Afferent lymph-derived T cells and DCs use different chemokine receptor CCR7-dependent routes for entry into the lymph node and intranodal migration.

Little is known about the molecular mechanisms that determine the entry into the lymph node and intranodal positioning of lymph-derived cells. By injecting cells directly into afferent lymph vessels of popliteal lymph nodes, we demonstrate that lymph-derived T cells entered lymph-node parenchyma mainly from peripheral medullary sinuses, whereas dendritic cells (DCs) transmigrated through the floor of the subcapsular sinus on the afferent side. Transmigrating DCs induced local changes that allowed the concomitant entry of T cells at these sites. Signals mediated by the chemokine receptor CCR7 were absolutely required for the directional migration of both DCs and T cells into the T cell zone but were dispensable for the parenchymal entry of lymph-derived T cells and dendrite probing of DCs. Our findings provide insight into the molecular and structural requirements for the entry into lymph nodes and intranodal migration of lymph-derived cells of the immune system.

Evaluation of Safety, Efficacy, and Compliance of Intralymphatic Immunotherapy for Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Intralymphatic immunotherapy (ILIT) is an emerging type of allergen immunotherapy with fewer injections and shorter course for allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (ARC). The efficacy and safety have not been confirmed by informative and powerful evidence yet. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted through electronic searching with PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). The safety (incidence of adverse events [AEs]), compliance (percent of patients completing treatment), and clinical efficacy of ILIT were evaluated. Clinical efficacy could be assessed by improvement of subjective symptom and rescue medication use or the nasal tolerance to specific allergen. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022353562). RESULTS: 12 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ILIT with placebo and 3 trials (2 RCTs and one case-control study) comparing ILIT and SCIT were included in this review. Totally, 582 patients diagnosed as AR or ARC were enrolled. Almost all the AEs were mild-to-moderate reactions except 2 patients developed anaphylactic reactions at the intralymphatic injection dose 5,000 SQ-U in one study. ILIT got higher incidence of local AEs than placebo, but their incidence of systemic AEs was similar. ILIT was safer than SCIT (p < 0.05). Almost all the patients could complete ILIT treatment, and the most common reason for discontinuation of ILIT was AEs. The compliance of patients receiving ILIT seemed higher than patients receiving SCIT. ILIT could significantly ameliorate subjective allergic symptoms, especially for seasonal ARC, and increase nasal tolerance, similar to SCIT. CONCLUSION: ILIT was a safe and effective treatment for ARC and could achieve comparable clinical improvement with SCIT with shorter duration and higher compliance. Moreover, ILIT was safer than SCIT.

A 1-year pilot study of intralymphatic injections of GAD-alum in individuals with latent autoimmune diabetes in adults (LADA) with signs of high immunity: No safety concerns and resemblance to juvenile type 1 diabetes.

AIMS: To test, for the first time in latent autoimmune diabetes in adults (LADA), the effects of autoantigen-specific immunotherapy by intralymphatic administration of aluminium-formulated recombinant human glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 (GAD-alum); specifically, to test if this treatment is safe, to test whether it induces a strong immunological response akin to a similar protocol in type 1 diabetes and to look for associations with preserved beta-cell function. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three GAD-alum injections, 4 µg each, were administered 1 month apart into an inguinal lymph node in 14 people with newly diagnosed LADA (age 30-62 years) presenting with high levels of antibodies against glutamic acid decarboxylase (GADA). Adverse effects, immunological variables and beta-cell function were monitored, with detailed measurements at 5 and 12 months from baseline. RESULTS: Clinical adverse effects were minor and transient and measured laboratory variables were unaffected. All participants completed the study. Treatment raised levels of GADA, elicited strong effects on reactivity of peripheral blood mononuclear cells to GAD and raised cytokine/chemokine levels. Beta-cell function appeared stable preferentially in the seven participants carrying human leukocyte antigen (HLA) haplotypes DR3DQ2, as assessed by C-peptide glucagon tests (P < 0.05 vs. seven non-carriers). CONCLUSION: Intralymphatic treatment with GAD-alum in LADA is without clinical or other safety concerns over a 12-month period. As in a similar protocol used in type 1 diabetes, treatment exerts a strong immunological impact and is compatible with protection of beta-cell function preferentially in HLA-DR3DQ2 LADA patients. These findings pave the way for a randomized controlled trial in this important subgroup of LADA patients.

Intralymphatic immunotherapy improves grass pollen allergic rhinoconjunctivitis: A 3-year randomized placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinoconjunctivitis is a global health problem. Different allergen immunotherapy regimes are marketed but have low adherence because they are expensive, complex, and time-consuming. New allergen immunotherapy forms are needed. OBJECTIVE: In a 3-year follow-up double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial, we aimed to investigate the effect of intralymphatic allergen immunotherapy (ILIT). METHODS: Patients with grass pollen rhinoconjunctivitis were treated with 3 ILIT injections and an ILIT booster 1 year later, 3 ILIT injections and a placebo booster, or 3 placebo injections and a placebo booster. Primary outcome was improvement in a combined symptom and medication score (cSMS). A novel evaluation tool with a linear regression model of cSMS and grass pollen counts was developed. Secondary outcomes were changes in grass specific immunoglobulins and skin and nasal provocation tests to grass pollen. RESULTS: A total of 36 patients were included. Log10-transformed cSMS was reduced by 0.30 (95% CI, 0.11-0.49; P = .002), equaling 48.5% (95% CI, 24.5%-62%), in the entire 3-year follow-up period, significant only in the first follow-up season but not in the second and third seasons. The regression model showed a 37% (P < .001) reduction in cSMS. The booster injection 1 year later had no additional effect. Secondary, repeated measures of IgE and IgG4 to grass showed significant between-group difference and within-group change in the ILIT groups. No change in provocation test results was found. CONCLUSIONS: ILIT gives a substantial reduction in grass pollen allergy symptoms and use of rescue medication, significant in the first season after treatment. A booster injection had no additional effect.

Study of the physicochemical properties of drugs suitable for administration using a lymphatic drug delivery system.

Lymph node (LN) metastasis is thought to account for 20-30% of deaths from head and neck cancer. The lymphatic drug delivery system (LDDS) is a new technology that enables the injection of drugs into a sentinel LN (SLN) during the early stage of tumor metastasis to treat the SLN and secondary metastatic LNs. However, the optimal physicochemical properties of the solvent used to carry the drug have not been determined. Here, we show that the osmotic pressure and viscosity of the solvent influenced the antitumor effect of cisplatin (CDDP) in a mouse model of LN metastasis. Tumor cells were inoculated into the proper axillary LN (PALN), and the LDDS was used to inject CDDP solution into the subiliac LN (SiLN) to treat the tumor cells in the downstream PALN. CDDP dissolved in saline had no therapeutic effects in the PALN after it was injected into the SiLN using the LDDS or into the tail vein (as a control). However, CDDP solution with an osmotic pressure of ~ 1,900 kPa and a viscosity of ~ 12 mPa⋅s suppressed tumor growth in the PALN after it was injected into the SiLN using the LDDS. The high osmotic pressure dilated the lymphatic vessels and sinuses to enhance drug flow in the PALN, and the high viscosity increased the retention of CDDP in the PALN. Our results demonstrate that optimizing the osmotic pressure and viscosity of the solvent can enhance the effects of CDDP, and possibly other anticancer drugs, after administration using the LDDS.

Intralymphatic immunotherapy with tyrosine-adsorbed allergens: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Most previous studies used aluminum hydroxide-absorbed allergen extracts in evaluating the potential therapeutic roles of intralymphatic allergen-specific immunotherapy (ILAIT). In this study, we evaluated the therapeutic efficacy and safety of ILAIT with L-tyrosine-adsorbed allergen extracts of Dermatophagoides farinae, D. pteronyssinus, cat, dog, or mixtures thereof, in patients with allergic rhinitis induced by these allergens. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, study subjects received three intralymphatic injections of L-tyrosine-adsorbed allergen extracts (active group) or saline (placebo group) at 4-week intervals. RESULTS: Although ILAIT reduced daily medication use and skin reactivity to HDM and cat allergens at 4 months after treatment, overall symptom score on a visual analog scale (VAS), sinonasal outcome test-20 (SNOT-20), rhinoconjunctivitis quality of life questionnaire (RQLQ), daily symptom score (dSS), daily medication score (dMS), daily symptom medication score (dSMS), nasal reactivity to HDM allergen, and basophil activity to HDM, cat, and dog allergens at 4 months and 1 year after treatment were similar between the treatment and control groups. Intralymphatic injection was more painful than a venous puncture, and pain at the injection site was the most frequent local adverse event (12.8%); dyspnea and wheezing were the most common systemic adverse events (5.3%). CONCLUSIONS: ILAIT with L-tyrosine-adsorbed allergen extracts does not exhibit profound therapeutic efficacy in allergic rhinitis and can provoke moderate-to-severe systemic reactions and cause pain at the injection site. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02665754; date of registration: 28 January 2016.

Future of allergic rhinitis management.

OBJECTIVE: To present a comprehensive, clinically focused scoping review of therapeutic agents and practices comprising the future of allergic rhinitis (AR) management. DATA SOURCES: A review of the published literature was performed using the PubMed database, published abstracts, and virtual presentations from scientific meetings and posted results on ClinicalTrials.gov. STUDY SELECTIONS: Primary manuscripts with trial results, case reports, case series, and clinical trial data from ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, and articles highlighting expert perspectives on management of AR were selected. RESULTS: Telemedicine, social media, and mHealth facilitate integrated care for AR management. Pharmacotherapy remains the standard of care for AR management; however, treatment combinations are recommended. Intralymphatic immunotherapy and peptide immunotherapy are the most promising new allergen immunotherapy options. Studies of targeted biologics for AR are ongoing. Probiotics may be beneficial for AR management, particularly Bifidobacterium spp, and as an add-on to allergen immunotherapy. CONCLUSION: AR is a chronic and often comorbid condition that requires integrated care for optimal management. New formulations and combinations of existing AR therapies are the most promising and merit future research.

Intralymphatic immunotherapy for allergic rhinoconjunctivitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Intralymphatic immunotherapy (ILIT) is a new route of allergen-specific immunotherapy. Data confirming its effect is restricted to a small number of studies. METHODOLOGY: A systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted. The short-term (less than 24 weeks), medium-term (24-52 weeks), and long-term (more than 52 weeks) effects of ILIT in patients with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (ARC) were assessed. The outcomes were combined symptom and medication scores (CSMS), symptoms visual analog scale (VAS), disease-specific quality of life (QOL), specific IgG4 level, specific IgE level, and adverse events. RESULTS: Eleven randomized controlled trials and 2 cohorts (483 participants) were included. Compared with placebo, short term benefits of ILIT for seasonal ARC improved CSMS, improved VAS and increased specific IgG4 level but did not change QOL or specific IgE level. Medium-term effect improved VAS. Data on the long-term benefit of ILIT remain unavailable and require longer term follow-up studies. There were no clinical benefits of ILIT for perennial ARC. ILIT was safe and well-tolerated. CONCLUSION: ILIT showed short-term benefits for seasonal ARC. The sustained effects of ILIT were inconclusive. It was well tolerated.

Intralymphatic immunotherapy for mountain cedar pollinosis: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Allergen immunotherapy can provide long-term benefits, including symptomatic relief and reduced disease progression, but it requires a lengthy regimen that presents barriers to patient adherence. Thus, there is a need for improved approaches to immunotherapy. Recently, several clinical trials have reported successful results from intralymphatic immunotherapy. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of intralymphatic immunotherapy for allergies caused by mountain cedar pollen in a proof-of-concept study. METHODS: A total of 21 patients with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis because of mountain cedar pollen were randomized to receive 3 monthly intralymphatic injections of allergenic extract or placebo before the 2018-2019 mountain cedar pollen season. Safety was monitored during treatment to the end of the pollen season using structured and spontaneous reports. Clinical efficacy information was collected using a daily electronic diary of symptoms and allergy medication. Allergen-specific serum immunoglobulin E was assessed before treatment and at the end of the study. RESULTS: There were no serious adverse events or systemic reactions in either group. A total of 4 patients experienced mild injection-site reactions. Patients receiving intralymphatic immunotherapy experienced a significant improvement in allergy symptoms and medication use relative to patients receiving placebo (P < .001), and the active treatment group had lower average total combined scores on 20 of 27 days during the peak pollen season (P < .05). There was no significant difference among groups in changes to mean mountain cedar-specific serum immunoglobulin E levels. CONCLUSION: In this proof-of-concept trial, intralymphatic immunotherapy was well tolerated and improved the symptoms and medication use associated with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis caused by mountain cedar pollen. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under the registration number NCT03682965 before the enrollment of the first subject.

Autoantigen Treatment in Type 1 Diabetes: Unsolved Questions on How to Select Autoantigen and Administration Route.

Autoantigen treatment has been tried for the prevention of type 1 diabetes (T1D) and to preserve residual beta-cell function in patients with a recent onset of the disease. In experimental animal models, efficacy was good, but was insufficient in human subjects. Besides the possible minor efficacy of peroral insulin in high-risk individuals to prevent T1D, autoantigen prevention trials have failed. Other studies on autoantigen prevention and intervention at diagnosis are ongoing. One problem is to select autoantigen/s; others are dose and route. Oral administration may be improved by using different vehicles. Proinsulin peptide therapy in patients with T1D has shown possible minor efficacy. In patients with newly diagnosed T1D, subcutaneous injection of glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) bound to alum hydroxide (GAD-alum) can likely preserve beta-cell function, but the therapeutic effect needs to be improved. Intra-lymphatic administration may be a better alternative than subcutaneous administration, and combination therapy might improve efficacy. This review elucidates some actual problems of autoantigen therapy in the prevention and/or early intervention of type 1 diabetes.

Clinical efficacy and safety of cervical intralymphatic immunotherapy for house dust mite allergic rhinitis: A pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have demonstrated that intralymphatic immunotherapy (ILIT), a less time-consuming alternative to conventional subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT), is safe and effective. However, because of the private location of inguinal lymph nodes, inguinal ILIT is relatively inconvenient. We proposed a novel form of ILIT that involves 3 injections of allergen into cervical lymph nodes. The aim of this study is to determine the clinical efficacy and safety of cervical ILIT on house dust mite induced allergic rhinitis (AR) in adults. METHODS: In this study, we performed a prospective cohort study to determine the clinical efficacy and safety of cervical ILIT on house dust mite induced AR in adults, by comparing the symptom scores, quality-of-life scores (QOLS) and drug scores (use of rescue medication) before and after treatment. Meanwhile, side events were also recorded. RESULTS: Cervical ILIT elicited no moderate-severe adverse events. Patients receiving cervical ILIT experienced a significant improvement in nasal symptoms, eye symptoms and quality of life, as compared to baseline (P all <0.001). A reduction in the use of rescue medication was also demonstrated (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this first-in-human clinical study, cervical ILIT was demonstrated safe and induced allergen tolerance after 3 injections.

Long-term effects of intralymphatic immunotherapy (ILIT) on canine atopic dermatitis.

BACKGROUND: Subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy (SCIT) is an established and efficacious therapy for canine atopic dermatitis (AD). In humans, intralymphatic immunotherapy (ILIT) was reported to be associated with fewer and less severe adverse effects than subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy and to be efficacious for several years after three intralymphatic injections. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate safety and effects of ILIT in a case series of dogs with (AD). ANIMALS: Fifty one privately owned dogs with AD. METHODS: Dogs received injections of 0.2 mL alum-precipitated allergen extract into the popliteal lymph nodes at monthly intervals for 3-5 months. Lesion scores, pruritus and medication scores were determined before and at three and 12 months after beginning immunotherapy, and compared in a per protocol analysis (PP) and an intention-to-treat analysis (ITT). RESULTS: Twenty two dogs completed the study and 29 dogs did not fulfil study completion criteria due to lack of a final study visit (21 of 29) or due to insufficient improvement (14 of 29). All scores improved during the study with both analyses. For pruritus and Quality of Life scores this improvement was significant with both analyses; for Canine Atopic Dermatitis Extent and Severity Index (CADESI)-03 values and medication scores only with PP. The only rare adverse effects observed included mild swelling of the lymph node post-injection and increased pruritus. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: ILIT is safe and feasible, and provides long-lasting relief in some atopic dogs with a limited number of injections.

Intralymphatic immunotherapy of pollen-induced rhinoconjunctivitis: a double-blind placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Allergen-specific immunotherapy represents the only disease-modifying treatment for allergic diseases. We and others have previously demonstrated that intralymphatic immunotherapy (ILIT), a less time-consuming alternative to conventional subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT), is safe and effective. However, this has recently been disputed. The aim of this study was therefore to expand our previous trial, further assessing the safety and efficacy of ILIT. METHODS: Thirty-six patients with pollen-induced rhinoconjunctivitis were randomised to receive three intralymphatic inguinal injections of active allergen (1000 SQ-U birch- or grass-pollen) or placebo. Clinical effects, safety and circulating immunological markers were assessed before, 4 weeks after treatment and at the end of the consecutive pollen season. RESULTS: No moderate or severe reactions were recorded following ILIT. Patients receiving active ILIT experienced a significant improvement in self-recorded seasonal allergic symptoms, as compared to placebo (p = 0.05). In a subgroup of these patients ("improved"), a reduction in nasal symptoms following nasal allergen provocation was also demonstrated. No changes in total IgE or IgG4 were found. However, the affinity of allergen specific IgG4 following active treatment was significantly increased, as compared to non-improved patients (p = 0.04). This could be correlated with clinical improvement, on an individual level. CONCLUSIONS: This double-blinded placebo-controlled study confirms that ILIT is a safe and effective treatment for pollen-induced rhinoconjunctivitis, markedly reducing seasonal allergic symptoms. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT: 2009-016815-39.

Anatomical variations in lymphatic drainage of the right lung: applications in lung cancer surgery.

OBJECTIVES: To specify the topography and variations in lymphatic drainage of the right lung to the mediastinum and their therapeutic implications in non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC). MATERIALS AND METHOD: We injected a dye into the subpleural lymphatic vessels in 65 right lung segments, followed by dissection in 22 subjects. RESULTS: At the upper lobe, we had injected 32 segments. We noted extrasegmental overflow in one case; extrasegmental and extralobar drainage in two cases; drainage to the lymph nodes of another lobe in one case. Fifty-six percent of the segments drained directly (skipping intrapulmonary and hilar lymph nodes) into the right paratracheal lymph nodes, and one dorsal segment drained into the thoracic duct. A ventral segment drained into the inferior tracheobronchial lymph nodes. A contralateral drainage to the recurrent chain was observed in two cases. Sixteen segments of the middle lobe were injected and mainly drained into the inferior tracheobronchial lymph nodes with six direct paths; one medial segment drained into the right anterior mediastinal chain. We noted three contralateral drainages and eight downward abdominal drainages. Out of the 17 segments of the lower lobe injected, 6 segments drained into the lymph nodes of another lobe, 5 segments showed a direct route to the lower quadrant chains. We noted one time a drainage into the paraesophageal lymph nodes. CONCLUSION: The variations in lymphatic drainage of the right lung require to carry out systematically a radical mediastinal lymphadenectomy during the removal of non-small cell lung cancers and to associate an adjuvant treatment.

[Intralymphatic immunotherapy: An effective and safe alternative route for canine atopic dermatitis]. / Intralymphatische Immuntherapie: Eine sichere und effektive Methode zur Desensibilisierung der caninen atopischen Dermatitis.

INTRODUCTION: Allergen-specific immunotherapy (ASIT) is the only etiologic treatment of atopic dermatitis in dogs. In humans it has been shown that intralymphatic immunotherapy (ILIT) enhanced efficacy and patient compliance and reduced treatment time from 3 years to 8 weeks. As only safety data have been published yet, the aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of ILIT in dogs. 20 atopic dogs underwent ILIT with alum-precipitated allergens administered every 4 weeks for 3 to 7 times in the popliteal lymph node. Pruritus (Hill score), CADESI (canine atopic dermatitis severety index), concurrent medications and adverse reactions were recorded initially and every 4 weeks for a total period of 24 weeks. The observed clinical response was good in 12/20 (60%) patients and improvement could be seen in some dogs already after 4 weeks. The median number of injections was 5.6. All dogs tolerated the procedure well and no adverse effects were recognized during or after ILIT. Therefore ILIT should be regarded as a safe alternative to subucaneous ASIT, enabling a faster clinical improvement with the same response rate.

INTRODUCTION: L'immunothérapie spécifique de l'allergène est le seul traitement étiologique de la dermite atopique du chien. On a pu montrer que, chez l'homme, l'immunothérapie intralymphatique (ITIL) augmente la fiabilité du traitement et permet de réduire sa durée de 3 ans à 8 semaines. Comme jusqu'à ce jour seules des données relatives à la tolérance avaient été publiées, la présente étude a pour but d'examiner l'efficacité clinique de l'ITIL chez les chiens. Vingt chiens atopiques ont été désensibilisés au moyen d'allergènes précipités à l'aluminium par ITIL dans les ganglions poplités toutes les 4 semaines. Le prurit (Hill score), le CADESI (canine atopic dermatitis severity index), les médicaments appliqués et les effets secondaires observés ont été enregistrés au début du traitement puis toutes les 4 semaines durant au total 24 semaines. 12/20 (60%) des patients ont bien répondu au traitement. L'amélioration clinique a pu être partiellement constatée après 4 semaines déjà. En moyenne, 5.6 injections ont été nécessaires. Tous les chiens ont bien toléré l'ITIL et il n'a pas été observé d'effet secondaire pendant ou après le traitement. L'immunothérapie intralymphatique semble donc une alternative sure à l'immunothérapie spécifique de l'antigène sous-cutanée et permet d'obtenir un effet plus rapide avec le même taux de réponse.

[MODERN APPROACHES TO TREATMENT OF A DONOR'S WOUNDS IN THE INJURED PERSONS WITH THE BURNS].

The impact of the treatment method proposed, using antioxidant therapy in patients, suffering the burns, on the speed and efficacy of the donor's wounds healing in their extremities was studied. In a control group of patients a standard treatment of the donor's wounds in extremities was conducted, while in the main group of patients the treatment was added with lymphotropic injection of antioxidant preparation Mexidol. Due to application of the method proposed, the wounds healing in the main group of the injured persons have had occurred significantly faster, than in the patients of a control group, and the complications of the wounds healing were absent.