Pharmacoeconomic analysis of palifermin to prevent mucositis among patients undergoing autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Trials have shown benefits of palifermin in reducing the incidence and severity of oral mucositis in patients with hematological malignancies undergoing autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) with total body irradiation (TBI)-based conditioning regimens. Similar outcome data are lacking for patients receiving non-TBI-based regimens. We performed a retrospective evaluation on the pharmacoeconomic benefit of palifermin in the setting of non-TBI-based conditioning and autologous HSCT. Between January 2002 and December 2010, 524 patients undergoing autologous HSCT for myeloma (melphalan 200 mg/m²) and lymphoma (high-dose busulfan, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide) as preparative regimen were analyzed. Use of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) was significantly lower in the palifermin-treated groups (myeloma: 13% versus 53%, P < .001; lymphoma: 46% versus 68%, P < .001). Median total transplant charges were significantly higher in the palifermin-treated group, after controlling for inflation (myeloma: $167,820 versus $143,200, P < .001; lymphoma: $168,570 versus $148,590, P < .001). Palifermin treatment was not associated with a difference in days to neutrophil engraftment, length of stay, and overall survival and was associated with an additional cost of $5.5K (myeloma) and $14K (lymphoma) per day of PCA avoided. Future studies are suggested to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of palifermin compared with other symptomatic treatments to reduce transplant toxicity using validated measures for pain and quality of life.

Economic impact of palifermin on the costs of hospitalization for autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplant: analysis of phase 3 trial results.

A double-blind, randomized trial showed that, compared with placebo, palifermin (recombinant human keratinocyte growth factor) reduced the frequency and duration of oral mucositis in patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing high-dose chemotherapy and total-body irradiation with autologous stem-cell support. This previously published study also showed a significant reduction in the incidence of adverse subsequent outcomes. The objective of this study was to estimate the impact of palifermin prophylaxis on hospital costs of transplantation in the trial. This was a retrospective, economic analysis of estimated costs for a previously published clinical trial. Costs were not collected during the trial. Therefore, we estimated the direct medical costs of hospitalization using hospital charges from similar patients' hospitalization charges selected from the National Inpatient Sample, a population-based, nationally representative sample of hospital claims. Costs were estimated from charges using Medicare's state-specific cost-to-charge ratios. These cost estimates were applied to the outcome data (incidence of febrile neutropenia, bacteremia/fungemia, or pneumonia, and use of total parenteral nutrition) from the clinical trial. Patients were those with hematologic malignancies who received high-dose chemotherapy and total-body irradiation with autologous stem cell transplant. We compared the estimated total hospital costs (in 2005 United States dollars) incurred by patients who received palifermin in the clinical trial with those incurred by patients who received placebo. Costs were analyzed from the provider's perspective. The mean cost of a hospital day in this population varied between $2,834, when no adverse outcomes occurred, and $4,663, when all 4 outcomes occurred. Reductions in adverse outcomes and their associated hospital stay offset the acquisition price of palifermin. A nonsignificant mean savings of $3,595 per patient (95% confidence interval: $2,090-$5,103) was observed. In sensitivity analyses, this observation was robust to all plausible values of per diem hospital costs and hypothetic per diem outpatient costs. In addition to its previously demonstrated clinical benefit, palifermin prophylaxis offers a favorable economic profile among patients with hematologic malignancies who receive total body irradiation and autologous stem cell support.