Quantifying Perioperative Risks for Antireflux and Hiatus Hernia Surgery: A Multicenter Cohort Study of 4301 Patients.

OBJECTIVE: Using a comprehensive Australian cohort, we quantified the incidence and determined the independent predictors of intraoperative and postoperative complications associated with antireflux and hiatus hernia surgeries. In addition, we performed an in-depth analysis to understand the complication profiles associated with each independent risk factor. BACKGROUND: Predicting perioperative risks for fundoplication and hiatus hernia repair will inform treatment decision-making, hospital resource allocation, and benchmarking. However, available risk calculators do not account for hernia anatomy or technical aspects of surgery in estimating perioperative risk. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of all elective antireflux and hiatus hernia surgeries in 36 Australian hospitals over 10 years. Hierarchical multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the independent predictors of intraoperative and postoperative complications accounting for patient, surgical, anatomic, and perioperative factors. RESULTS: A total of 4301 surgeries were analyzed. Of these, 1569 (36.5%) were large/giant hernias and 292 (6.8%) were revisional procedures. The incidence rates of intraoperative and postoperative complications were 12.6% and 13.3%, respectively. The Charlson Comorbidity Index, hernia size, revisional surgery, and baseline anticoagulant usage independently predicted both intraoperative and postoperative complications. These risk factors were associated with their own complication profiles. Finally, using risk matrices, we visualized the cumulative impact of these 4 risk factors on the development of intraoperative, overall postoperative, and major postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: This study has improved our understanding of perioperative morbidity associated with antireflux and hiatus hernia surgery. Our findings group patients along a spectrum of perioperative risks that inform care at an individual and institutional level.

Laparoscopic heller myotomy versus peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of achalasia.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To compare different therapeutic modalities and determine their role in the treatment of esophageal achalasia. RECENT FINDINGS: The last 3 decades have seen a significant improvement in the diagnosis and treatment of esophageal achalasia. Conventional manometry has been replaced by high-resolution manometry, which has determined a more precise classification of achalasia in three subtypes, with important treatment implications. Therapy, while still palliative, has evolved tremendously. While pneumatic dilatation was for a long time the main choice of treatment, this approach slowly changed at the beginning of the nineties when minimally invasive surgery was adopted, initially thoracoscopically and then laparoscopically with the addition of partial fundoplication. And in 2010, the first report of a new endoscopic technique - peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) - was published, revamping the interest in the endoscopic treatment of achalasia. SUMMARY: This review focuses particularly on the comparison of POEM and laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) with partial fundoplication as primary treatment modality for esophageal achalasia. Based on the available data, we believe that LHM with partial fundoplication should be the primary treatment modality in most patients. POEM should be selected when surgical expertise is not available, for type III achalasia, for the treatment of recurrent symptoms, and for patients who had prior abdominal operations that would make LHM challenging and unsafe.

Nissen Fundoplication in Infants With Severe Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) is a common respiratory morbidity among premature infants. Nissen fundoplication may be performed on infants with BPD to protect the lungs from gastroesophageal reflux-related aspiration, but the indications and benefits associated with fundoplication are not well-defined. This study evaluated associations of Nissen with clinical outcomes in infants with severe BPD (sBPD), using propensity score matching to minimize bias and confounding. METHODS: Infants ≤31 wk gestational age with sBPD (grade 2-3) admitted to a single neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) between January 2016 and October 2021 were included. Patients with sBPD who underwent Nissen fundoplication during initial NICU admission were propensity score-matched at a 1:2 ratio with control patients who did not undergo Nissen (no-Nissen). Outcomes were compared, including time to freedom from respiratory support (defined as ≤2 L nasal cannula), time to initial NICU discharge, and incidence of hospital readmission or death within 1 y postdischarge. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, 18 Nissen infants were compared with 30 no-Nissen infants. The Nissen group trended toward longer time to freedom from respiratory support (median 105 versus 70 d, P = 0.09), and had longer initial hospital stays (188 versus 111 d, P = 0.002), more 1-y hospital readmissions (83% versus 50%, P = 0.04), and more tracheostomies (28% versus 0%, P = 0.005). Mortality during first-year postdischarge was similar (6% versus 10%, P = 1.0). CONCLUSIONS: Despite adjustment for confounding variables, Nissen fundoplication was associated with prolonged support and greater resource utilization among infants with sBPD. Prospective studies are needed to clarify indications for fundoplication in this population.

Forgoing Preoperative Manometry for Minimally Invasive Hiatal Hernia Repair.

INTRODUCTION: Hiatal hernia commonly occurs in adults. Although most patients are asymptomatic, some experience reflux symptoms or dysphagia. These patients are frequently managed with acid suppression and lifestyle changes. However, medical management does not provide durable relief for some patients; therefore, surgical repair is considered. Routine preoperative investigations include esophagoscopy, esophagography, and manometry. We investigated the role of preoperative motility studies for the management of these patients when partial fundoplication is planned. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 185 patients who underwent elective minimally invasive hiatal hernia repair with partial fundoplication between 2014 and 2018. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether a preoperative motility study was performed. The primary outcomes were postoperative dysphagia, complications, postoperative interventions, and use of proton pump inhibitors. RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients underwent preoperative manometry and 86 did not. The lack of preoperative manometry was not associated with increased postoperative morbidity, including leak rate, readmission, and 30-d mortality. The postoperative dysphagia rates of the manometry and nonmanometry groups were 5% (5/99 patients) and 7% (6/86 patients) (P = 0.80), respectively. Furthermore, seven of 99 (7%) patients in the manometry group and 10 of 86 (12%) (P = 0.42) patients in the nonmanometry group underwent interventions, mainly endoscopic dilation, postoperatively owing to symptom recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Forgoing preoperative manometry was not associated with significant adverse outcomes after minimally invasive hiatal hernia repair. Although manometry is reasonable to perform, it should not be considered a mandatory part of the preoperative assessment when partial fundoplication is planned.

Perioperative outcomes of the surgical management of achalasia in two tertiary Cameroonian hospitals: a cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Achalasia is a rare esophageal disease with potentially lethal complications. Knowledge of the outcomes of the different surgical treatment modalities for achalasia by Heller's cardiomyotomy (HCM) helps to choose the safest and most effective option. However, data on the management of achalsia using a Heller myotomy is limited in Africa. Thus, our aim was to determine the perioperative morbidity, mortality and short-term functional outcomes of HCM in Cameroon. METHODOLOGY: We conducted a cohort study throughout a 10-year chart review of patients who underwent HCM for achalasia and were followed up postoperatively for at least three months at two tertiary health centers in Cameroon. We analyzed demographic data, preoperative clinical and imaging data, treatment details, and outcomes at three to twelve months after HCM using the Eckardt score. RESULTS: We enrolled 29 patients with achalasia having a mean age of 24 ± 16 years and predominantly females (M/F of 1/3.8). The mean symptom duration was 51 ± 20 months. In 80% of cases, the diagnosis was made through a conventional x-ray contrast imaging or "barium swallow test" (93%) and/or an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (86%). The gold standard diagnostic method via esophageal manometry was unavailable. Preoperatievly, all patients had symptoms suggestive of an active achalasia. HCM was performed via laparotomy in 75% as opposed to 25% laparoscopic HCM procedures. Dor's anterior partial fundoplication was the main anti-reflux procedure performed (59%). Mucosal perforations were the only intraoperative complications in eight patients (2 during laparoscopy vs. 6 during laparotomy; p > 0.5) and were managed successfully by simple sutures. Postoperative complications were non-severe and occurred in 10% of patients all operated via laparotomy. The mean postoperative length of hospital stay was 7 ± 3 days for laparotomy vs. 5 ± 2 days for laparoscopy; p > 0.5. The perioperative mortality rate was nil. Overall, the short-term postoperative functional outcome was rated excellent; average Eckardt score of 1.5 ± 0.5 (vs. preoperative Eckardt Score of 9 ± 1; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Achalasia is diagnosed late in this resource-limited setting. HCM yields satisfactory outcomes, especially via laparoscopic management. An improvement in diagnostic esophageal manometry and mini-invasive surgical infrastructure and the required surgical training/skills are needed for optimal achalasia care.

A synopsis of the SAGES ADOPT course for foregut surgery and its positive impact on surgeons' confidence levels.

BACKGROUND: The Acquisition of Data for Outcomes and Procedure Transfer (ADOPT) program was established by SAGES to develop and expand individual surgeon's comfort with specific, complex operations using hands-on teaching and longitudinal mentoring. The 2022-2023 Foregut (Dominating the Hiatus) section of the course focused on hiatal hernia dissection and gastric fundoplication techniques. Our aim was to describe the experience of surgeons who participated in the course. METHODS: The hands-on component occurred in March 2022 at the SAGES annual meeting. Each expert mentor was matched to two participants. The mentors guided the surgeons through steps of a laparoscopic paraesophageal (PEH) hernia repair and fundoplication using a cadaveric model. Afterwards, monthly group webinars occurred and participants could receive individual coaching from their assigned mentor for a year. Each participant was given a pre-course survey with 3 and 12-month follow-up questionnaires. RESULTS: The majority of the 16 participants were employed in non-academic settings (87.5%). Years in practice ranged from 1 to 26, and 69% completed a fellowship. 100% completed the pre-course survey, and 53.8% responded to the 12-month post-course survey. Participant-reported effectiveness in performing a PEH hernia repair with fundoplication increased from 37.5% pre-course to 85.7% by the conclusion of the course. Confidence levels for the six core steps of the operation also increased: pre-course only 56-75% were confident with each step, this improved to 100% in four out of six steps. 85.7% said the course has changed their practice. DISCUSSION: Since inception, the ADOPT program has aimed to provide expert instruction for practicing surgeons to learn new techniques or improve their confidence in performing operations. The data for the 2022 ADOPT Foregut course shows that 1 year of participation made a positive impact on these surgeons' practices. This helps to fill in the learning gap that occurs after formal surgical training ends.

Assessment of laparoscopic fundoplication with endoscopy: room for improvement.

INTRODUCTION: Gastroesophageal reflux disease affects a significant portion of the Australian and world population. Minimally invasive laparoscopic fundoplication is a highly effective treatment in appropriately selected patients, with a 90% satisfaction rate. However, up to 5% will undergo revisional surgery. Endoscopy is an important investigation in the evaluation of persistent or new symptoms after fundoplication. Our study sought to evaluate the inter-rater reliability and variability in assessing fundoplication with endoscopy. METHODS: Upper gastrointestinal (UGI) surgeons and gastroenterologists were invited to join the cohort study through their professional membership with two societies based in Australia. Participants completed a two part 25-item multiple choice questionnaire, involving the analysis of ten static endoscopic images post-fundoplication. RESULTS: A total of 101 participants were included in the study (64 UGI surgeons and 37 gastroenterologists). Over 95% of participants were consultant level, working in non-rural tertiary hospitals. Total accuracy for all 10 cases combined was 76% for UGI surgeons and 69.9% for gastroenterologists. In three of the 10 cases, UGI surgeons performed significantly better than gastroenterologists (p < 0.05). When assessing performance across each of the 4 questions for each case, UGI surgeons were more accurate than gastroenterologists in describing the integrity of the wrap (p = 0.014). Inter-rater reliability was low across both groups for most domains (kappa < 1). CONCLUSION: Our study confirms low inter-rater reliability between endoscopists and large variations in reporting. UGI surgeons performed better than gastroenterologists in certain cases, usually when describing the integrity of the fundoplication. Our study provides further support for the use of a standardized reporting system in post-fundoplication patients.

Validity and reliability evidence support task-specific metrics for laparoscopic fundoplication.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair (LHHR) is a complex operation requiring advanced surgical training. Surgical simulation offers a potential solution for learning complex operations without the need for high surgical volume. Our goal is to develop a virtual reality (VR) simulator for LHHR; however, data supporting task-specific metrics for this procedure are lacking. The purpose of this study was to develop and assess validity and reliability evidence of task-specific metrics for the fundoplication phase of LHHR. METHODS: In phase I, structured interviews with expert foregut surgeons were conducted to develop task-specific metrics (TSM). In phase II, participants with varying levels of surgical expertise performed a laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication procedure on a porcine stomach explant. Video recordings were independently assessed by two blinded graders using global and TSM. An intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess interrater reliability (IRR). Performance scores were compared using a Kruskal-Wallis test. Spearman's rank correlation was used to evaluate the association between global and TSM. RESULTS: Phase I of the study consisted of 12 interviews with expert foregut surgeons. Phase II engaged 31 surgery residents, a fellow, and 6 attendings in the simulation. Phase II results showed high IRR for both global (ICC = 0.84, p < 0.001) and TSM (ICC = 0.75, p < 0.001). Significant between-group differences were detected for both global (χ2 = 24.01, p < 0.001) and TSM (χ2 = 18.4, p < 0.001). Post hoc analysis showed significant differences in performance between the three groups for both metrics (p < 0.05). There was a strong positive correlation between the global and TSM (rs = 0.86, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: We developed task-specific metrics for LHHR and using a fundoplication model, we documented significant reliability and validity evidence. We anticipate that these LHHR task-specific metrics will be useful in our planned VR simulator.

Tailoring the wrap: intraoperative functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) during hiatal hernia repair.

INTRODUCTION: The introduction of the functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) has provided objective, real-time feedback on the geometric variations with each component of a hiatal hernia repair (HHR). The utility of this technology in altering intraoperative decision-making has been scarcely reported. Herein, we report a single-center series of intraoperative FLIP during HHR. METHODS: A retrospective review of electronic medical records between 2020 and 2022 was conducted and all patients undergoing non-recurrent HHR with FLIP were queried. Patient and hernia characteristics, intraoperative FLIP values and changes in decision-making, as well as early post-operative outcomes were reported. Both diameter and distensibility index (DI) were measured at 40 ml and 50 ml balloon inflation after hiatal dissection, after hiatal closure, and after fundoplication when indicated. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients met inclusion criteria. Mean age was 62 ± 14 years and mean BMI was 28 ± 6 kg/m2. The majority (53%) were type I hiatal hernias. The largest drop in DI occurred after hiatal closure, with minimal change seen after fundoplication (mean DI of 4.3 ± 2. after completion of HH dissection, vs 2.7 ± 1.2 after hiatal closure and 2.3 ± 1 after fundoplication when performed). In 13 (39%) of cases, FLIP values directly impacted intraoperative decision-making. Fundoplication was deferred in 4/13 (31%) patients, the wrap was loosened in 2/13 (15%); the type of fundoplication was altered to achieve adequate anti-reflux values in 2/13 (15%) patients, and in 1/13 (3%) the wrap was tightened. CONCLUSION: FLIP measurements can be used intraoperatively to guide decision-making and alter management plan based on objective values. Long-term outcomes and further prospective studies are required to better delineate the value of this technology.

Management of symptomatic, asymptomatic, and recurrent hiatal hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The surgical management of hiatal hernia remains controversial. We aimed to compare outcomes of mesh versus no mesh and fundoplication versus no fundoplication in symptomatic patients; surgery versus observation in asymptomatic patients; and redo hernia repair versus conversion to Roux-en-Y reconstruction in recurrent hiatal hernia. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and the ClinicalTrials.gov databases between 2000 and 2022 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), observational studies, and case series (asymptomatic and recurrent hernias). Screening was performed by two trained independent reviewers. Pooled analyses were performed on comparative data. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and Newcastle Ottawa Scale for randomized and non-randomized studies, respectively. RESULTS: We included 45 studies from 5152 retrieved records. Only six RCTs had low risk of bias. Mesh was associated with a lower recurrence risk (RR = 0.50, 95%CI 0.28, 0.88; I2 = 57%) in observational studies but not RCTs (RR = 0.98, 95%CI 0.47, 2.02; I2 = 34%), and higher total early dysphagia based on five observational studies (RR = 1.44, 95%CI 1.10, 1.89; I2 = 40%) but was not statistically significant in RCTs (RR = 3.00, 95%CI 0.64, 14.16). There was no difference in complications, reintervention, heartburn, reflux, or quality of life. There were no appropriate studies comparing surgery to observation in asymptomatic patients. Fundoplication resulted in higher early dysphagia in both observational studies and RCTs ([RR = 2.08, 95%CI 1.16, 3.76] and [RR = 20.58, 95%CI 1.34, 316.69]) but lower reflux in RCTs (RR = 0.31, 95%CI 0.17, 0.56, I2 = 0%). Conversion to Roux-en-Y was associated with a lower reintervention risk after 30 days compared to redo surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence for optimal management of symptomatic and recurrent hiatal hernia remains controversial, underpinned by studies with a high risk of bias. Shared decision making between surgeon and patient is essential for optimal outcomes.

Impact of Toupet fundoplication with bougie on post-operative dysphagia and quality of life.

INTRODUCTION: Numerous studies comment on quality of life outcomes comparing complete and partial fundoplication with or without a bougie. Society guidelines are moving toward recommending partial fundoplication over complete fundoplication due to improved side effect profile with similar outcomes. Retrospective studies and randomized trials have elucidated that use of a bougie during Nissen fundoplication does impact long-term dysphagia. To date there are no retrospective or prospective data that guide practice for partial fundoplications. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this project is to investigate the clinical implications of using a bougie for Toupet fundoplication with regard to short-term and long-term dysphagia and need for further therapeutic interventions. METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained gastroesophageal database was performed. Demographic, pre-operative quality of life outcomes data, perioperative, and post-operative quality of life outcomes data of 373 patients from 2011 to 2022 undergoing Toupet fundoplication without bougie or with a traditional Savary 56Fr or 58Fr bougie were reviewed. The two groups were compared using student's t-test to identify statically significant differences between the groups. RESULTS: Between 2011 and 2022, 373 patients underwent Toupet fundoplication (276 with traditional bougie, 97 without). Median follow-up in the bougie group was 19 months, versus 9 months in the non bougie group. There was no difference between early (3 weeks) and late dysphagia scores (6 months). In the bougie group there were two mucosal perforations due to the bougie. There were no statistically significant differences in GERD-HRQL, gas bloat, and dysphagia scores between groups at one year. CONCLUSION: There is no difference observed in early or late dysphagia scores, GERD-HRQL, gas bloat or need for dilation in patients undergoing Toupet fundoplication with or without a traditional bougie. It is reasonable to discontinue the use of a traditional bougie during Toupet fundoplication, especially due to risk of esophageal perforation.

Concomitant hiatal hernia repair with transoral incisionless fundoplication for the treatment of refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF) is safe and effective in select patients with hiatal hernias ≤ 2 cm with refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). For patients with hiatal hernias > 2 cm, concomitant hiatal hernia (HH) repair with TIF (cTIF) is offered as an alternative to conventional anti-reflux surgery (ARS). Yet, data on this approach is limited. Through a comprehensive systematic review, we aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cTIF for managing refractory GERD in patients with hernias > 2 cm. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a systematic review of studies evaluating cTIF outcomes from PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Cochrane databases up to February 14, 2024. Primary outcomes included complete cessation of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). Secondary outcomes included objective GERD assessment, adverse events, and treatment-related side effects. Pooled analysis was employed wherever feasible. RESULTS: Seven observational studies (306 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Five were retrospective cohort studies and two were prospective observational studies. The median rate of discontinuation of PPIs was 73.8% (range 56.4-94.4%). Significant improvements were observed in disease-specific, validated GERD questionnaires. The median rate for complications was 4.4% (range 0-7.9%), and the 30-day readmission rate had a median of 3.3% (range 0-5.3%). The incidence of dysphagia was 11 out of 164 patients, with a median of 5.3% (range 0-8.3%), while the incidence of gas bloating was 15 out of 127 patients, with a median of 6.9% (range 0-13.8%). CONCLUSION: Current data on cTIF suggests a promising alternative to ARS with comparable short-term efficacy and safety profile for managing refractory GERD with a low side effect profile. However, longer-term data and comparative efficacy studies are needed.

Fundoplication vs. gastric fixation for the management of emergency hiatal hernia repairs: a retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: There is a paucity of literature comparing safety outcomes between formal fundoplication and gastric fixation procedures for hiatal hernia repairs, especially in the emergency setting. The objective of this study was to evaluate 30-day clinical outcomes between fundoplication and gastric fixation performed in emergency hiatal hernia repairs. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study using the National Surgery Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database from 2011 to 2021 was conducted. The study population was determined using ICD9/10 codes describing diaphragmatic hernia without obstruction or gangrene, with obstruction, and with gangrene. Elective cases were excluded. CPT codes were used to group fundoplication procedures and gastric fixation procedures. The primary outcome was the 30-day complication rate. Secondary outcomes included 30-day readmission, reoperation and mortality rates. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to adjust for clinically relevant confounding variables. RESULTS: A total of 971 and 346 were in the fundoplication and gastric fixation groups, respectively. Fundoplication was associated with a significantly lower (p < 0.05) 30-day complication, reoperation and mortality rates. There was no statistically significant difference with respect to readmission. After adjustment, fundoplication was significantly associated with a decrease in odds of 30-day complications (OR 0.53, p < 0.001 95% CI 0.40-0.71) and mortality (OR 0.55, p = 0.033 95% CI 0.32-0.95). However, there was no significant difference with respect to 30-day readmission (OR 0.86, p = 0.449 95% CI 0.59-1.27) and reoperation (OR 0.66, p = 0.063 95% CI 0.42-1.02). CONCLUSION: Patients with hiatal hernias that underwent emergent repair with fundoplication had a significantly lower 30-day complication and mortality rates compared to those who underwent gastric fixation procedures. Fundoplication is a safe and feasible approach to manage hiatal hernias in the emergency setting for select patients.

Determination of causes of post-operative dysphagia after anti-reflux surgery based on intra-operative planimetry.

INTRODUCTION: Dysphagia after anti-reflux surgery (ARS) is one of the most common indications for re-operative anti-reflux surgery and a leading cause of patient dissatisfaction. Unfortunately, the factors affecting its development are poorly understood. We investigated the correlation between pre-operative manometric and the intra-operative impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP™) measurements and development of post-operative dysphagia. METHODS: A review of patients who underwent index robotic ARS in our institution. Patients who underwent pre-operative manometry and intra-operative EndoFLIP™ were included in our study. Dysphagia was assessed pre-operatively and at 3-month after surgery. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients (26.9%) reported post-operative dysphagia, and 34 (16.6%) reported new or worsening dysphagia. On pre-operative manometry, patients with post-operative dysphagia had a lower distal contractile integral [868.7 (IQR 402.2-1447) mmHg s cm vs 1207 (IQR 612.1-2111) mmHg s cm, p = 0.006) and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure [14.7 IQR (8.9-23.6) mmHg vs 20.7 IQR (10.2-32.6) mmHg, p = 0.01] compared to those without post-operative dysphagia. They were also found to have higher pre-operative cross-sectional surface area (CSA) [83 IQR (44.5-112) mm2 vs 66 IQR (42-93) mm2, p = 0.02], and distensibility index (DI) [4.2 IQR (2.2-5.5) mm2/mmHg vs 2.9 IQR (1.6-4.6) mm2/mmHg, p = 0.003] compared to patients without post-operative dysphagia. Additionally, the decrease in CSA [- 34 (- 18.5, - 74.5) mm2 vs - 26.5 (- 10.5, - 53.7) mm2, p = 0.03] and DI [- 2.3 (- 1.2, - 3.7) mm2/mmHg vs - 1.6 (- 0.7, - 3.3) mm2/mmHg, p = 0.03] measurements were greater in patients with post-operative dysphagia. CONCLUSION: Patients who developed dysphagia post-operatively had poorer pre-operative motility and a greater change in LES characteristics intra-operatively. This finding suggests the utility of pre-operative manometry and intra-operative EndoFLIP in identifying patients at risk of developing dysphagia post-operatively.

Automated task-level autonomy assessment in robotic surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Surgical autonomy for trainees has remained elusive to quantify. Proportion of active control time (ACT) of a trainee during a robotic case can be used as a broad measure of autonomy. However, this metric lacks in the granular detail of quantifying at what specific steps trainees were actively participating. We aim to quantify trainee involvement during robotic-assisted hiatal hernia repair at a task-specific level. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of surgical performance data from robotic-assisted hiatal hernia repairs performed. These cases were segmented into 5 tasks by AI-assisted annotation with human review. The segmented tasks included: hiatal dissection, gastric fundus mobilization, mediastinal dissection, cruroplasty and fundoplication. Tasks were excluded if video segmentation of tasks was incorrect. During each task, ACT was recorded for resident, fellow and attending. Resident and fellow ACT per task was compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: Residents had the highest %ACT in the hiatal dissection (53%), gastric fundus mobilization (84%) and fundoplication (57%) tasks. Fellows had greater than 80% ACT in all 5 tasks, with the highest %ACT in the gastric fundus mobilization (100%) and hiatal dissection (88%). There was a significant difference between resident and fellow ACT during mediastinal dissection and cruroplasty. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates how objective performance metrics and automated case segmentation can quantify trainee participation at a task-specific level. By utilizing data afforded by a robotic surgery platform, we are able to provide an objective and automated form of assessment with minimal impact on the workflow of attendings and residents. Our findings can serve to inform residents on what steps they can expect to be involved in during the procedure, appropriate to their PGY level. With this task-level data, we can provide a roadmap for trainee progression to achieve full surgical autonomy.

Short term safety of magnetic sphincter augmentation vs minimally invasive fundoplication: an ACS-NSQIP analysis.

PURPOSE: Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation (MSA) is an FDA-approved anti-reflux procedure with comparable outcomes to fundoplication. However, most data regarding its use are limited to single or small multicenter studies which may limit the generalizability of its efficacy. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of patients undergoing MSA vs fundoplication in a national database. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The 2017-2020 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) Registry was utilized to evaluate patients undergoing MSA or fundoplication. Patients requiring Collis gastroplasty, paraesophageal hernia repair, and emergency cases, were excluded. Patient outcomes included overall complication rates, readmissions, reoperations, and mortality. RESULTS: A total of 7,882 patients underwent MSA (n = 597) or fundoplication (n = 7285). MSA patients were younger (51 vs 57, p < 0.001), and more often male (49.6 vs 34.3%, p < 0.001). While patients undergoing MSA experienced similar rates of reoperation (1.0 vs 2.0%, p = 0.095), they experienced fewer readmissions (2.2 vs 4.7%, p = 0.005), complications (0.6 vs 4.0%, p < 0.001), shorter mean (SD) hospital length of stay(days) (0.4 ± 4.3 vs 1.8 ± 4.6, p < 0.001) and operative time(min) (80.8 ± 36.1 vs 118.7 ± 63.7, p < 0.001). Mortality was similar between groups (0 vs 0.3%, p = 0.175). On multivariable analysis, MSA was independently associated with reduced postoperative complications (OR 0.23, CI 0.08 to 0.61, p = 0.002), readmissions (OR 0.53, CI 0.30 to 0.94, p = 0.02), operative time (RC - 36.56, CI - 41.62 to - 31.49. p < 0.001) and length of stay (RC - 1.22, CI - 1.61 to - 0.84 p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In this national database study, compared to fundoplication MSA was associated with reduced postoperative complications, fewer readmissions, and shorter operative time and hospital length of stay. While randomized trials are lacking between MSA and fundoplication, both institutional and national database studies continue to support the use of MSA as a safe anti-reflux operation.

Paraesophageal hernia recurrence following repair: making the case for reoperative surgery in a propensity-matched cohort.

BACKGROUND: Paraesophageal hernia repairs (PEHRs) have high rates of radiographic recurrence, with some patients requiring repeat operation. This study characterizes patients who underwent PEHR to identify the factors associated with postoperative symptom improvement and radiographic recurrence. We furthermore use propensity score matching to compare patients undergoing initial and reoperative PEHR to identify the factors predictive of recurrence or need for reoperation. METHODS: After IRB approval, patients who underwent PEHR at a tertiary care center between January 2018 and December 2022 were identified. Patient characteristics, preoperative imaging, operative findings, and postoperative outcomes were recorded. A computational generalization of inverse propensity score weight was then used to construct populations of initial and redo PEHR patients with similar covariate distributions. RESULTS: A total of 244 patients underwent PEHR (78.7% female, mean age 65.4 ± 12.3 years). Most repairs were performed with crural closure (81.4%) and fundoplication (71.7%) with 14.2% utilizing mesh. Postoperatively, 76.5% of patients had subjective symptom improvement and of 157 patients with postoperative imaging, 52.9% had evidence of radiographic recurrence at a mean follow-up of 10.4 ± 13.6 months. Only 4.9% of patients required a redo operation. Hernia type, crural closure, fundoplication, and mesh usage were not predictors of radiographic recurrence or symptom improvement (P > 0.05). Propensity weight score analysis of 50 redo PEHRs compared to a matched cohort of 194 initial operations revealed lower rates of postoperative symptom improvement (P < 0.05) but no differences in need for revision, complication rates, ED visits, or readmissions. CONCLUSIONS: Most PEHR patients have symptomatic improvement with minimal complications and reoperations despite frequent radiographic recurrence. Hernia type, crural closure, fundoplication, and mesh usage were not significantly associated with recurrence or symptom improvement. Compared to initial PEHR, reoperative PEHRs had lower rates of symptom improvement but similar rates of recurrence, complications, and need for reoperation.

Lessons learned from revision procedures: a case series pleading for reinforcement of the anterior hiatus in recurrent hiatal hernia.

BACKGROUND: Hiatal Hernia (HH) is a common structural defect of the diaphragm. Laparoscopic repair with suturing of the hiatal pillars followed by fundoplication has become standard practice. In an attempt to lower HH recurrence rates, mesh reinforcement, commonly located at the posterior site of the esophageal hiatus, has been used. However, effectiveness of posterior mesh augmentation is still up to debate. There is a lack of understanding of the mechanism of recurrence requiring further investigation. We investigated the anatomic location of HH recurrences in an attempt to assess why HH recurrence rates remain high despite various attempts with mesh reinforcement. METHODS: A retrospective case series of prospectively collected data from patients with hiatal hernia repair between 2012 and 2020 was performed. In total, 54 patients with a recurrent hiatal hernia operation were included in the study. Video clips from the revision procedure were analyzed by a surgical registrar and senior surgeon to assess the anatomic location of recurrent HH. For the assessment, the esophageal hiatus was divided into four equal quadrants. Additionally, patient demographics, hiatal hernia characteristics, and operation details were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: 54 patients were included. The median time between primary repair and revision procedure was 25 months (IQR 13-95, range 0-250). The left-anterior quadrant was involved in 43 patients (80%), the right-anterior quadrant in 21 patients (39%), the left-posterior quadrant in 21 patients (39%), and the right-posterior quadrant in 10 patients (19%). CONCLUSION: In this study, hiatal hernia recurrences occured most commonly at the left-anterior quadrant of the hiatus, however, posterior recurrences were not uncommon. Based on our results, we hypothesize that both posterior and anterior hiatal reinforcement might be a suitable solution to lower the recurrence rate of hiatal hernia. A randomized controlled trial using a circular, bio-absorbable mesh has been initiated to test our hypothesis.

SAGES guidelines for the surgical treatment of hiatal hernias.

BACKGROUND: Hiatal hernia (HH) is a common condition. A multidisciplinary expert panel was convened to develop evidence-based recommendations to support clinicians, patients, and others in decisions regarding the treatment of HH. METHODS: Systematic reviews were conducted for four key questions regarding the treatment of HH in adults: surgical treatment of asymptomatic HH versus surveillance; use of mesh versus no mesh; performing a fundoplication versus no fundoplication; and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) versus redo fundoplication for recurrent HH. Evidence-based recommendations were formulated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations methodology by subject experts. When the evidence was insufficient to base recommendations on, expert opinion was utilized instead. Recommendations for future research were also proposed. RESULTS: The panel provided one conditional recommendation and two expert opinions for adults with HH. The panel suggested routinely performing a fundoplication in the repair of HH, though this was based on low certainty evidence. There was insufficient evidence to make evidence-based recommendations regarding surgical repair of asymptomatic HH or conversion to RYGB in recurrent HH, and therefore, only expert opinions were offered. The panel suggested that select asymptomatic patients may be offered surgical repair, with criteria outlined. Similarly, it suggested that conversion to RYGB for management of recurrent HH may be appropriate in certain patients and again described criteria. The evidence for the routine use of mesh in HH repair was equivocal and the panel deferred making a recommendation. CONCLUSIONS: These recommendations should provide guidance regarding surgical decision-making in the treatment of HH and highlight the importance of shared decision-making and consideration of patient values to optimize outcomes. Pursuing the identified research needs will improve the evidence base and may allow for stronger recommendations in future evidence-based guidelines for the treatment of HH.

Impedance planimetry (EndoFLIPTM) and surgical outcomes after Hill compared to Toupet fundoplication.

INTRODUCTION: Endoluminal functional lumen imaging probe (EndoFLIP) provides a real-time assessment of gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) compliance during fundoplication. Given the limited data on EndoFLIP measurements during the Hill procedure, we investigated the impact of the Hill procedure on GEJ compliance compared to Toupet fundoplication. METHODS: Patients who underwent robotic Hill or Toupet fundoplication with intraoperative EndoFLIP between 2017 and 2022 were included. EndoFLIP measurements of the GEJ included cross sectional surface area (CSA), intra-balloon pressure, high pressure zone length (HPZ), distensibility index (DI), and compliance. Subjective reflux symptoms, gastroesophageal reflux disease-health related quality of life (GERD-HRQL) score, and dysphagia score were assessed pre-operatively as well as at short- and longer-term follow-up. RESULTS: One-hundred and fifty-four patients (71.9%) had a Toupet fundoplication while sixty (28%) patients underwent the Hill procedure. The CSA [27.7 ± 10.9 mm2 vs 42.2 ± 17.8 mm2, p < 0.0001], pressure [29.5 ± 6.2 mmHg vs 33.9 ± 8.5 mmHg, p = 0.0009], DI [0.9 ± 0.4 mm2/mmHg vs 1.3 ± 0.6 mm2/mmHg, p = 0.001], and compliance [25.9 ± 12.8 mm3/mmHg vs 35.4 ± 13.4 mm3/mmHg, p = 0.01] were lower after the Hill procedure compared to Toupet. However, there was no difference in post-fundoplication HPZ between procedures [Hill: 2.9 ± 0.4 cm, Toupet: 3.1 ± 0.6 cm, p = 0.15]. Follow-up showed no significant differences in GERD-HRQL scores, overall dysphagia scores or atypical symptoms between groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The Hill procedure is as effective to the Toupet fundoplication in surgically treating gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) despite the lower CSA, DI, and compliance after the Hill procedure. Both procedures led to DI < 2 mm2/mmHg with no significant differences in dysphagia reporting (12-24) months after the procedure. Further studies to elucidate a cutoff value for DI for postoperative dysphagia development are still warranted.