Identification of a novel opioid, N-piperidinyl etonitazene (etonitazepipne), in patients with suspected opioid overdose.

BACKGROUND: Novel opioids in the illicit drug supply, such as the "nitazene" group of synthetic opioids, present an ongoing public health problem due to high potency and respiratory depressant effects. We describe three patients in whom N-piperidinyl etonitazene, a compound not previously reported in human exposure, was detected after suspected opioid overdose. Other substances that these patients tested for included fentanyl, cocaine, levamisole, phenacetin, benzoylecgonine, para-fluorofentanyl, presumptive heroin (tested as 6-monoacetylmorphine (6-MAM), morphine, and codeine), and tramadol. METHODS: This is a case series of patients with acute opioid overdose enrolled in an ongoing multicenter prospective cohort study. Data collected included reported substance use, clinical course, naloxone dose and response, outcome, and analytes detected in biological samples. RESULTS: Between October 6, 2020 and October 31, 2021, 1006 patients were screened and 412 met inclusion criteria. Of these, three patients (age 33-55) tested positive for N-piperidinyl etonitazene at one site in New Jersey over a period of three days in July 2021. Two patients reported the use of cocaine; one reported the use of heroin and alprazolam. All three patients received naloxone with improvement in their mental status (2 milligrams (mg) intranasally (IN); 8 mg IN; 0.08 mg intravenous (IV)). Two of three received subsequent doses for recurrence of opioid toxicity (0.4-0.6 mg IV). One patient was diagnosed with pneumonia and admitted to the intensive care unit, one was discharged from the Emergency Department (ED), and one used additional drug while in the ED and required admission for a naloxone infusion. None developed organ damage or sequelae. CONCLUSION: These cases represent a local outbreak of a novel "nitazene" opioid. Public health toxicosurveillance should incorporate routine testing of this emerging class of synthetic compounds in the illicit drug supply.

Microspherical Particles of Solid Dispersion of Polyvinylpyrrolidone K29-32 for Inhalation Administration.

Inhalation administration is a promising alternative to the invasive drug delivery methods. The particle size required for ideal drug aerosol preparation is between 1 and 3 µm. The application of microspherical particles of solid dispersions enhances bioavailability of poorly soluble drugs due to the solubilization. In the present work, the spray drying process of the production of microspherical particles of solid dispersions of polyvinylpyrrolidone K29-32 with model hydrophobic drug, phenacetin, was optimized using the results of DSC, PXRD, and viscometry. The diameter of the obtained particles is within 1-3 µm range. The Gibbs energy of dissolution in water was shown to be negative for the mixture with polymer/phenacetin mass ratio 5 : 1. We have demonstrated that the optimal size distribution for the inhalation administration is obtained for microspherical particles produced using spray caps with 7.0 µm hole size. The dissolution rates of phenacetin from the produced microspherical particles were faster than that of drug powder. As evidenced by powder X-ray diffraction data, phenacetin stayed in amorphous state for 4 months in microspherical particles of solid dispersions. According to the obtained results, strategic application of the spray drying process could be beneficial for the improvement of the pharmaceutical properties of model drug, phenacetin.

Problems with the use of oxycodone compound in patients with chronic pain.

In a pain management program (200 patients), a group of daily users of oxycodone compound (29 patients) and a subgroup who were taking a "high dose" of oxycodone compound (13 patients) were compared with a group of 171 non-users of oxycodone compound. A significantly lower treatment success rate was observed in the users (P = 0.04) and high-dose users (P = 0.03). A similar trend was seen in preliminary data available in a larger sample (514 patients). Continued study of these findings is necessary. Meanwhile, in patients with chronic pain, there should be cautious use of this compound.

Crossover and parallel study of oral analgesics.

Ten years ago, analgesics were studied using crossover designs. In recent years, analgesics have been studied only in parallel designs primarily because biostatisticians do not like crossover studies. The advantages of crossover studies are numerous: (1) patients serve as their own control; (2) there is less variability of responses among patients; and (3) a smaller number of patients is needed to provide statistically significant data. As long as crossover of treatment medications does not occur within 4 to 6 hours, the problem of carryover effect of the previous medication is insignificant or negligible. Two studies will be presented. One is a crossover study of Percodan with and without naloxone to placebo. The other is a parallel study comparing the effects of propoxyphene with naloxone to those of propoxyphene alone. The results of these studies reaffirm the value of the crossover method of evaluating analgesics.

Analgesic efficacy of zomepirac sodium in patients with pain due to cancer.

In a single-dose, a double-blind crossover study in 40 patients with chronic pain due to advanced cancer, zomepirac sodium (Zomax), a new, single-entity, non-narcotic analgesic, was compared to oxycodone with APC (Percodan) and placebo. Both a verbal and a curvilinear visual analog scale were used in the study, and the results obtained were comparable. Zomepirac sodium, 100 mg, provided analgesia equal to oxycodone with APC in all assessments of pain intensity and pain relief. The analgesic activity of zomepirac sodium was apparent by 1 hour, reached a peak between 3 and 4 hours after administration, and lasted at least 6 hours. Zomepirac sodium, 100 mg, appears to be an acceptable alternative to narcotic combinations such as oxycodone with APC in the management of moderate to severe cancer pain. The visual analog scale presented appears to be useful in the evaluation of analgesic efficacy and appears to be acceptable as an alternative to the more conventional verbal scale.

Fiorinal with Codeine in the management of tension headache: impact of placebo response.

The well-known difficulty in distinguishing the response to a combination headache medication and its individual components in the presence of a high placebo response was again demonstrated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center trial comparing Fiorinal with Codeine and its Fiorinal and codeine phosphate components in relieving the pain, tension, and muscle contraction associated with tension headache. In the original analysis of the study data, no distinction was apparent between patient response to Fiorinal with Codeine and the response to the individual components, a finding that appeared to conflict with the results of a similar earlier study. This apparent discrepancy was attributable to a high placebo response in the later study. Separation of study subjects according to their baseline level of anxiety and pain identified a subset of less anxious patients with mild to moderate pain severity who were least likely to respond to placebo. Analysis of data from these patients showed that Fiorinal with Codeine was significantly better than placebo in improving patients' self-ratings of various symptoms of tension headache at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 4 hours after ingestion of the study medication. The combination drug was also consistently superior to Fiorinal alone and codeine alone in improving the patients' self-evaluation items, and differences between the combination and its components were generally of statistical or borderline significance during the last half of the study. The investigators' assessments of the effect of treatment on the three principal variables in tension headache (namely, headache pain, psychic tension, and muscle contraction of the head, neck, and shoulders) at the final patient visit also showed Fiorinal with Codeine to be not only significantly superior to placebo but also consistently superior to either component. The superiority of the combination over Fiorinal alone achieved borderline significance for headache pain and psychic tension.

Fiorinal with codeine in the treatment of tension headache--the contribution of components to the combination drug.

The contribution of the Fiorinal and codeine phosphate components to the effectiveness of the Fiorinal with Codeine combination in the treatment of tension headache symptoms was evaluated in a randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter double-blind study. Patients admitted to the trial took two capsules of Fiorinal with Codeine, Fiorinal alone, codeine alone, or placebo during each of two tension headache attacks. Immediately before and at intervals up to four hours after drug ingestion, patients rated pain severity, pain relief, the tense and uptight feeling, and muscle stiffness. The response to treatment was evaluated in 154 patients. Despite a high placebo response, a factor known to obscure the contribution of components, Fiorinal and codeine were each found to contribute significantly to the therapeutic effect of the Fiorinal with Codeine combination. Statistical or borderline superiority of the combination drug over Fiorinal alone was seen most frequently at the early evaluations, a finding that reflected the rapid onset of action of codeine. Statistically significant differences between Fiorinal with Codeine and codeine alone seen principally at the later assessments reflected the long duration of action of the Fiorinal component. The frequency of adverse reactions did not differ significantly among the four study groups.

Assessment of Fiorinal with Codeine in the treatment of tension headache.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study was conducted to ascertain the contribution of Fiorinal and codeine phosphate to the efficacy of Fiorinal with Codeine in relieving the pain, tension, and muscle stiffness associated with tension headache. Patients were given Fiorinal with Codeine, Fiorinal alone, codeine alone, or placebo for use during two separate headache attacks at least 24 hours apart and were asked to rate the effectiveness of the assigned medication on each occasion. The various symptoms of tension headache were evaluated by the patient 0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 4 hours after ingestion of the study medication. At the final patient visit, the investigator assessed the effect of treatment on the three chief components of tension headache, head pain, psychic tension, and muscle contraction. Fiorinal with Codeine was generally significantly more effective than placebo or Fiorinal alone in improving all patient-evaluated items between the second and the fourth hours after administration. The combination was also generally significantly better than codeine alone with respect to pain severity, pain relief, the ability to perform daily activities, and average pathology. The three variables rated by the physician also were generally reduced significantly more with the combination than with placebo or Fiorinal alone. Side effects occurred in only one patient treated with Fiorinal with Codeine.

The onset of action and the analgesic efficacy of Saridon (a propyphenazone/paracetamol/ caffeine combination) in comparison with paracetamol, ibuprofen, aspirin and placebo (pooled statistical analysis).

The objective was to evaluate the onset of action, analgesic efficacy and tolerability of Saridon*, a propyphenazone 150 mg/paracetamol 250 mg/caffeine 50 mg combination, in comparison with paracetamol 500 mg, aspirin 500 mg, ibuprofen 200 mg and placebo, by a pooled statistical analysis of eight studies. Out of 500 generally healthy patients (55.2% men, 44.8% women), average age 43.5 years, 329 (65.8%) had moderate and 171 (34.2%) severe acute dentoalveolar pain. More Saridon-treated patients reported 'pain gone/partly gone' and less 'pain unchanged or worse' compared with paracetamol, aspirin and placebo 30min (p = 0.009, p < 0.001, p = 0.001, respectively) and 60 min after dosing (p < 0.0001 for all). The difference with ibuprofen was observed 60 min after dosing (p < 0.01). Pain intensity differences 30 min and 60 min after dosing infer that Saridon has a faster onset of action than all of the other medications that it was compared with (ibuprofen at only 60 min after dosing). Total pain relief scores four hours after dosing were higher in the Saridon group compared with the paracetamol, ibuprofen, placebo (p < 0.0001 for all) and aspirin groups (p < 0.01). At the end of the study, patients assessed Saridon as more efficacious than the other study medications (p < 0.0001 for all). No serious adverse events were observed with any of the drugs studied. All medications were well tolerated. Twenty patients (4.0%) reported adverse events with no significant differences between groups. The most common adverse events were gastrointestinal disorders, followed by nervous system, skin, subcutaneous tissue, respiratory, cardiac and general disorders. Saridon is an effective analgesic that combines the advantage of fast onset and effective analgesia as compared with paracetamol alone, ibuprofen, aspirin or placebo. The results of this pooled analysis of eight studies should be confirmed in a double-blind study, since seven of the studies included in this analysis were single blind.

Drug-induced hepatitis with hepatic granuloma due to saridon.

A 38-year-old Japanese woman with no past history of liver disease developed liver dysfunction associated with fever, anorexia, and general malaise following the prolonged administration of saridon. A liver biopsy demonstrated multiple noncaseating epithelioid granulomas within hepatic lobules, with an inflammatory cell infiltrate of the lobular parenchyma and portal tracts. Viral markers and autoantibodies were negative. Lymphocyte stimulation tests for saridon and for isopropylantipyrine, one of the constituents of saridon, were positive, and therefore a diagnosis of drug-induced hepatitis due to administration of saridon was made. Her symptoms resolved and liver function test results returned to normal following discontinuation of the drug. The possibility of drug-induced hepatitis must be considered when liver dysfunction or systemic symptomatology develops during saridon therapy.

Studies on the modification of renal lesions due to aspirin and oxyphenbutazone in the rat and the effects on the kidney of 2:4 dinitrophenol.

Cortical tubular necrosis induced by either aspirin (300 mg/kg) or oxyphenbutazone (444 mg/kg) was reduced if probenecid (300 mg/kg) was administered at the same time. The prior administration of aspirin (600 mg/kg) reduced the tubular necrosis that follows administration of oxyphenbutazone (444 mg/kg) alone, thus demonstrating that some degree of cross-tolerance between the two drugs occurs. Phenacetin pretreatment (597 mg/kg) was less effective, while paracetamol (503 mg/kg) was without effect in this regard. Those substances that reduced the oxyphenbutazone-induced cortical lesion also ameliorated the focal degenerative change in the lower nephron attributed to this drug. Oral administration of 2:4 dinitrophenol (20 mg/kg) led to only minor cortical tubular necrosis in a few animals.

Naproxen sodium vs. a combination of aspirin, phenacetin, caffeine and codeine phosphate for pain after major gynecologic surgery. A multicenter comparison.

In this multicenter study a nonnarcotic analgesic available for moderate pain, naproxen sodium, 550 mg, was compared to a combination that is used extensively for moderate to severe pain, aspirin, phenacetin, caffeine and codeine phosphate (APC/C) (60 mg of codeine phosphate). Women with pain after major gynecologic surgery reported a similar pattern in pain reduction with the two medications except for a relatively sharper increase in pain intensity between four and six hours after administration of APC/C. A smaller number of patient complaints suggested that naproxen sodium was better tolerated than APC/C.

[Study of the association of bladder cancer and phenacetin use. Problems set by a pharmaco-epidemiological study]. / Etude de l'association entre le cancer de la vessie et la consommation de phénacétine. Problèmes posés par une étude de pharmacoépidémiologie.

In a survey of the literature, phenacetin appears to be responsible for an increased risk of urothelial tumours in humans, especially renal pelvis tumour. Few observations have suggested an association between bladder cancer and phenacetin containing analgesics however. To assess this association in France, a case-control study of bladder cancer (143 cases, 120 controls) was undertaken. We point at some methodological difficulties, such as difficulties of recall, definition of a control group, non-responses, possible French distinctive features of analgesics use. Results are not able to confirm the suspected relationship between bladder cancer and phenacetin use.

Use of analgesics in self-medication.

Self-medication with analgesics is common and accepted and even recommended by health systems in order to avoid reimbursement. Self-medication, nevertheless, is not an easy task, since making choices is difficult for patients on the basis of the available standard information. Guiding information for patients has to be improved, but also physicians need to be trained how to handle self-medication of their patients. Special attention should be paid to the approval of combination analgesics for the treatment of headache and migraine. There were two major points of discussion during the last decades: possible risks of nephropathy and possible drug-induced overuse. According to a very recent evaluation, analgesic-associated nephropathy appears to have been primarily caused by phenacetin rather than any other single or combination analgesics. Analgesic-induced overuse is also caused by the psychotropic actions of phenacetin in presentations providing rapid absorption, such as powders, rather than by other analgesics or caffeine.

[Analgesics and antipyretics in pediatrics]. / Analgetika-antipyretika v pediatrických indikacích.

We compared the most usual analgetics-antipyretics in pediatric indications, especially paracetamol and acetylosalicylic acid. We watched the effectivity and side effects of both substances according to literature.