Structure of the MRAS-SHOC2-PP1C phosphatase complex.

RAS-MAPK signalling is fundamental for cell proliferation and is altered in most human cancers1-3. However, our mechanistic understanding of how RAS signals through RAF is still incomplete. Although studies revealed snapshots for autoinhibited and active RAF-MEK1-14-3-3 complexes4, the intermediate steps that lead to RAF activation remain unclear. The MRAS-SHOC2-PP1C holophosphatase dephosphorylates RAF at serine 259, resulting in the partial displacement of 14-3-3 and RAF-RAS association3,5,6. MRAS, SHOC2 and PP1C are mutated in rasopathies-developmental syndromes caused by aberrant MAPK pathway activation6-14-and SHOC2 itself has emerged as potential target in receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK)-RAS-driven tumours15-18. Despite its importance, structural understanding of the SHOC2 holophosphatase is lacking. Here we determine, using X-ray crystallography, the structure of the MRAS-SHOC2-PP1C complex. SHOC2 bridges PP1C and MRAS through its concave surface and enables reciprocal interactions between all three subunits. Biophysical characterization indicates a cooperative assembly driven by the MRAS GTP-bound active state, an observation that is extendible to other RAS isoforms. Our findings support the concept of a RAS-driven and multi-molecular model for RAF activation in which individual RAS-GTP molecules recruit RAF-14-3-3 and SHOC2-PP1C to produce downstream pathway activation. Importantly, we find that rasopathy and cancer mutations reside at protein-protein interfaces within the holophosphatase, resulting in enhanced affinities and function. Collectively, our findings shed light on a fundamental mechanism of RAS biology and on mechanisms of clinically observed enhanced RAS-MAPK signalling, therefore providing the structural basis for therapeutic interventions.

Structure-function analysis of the SHOC2-MRAS-PP1C holophosphatase complex.

Receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK)-RAS signalling through the downstream mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascade regulates cell proliferation and survival. The SHOC2-MRAS-PP1C holophosphatase complex functions as a key regulator of RTK-RAS signalling by removing an inhibitory phosphorylation event on the RAF family of proteins to potentiate MAPK signalling1. SHOC2 forms a ternary complex with MRAS and PP1C, and human germline gain-of-function mutations in this complex result in congenital RASopathy syndromes2-5. However, the structure and assembly of this complex are poorly understood. Here we use cryo-electron microscopy to resolve the structure of the SHOC2-MRAS-PP1C complex. We define the biophysical principles of holoenzyme interactions, elucidate the assembly order of the complex, and systematically interrogate the functional consequence of nearly all of the possible missense variants of SHOC2 through deep mutational scanning. We show that SHOC2 binds PP1C and MRAS through the concave surface of the leucine-rich repeat region and further engages PP1C through the N-terminal disordered region that contains a cryptic RVXF motif. Complex formation is initially mediated by interactions between SHOC2 and PP1C and is stabilized by the binding of GTP-loaded MRAS. These observations explain how mutant versions of SHOC2 in RASopathies and cancer stabilize the interactions of complex members to enhance holophosphatase activity. Together, this integrative structure-function model comprehensively defines key binding interactions within the SHOC2-MRAS-PP1C holophosphatase complex and will inform therapeutic development .

Structural basis for SHOC2 modulation of RAS signalling.

The RAS-RAF pathway is one of the most commonly dysregulated in human cancers1-3. Despite decades of study, understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying dimerization and activation4 of the kinase RAF remains limited. Recent structures of inactive RAF monomer5 and active RAF dimer5-8 bound to 14-3-39,10 have revealed the mechanisms by which 14-3-3 stabilizes both RAF conformations via specific phosphoserine residues. Prior to RAF dimerization, the protein phosphatase 1 catalytic subunit (PP1C) must dephosphorylate the N-terminal phosphoserine (NTpS) of RAF11 to relieve inhibition by 14-3-3, although PP1C in isolation lacks intrinsic substrate selectivity. SHOC2 is as an essential scaffolding protein that engages both PP1C and RAS to dephosphorylate RAF NTpS11-13, but the structure of SHOC2 and the architecture of the presumptive SHOC2-PP1C-RAS complex remain unknown. Here we present a cryo-electron microscopy structure of the SHOC2-PP1C-MRAS complex to an overall resolution of 3 Å, revealing a tripartite molecular architecture in which a crescent-shaped SHOC2 acts as a cradle and brings together PP1C and MRAS. Our work demonstrates the GTP dependence of multiple RAS isoforms for complex formation, delineates the RAS-isoform preference for complex assembly, and uncovers how the SHOC2 scaffold and RAS collectively drive specificity of PP1C for RAF NTpS. Our data indicate that disease-relevant mutations affect complex assembly, reveal the simultaneous requirement of two RAS molecules for RAF activation, and establish rational avenues for discovery of new classes of inhibitors to target this pathway.

The SDS22:PP1:I3 complex: SDS22 binding to PP1 loosens the active site metal to prime metal exchange.

SDS22 and Inhibitor-3 (I3) are two ancient regulators of protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) that regulate multiple essential biological processes. Both SDS22 and I3 form stable dimeric complexes with PP1; however, and atypically for PP1 regulators, they also form a triple complex, where both proteins bind to PP1 simultaneously (SPI complex). Here we report the crystal structure of the SPI complex. While both regulators bind PP1 in conformations identical to those observed in their individual PP1 complexes, PP1 adopts the SDS22-bound conformation, which lacks its M1 metal. Unexpectedly, surface plasmon resonance (SPR) revealed that the affinity of I3 for the SDS22:PP1 complex is ∼10-fold lower than PP1 alone. We show that this change in binding affinity is solely due to the interaction of I3 with the PP1 active site, specifically PP1's M2 metal, demonstrating that SDS22 likely allows for PP1 M2 metal exchange and thus PP1 biogenesis.

Leishmania PNUTS discriminates between PP1 catalytic subunits through an RVxF-ΦΦ-F motif and polymorphisms in the PP1 C-tail and catalytic domain.

Phosphoprotein phosphatase 1 (PP1) associates with specific regulatory subunits to achieve, among other functions, substrate selectivity. Among the eight PP1 isotypes in Leishmania, PP1-8e associates with the regulatory protein PNUTS along with the structural factors JBP3 and Wdr82 in the PJW/PP1 complex that modulates RNA polymerase II (pol II) phosphorylation and transcription termination. Little is known regarding interactions involved in PJW/PP1 complex formation, including how PP1-8e is the selective isotype associated with PNUTS. Here, we show that PNUTS uses an established RVxF-ΦΦ-F motif to bind the PP1 catalytic domain with similar interfacial interactions as mammalian PP1-PNUTS and noncanonical motifs. These atypical interactions involve residues within the PP1-8e catalytic domain and N and C terminus for isoform-specific regulator binding. This work advances our understanding of PP1 isoform selectivity and reveals key roles of PP1 residues in regulator binding. We also explore the role of PNUTS as a scaffold protein for the complex by identifying the C-terminal region involved in binding JBP3 and Wdr82 and impact of PNUTS on the stability of complex components and function in pol II transcription in vivo. Taken together, these studies provide a potential mechanism where multiple motifs within PNUTS are used combinatorially to tune binding affinity to PP1, and the C terminus for JBP3 and Wdr82 association, in the Leishmania PJW/PP1 complex. Overall, our data provide insights in the formation of the PJW/PP1 complex involved in regulating pol II transcription in divergent protozoans where little is understood.

Serine/threonine phosphatases: mechanism through structure.

The reversible phosphorylation of proteins is accomplished by opposing activities of kinases and phosphatases. Relatively few protein serine/threonine phosphatases (PSPs) control the specific dephosphorylation of thousands of phosphoprotein substrates. Many PSPs, exemplified by protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) and PP2A, achieve substrate specificity and regulation through combinatorial interactions between conserved catalytic subunits and a large number of regulatory subunits. Other PSPs, represented by PP2C and FCP/SCP, contain both catalytic and regulatory domains within the same polypeptide chain. Here, we discuss biochemical and structural investigations that advance the mechanistic understanding of the three major classes of PSPs, with a focus on PP2A.

Regulation of Synaptic Transmission and Plasticity by Protein Phosphatase 1.

Protein phosphatases, by counteracting protein kinases, regulate the reversible phosphorylation of many substrates involved in synaptic plasticity, a cellular model for learning and memory. A prominent phosphatase regulating synaptic plasticity and neurologic disorders is the serine/threonine protein phosphatase 1 (PP1). PP1 has three isoforms (α, ß, and γ, encoded by three different genes), which are regulated by a vast number of interacting subunits that define their enzymatic substrate specificity. In this review, we discuss evidence showing that PP1 regulates synaptic transmission and plasticity, as well as presenting novel models of PP1 regulation suggested by recent experimental evidence. We also outline the required targeting of PP1 by neurabin and spinophilin to achieve substrate specificity at the synapse to regulate AMPAR and NMDAR function. We then highlight the role of inhibitor-2 in regulating PP1 function in plasticity, including its positive regulation of PP1 function in vivo in memory formation. We also discuss the distinct function of the three PP1 isoforms in synaptic plasticity and brain function, as well as briefly discuss the role of inhibitory phosphorylation of PP1, which has received recent emphasis in the regulation of PP1 activity in neurons.

SDS22 selectively recognizes and traps metal-deficient inactive PP1.

The metalloenzyme protein phosphatase 1 (PP1), which is responsible for ≥50% of all dephosphorylation reactions, is regulated by scores of regulatory proteins, including the highly conserved SDS22 protein. SDS22 has numerous diverse functions, surprisingly acting as both a PP1 inhibitor and as an activator. Here, we integrate cellular, biophysical, and crystallographic studies to address this conundrum. We discovered that SDS22 selectively binds a unique conformation of PP1 that contains a single metal (M2) at its active site, i.e., SDS22 traps metal-deficient inactive PP1. Furthermore, we showed that SDS22 dissociation is accompanied by a second metal (M1) being loaded into PP1, as free metal cannot dissociate the complex and M1-deficient mutants remain constitutively trapped by SDS22. Together, our findings reveal that M1 metal loading and loss are essential for PP1 regulation in cells, which has broad implications for PP1 maturation, activity, and holoenzyme subunit exchange.

Essential role of GEXP15, a specific Protein Phosphatase type 1 partner, in Plasmodium berghei in asexual erythrocytic proliferation and transmission.

The essential and distinct functions of Protein Phosphatase type 1 (PP1) catalytic subunit in eukaryotes are exclusively achieved through its interaction with a myriad of regulatory partners. In this work, we report the molecular and functional characterization of Gametocyte EXported Protein 15 (GEXP15), a Plasmodium specific protein, as a regulator of PP1. In vitro interaction studies demonstrated that GEXP15 physically interacts with PP1 through the RVxF binding motif in P. berghei. Functional assays showed that GEXP15 was able to increase PP1 activity and the mutation of the RVxF motif completely abolished this regulation. Immunoprecipitation assays of tagged GEXP15 or PP1 in P. berghei followed by immunoblot or mass spectrometry analyses confirmed their interaction and showed that they are present both in schizont and gametocyte stages in shared protein complexes involved in the spliceosome and proteasome pathways and known to play essential role in parasite development. Phenotypic analysis of viable GEXP15 deficient P. berghei blood parasites showed that they were unable to develop lethal infection in BALB/c mice or to establish experimental cerebral malaria in C57BL/6 mice. Further, although deficient parasites produced gametocytes they did not produce any oocysts/sporozoites indicating a high fitness cost in the mosquito. Global proteomic and phosphoproteomic analyses of GEXP15 deficient schizonts revealed a profound defect with a significant decrease in the abundance and an impact on phosphorylation status of proteins involved in regulation of gene expression or invasion. Moreover, depletion of GEXP15 seemed to impact mainly the abundance of some specific proteins of female gametocytes. Our study provides the first insight into the contribution of a PP1 regulator to Plasmodium virulence and suggests that GEXP15 affects both the asexual and sexual life cycle.

A strong correlation between consensus sequences and unique super secondary structures in leucine rich repeats.

Leucine rich repeats (LRRs) are present in over 430 000 proteins from viruses to eukaryotes. The LRRs are 20 to 30 residues long and occur in tandem. Individual LRRs are separated into a highly conserved segment with the consensus of LxxLxLxxNxL or LxxLxLxxNxxL (HCS) and a variable segment (VS). In LRRs parallel stacking of short ß-strands (at positions 3-5 in HCS) form a super helix arrangement called a solenoid structure. Many classes have been recognized. All three classes of Plant specific, Leptospira-like, and SDS22-like LRRs which are 24, 23, and 22 residues long, respectively, form a 3(10)-helix in the VS part. To get a deeper understanding of sequence, structure correlations in LRR structures, we utilized secondary structure assignment and HELFIT analysis (calculating helix axis, pitch, radius, residues per turn, and handedness) based on the atomic coordinates in crystal structures of 43 LRR proteins. We also defined three structural parameters using the three unit vectors of the helix axes of 3(10)-helix, ß-turn, and LRR-domain calculated by HELFIT. The combination of the secondary structure assignment and HELFIT reveals that their LRRs adopt unique super secondary structures consisting of a 3(10)-helix and one or two Type I ß-turns. We propose one structural parameter as a geometrical invariant of LRR solenoid structures. The common LxxLxxL sequence (where "L" is Leu, Ile, Val, Phe or Cys) in the three classes is an essential determinant for the super secondary structures providing a medium range interaction.

Novel phosphorylation-dependent regulation in an unstructured protein.

This work explores how phosphorylation of an unstructured protein region in inhibitor-2 (I2) regulates protein phosphatase-1 (PP1) enzyme activity using molecular dynamics (MD). Free I2 is largely unstructured; however, when bound to PP1, three segments adopt a stable structure. In particular, an I2 helix (i-helix) blocks the PP1 active site and inhibits phosphatase activity. I2 phosphorylation in the PP1-I2 complex activates phosphatase activity without I2 dissociation. The I2 Thr74 regulatory phosphorylation site is in an unstructured domain in PP1-I2. PP1-I2 MD demonstrated that I2 phosphorylation promotes early steps of PP1-I2 activation in explicit solvent models. Moreover, phosphorylation-dependent activation occurred in PP1-I2 complexes derived from I2 orthologs with diverse sequences from human, yeast, worm, and protozoa. This system allowed exploration of features of the 73-residue unstructured human I2 domain critical for phosphorylation-dependent activation. These studies revealed that components of I2 unstructured domain are strategically positioned for phosphorylation responsiveness including a transient α-helix. There was no evidence that electrostatic interactions of I2 phosphothreonine74 influenced PP1-I2 activation. Instead, phosphorylation altered the conformation of residues around Thr74. Phosphorylation uncurled the distance between I2 residues Glu71 to Tyr76 to promote PP1-I2 activation, whereas reduced distances reduced activation. This I2 residue Glu71 to Tyr76 distance distribution, independently from Thr74 phosphorylation, controls I2 i-helix displacement from the PP1 active site leading to PP1-I2 activation.

Overexpression of PP1-NIPP1 limits the capacity of cells to repair DNA double-strand breaks.

The ubiquitously expressed nuclear protein NIPP1 (also known as PPP1R8) recruits phosphoproteins for regulated dephosphorylation by the associated protein phosphatase PP1. To bypass the PP1 titration artifacts seen upon NIPP1 overexpression, we have engineered covalently linked fusions of PP1 and NIPP1, and demonstrate their potential to selectively explore the function of the PP1:NIPP1 holoenzyme. By using inducible stable cell lines, we show that PP1-NIPP1 fusions cause replication stress in a manner that requires both PP1 activity and substrate recruitment via the ForkHead Associated domain of NIPP1. More specifically, PP1-NIPP1 expression resulted in the build up of RNA-DNA hybrids (R-loops), enhanced chromatin compaction and a diminished repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), culminating in the accumulation of DSBs. These effects were associated with a reduced expression of DNA damage signaling and repair proteins. Our data disclose a key role for dephosphorylation of PP1:NIPP1 substrates in setting the threshold for DNA repair, and indicate that activators of this phosphatase hold therapeutic potential as sensitizers for DNA-damaging agents.

A substrate-trapping strategy for protein phosphatase PP1 holoenzymes using hypoactive subunit fusions.

The protein Ser/Thr phosphatase PP1 catalyzes an important fraction of protein dephosphorylation events and forms highly specific holoenzymes through an association with regulatory interactors of protein phosphatase one (RIPPOs). The functional characterization of individual PP1 holoenzymes is hampered by the lack of straightforward strategies for substrate mapping. Because efficient substrate recruitment often involves binding to both PP1 and its associated RIPPO, here we examined whether PP1-RIPPO fusions can be used to trap substrates for further analysis. Fusions of an hypoactive point mutant of PP1 and either of four tested RIPPOs accumulated in HEK293T cells with their associated substrates and were co-immunoprecipitated for subsequent identification of the substrates by immunoblotting or MS analysis. Hypoactive fusions were also used to study RIPPOs themselves as substrates for associated PP1. In contrast, substrate trapping was barely detected with active PP1-RIPPO fusions or with nonfused PP1 or RIPPO subunits. Our results suggest that hypoactive fusions of PP1 subunits represent an easy-to-use tool for substrate identification of individual holoenzymes.

Protein phosphatase 1 of Leishmania donovani exhibits conserved catalytic residues and pro-inflammatory response.

Protein phosphorylation, governed by kinases and phosphatases, plays a pivotal role in enormous cellular signaling pathways. Although PPP family of serine/threonine phosphatases have been involved in multiplication and growth of trypanosomatid parasites, but comprehensive knowledge is still very limited. In the present study, protein phosphatase 1 from Leishmania donovani (LdPP1) was purified to homogeneity and its structural attributes were explored employing CD and fluorescence spectroscopy as well as bioinformatics methods. The CD analysis revealed an appropriate secondary structure with α-helices content outnumbering the ß-sheets, whereas intrinsic fluorescence study depicted about the buried positioning of tryptophan residues. The three-dimensional structure of LdPP1, determined by homology modeling, displayed all the characteristic features including similar position of metal as well as inhibitor binding site corresponding to the known PP1 structures. Furthermore, ELISA and qRT-PCR results showed that LdPP1 elicit the pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α and IL-6 at translated and transcriptional levels in THP1 macrophages. Subsequently, immune effector molecule nitric oxide and transcription factor NF-κB production was also found to be increased upon LdPP1 stimulation. Altogether, this is the first report on PPP phosphatase of trypanosomatid parasite that represents the structural highlights along with protein-mediated immunomodulation in human macrophages.

Human RIF1 and protein phosphatase 1 stimulate DNA replication origin licensing but suppress origin activation.

The human RIF1 protein controls DNA replication, but the molecular mechanism is largely unknown. Here, we demonstrate that human RIF1 negatively regulates DNA replication by forming a complex with protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) that limits phosphorylation-mediated activation of the MCM replicative helicase. We identify specific residues on four MCM helicase subunits that show hyperphosphorylation upon RIF1 depletion, with the regulatory N-terminal domain of MCM4 being particularly strongly affected. In addition to this role in limiting origin activation, we discover an unexpected new role for human RIF1-PP1 in mediating efficient origin licensing. Specifically, during the G1 phase of the cell cycle, RIF1-PP1 protects the origin-binding ORC1 protein from untimely phosphorylation and consequent degradation by the proteasome. Depletion of RIF1 or inhibition of PP1 destabilizes ORC1, thereby reducing origin licensing. Consistent with reduced origin licensing, RIF1-depleted cells exhibit increased spacing between active origins. Human RIF1 therefore acts as a PP1-targeting subunit that regulates DNA replication positively by stimulating the origin licensing step, and then negatively by counteracting replication origin activation.

The split protein phosphatase system.

Reversible phosphorylation of proteins is a post-translational modification that regulates all aspect of life through the antagonistic action of kinases and phosphatases. Protein kinases are well characterized, but protein phosphatases have been relatively neglected. Protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) catalyzes the dephosphorylation of a major fraction of phospho-serines and phospho-threonines in cells and thereby controls a broad range of cellular processes. In this review, I will discuss how phosphatases were discovered, how the view that they were unselective emerged and how recent findings have revealed their exquisite selectivity. Unlike kinases, PP1 phosphatases are obligatory heteromers composed of a catalytic subunit bound to one (or two) non-catalytic subunit(s). Based on an in-depth study of two holophosphatases, I propose the following: selective dephosphorylation depends on the assembly of two components, the catalytic subunit and the non-catalytic subunit, which serves as a high-affinity substrate receptor. Because functional complementation of the two modules is required to produce a selective holophosphatase, one can consider that they are split enzymes. The non-catalytic subunit was often referred to as a regulatory subunit, but it is, in fact, an essential component of the holoenzyme. In this model, a phosphatase and its array of mostly orphan substrate receptors constitute the split protein phosphatase system. The set of potentially generalizable principles outlined in this review may facilitate the study of these poorly understood enzymes and the identification of their physiological substrates.

Protein Phosphatase 1-Targeting Small-Molecule C31 Inhibits Ebola Virus Replication.

Background: Ebola virus (EBOV) infection causes severe hemorrhagic fever. EBOV transcription is controlled by host protein phosphatase 1 (PP1), which dephosphorylates VP30 protein. We previously developed 1E7-03, a compound targeting a noncatalytic site of PP1 that induced VP30 phosphorylation and inhibited EBOV transcription. Here, we attempted to further improve 1E7-03, which was not stable in murine serum. Results: High-throughput screening with EBOV-green fluorescent protein was conducted on 72 1E7-03 analogs and identified 6 best inhibitory and the least toxic compounds. A parallel in silico screening of compounds from the ZINC database by docking to PP1 identified the best-binding compound C31, which was also present among the top 6 compounds found in the viral screen. C31 showed the best EBOV inhibitory activity among the top 6 compounds and also inhibited EBOV minigenome. C31 bound to the PP1 C-terminal groove in vitro and increased VP30 phosphorylation in cultured cells. C31 demonstrated improved stability in mouse plasma and cell permeability, compared with 1E7-03. It was also detected for 24 hours after injection in mice. Conclusion: C31 represents a novel PP1-targeting EBOV inhibitor with improved pharmacological properties that can be further evaluated for future antifiloviral therapy.

PKC mediated phosphorylation of TIMAP regulates PP1c activity and endothelial barrier function.

TGF-ß inhibited membrane-associated protein (TIMAP) is greatly expressed in endothelial cell lines and serves as a protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) regulatory subunit. Phosphorylation state of TIMAP, through affecting PP1 activity, has a remarkable effect on endothelial barrier function. Here we present evidence for a previously unidentified PKC phosphorylation site in TIMAP. Protein-protein interaction was detected in pulmonary endothelial cells between endogenous TIMAP and activated PKCα. PKCα phosphorylated the full length recombinant TIMAP in in vitro kinase assay and Ser331 of TIMAP was shown to be phosphorylated by PKC. Phosphorylation of TIMAP upon PKC activation in endothelial cells results in enrichment of TIMAP in the membrane, but no such change can be observed in PKC depleted cells. However, the previously identified PKA/GSK-3ß induced enrichment of TIMAP at the plasma membrane was not affected in the absence of PKC. Interaction between TIMAP and the TIMAP-PP1 substrate phospho-ERM was described earlier, but now we show that binding of PKC phosphorylated TIMAP to ERM is severely reduced. This suggests an inhibitory effect of phospho-Ser331 on TIMAP-PP1 activity toward phospho-ERM. Accordingly, phospho-ERM level in the membrane fraction of the phospho-mimic S331D TIMAP mutant transfected cells was increased, but the S331A mutant overexpressing endothelial cells had a lower phospho-ERM level. Consistent with the phospho-ERM level, electric resistance measurements showed that the S331A mutation of TIMAP resulted in faster recovery from the PMA treatment. Taken together, phosphorylation of TIMAP on Ser331 by PKC represents a new mechanism of endothelial barrier regulation, through the inhibition of phospho-ERM dephosphorylation.

The heterotrimeric G protein Gß1 interacts with the catalytic subunit of protein phosphatase 1 and modulates G protein-coupled receptor signaling in platelets.

Thrombosis is caused by the activation of platelets at the site of ruptured atherosclerotic plaques. This activation involves engagement of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) on platelets that promote their aggregation. Although it is known that protein kinases and phosphatases modulate GPCR signaling, how serine/threonine phosphatases integrate with G protein signaling pathways is less understood. Because the subcellular localization and substrate specificity of the catalytic subunit of protein phosphatase 1 (PP1c) is dictated by PP1c-interacting proteins, here we sought to identify new PP1c interactors. GPCRs signal via the canonical heterotrimeric Gα and Gßγ subunits. Using a yeast two-hybrid screen, we discovered an interaction between PP1cα and the heterotrimeric G protein Gß1 subunit. Co-immunoprecipitation studies with epitope-tagged PP1c and Gß1 revealed that Gß1 interacts with the PP1c α, ß, and γ1 isoforms. Purified PP1c bound to recombinant Gß1-GST protein, and PP1c co-immunoprecipitated with Gß1 in unstimulated platelets. Thrombin stimulation of platelets induced the dissociation of the PP1c-Gß1 complex, which correlated with an association of PP1c with phospholipase C ß3 (PLCß3), along with a concomitant dephosphorylation of the inhibitory Ser1105 residue in PLCß3. siRNA-mediated depletion of GNB1 (encoding Gß1) in murine megakaryocytes reduced protease-activated receptor 4, activating peptide-induced soluble fibrinogen binding. Thrombin-induced aggregation was decreased in PP1cα-/- murine platelets and in human platelets treated with a small-molecule inhibitor of Gßγ. Finally, disruption of PP1c-Gß1 complexes with myristoylated Gß1 peptides containing the PP1c binding site moderately decreased thrombin-induced human platelet aggregation. These findings suggest that Gß1 protein enlists PP1c to modulate GPCR signaling in platelets.

Cell cycle-dependent regulation of Greatwall kinase by protein phosphatase 1 and regulatory subunit 3B.

Greatwall (Gwl) kinase plays an essential role in the regulation of mitotic entry and progression. Mitotic activation of Gwl requires both cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1)-dependent phosphorylation and its autophosphorylation at an evolutionarily conserved serine residue near the carboxyl terminus (Ser-883 in Xenopus). In this study we show that Gwl associates with protein phosphatase 1 (PP1), particularly PP1γ, which mediates the dephosphorylation of Gwl Ser-883. Consistent with the mitotic activation of Gwl, its association with PP1 is disrupted in mitotic cells and egg extracts. During mitotic exit, PP1-dependent dephosphorylation of Gwl Ser-883 occurs prior to dephosphorylation of other mitotic substrates; replacing endogenous Gwl with a phosphomimetic S883E mutant blocks mitotic exit. Moreover, we identified PP1 regulatory subunit 3B (PPP1R3B) as a targeting subunit that can direct PP1 activity toward Gwl. PPP1R3B bridges PP1 and Gwl association and promotes Gwl Ser-883 dephosphorylation. Consistent with the cell cycle-dependent association of Gwl and PP1, Gwl and PPP1R3B dissociate in M phase. Interestingly, up-regulation of PPP1R3B facilitates mitotic exit and blocks mitotic entry. Thus, our study suggests PPP1R3B as a new cell cycle regulator that functions by governing Gwl dephosphorylation.