide , Vértebras LombaresRESUMO
Non-pharmacological therapies, such as whole-food interventions, are gaining interest as potential approaches to prevent and/or treat low bone mineral density (BMD) in postmenopausal women. Previously, prune consumption preserved two-dimensional BMD at the total hip. Here we demonstrate that prune consumption preserved three-dimensional BMD and estimated strength at the tibia. PURPOSE: Dietary consumption of prunes has favorable impacts on areal bone mineral density (aBMD); however, more research is necessary to understand the influence on volumetric BMD (vBMD), bone geometry, and estimated bone strength. METHODS: This investigation was a single center, parallel arm 12-month randomized controlled trial (RCT; NCT02822378) to evaluate the effects of 50 g and 100 g of prunes vs. a Control group on vBMD, bone geometry, and estimated strength of the radius and tibia via peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) in postmenopausal women. Women (age 62.1 ± 5.0yrs) were randomized into Control (n = 78), 50 g Prune (n = 79), or 100 g Prune (n = 78) groups. General linear mixed effects (LME) modeling was used to assess changes over time and percent change from baseline was compared between groups. RESULTS: The most notable effects were observed at the 14% diaphyseal tibia in the Pooled (50 g + 100 g) Prune group, in which group × time interactions were observed for cortical vBMD (p = 0.012) and estimated bone strength (SSI; p = 0.024); all of which decreased in the Control vs. no change in the Pooled Prune group from baseline to 12 months/post. CONCLUSION: Prune consumption for 12 months preserved cortical bone structure and estimated bone strength at the weight-bearing tibia in postmenopausal women.
Assuntos
Conservadores da Densidade Óssea , Pós-Menopausa , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Tíbia/diagnóstico por imagem , Densidade Óssea , Osso e Ossos , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Rádio (Anatomia)/diagnóstico por imagem , Absorciometria de FótonRESUMO
PURPOSE: The main effect of anti-resorptive agents such as bisphosphonates is a reduction of bone resorption, with a consequent marked decrease of bone turnover. This post-hoc analysis investigated the changes of histomorphometric parameters of bone turnover after alendronate (ALN), according to the baseline turnover. METHODS: Ninety postmenopausal women underwent a transiliac bone biopsy before and after 6 (n = 44) or 12 (n = 46) months of treatment with ALN (70 mg/week). The dynamic parameters reflecting the bone formation and bone turnover were mineralizing surface (MS/BS; %), bone formation rate (BFR/BS; µm3/µm2/d), and activation frequency (Ac.f; /yr). Biochemical markers sPINP and the sCTX were assessed before treatment and after 3, 6, and 12 months. Subjects were divided into quartiles based on the baseline values of BFR/BS. RESULTS: At baseline, MS/BS and Ac.f were significantly different (p < 0.0001) among the BFR quartiles. sCTX and sP1NP were not significantly different among quartiles. After ALN treatment, MS/BS was not significantly different among quartiles but Ac.f remained significantly lower in the first quartile compared to the third and fourth ones (p < 0.03). The absolute value of the difference between pre- and post-treatment significantly correlated with the baseline BFR/BS but when expressed in percent of the baseline value, the magnitude of the diminutions of MS/BS, Ac.f, sCTX, and sP1NP was similar in the four baseline BFR quartiles. CONCLUSION: The percentage response to ALN appeared independent of the baseline level of bone turnover. After treatment, the bone turnover tended to be similar in all BFR quartiles. This analysis investigated the influence of baseline turnover measured by bone histomorphometry on the effect of alendronate. When expressed in percent of pre-treatment values, the decreases of histomorphometric parameters and biochemical markers of bone turnover were independent of the baseline turnover.
Assuntos
Conservadores da Densidade Óssea , Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa , Feminino , Humanos , Alendronato/farmacologia , Alendronato/uso terapêutico , Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa/tratamento farmacológico , Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa/patologia , Osso e Ossos/patologia , Remodelação Óssea/fisiologia , Biomarcadores , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/farmacologia , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Densidade ÓsseaRESUMO
Antiresorptive medications do not negatively affect fracture healing in humans. Teriparatide may decrease time to fracture healing. Romosozumab has not shown a beneficial effect on human fracture healing. BACKGROUND: Fracture healing is a complex process. Uncertainty exists over the influence of osteoporosis and the medications used to treat it on fracture healing. METHODS: Narrative review authored by the members of the Fracture Working Group of the Committee of Scientific Advisors of the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF), on behalf of the IOF and the Société Internationale de Chirurgie Orthopédique et de Traumatologie (SICOT). RESULTS: Fracture healing is a multistep process. Most fractures heal through a combination of intramembranous and endochondral ossification. Radiographic imaging is important for evaluating fracture healing and for detecting delayed or non-union. The presence of callus formation, bridging trabeculae, and a decrease in the size of the fracture line over time are indicative of healing. Imaging must be combined with clinical parameters and patient-reported outcomes. Animal data support a negative effect of osteoporosis on fracture healing; however, clinical data do not appear to corroborate with this. Evidence does not support a delay in the initiation of antiresorptive therapy following acute fragility fractures. There is no reason for suspension of osteoporosis medication at the time of fracture if the person is already on treatment. Teriparatide treatment may shorten fracture healing time at certain sites such as distal radius; however, it does not prevent non-union or influence union rate. The positive effect on fracture healing that romosozumab has demonstrated in animals has not been observed in humans. CONCLUSION: Overall, there appears to be no deleterious effect of osteoporosis medications on fracture healing. The benefit of treating osteoporosis and the urgent necessity to mitigate imminent refracture risk after a fracture should be given prime consideration. It is imperative that new radiological and biological markers of fracture healing be identified. It is also important to synthesize clinical and basic science methodologies to assess fracture healing, so that a convergence of the two frameworks can be achieved.
Assuntos
Conservadores da Densidade Óssea , Consolidação da Fratura , Osteoporose , Fraturas por Osteoporose , Humanos , Consolidação da Fratura/efeitos dos fármacos , Consolidação da Fratura/fisiologia , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/farmacologia , Fraturas por Osteoporose/prevenção & controle , Fraturas por Osteoporose/fisiopatologia , Osteoporose/tratamento farmacológico , Osteoporose/fisiopatologia , Teriparatida/uso terapêutico , Teriparatida/farmacologia , Animais , Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais/farmacologiaRESUMO
Osteoporosis-pseudoglioma syndrome (OPPG) and LRP5 high bone mass (LRP5-HBM) are two rare bone diseases with opposite clinical symptoms caused by loss-of-function and gain-of-function mutations in LRP5. Bisphosphonates are an effective treatment for OPPG patients. LRP5-HBM has a benign course, and age-related bone loss is found in one LRP5-HBM patient. PURPOSE: Low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5 (LRP5) is involved in the canonical Wnt signaling pathway. The gain-of-function mutation leads to high bone mass (LRP5-HBM), while the loss-of-function mutation leads to osteoporosis-pseudoglioma syndrome (OPPG). In this study, the clinical manifestations, disease-causing mutations, treatment, and follow-up were summarized to improve the understanding of these two diseases. METHODS: Two OPPG patients and four LRP5-HBM patients were included in this study. The clinical characteristics, biochemical and radiological examinations, pathogenic mutations, and structural analysis were summarized. Furthermore, several patients were followed up to observe the treatment effect and disease progress. RESULTS: Congenital blindness, persistent bone pain, low bone mineral density (BMD), and multiple brittle fractures were the main clinical manifestations of OPPG. Complex heterozygous mutations were detected in two OPPG patients. The c.1455G > T mutation in exon 7 was first reported. During the follow-up, BMD of two patients was significantly improved after bisphosphonate treatment. On the contrary, typical clinical features of LRP5-HBM included extremely high BMD without fractures, torus palatinus and normal vision. X-ray showed diffuse osteosclerosis. Two heterozygous missense mutations were detected in four patients. In addition, age-related bone loss was found in one LRP5-HBM patient after 12-year of follow-up. CONCLUSION: This study deepened the understanding of the clinical characteristics, treatment, and follow-up of OPPG and LRP5-HBM; expanded the pathogenic gene spectrum of OPPG; and confirmed that bisphosphonates were effective for OPPG. Additionally, it was found that Ala242Thr mutation could not protect LRP5-HBM patients from age-related bone loss. This phenomenon deserves further study.
Assuntos
Conservadores da Densidade Óssea , Densidade Óssea , Difosfonatos , Proteína-5 Relacionada a Receptor de Lipoproteína de Baixa Densidade , Mutação , Humanos , Proteína-5 Relacionada a Receptor de Lipoproteína de Baixa Densidade/genética , Densidade Óssea/fisiologia , Densidade Óssea/genética , Feminino , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/farmacologia , Masculino , Difosfonatos/uso terapêutico , Difosfonatos/farmacologia , Adulto , Seguimentos , Osteogênese Imperfeita/genética , Osteogênese Imperfeita/fisiopatologia , Osteogênese Imperfeita/tratamento farmacológico , Osteogênese Imperfeita/complicações , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , CriançaRESUMO
Review of medical records from 173 women with osteoporosis who received abaloparatide treatment revealed that 96.0% had at least one visit for osteoporosis management and 55.5% had medication support group access. The most common reasons for discontinuing treatment were financial (31.2%) and tolerability (22.8%). Most patients (64.8%) completed treatment as prescribed. PURPOSE: Abaloparatide is approved for the treatment of women with postmenopausal osteoporosis at high risk for fracture. This study evaluated real-world treatment patterns for patients new to abaloparatide, regardless of osteoporosis treatment history. METHODS: Data for patients with ≥ 1 prescription for abaloparatide were collected retrospectively from six academic and clinical practice settings across the US. RESULTS: A total of 173 patients were enrolled (mean [SD] age, 69.8 [7.4] years). At the time of abaloparatide treatment initiation, 78.6% had received other osteoporosis medications. Mean (SD) time from discontinuation of osteoporosis medications prior to initiation of abaloparatide was 1.7 (3.2) years. Twenty-four months of follow-up data from the initiation date of abaloparatide was collected from 94.0% of patients and 6.0% of patients had 12-24 months of follow-up. During the follow-up period, 96.0% of patients had at least one visit for osteoporosis management and 55.5% had access to a medication support program. The median duration of therapy was 18.6 months and 105/162 (64.8%) completed abaloparatide treatment as prescribed. The most common reasons for treatment discontinuation were financial (31.2%) and tolerability (22.8%). Following completion of a course of treatment with abaloparatide, 82/162 (50.6%) patients transitioned to another osteoporosis medication. The median time between abaloparatide treatment course completion and the initiation of follow-on medication was 21 days. CONCLUSION: Most patients completed treatment with abaloparatide as prescribed, and over half continued with an antiresorptive agent. This favorable conduct may be the result of regular follow-up visits and accessibility to both medication and patient support services.
Assuntos
Conservadores da Densidade Óssea , Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa , Proteína Relacionada ao Hormônio Paratireóideo , Humanos , Feminino , Idoso , Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa/tratamento farmacológico , Proteína Relacionada ao Hormônio Paratireóideo/uso terapêutico , Proteína Relacionada ao Hormônio Paratireóideo/farmacologia , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fraturas por Osteoporose/prevenção & controle , Adesão à Medicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Custos de MedicamentosRESUMO
Our review of 52 RCTs from 5 databases suggests a tendency for notable improvement in BMD when combining herbal medicine with supplements (calcium and vitamin D variants) compared to supplement monotherapy in primary osteoporosis. However, caution is needed in interpreting results due to substantial heterogeneity among included studies. PURPOSE: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine whether herbal medicine (HM) plus supplements such as calcium (Ca) or vitamin D (Vit.D) improves bone mineral density (BMD) compared to supplements alone in primary osteoporosis (OP) patients. METHODS: We searched 5 databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using HMs with supplements (Ca or Vit.D variants) as interventions for primary OP patients published until August 31, 2022. Meta-analysis using BMD score as the primary outcome was performed using RevMan 5.4 version. Risk of bias in the included studies was assessed useing RoB 2.0 tool. RESULTS: In total, 52 RCTs involving 4,889 participants (1,408 men, 3,481 women) were included, with average BMD scores of 0.690 ± 0.095 g/cm2 (lumbar) and 0.625 ± 0.090 g/cm2 (femoral neck). As a result of performing meta-analysis using BMD scores for all 52 RCTs included in this review, combination of HMs with Ca and Vit.D variants improved the BMD score by 0.08 g/cm2 (lumbar, 38 RCTs, 95% CI: 0.06-0.10, p < 0.001, I2 = 97%) and 0.06 g/cm2 (femoral neck, 19 RCTs, 95% CI: 0.04-0.08, p < 0.001, I2 = 92%)compared to controls. However, statistical significance of the lumbar BMD improvement disappeared after adjusting for potential publication bias. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that combining of HM and supplements tends to be more effective in improving BMD in primary OP than supplements alone. However, caution is needed in interpretation due to the reporting bias and high heterogeneity among studies, and well-designed RCTs are required in the future.
Assuntos
Conservadores da Densidade Óssea , Densidade Óssea , Cálcio , Suplementos Nutricionais , Osteoporose , Vitamina D , Humanos , Densidade Óssea/efeitos dos fármacos , Densidade Óssea/fisiologia , Vitamina D/uso terapêutico , Osteoporose/fisiopatologia , Osteoporose/tratamento farmacológico , Osteoporose/prevenção & controle , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/farmacologia , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Medicamentos de Ervas Chinesas/uso terapêutico , Medicamentos de Ervas Chinesas/farmacologia , Quimioterapia CombinadaRESUMO
Joint replacement surgery is common in older adults, leading to increasing periprosthetic fracture (PPFx) occurrence. We reviewed all PPFx seen over a 4-year period at an academic hospital. Clinical osteoporosis could be diagnosed based on existing data in 104 (67%) at the time of PPFx. Periprosthetic fractures are generally osteoporosis-related. PURPOSE: Periprosthetic fractures (PPFx) cause morbidity, mortality, and cost. This study's purpose was to describe osteoporosis-related data available at the time of PPFx. METHODS: The electronic medical record (EMR) of PPFx patients seen over 4 years in a university orthopedic practice were reviewed. Demographic data and osteoporosis relevant parameters were collected. Prior DXA studies were reviewed, and L1 Hounsfield unit (HU) measurements were performed on CT scans obtained within 2 years before PPFx. Clinical osteoporosis was defined as prior diagnosis, prescribed osteoporosis treatment, T-score ≤ - 2.5, HU ≤ 100, or prior fracture. RESULTS: Records of 156 PPFx patients (115 F/41 M), mean (SD) age 75.4 (11.9), were reviewed. Almost all 153/156 (98%) of these fractures were femoral. Falls caused 139 (89%); 12 (8%) were spontaneous. Mean time post-arthroplasty was 7.9 (6.3) years. Prior fragility fracture(s) occurred in 72 (46%); 14 were PPFx. Osteoporosis was previously diagnosed in 45 (29%) and medications prescribed in 41 (26%). Prior to PPFx, DXA data were available in 62, mean (SD) lowest T-score was - 1.9 (0.9) and was ≤ - 2.5 in 19. CT data were available in 46; mean (SD) L1 HU was 79.0 (29.4) and was ≤ 100 in 35. Based on existing data, clinical osteoporosis could have been diagnosed in 104 (67%) at the time of PPFx. CONCLUSION: Periprosthetic fractures are osteoporosis-related. They occur in older adults, often female, and result from falls; BMD, when assessed, is low. Data available at the time of PPFx often allows osteoporosis diagnosis; this should prompt evaluation and pharmacologic treatment consideration.
Assuntos
Absorciometria de Fóton , Osteoporose , Fraturas por Osteoporose , Fraturas Periprotéticas , Humanos , Fraturas por Osteoporose/etiologia , Fraturas por Osteoporose/diagnóstico por imagem , Feminino , Idoso , Fraturas Periprotéticas/diagnóstico , Fraturas Periprotéticas/etiologia , Masculino , Osteoporose/complicações , Osteoporose/diagnóstico , Absorciometria de Fóton/métodos , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Densidade Óssea/fisiologia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Diagnóstico Ausente/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Artroplastia de Quadril , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Artroplastia do JoelhoRESUMO
Teriparatide and denosumab, anti-osteoporosis medications with different mechanisms, have been widely used in the patients with osteoporotic vertebral fracture (OVF) considered as advanced osteoporosis. Teriparatide has been shown to enhance bone formation and fracture healing in OVF, but there are still no sufficient evidences discussing about the role of denosumab in newly developed OVF. In this study, we found the similar radiological deformation and functional outcomes of conservative treatment with teriparatide and denosumab in thoracolumbar (TL) OVF, and teriparatide showed a more frequent incidence of fracture union with paravertebral bone bridge formation compared to denosumab. INTRODUCTION: Teriparatide and denosumab have been widely used to treat advanced osteoporosis and prevent subsequent fractures in patients with OVCF. Unlike teriparatide, which is considered to be effective in fracture healing, there is still no clear role and evidence for the effect of denosumab in acute OVCF. This study compared the radiological and functional outcomes of conservative treatment with teriparatide and denosumab in TL-OVF. METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled 78 women with mean age of 74.69 ± 7.66 (60-92) years diagnosed as a TL-OVF with no neurological deficits. All patients were treated conservatively with teriparatide (34 of group T, once-daily 20 µg) or denosumab (44 of group D, once-6 months 60 mg) for 6 months. We evaluated the radiological deformation (kyphotic angle, segmental vertebral kyphotic angle, and compression ratio) and the incidence of fracture union with paravertebral bone bridge formation (FUPB) and functional outcomes using the visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at 0, 3, and 6 months. RESULTS: In the radiological deformation and functional outcomes, there were no significant differences at 0, 3, and 6 months between the two groups (P > 0.05). However, the incidence of FUPB at 6 months was higher in group T (20/34, 58.8%) compared to group D (11/44, 25.0%) (P = 0.004), and teriparatide was the most statistically significant factor for achieving FUPB (OR 4.486, P = 0.012) in multivariable logistic analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Teriparatide and denosumab, despite of their different pharmacological mechanisms, showed similar radiological deformation and functional outcomes in the conservative treatment of TL-OVF. However, teriparatide showed a significantly higher incidence of fracture union with paravertebral bone bridge formation.
Assuntos
Conservadores da Densidade Óssea , Osteoporose , Fraturas por Osteoporose , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral , Humanos , Feminino , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Teriparatida/uso terapêutico , Denosumab/uso terapêutico , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/etiologia , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/tratamento farmacológico , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tratamento Conservador/efeitos adversos , Fraturas por Osteoporose/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas por Osteoporose/prevenção & controle , Fraturas por Osteoporose/tratamento farmacológico , Osteoporose/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of sequential treatment with romosozumab-to-alendronate compared to alendronate monotherapy and teriparatide-to-alendronate, in postmenopausal osteoporotic women from a Belgian healthcare perspective. Romosozumab-to-alendronate was found to be cost-effective compared to alendronate monotherapy and dominant compared to teriparatide-to-alendronate for osteoporotic women at high risk of fracture in Belgium. PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of sequential treatment with romosozumab followed by alendronate compared to alendronate monotherapy and teriparatide followed by alendronate, in postmenopausal osteoporotic women at high risk of fracture, from a Belgian healthcare perspective. Romosozumab is reimbursed in Belgium since December 2021. METHODS: A Markov microsimulation model was used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of romosozumab-to-alendronate compared to alendronate monotherapy and to teriparatide-to-alendronate over a lifetime horizon. Patients transition between five different health states every 6 months based on fracture risks or death. The model was populated with Belgium-specific epidemiological and cost data, where available. The fracture risk reduction of romosozumab treatment was collated from the ARCH study, and from a published network meta-analysis. Costs were included from a healthcare perspective (NIHDI). Cost-effectiveness was reported in terms of costs per quality-adjusted life year (QALY), reported in Euro () 2022. Deterministic (DSA) and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were performed. RESULTS: Romosozumab-to-alendronate was associated with 0.12 additional QALYs at an additional cost of 2314 compared to alendronate monotherapy, resulting in an ICER of 19,978. Compared to teriparatide-to-alendronate, romosozumab-to-alendronate was found to be dominant, with higher QALYs and lower costs. The base-case results were robust to uncertainty in the input parameters when conducting the sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSION: Sequential treatment with romosozumab followed by alendronate was found to be cost-effective compared to alendronate monotherapy and dominant compared to teriparatide followed by alendronate for postmenopausal women with osteoporosis at high risk of fracture in Belgium.