Safety and efficacy of ibrutinib in combination with rituximab and lenalidomide in previously untreated follicular and marginal zone lymphoma: An open label, phase 2 study.

BACKGROUND: Follicular lymphoma (FL) and marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) are indolent non-Hodgkin lymphomas (iNHL). Median survival for iNHL is approximately 20 years. Because standard treatments are not curative, patients often receive multiple lines of therapy with associated toxicity-rationally designed, combination therapies with curative potential are needed. The immunomodulatory drug lenalidomide was evaluated in combination with rituximab for the frontline treatment of FL in the phase 3 RELEVANCE study. Ibrutinib, an oral Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is active in NHL and was evaluated in combination with lenalidomide, rituximab, and ibrutinib (IRR) in a phase 1 study. METHODS: The authors conducted an open-label, phase 2 clinical trial of IRR for previously untreated FL and MZL. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) at 24 months. RESULTS: This study included 48 participants with previously untreated FL grade 1-3a (N = 38), or MZL (N = 10). Participants received 12, 28-day cycles of lenalidomide (15 mg, days 1-21 cycle 1; 20 mg, cycles 2-12), rituximab (375 mg/m2 weekly in cycle 1; day 1 cycles 2-12), and ibrutinib 560 mg daily. With a median follow-up of 65.3 months, the estimated PFS at 24 months was 78.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 68.0%-91.4%) and 60-month PFS was 59.7% (95% CI, 46.6%-76.4%). One death occurred unrelated to disease progression. Grade 3-4 adverse events were observed in 64.6%, including 50% with grade 3-4 rash. CONCLUSIONS: IRR is highly active as frontline therapy for FL and MZL. Compared to historical results with lenalidomide and rituximab, PFS is similar with higher grade 3-4 toxicity, particularly rash. The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02532257).

Combined BRAF, MEK, and heat-shock protein 90 inhibition in advanced BRAF V600-mutant melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Resistance to BRAF and MEK inhibitors in BRAF V600-mutant melanoma is common. Multiple resistance mechanisms involve heat-shock protein 90 (HSP90) clients, and a phase 1 study of vemurafenib with the HSP90 inhibitor XL888 in patients with advanced melanoma showed activity equivalent to that of BRAF and MEK inhibitors. METHODS: Vemurafenib (960 mg orally twice daily) and cobimetinib (60 mg orally once daily for 21 of 28 days) with escalating dose cohorts of XL888 (30, 45, 60, or 90 mg orally twice weekly) was investigated in a phase 1 trial of advanced melanoma, with a modified Ji dose-escalation design. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were enrolled. After two dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) (rash and acute kidney injury) in the first cohort, lower doses of vemurafenib (720 mg) and cobimetinib (40 mg) were investigated with the same XL888 doses. Three DLTs (rash) were observed in 12 patients in the XL888 60-mg cohort, and this was determined as the maximum tolerated dose. Objective responses were observed in 19 patients (76%), and the median progression-free survival was 7.6 months, with a 5-year progression-free survival rate of 20%. The median overall survival was 41.7 months, with a 5-year overall survival rate of 37%. Single-cell RNA sequencing was performed on baseline and on-treatment biopsies; treatment was associated with increased immune cell influx (CD4-positive and CD8-positive T cells) and decreased melanoma cells. CONCLUSIONS: Combined vemurafenib and cobimetinib plus XL888 had significant toxicity, requiring frequent dose reductions, which may have contributed to the relatively low progression-free survival despite a high tumor response rate. Given overlapping toxicities, caution must be used when combining HSP90 inhibitors with BRAF and MEK inhibitors.

Overall Survival Benefit with Tebentafusp in Metastatic Uveal Melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Uveal melanoma is a disease that is distinct from cutaneous melanoma, with a low tumor mutational burden and a 1-year overall survival of approximately 50% in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma. Data showing a proven overall survival benefit with a systemic treatment are lacking. Tebentafusp is a bispecific protein consisting of an affinity-enhanced T-cell receptor fused to an anti-CD3 effector that can redirect T cells to target glycoprotein 100-positive cells. METHODS: In this open-label, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned previously untreated HLA-A*02:01-positive patients with metastatic uveal melanoma in a 2:1 ratio to receive tebentafusp (tebentafusp group) or the investigator's choice of therapy with single-agent pembrolizumab, ipilimumab, or dacarbazine (control group), stratified according to the lactate dehydrogenase level. The primary end point was overall survival. RESULTS: A total of 378 patients were randomly assigned to either the tebentafusp group (252 patients) or the control group (126 patients). Overall survival at 1 year was 73% in the tebentafusp group and 59% in the control group (hazard ratio for death, 0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.37 to 0.71; P<0.001) in the intention-to-treat population. Progression-free survival was also significantly higher in the tebentafusp group than in the control group (31% vs. 19% at 6 months; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.58 to 0.94; P = 0.01). The most common treatment-related adverse events in the tebentafusp group were cytokine-mediated events (due to T-cell activation) and skin-related events (due to glycoprotein 100-positive melanocytes), including rash (83%), pyrexia (76%), and pruritus (69%). These adverse events decreased in incidence and severity after the first three or four doses and infrequently led to discontinuation of the trial treatment (2%). No treatment-related deaths were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with tebentafusp resulted in longer overall survival than the control therapy among previously untreated patients with metastatic uveal melanoma. (Funded by Immunocore; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03070392; EudraCT number, 2015-003153-18.).

Macrophage-derived CXCL9 and CXCL11, T-cell skin homing, and disease control in mogamulizumab-treated CTCL patients.

Cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCLs) are rare malignancies involving primarily the skin. Responses to treatment are usually short-lived in advanced CTCL. The determinants of long-term CTCL control are unclear. Mogamulizumab, an anti-human CCR4 antibody that acts by antibody-dependent cell cytotoxicity against CCR4+ CTCL tumor cells and peripheral memory blood regulatory T cells, has been associated with long-lasting remissions and immune adverse events. Here, we reported skin rashes in 32% of 44 patients with CTCL treated with mogamulizumab, associated with significantly higher overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.16; 0.04-0.73; P = .01). Rash occurred in patients with Sézary syndrome and was associated with longer time to progression. These rashes were characterized by a CD163+ granulomatous and/or CD8+ lichenoid skin infiltrate. High-throughput sequencing analysis of T-cell receptor ß genes in skin and blood flow cytometry confirmed the depletion of CTCL tumor cells, as well as the recruitment of new reactive T-cell clones in skin at the time of skin rash. CXCL9 and CXCL11, two macrophage-derived chemokines that recruit CXCR3+ T cells to skin, were overexpressed in skin rashes. A higher frequency of TIGIT+ and PD1+ exhausted reactive blood T cells was observed at baseline in patients with rash, and this frequency decreased with mogamulizumab treatment. These data are consistent with mogamulizumab-induced long-term immune CTCL control by activation of the macrophage and T-cell responses in patients with rash.

Real-world analysis of apalutamide-associated skin rash in Chinese patients with prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to explore the clinical characteristics of apalutamide-associated skin rash and management of skin rash in real-world Chinese patients with prostate cancer. METHODS: We investigated 138 patients with prostate cancer who received apalutamide in the Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University from January 2022 to March 2023. The primary end points were the incidence of skin rash and the time to skin rash. The second end points were the grade of skin rash, the time to remission, the rate of recurrence of skin rash, clinical risk factors and management of skin rash. RESULTS: One hundred patients were analyzed. Patients were a median of 73 years old (IQR 68-77.75). Thirty-two patients (32%) developed apalutamide­associated skin rash. The median time to incidence and remission of skin rash were 57.5 and 11.5 days, respectively. Of 32 skin rash, 27 patients had apalutamide therapy maintained after rash remission. There were seven patients having recurrence of skin rash. By multivariable logistic regression analysis, we revealed that hypertension history (OR 3.22, 95% CI 1.09-9.53, p = 0.035), bad life-styles (OR 3.29, 95% CI 1.11-9.8, p = 0.032), ECOG ≥ 1 (OR 3.92, 95% CI 1.33-11.55, p = 0.013), and high tumor burden (OR 3.13, 95% CI 1.07-9.14, p = 0.037) were independently associated with higher incidence of skin rash. CONCLUSION: Nearly one-third of Chinese patients experienced skin rash after taking apalutamide in our study. The poor health patients might have a higher incidence of apalutamide-associated skin rash.

Feasibility and safety of EGFR-TKI neoadjuvant therapy for EGFR-mutated NSCLC: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The role of neoadjuvant epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) targeted therapy for EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is unclear. Previous studies have shown that EGFR-TKIs have excellent anti-tumor activity. However, almost all studies on neoadjuvant EGFR-TKI treatment for EGFR-mutated NSCLC have been non-randomized controlled trials with small sample sizes and different methods of statistical analysis, which may lead to a lack of valid metrics to assess the feasibility and safety of neoadjuvant EGFR-TKI treatment. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant EGFR-TKI treatment for NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations. METHODS: Relevant studies were systematically searched in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Results including objective response rate (ORR), complete resection rate (R0), downstaging rate, pathological complete response (PCR), major pathological response (MPR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) were used for further analysis. RESULTS: This meta-analysis ultimately included 11 studies involving 344 patients with EGFR-positive mutations in NSCLC. In terms of tumor response, the pooled ORR was 57% (95% CI: 42%-73%), and in the Osimertinib subgroup, the pooled ORR was 80% (95% CI: 63%-98%). Analysis of studies that reported a downstaging rate showed the pooled downstaging rate of 41% (95% CI: 9%-74%) and the pooled downstaging rate of 74% (95% CI: 22%-100%) in the Osimertinib subgroup. In terms of surgical outcomes, the pooled pCR rate was 3% (95% CI: 0%-7%), the pooled MPR rate was 11% (95% CI: 6%-17%), and the pooled R0 resection rate was 91% (95% CI: 85%-95%). The most common adverse events associated with neoadjuvant therapy were rash and diarrhea. The pooled incidence of any grade of rash was 47.1% (95% CI: 25.4%-69.3%), and the pooled incidence of grade ≥ 3 rash was 0.6% (95% CI: 0.0%-2.5%). The pooled incidence of diarrhea of any grade was 28.8% (95% CI: 14.4%-45.4%), with the pooled incidence of grade ≥ 3 diarrhea of 0.2% (95% CI: 0.0%-1.6%). The pooled incidence of ≥ grade 3 adverse events was significantly lower. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis confirmed the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant EGFR-TKIs for the treatment of NSCLC patients with EGFR-positive mutations and that third-generation EGFR-TKIs were superior to first- and second-generation EGFR-TKIs in terms of shrinking tumor volume and lowering tumor stage; however, future large-scale and multicenter randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm this conclusion. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42023466731.

Rash caused by lurasidone in old chinese patient with bipolar disorder: case-based review.

BACKGROUND: Rash is one of common adverse drug reaction and which have been reported in typical and atypical antipsychotics. Reports of lurasidone induced skin reactions are sparse. In this study, we report a case of rash caused by lurasidone. CASE PRESENTATION: A 63-year-old man with bipolar disorder (BD) who is treated by lurasidone. However, the patient presents a rash all over after lurasidone dose increasing from 40 mg/day to 60 mg/day. With the diagnosis of drug induced rash, lurasidone was discontinued, and the rash complete disappears within 2 weeks. In addition, all case reports about antipsychotics associated rash were reviewed by searching English and Chinese database including Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI and Wanfang database. A total of 139 articles contained 172 patients were included in our study. The literature review and our case suggest that the cutaneous adverse events caused by antipsychotic drugs should not be ignored, particularly for the patient who was first use or at dose increasing of antipsychotic. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, we report a case of lurasidone related rash and review rash caused by antipsychotics. Psychiatrists should be alert to the possibility of the rash caused by antipsychotics, especially the patient was first use of antipsychotics or the antipsychotic dose was increasing.

Foamy Macrophages in a Case of Mononucleosis With Amoxicillin-Induced Rash, Hyperlipidemia, and Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis.

ABSTRACT: A 38-year-old man presented with fever, cough, and jaundice. Four days before, he had started taking amoxicillin/clavulanic acid. He subsequently developed a morbilliform rash, and, according to clinical features and blood analyses, a diagnosis of mononucleosis with Epstein-Barr virus-associated antibiotic-induced exanthema and secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis was made. A skin biopsy revealed a superficial perivascular lymphohistiocytic infiltrate with interface dermatitis and many foamy macrophages in the papillary dermis and around the vessels of the superficial dermal plexus. A blood lipid test uncovered marked hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia. After treatment with dexamethasone and immunoglobulin, the skin rash, liver function, and lipid profile progressively improved. Xanthomatous cells have been observed in skin biopsies of acute graft-versus-host disease with liver involvement, and these cells have been suggested to represent a clue to the presence of hepatic disease. In our case, underlying cholestatic hepatopathy with hyperlipidemia was present. We believe that the incidental finding of foamy cells in graft-versus-host disease cases and in our case are likely related to the presence of severe liver disease with cholestatic hepatopathy and secondary hyperlipidemia in different background conditions.

Symmetrical drug-related intertriginous and flexural exanthema (SDRIFE) after administration of corticosteroids: Case series and review of literature.

BACKGROUND: Cutaneous manifestations of drug-induced type IV reactions vary widely, with symmetrical drug-related intertriginous and flexural exanthema (SDRIFE) being a less common presentation. Corticosteroids (CS), primarily known for their anti-inflammatory effects, rarely induce hypersensitivity reactions. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this case series is to report four cases of SDRIFE following systemic prednisolone therapy and to review existing CS classification proposals to better understand cross-reactivity of CS. PATIENTS/METHODS: Patients recruited at a German dermatology centre underwent allergologic evaluation including prick and patch testing with various CS. Positive cases underwent oral challenge testing with alternative agents. The classification systems of Coopman et al. and Baeck et al. were taken into account. DISCUSSION: Despite a paucity of literature, CS-induced type IV reactions do occur, including SDRIFE. Classification systems based on chemical structure provide insight into cross-reactivity patterns. Provocation tests with alternative CS highlight the complexity of managing CS hypersensitivity. CONCLUSION: SDRIFE may develop following systemic prednisolone therapy. Classification systems are helpful in understanding cross-reactivity and help in the selection of alternative preparations but are not always reliable. Individualised assessment is crucial for managing CS hypersensitivity, with consideration of alternative agents and emergency use of CS when necessary.

Association between Antibiotic Exposure and the Risk of Rash in Children with Infectious Mononucleosis: a Multicenter, Retrospective Cohort Study.

Present evidence suggests that the administration of antibiotics, particularly aminopenicillins, may increase the risk of rash in children with infectious mononucleosis (IM). This retrospective, multicenter cohort study of children with IM was conducted to explore the association between antibiotic exposure in IM children and the risk of rash. A robust error generalized linear regression was performed to address the potential cluster effect, as well as confounding factors such as age and sex. A total of 767 children (aged from 0 to 18 years) with IM from 14 hospitals in Guizhou Province were included in the final analysis. The regression analysis implied that exposure to antibiotics was associated with a significantly increased incidence of overall rash in IM children (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], ~1.04 to 2.08; P = 0.029). Of 92 overall rash cases, 43 were probably related to antibiotic exposure: two cases (4.08%) in the amoxicillin-treated group and 41 (8.15%) in the group treated with other antibiotics. Regression analysis indicated that the risk of rash induced by amoxicillin in IM children was similar to that induced by other penicillins (AOR, 1.12; 95% CI, ~0.13 to 9.67), cephalosporins (AOR, 2.45; 95% CI, ~0.43 to 14.02), or macrolides (AOR, 0.91; 95% CI, ~0.15 to 5.43). Antibiotic exposure may be associated with an increased risk of overall rash in IM children, but amoxicillin was not found to be associated with any increased risk of rash during IM compared to other antibiotics. We suggest that clinicians be vigilant against the occurrence of rash in IM children receiving antibiotic therapy, rather than indiscriminately avoiding prescribing amoxicillin.

Beyond Skin Rash: Alpelisib-Induced Anaphylactic Reactions.

Alpelisib is a specific oral PI3K inhibitor used combined with fulvestrant for the treatment of patients with HR+/HER2-/PIK3CA-mutated metastatic breast cancer. Adverse drug reactions with alpelisib are common, including hyperglycemia and rash. Here we describe extraordinary and life-threatening reactions beyond skin rash in two patients with progressive PIK3CA-mutated metastatic cancer in whom alpelisib was initiated. Case-A (vaginal cancer): After 10 days on treatment, she developed dry eyes, generalized rash and itching. Alpelisib was interrupted and symptomatic treatment initiated. Because of an initial tumor response, a rechallenge was done. Ninety minutes after a reduced dose of alpelisib, she developed an anaphylactic reaction with angioedema, hypotension, and skin rash. Case-B (breast cancer): After 11 days on treatment, she developed skin rash and alpelisib was interrupted. At re-initiation, she felt tingles in her face and ears and some skin erythema. Given the mild rash, a second rechallenge with premedication was performed. Ninety minutes after a reduced dose of alpelisib, she developed a type-1 allergic reaction with angioedema, tingles, and skin rash. In both cases, a type-1 allergic reaction was diagnosed and symptomatic treatment was initiated, alpelisib was permanently discontinued and the patients fully recovered the next week(s). This report underlines the critical importance to consider type-I allergic reactions in the differential diagnosis in cases of rash associated with alpelisib. Even if a reaction develops after days on treatment, a type-I allergic reaction cannot be excluded. A rechallenge can be dangerous and should always be well contemplated or even avoided.

Potential Involvement of Sulfotransferase in the Mechanism of Lamotrigine-induced Skin Rash.

The mechanism of drug-induced skin rash is not well understood. Circumstantial evidence suggests that the covalent binding of a reactive metabolite is involved in the mechanism of most idiosyncratic drug reactions. However, there is a limited quantity of drug metabolizing enzymes in the skin, except for sulfotransferases. It is possible that some drugs are metabolized to reactive sulfate metabolites that are responsible for skin rashes. For example, nevirapine-induced skin rash involves metabolism of nevirapine to 12-hydroxy-nevirapine, which is further metabolized by sulfotransferase in the skin to a reactive benzylic sulfate that covalently binds to proteins. The working hypothesis is that lamotrigine, valdecoxib, and sertraline skin rashes involve the formation of reactive sulfate in the skin. Lamotrigine-N-oxide, hydroxy-valdecoxib, and hydroxy-sertraline were tested as substrates with known human sulfotransferases. Hydroxy-valdecoxib and the benzylic alcohol metabolite of sertraline were not substrates for human sulfotransferases. Therefore, this pathway is presumably not involved in the mechanism by which they cause skin rashes. In contrast, lamotrigine-N-oxide is a substrate for several human sulfotransferases and the sulfate is chemically reactive. Furthermore, lamotrigine-N-sulfate not only alkylates proteins as we described previously but also forms the sulfate of tyrosine, suggesting another possible mechanism for protein modification. This study has further added to the understanding of the potential of the sulfotransferase pathways and protein sulfation to play a role in drug-induced skin rash.

Cetuximab severe cutaneous toxicity a gateway for bacteremia: case report.

EGFR inhibitors used in the treatment of metastatic wild-RAS colorectal cancer in combination with chemotherapy are associated with dermatologic side events that are low grade in most cases. We report a case of severe cutaneous toxicity secondary to cetuximab associated with bacterial cellulitis. A 57-year-old woman with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the colon, receiving FOLFIRI and Cetuximab as a first-line treatment, presented with a severe erythematous rash and xerosis resistant to local treatment with moisturizing emollients. Few days later, the patient becomes febrile, and the rash becomes more diffuse with a sandpaper appearance on the face, neck, chest, and flexor creases with exfoliation of large areas of skin. A bacterial cellulitis secondary to a dermatologic severe toxicity of Cetuximab was suspected. The patient started on antibiotics and local treatment with good response. This is a life-threatening cutaneous toxicity of cetuximab with secondary bacterial infection. Early recognition of cutaneous side effects of EGFR inhibitors is important to prevent such type of toxicities.

Desensitization protocol to lenalidomide: An effective and safe treatment modality for delayed hypersensitivity-induced rash in patients with multiple myeloma.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Lenalidomide is considered a standard of care in multiple myeloma (MM) Some MM patients will develop delayed hypersensitivity to lenalidomide, which can lead to treatment discontinuation. Desensitization to lenalidomide can help these patients to complete treatment courses. Here, we aimed to review lenalidomide-treated MM patients who developed delayed hypersensitivity-induced rash and were treated with desensitization. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of medical files of MM patients, who were desensitized to lenalidomide due to delayed hypersensitivity rash. Patients were treated between 2018 and 2022 at Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel. RESULTS: Search of patients yielded 16 patients that underwent desensitization to lenalidomide within the study period. The desensitization protocol consisted of a slow, 3-week-long protocol with lenalidomide's target doses of 10, 15, and 25 mg/day. Of the 16 patients, 10 (62.5%) succeeded to complete the protocol and thus were able to complete lenalidomide treatment cycles. One patient with unsuccessful desensitization was subsequently treated with first-generation IMiD thalidomide, with no rash appearing. None of the patients that were treated with desensitization had severe immune-mediated or non-dermatological adverse reactions. CONCLUSIONS: Desensitization to lenalidomide is safe and effective. Discontinuation of lenalidomide in MM patients with delayed hypersensitivity and no contraindication to desensitization should be discouraged. Collaboration between hematologists and allergists is needed.

Comparison of cutaneous adverse events between second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors and imatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) often experience cutaneous adverse events, such as rashes and pruritus. In this study, we aimed to compare the risks of cutaneous adverse events between imatinib- and second-generation TKI-treated patients with CML. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Paired reviewers independently obtained studies from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library published until 15 March 2022. The following terms were searched: (Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic and BCR-ABL Positive), chronic myeloid leukemia, tyrosine kinase inhibitor, TKI, imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib, bosutinib, and radotinib. Two independent reviewers screened the results and selected articles on cutaneous adverse events. RevMan 5.4 and the Cochrane Collaboration tool were used to perform the meta-analysis and risk of bias assessment. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Eleven trials involving 4502 patients were analyzed in this study. Patients treated with second-generation TKIs were significantly more likely to experience cutaneous adverse events than those treated with imatinib with a relative risk (RR) of 1.62 (95% confidence interval [CI], [1.25-2.09]). Except dasatinib (RR [95% CI], 1.39 [0.75-2.56]), the risk of adverse events was more with second-generation TKIs than with imatinib as follows: nilotinib (2.11 [1.53-2.90]), bosutinib (1.41 [1.07-1.86]), and radotinib (1.87 [1.33-2.63]). Rash was the most common cutaneous adverse event that was observed in 21.6% of cases across all grades, followed by pruritus (5.7%) and alopecia (4.3%). In conclusion, our findings suggest that cutaneous adverse events occur more frequently with second-generation TKIs than with imatinib. Therefore, effective management of the cutaneous outcome is necessary to achieve high patient adherence to medication and successful treatment with TKIs.

Cutaneous eruptions from ibrutinib resembling epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor-induced dermatologic adverse events.

BACKGROUND: Ibrutinib is an oral inhibitor of Bruton tyrosine kinase that is approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for several lymphoproliferative disorders and chronic graft-versus-host disease. OBJECTIVE: To characterize cutaneous eruptions arising from ibrutinib and highlight overlap with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor-induced dermatologic adverse events. METHODS: Single-center retrospective cohort of patients referred to the Skin Toxicities Program for treatment of cutaneous eruptions while taking ibrutinib. RESULTS: Among 19 patients, cutaneous eruptions manifested as facial-predominant papulopustular eruptions, petechiae, or ecchymoses, photosensitivity, panniculitis, xerosis, and clinical staphylococcal overgrowth. Most patients were able to continue ibrutinib therapy with focused treatment of their cutaneous toxicities. LIMITATIONS: This study represents cases at a single tertiary care center and is limited to patients referred for toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: With the exception of petechiae, the cutaneous toxicities of ibrutinib overlap with those associated with selective EGFR inhibitors. We observed that these reactions can be successfully managed using approaches for EGFR inhibitor-induced cutaneous adverse events.

Rash with different types of BCR-ABL inhibitors in chronic myelogenous leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Objective: A meta-analysis was conducted to systematically review the risks of all-grade as well as high-grade rash in chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) patients using different types of BCR-ABL inhibitors. Methods: Literature published between 2000 and April 2022 were searched using PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase and ClinicalTrials.gov. Results: A total of 12 studies were included for meta-analysis. The results showed that the incidence of all-grade or high-grade rash associated with new-generation BCR-ABL inhibitors had no significant difference compared with a standard dose of imatinib. Subgroup analysis suggested that, compared with imatinib, the incidence of all grades of rash was higher in the nilotinib, bosutinib and ponatinib groups. Conclusion: For CML patients treated with nilotinib, bosutinib and ponatinib, the occurrence of skin toxicity should not be ignored.

Risk factor analysis for anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody-induced skin toxicities in real-world metastatic colorectal cancer treatment.

PURPOSE: Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) monoclonal antibodies are effective in treating RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, their administration induces skin toxicity, markedly reducing patients' quality of life. This study is aimed at identifying the risk factors associated with anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody-induced skin toxicities. METHODS: Patients with mCRC (n = 116) who received anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody treatment were retrospectively evaluated. Primary endpoint was evaluation of the risk factors for grade ≥ 2 overall skin toxicities during all the treatment periods. Furthermore, factors associated with each grade ≥ 2 skin symptoms were assessed. RESULTS: Incidence of total grade ≥ 2 skin toxicity symptoms was 61.2%, and those of grade ≥ 2 rash, dry skin, fissures, and paronychia were 34.5%, 25.9%, 20.7%, and 25.0%, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that liver metastasis was an independent risk factor for overall grade ≥ 2 skin toxicities (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 2.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22-6.78; P = 0.02) and prophylactic administration of antibiotics as a preventive factor (OR 0.10; 95%CI 0.01-0.91; P = 0.04). For grade ≥ 2 rash, prophylactic use of systemic antibiotics and topical steroid ointment was a preventive factor (OR 0.37; 95%CI 0.16-0.89; P = 0.03). Moreover, liver metastasis (OR 8.37; 95%CI 1.98-35.47; P = 0.004) and prophylactic administration of antibiotics (OR 0.15; 95%CI 0.03-0.76; P = 0.02) were significantly associated with grade ≥ 2 paronychia. CONCLUSION: Liver metastasis was suggested to be a risk factor for the incidence of overall grade ≥ 2 skin toxicities; moreover, preemptive systemic antibiotic administration drastically decreased this risk during all periods of anti-EGFR treatment for mCRC.

Alectinib-induced rash unresponsive to desensitization: a case report and literature review.

BACKGROUND: Since the inception of targeted therapies in treating lung cancer, providers have had to be aware of a new host of side effects when selecting management options for patients. Although targeted therapies are creating increased hope for patients with non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC), understanding their side effects presents a challenge for providers. Alectinib, a second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is a targeted therapy used in patients with non-small cell lung cancer found to have anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) mutations. Alectinib is the focus of this case report and literature review as we seek to understand side effects providers may encounter when prescribing these therapies. CASE PRESENTATION: We begin our report with the case of a 63-year-old Hispanic female with stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer found to have the ALK genomic alteration. She was started on Alectinib, and on Day 11, she developed a severe maculopapular rash requiring hospitalization. After complete resolution, desensitization with Alectinib was attempted but unsuccessful. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the unsuccessful desensitization of this patient, it is important to report this rare side effect in order to better understand how providers can pursue management. Case reports such as this can aid providers in potentially preventing, treating, and rechallenging patients on targeted therapies in the future.

Expanding the Histologic Spectrum of Sudden Conjunctivitis, Lymphopenia, and Rash Combined With Hemodynamic Changes.

ABSTRACT: Sudden conjunctivitis, lymphopenia, and rash combined with hemodynamic changes (SCoRCH) is a recently described hypersensitivity reaction to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. To date, only 1 case of histologic findings in SCoRCH has been reported, revealing a superficial perivascular dermatitis. In this article, we present a 53-year-old woman with a four-day history of a widespread, confluent, erythematous, and dusky rash after exposure to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Histologic examination revealed a vacuolar interface dermatitis with several apoptotic keratinocytes at multiple levels of the epidermis, similar to an erythema multiforme-like presentation. As described in SCoRCH, our patient's clinical findings rapidly improved within 48 hours of presentation without treatment. This case adds to the current literature by identifying a newly described histopathological presentation of SCoRCH.