RESUMO
The National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) recently published a new strategic vision for the future of human genomics, the product of an extensive, multi-year engagement with numerous research, medical, educational, and public communities. The theme of this 2020 vision-The Forefront of Genomics-reflects NHGRI's critical role in providing responsible stewardship of the field of human genomics, especially as genomic methods and approaches become increasingly disseminated throughout biomedicine. Embracing that role, the new NHGRI strategic vision features a set of guiding principles and values that provide an ethical and moral framework for the field. One principle emphasizes the need to champion a diverse genomics workforce because "the promise of genomics cannot be fully achieved without attracting, developing, and retaining a diverse workforce, which includes individuals from groups that are currently underrepresented in the genomics enterprise." To build on the remarkable metamorphosis of the field over the last three decades, enhancing the diversity of the genomics workforce must be embraced as an urgent priority. Toward that end, NHGRI recently developed an "action agenda" for training, employing, and retaining a genomics workforce that reflects the diversity of the US population.
Assuntos
Genoma Humano/genética , Genômica/organização & administração , Recursos Humanos/organização & administração , Humanos , National Human Genome Research Institute (U.S.)/organização & administração , Estados UnidosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has strained many healthcare systems. In response, U.S. hospitals altered their care delivery systems, but there are few data regarding specific structural changes. Understanding these changes is important to guide interpretation of outcomes and inform pandemic preparedness. We sought to characterize emergency responses across hospitals in the United States over time and in the context of local case rates early in the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. DESIGN: We surveyed hospitals from a national acute care trials group regarding operational and structural changes made in response to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic from January to August 2020. We collected prepandemic characteristics and changes to hospital system, space, staffing, and equipment during the pandemic. We compared the timing of these changes with county-level coronavirus disease 2019 case rates. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: U.S. hospitals participating in the Prevention and Early Treatment of Acute Lung Injury Network Coronavirus Disease 2019 Observational study. Site investigators at each hospital collected local data. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Forty-five sites participated (94% response rate). System-level changes (incident command activation and elective procedure cancellation) occurred at nearly all sites, preceding rises in local case rates. The peak inpatient census during the pandemic was greater than the prior hospital bed capacity in 57% of sites with notable regional variation. Nearly half (49%) expanded ward capacity, and 63% expanded ICU capacity, with nearly all bed expansion achieved through repurposing of clinical spaces. Two-thirds of sites adapted staffing to care for patients with coronavirus disease 2019, with 48% implementing tiered staffing models, 49% adding temporary physicians, nurses, or respiratory therapists, and 30% changing the ratios of physicians or nurses to patients. CONCLUSIONS: The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic prompted widespread system-level changes, but front-line clinical care varied widely according to specific hospital needs and infrastructure. Linking operational changes to care delivery processes is a necessary step to understand the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on patient outcomes.
Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Atenção à Saúde/organização & administração , Hospitais , Capacidade de Resposta ante Emergências/organização & administração , Cuidados Críticos/organização & administração , Número de Leitos em Hospital , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/organização & administração , SARS-CoV-2 , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Recursos Humanos/organização & administraçãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: While optimal utilization of the nurse practitioner (NP) workforce is an increasingly popular proposal to alleviate the growing primary care shortage, federal, state, and organizational scope of practice policies inhibit NPs from practicing to the full extent of their license and training. In March of 2020, NP state-specific supervisory requirements were temporarily waived to meet the demands of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in Massachusetts. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine the impact of temporarily waived state practice restrictions on NP perception of care delivery during the initial surge of the COVID-19 pandemic in Massachusetts. RESEARCH DESIGN: Mixed methods descriptive analysis of a web-based survey of Massachusetts NPs (N=391), conducted in May and June 2020. RESULTS: The vast majority (75%) of NPs believed the temporary removal of practice restriction did not perceptibly improve clinical work. Psychiatric mental health NPs were significantly more likely than other NP specialties to believe the waiver improved clinical work (odds ratio=6.68, P=0.001). NPs that experienced an increase in working hours during the pandemic surge were also more likely to report a positive effect of the waiver (odds ratio=2.56, P=0.000). CONCLUSIONS: Temporary removal of state-level practice barriers alone is not sufficient to achieve immediate full scope of practice for NPs. The successful implementation of modernized scope of practice laws may require a collective effort to revise organizational and payer policies accordingly.
Assuntos
COVID-19/terapia , Profissionais de Enfermagem/organização & administração , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Padrões de Prática em Enfermagem/organização & administração , Atenção Primária à Saúde/organização & administração , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Certificação , Implementação de Plano de Saúde , Humanos , Licenciamento , Massachusetts/epidemiologia , Profissionais de Enfermagem/legislação & jurisprudência , Padrões de Prática em Enfermagem/legislação & jurisprudência , Atenção Primária à Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Autonomia Profissional , Inquéritos e Questionários/estatística & dados numéricos , Recursos Humanos/legislação & jurisprudência , Recursos Humanos/organização & administraçãoRESUMO
In response to the estimated potential impact of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) on New York City hospitals, our institution prepared for an influx of critically ill patients. Multiple areas of surge planning progressed, simultaneously focused on infection control, clinical operational challenges, ICU surge capacity, staffing, ethics, and maintenance of staff wellness. The protocols developed focused on clinical decisions regarding intubation, the use of high-flow oxygen, engagement with infectious disease consultants, and cardiac arrest. Mechanisms to increase bed capacity and increase efficiency in ICUs by outsourcing procedures were implemented. Novel uses of technology to minimize staff exposure to COVID-19 as well as to facilitate family engagement and end-of-life discussions were encouraged. Education and communication remained key in our attempts to standardize care, stay apprised on emerging data, and review seminal literature on respiratory failure. Challenges were encountered and overcome through interdisciplinary collaboration and iterative surge planning as ICU admissions rose. Support was provided for both clinical and nonclinical staff affected by the profound impact COVID-19 had on our city. We describe in granular detail the procedures and processes that were developed during a 1-month period while surge planning was ongoing and the need for ICU capacity rose exponentially. The approaches described here provide a potential roadmap for centers that must rapidly adapt to the tremendous challenge posed by this and potential future pandemics.
Assuntos
Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Recursos em Saúde/provisão & distribuição , Hospitais , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Capacidade de Resposta ante Emergências , Manuseio das Vias Aéreas , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Estado Terminal , Hospitalização , Humanos , Controle de Infecções/organização & administração , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Cidade de Nova Iorque/epidemiologia , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Recursos Humanos/organização & administraçãoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Almost 15% of all US births occur in rural hospitals, yet rural hospitals are closing at an alarming rate because of shortages of delivering clinicians, nurses, and anesthesia support. We describe maternity staffing patterns in successful rural hospitals across North Carolina. METHODS: All of the hospitals in the state with ≤200 beds and active maternity units were surveyed. Hospitals were categorized into three sizes: critical access hospitals (CAHs) had ≤25 acute staffed hospital beds, small rural hospitals had ≤100 beds without being defined as CAHs, and intermediate rural hospitals had 101 to 200 beds. Qualitative data were collected at a selection of study hospitals during site visits. Eighteen hospitals were surveyed. Site visits were completed at 8 of the surveyed hospitals. RESULTS: Nurses in CAHs were more likely to float to other units when Labor and Delivery did not have patients and nursing management was more likely to assist on Labor and Delivery when patient census was high. Anesthesia staffing patterns varied but certified nurse anesthetists were highly used. CAHs were almost twice as likely to accept patients choosing a trial of labor after cesarean section (CS) than larger hospitals, but CS rates were similar across all hospital types. Hospitals with only obstetricians as delivering providers had the highest CS rate (32%). The types of hospitals with the lowest CS rates were the hospitals with only family physicians (24%) or high proportions of certified nurse midwives (22%). CONCLUSIONS: Innovative staffing models, including family physicians, nurse midwives, and nurse anesthetists, are critical for the survival of rural hospitals that provide vital maternity services in underserved areas.
Assuntos
Salas de Parto/organização & administração , Hospitais Rurais/organização & administração , Serviços de Saúde Materna/provisão & distribuição , Serviços de Saúde Rural/provisão & distribuição , Recursos Humanos/organização & administração , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Humanos , Área Carente de Assistência Médica , North Carolina , Enfermeiros Anestesistas/provisão & distribuição , Enfermeiros Obstétricos/provisão & distribuição , Médicos de Família/provisão & distribuição , Gravidez , Pesquisa QualitativaRESUMO
This article describes an academic-clinical partnership program between a school of nursing and an American Nurse Credentialing Center Magnet®- and National Cancer Institute-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center based on a shared vision and multifaceted for optimal new graduate operating room (OR) recruitment and use of clinical partner resources. The program, now in its 3rd year, has a 100% retention rate among the cohorts. Implementing a multifaceted OR partnership program based on nursing theory is a strategy for workforce development to increase retention of new graduate OR nurses.
Assuntos
Bacharelado em Enfermagem/organização & administração , Hospitais de Ensino/organização & administração , Relações Interinstitucionais , Recursos Humanos de Enfermagem Hospitalar/educação , Enfermagem de Centro Cirúrgico/educação , Enfermagem de Centro Cirúrgico/organização & administração , Sociedades de Enfermagem/organização & administração , Recursos Humanos/organização & administração , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , Objetivos Organizacionais , Estados UnidosRESUMO
The promotion of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) in nursing is a topic of renewed importance, given the civil unrest following the death of George Floyd and identified disparities in health and health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite its progress, the nursing profession continues to struggle with recruiting and retaining a workforce that represents the cultural diversity of the patient population. The authors completed a review of the literature on DEI in nursing and found a scarcity of studies, and that a limitation exists due to the strength of the evidence examined. This article aims to provide a review of the literature on DEI in nursing, outcomes and strategies associated with organizational DEI efforts, and knowledge on how the American Nurses Credentialing Center Pathway to Excellence® Designation Program framework supports DEI initiatives. The authors further provided recommendations for nurse leaders and a checklist of proposed questions for assessing commitment, culture, and structural empowerment initiatives toward a more diverse, equitable, and inclusive organization.
Assuntos
Diversidade Cultural , Equidade em Saúde , Liderança , Enfermagem/normas , Inclusão Social , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Empoderamento , Humanos , Cultura Organizacional , Pandemias , Racismo/prevenção & controle , SARS-CoV-2 , Recursos Humanos/organização & administraçãoRESUMO
CONTEXT: The COVID-19 outbreak at the North West Regional Hospital (NWRH) site in Tasmania, Australia in April 2020 was both rapid and tragic. Within 10 days of identification of the first healthcare worker infection, both hospitals had closed, and all patients were discharged or decanted to other facilities within the state. The entire hospital staff (approximately 1300 people) and their households (approximately 3000-4000 people) were furloughed for 14 days to halt the spread of infection. During the furlough period, a decommissioning, terminal clean and recommissioning process was undertaken alongside recovery and reorientation of the workforce to personal protective equipment. Within 4 days of closure, an Australian Defence Force and Australian Medical Assistance Team team opened the prioritised emergency department to provide emergency care for the local community, supported by modified diagnostic services. The decommissioning and cleaning rolled on over the ensuing month, in a predetermined priority order. As staff returned from quarantine, they recommissioned their clinical areas. The final ward, a modified medical isolation wing, reopened on day 29. ISSUE: Disaster management activities may be grouped under four main headings: prevention, preparedness, response and recovery. There are many opportunities for improvement and learning, and this article focuses on the local response and recovery, describing the process undertaken from the perspective of a small management group. Authors CC, HE, TB and MW were on the ground during the decommissioning process, then managed aspects of the cleaning and recommissioning remotely from furlough. Authors TA and TC provided specialist IPC support and developed education remotely. LESSONS LEARNED: Almost 2 months on, no new COVID-19 infections had been reported. The aim of this article is to provide a foundation for site-specific adaptation to include in pandemic escalation plans in other regional and rural settings.
Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Pessoal de Saúde/organização & administração , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Controle de Infecções/organização & administração , Pandemias , Quarentena/métodos , Recursos Humanos/organização & administração , Humanos , Tasmânia/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Comorbidity with behavioral health conditions is highly prevalent among those experiencing serious medical illnesses and is associated with poor outcomes. Siloed provision of behavioral and physical healthcare has contributed to a workforce ill-equipped to address the often complex needs of these clinical populations. Trained specialist behavioral health providers are scarce and there are gaps in core behavioral health competencies among serious illness care providers. Core competency frameworks to close behavioral health training gaps in primary care exist, but these have not extended to some of the distinct skills and roles required in serious illness care settings. This paper seeks to address this issue by describing a common framework of training competencies across the full spectrum of clinical responsibility and behavioral health expertise for those working at the interface of behavioral health and serious illness care. The authors used a mixed-method approach to develop a model of behavioral health and serious illness care and to delineate seven core skill domains necessary for practitioners working at this interface. Existing opportunities for scaling-up the workforce as well as priority policy recommendation to address barriers to implementation are discussed.
Assuntos
Medicina do Comportamento/educação , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Serviços de Saúde Mental/organização & administração , Recursos Humanos/organização & administração , Competência Clínica , Cuidados Críticos , HumanosRESUMO
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a global health threat. A hospital in Zhuhai adopted several measures in Fever Clinic Management (FCM) to respond to the outbreak of COVID-19. FCM has been proved to be effective in preventing nosocomial cross infection. Faced with the emergency, the hospital undertook creative operational steps in relation to the control and spread of COVID-19, with special focuses on physical and administrative layout of buildings, staff training and preventative procedures. The first operational step was to set up triaging stations at all entrances and then complete a standard and qualified fever clinic, which was isolated from the other buildings within our hospital complex. Secondly, the hospital established its human resource reservation for emergency response and the allocation of human resources to ensure strict and standardised training methods through the hospital for all medical staff and ancillary employees. Thirdly, the hospital divided the fever clinic into partitioned areas and adapted a three-level triaging system. The experiences shared in this paper would be of practical help for the facilities that are encountering or will encounter the challenges of COVID-19, i.e. to prevent nosocomial cross infection among patients and physicians.
Assuntos
Infecções por Coronavirus/terapia , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/métodos , Arquitetura Hospitalar/métodos , Pneumonia Viral/terapia , COVID-19 , China/epidemiologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/prevenção & controle , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Surtos de Doenças , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/organização & administração , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/normas , Febre/diagnóstico , Febre/etiologia , Febre/terapia , Arquitetura Hospitalar/normas , Humanos , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Equipamento de Proteção Individual , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Viral/prevenção & controle , Ensino , Fatores de Tempo , Triagem/métodos , Ventilação/normas , Fluxo de Trabalho , Recursos Humanos/organização & administração , Recursos Humanos/normasRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Health sector priority setting in Low and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs) entails balancing between a high demand and low supply of scarce resources. Human Resources for Health (HRH) consume the largest allocation of health sector resources in LMICs. Health sector decentralization continues to be promoted for its perceived ability to improve efficiency, relevance and participation in health sector priority setting. Following the 2013 devolution in Kenya, both health service delivery and human resource management were decentralized to county level. Little is known about priority setting practices and outcomes of HRH within decentralized health systems in LMICs. Our study sought to examine if and how the Kenyan devolution has improved health sector priority setting practices and outcomes for HRH. METHODS: We used a mixed methods case study design to examine health sector priority setting practices and outcomes at county level in Kenya. We used three sources of data. First, we reviewed all relevant national and county level policy and guidelines documents relating to HRH management. We then accessed and reviewed county records of HRH recruitment and distribution between 2013 and 2018. We finally conducted eight key informant interviews with various stakeholder involved in HRH priority setting within our study county. RESULTS: We found that HRH numbers in the county increased by almost two-fold since devolution. The county had two forms of HRH recruitment: one led by the County Public Services Board as outlined by policy and guidelines and a parallel, politically-driven recruitment done directly by the County Department of Health. Though there were clear guidelines on HRH recruitment, there were no similar guidelines on allocation and distribution of HRH. Since devolution, the county has preferentially staffed higher level hospitals over primary care facilities. Additionally, there has been local county level innovations to address some HRH management challenges, including recruiting doctors and other highly specialized staff on fixed term contract as opposed to permanent basis; and implementation of local incentives to attract and retain HRH to remote areas within the county. CONCLUSION: Devolution has significantly increased county level decision-space for HRH priority setting in Kenya. However, HRH management and accountability challenges still exist at the county level. There is need for interventions to strengthen county level HRH management capacity and accountability mechanisms beyond additional resources allocation. This will boost the realization of the country's efforts for promoting service delivery equity as a key goal - both for the devolution and the country's quest towards Universal Health Coverage (UHC).
Assuntos
Alocação de Recursos para a Atenção à Saúde , Prioridades em Saúde/organização & administração , Política , Recursos Humanos/organização & administração , Atenção à Saúde/organização & administração , Humanos , Quênia , Responsabilidade SocialRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The ways of life in the Amazon are diverse and not widely known. In addition, social inequities, large geographic distances and inadequate health care network noticeably limit access to health services in rural areas. Over the last decades, Brazilian health authorities have implemented fluvial mobile units (FMU) as an alternative to increase access and healthcare coverage. The aim of the study was to identify the strategies of access and utilization of primary health care (PHC) services by assessing the strengths and limitations of the healthcare model offered by the FMU to reduce barriers to services and ensure the right to healthcare. METHODS: Qualitative and ethnographic research involving participant observation and semi-structured interviews. Data collection consisted of interviews with users and health professionals and the observation of service organization and healthcare delivered by the FMU, in addition to the therapeutic itineraries that determine demand, access and interaction of users with healthcare services. RESULTS: Primary care is offered by the monthly locomotion of the FMU that serves approximately 20 rural riverside communities. The effectiveness of the actions of the FMU proved to be adequate for conditions such as antenatal care for low-risk pregnancy, which require periodic consultations. However, conditions that require continued attention are not adequately met through the organization of care established in the FMU. The underutilization of the workforce of community health workers and disarrangement between their tasks and those of the rest of the multi-professional team are some of the reasons pointed out, making the healthcare continuity unfeasible within the intervals between the trips of the FMU. From the users' perspective, although the presence of the FMU provides healthcare coverage, the financial burden generated by the pursuit for services persists, since the dispersed housing pattern requires the locomotion of users to reach the mobile unit services as well as for specialized care in the urban centers. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of the FMU represents an advance in terms of accessibility to PHC. However, the organization of their activity uncritically replicates the routines adopted in the daily routine of health services located in urban spaces, proving to be inadequate for providing healthcare strategies capable of mitigating social and health inequalities faced by the users.
Assuntos
Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Unidades Móveis de Saúde/organização & administração , Atenção Primária à Saúde/organização & administração , Serviços de Saúde Rural/organização & administração , Brasil , Agentes Comunitários de Saúde/organização & administração , Feminino , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Gravidez , Cuidado Pré-Natal/organização & administração , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Recursos Humanos/organização & administraçãoRESUMO
Breast cancer is the most common malignancy among women worldwide. The current COVID-19 pandemic represents an unprecedented challenge leading to care disruption, which is more severe in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) due to existing economic obstacles. This review presents the global perspective and preparedness plans for breast cancer continuum of care amid the COVID-19 outbreak and discusses challenges faced by LMIC in implementing these strategies. Prioritization and triage of breast cancer patients in a multidisciplinary team setting are of paramount importance. Deescalation of systemic and radiation therapy can be utilized safely in selected clinical scenarios. The presence of a framework and resource-adapted recommendations exploiting available evidence-based data with judicious personalized use of current resources is essential for breast cancer care in LMIC during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/terapia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente/organização & administração , Recursos em Saúde/economia , Oncologia/organização & administração , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Mama/economia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/transmissão , COVID-19/virologia , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/normas , Países em Desenvolvimento , Feminino , Implementação de Plano de Saúde/economia , Implementação de Plano de Saúde/organização & administração , Humanos , Oncologia/economia , Oncologia/normas , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Seleção de Pacientes , SARS-CoV-2/patogenicidade , Triagem/organização & administração , Triagem/normas , Recursos Humanos/economia , Recursos Humanos/organização & administraçãoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Laboratories are vital in disease diagnosis, prevention, treatment and outbreak investigations. Although recent decades have seen rapid advancements in modernised equipment and laboratory processes, minimal investments have been made towards strengthening laboratory professionals in Africa. This workforce is characterised by insufficient numbers, skewed rural-urban distribution, inadequate qualifications, inadequate skill-mix and limited career opportunities. These factors adversely affect the performance of laboratory professionals, who are the backbone of quality services. In the era of Global Health Initiatives, this study describes the status of laboratory human resource and assesses the experiences, constrains and opportunities for strengthening them in Uganda. METHODS: This paper is part of a study, which assessed laboratory capacity in 21 districts during December 2015 to January 2016. We collected data using a laboratory assessment tool adapted from the WHO and USAID assessment tool for laboratory services and supply chain (ATLAS), 2006. Of the 100 laboratories, 16 were referral laboratories (hubs). To assess human resource constraints, we conducted 100 key informant interviews with laboratory managers and in charges. RESULTS: Across the facilities, there was an excess number of laboratory technicians at Health Center (HC) IV level by 30% and laboratory assistants were in excess by 90%. There was a shortage of laboratory technologists with only 50% of the posts filled at general hospitals. About 87.5% of hub laboratories had conducted formal onsite training compared to 51.2% of the non-hub laboratories. Less than half of HC III laboratories had conducted a formal onsite training; hospital laboratories had not conducted training on the use and maintenance of equipment. Almost all HC III laboratories had been supervised though supervision focused on HIV/AIDS. Financial resources, workload and lack of supervision were major constraints to human resource strengthening. CONCLUSION: Although opportunities for continuous education have emerged over the past decade, they are still threatened by inadequate staffing, skill mix and escalating workload. Moreover, excesses in staffing are more in favour of HIV, TB and malaria. The Ministry of Health needs to develop work-based staffing models to ensure adequate staff numbers and skill mix. Staffing norms need to be revised to accommodate laboratory technologists and scientists at high-level laboratories. Training needs to extend beyond HIV, TB and malaria.
Assuntos
Saúde Global , Laboratórios , Recursos Humanos/organização & administração , Estudos Transversais , Estudos de Casos Organizacionais , UgandaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Community health workers (CHWs) are widely recognized as essential to addressing disparities in health care delivery and outcomes in US vulnerable populations. In the state of Arizona, the sustainability of the workforce is threatened by low wages, poor job security, and limited opportunities for training and advancement within the profession. CHW voluntary certification offers an avenue to increase the recognition, compensation, training, and standardization of the workforce. However, passing voluntary certification legislation in an anti-regulatory state such as Arizona posed a major challenge that required a robust advocacy effort. CASE PRESENTATION: In this article, we describe the process of unifying the two major CHW workforces in Arizona, promotoras de salud in US-Mexico border communities and community health representatives (CHRs) serving American Indian communities. Differences in the origins, financing, and even language of the population-served contributed to historically divergent interests between CHRs and promotoras. In order to move forward as a collective workforce, it was imperative to integrate the perspectives of CHRs, who have a regular funding stream and work closely through the Indian Health Services, with those of promotoras, who are more likely to be grant-funded in community-based efforts. As a unified workforce, CHWs were better positioned to gain advocacy support from key health care providers and health insurance companies with policy influence. We seek to elucidate the lessons learned in our process that may be relevant to CHWs representing diverse communities across the US and internationally. CONCLUSIONS: Legislated voluntary certification provides a pathway for further professionalization of the CHW workforce by establishing a standard definition and set of core competencies. Voluntary certification also provides guidance to organizations in developing appropriate training and job activities, as well as ongoing professional development opportunities. In developing certification with CHWs representing different populations, and in particular Tribal Nations, it is essential to assure that the CHW definition is in alignment with all groups and that the scope of practice reflects CHW roles in both clinic and community-based settings. The Arizona experience underscores the benefits of a flexible approach that leverages existing strengths in organizations and the population served.
Assuntos
Certificação/normas , Agentes Comunitários de Saúde/organização & administração , Serviços de Saúde do Indígena/organização & administração , Arizona , Fortalecimento Institucional/organização & administração , Certificação/legislação & jurisprudência , Agentes Comunitários de Saúde/economia , Agentes Comunitários de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Agentes Comunitários de Saúde/normas , Tomada de Decisões , Política de Saúde , Serviços de Saúde do Indígena/economia , Humanos , México , Estudos de Casos Organizacionais , Recursos Humanos/organização & administraçãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: This study compares perspectives on specialized ophthalmic medical institutions, identifies the gaps in property and geographic offerings, and explores the ways that ophthalmic medical institutions can better allocate resources. The results of this research will increase patient's access to equitable and high-quality ophthalmic care in China. METHODS: The data for this research was gathered from the Survey of China National Eye Care Capacity and Resource for the year 2015. The paper specified the number, professional level of expertise, and educational background of ophthalmic health personnel. The authors of the paper analyzed and compared the differences in ophthalmic care in public vs. private and urban vs. rural regions in China. Descriptive statistics were used. RESULTS: Of the 395 specialized ophthalmic hospitals surveyed, 332 were private medical institutions (84%), and 63 were public (16%). Of the 26 607 ophthalmic personnel surveyed, working in specialized ophthalmic hospitals, 17 561 were in private hospitals (66%) and 9 046 were in public ones (34%). Furthermore, 22 578 of those personnel worked in urban ophthalmic institutions (85%) and 4 029 worked in rural ones (15%). As for regional differences, 14 090 personnel were located in eastern China (53%), 8 828 in central regions (33%), and 3 689 in the western regions (14%). CONCLUSIONS: Public ophthalmic medical institutions still face challenges in providing equitable and widespread care. The availability of well-staffed health centers varies significantly by region. These variations impact resource allocation and directly lead to inequalities and inaccessibility of health services in certain regions of China.
Assuntos
Pessoal de Saúde/organização & administração , Hospitais Especializados/organização & administração , Hospitais Especializados/estatística & dados numéricos , Oftalmologia/organização & administração , Oftalmologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoal Técnico de Saúde/organização & administração , Pessoal Técnico de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , China , Alocação de Recursos para a Atenção à Saúde/organização & administração , Pessoal de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Administração de Recursos Humanos em Hospitais/métodos , Administração de Recursos Humanos em Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Setor Privado/organização & administração , Setor Privado/estatística & dados numéricos , Setor Público/organização & administração , Setor Público/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços de Saúde Rural/organização & administração , Serviços de Saúde Rural/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Serviços Urbanos de Saúde/organização & administração , Serviços Urbanos de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Recursos Humanos/organização & administração , Recursos Humanos/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
Facing an investigation into performance concerns can be one of the most traumatic events in a doctor's career, and badly handled investigations can lead to severe distress. Yet there is no systematic way for National Health Service (NHS) Trusts to record the frequency of investigations, and extremely little data on the long-term outcomes of such action for the doctors. The document-Maintaining High Professional Standards in the Modern NHS (a framework for the initial investigation of concerns about doctors and dentists in the NHS)-should protect doctors from facing unfair or mismanaged performance management procedures, which include conduct, capability and health. Equally, it provides NHS Trusts with a framework that must be adhered to when managing performance concerns regarding doctors. Yet, very few doctors have even heard of it or know about the provisions it contains for their protection, and the implementation of the framework appears to be very variable across NHS Trusts. By empowering all doctors with the knowledge of what performance management procedures exist and how best practice should be implemented, we aim to ensure that they are informed participants in any investigation should it occur.
Assuntos
Competência Clínica/normas , Médicos , Prática Profissional , Profissionalismo , Desempenho Profissional/normas , Humanos , Responsabilidade Legal , Erros Médicos/legislação & jurisprudência , Erros Médicos/prevenção & controle , Gestão de Recursos Humanos/métodos , Médicos/psicologia , Médicos/normas , Prática Profissional/organização & administração , Prática Profissional/normas , Profissionalismo/ética , Profissionalismo/legislação & jurisprudência , Profissionalismo/normas , Medicina Estatal/normas , Reino Unido , Recursos Humanos/organização & administraçãoRESUMO
The International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment (INAHTA) spans the globe as a network of 50 publicly-funded health technology assessment (HTA) agencies supporting health system decision making for 1.4 billion people in thirty countries. Agency members are non-profit HTA organizations that are part of, or directly support, regional or national governments. Recently, INAHTA surveyed its members to gather perspectives from agency leadership on the most important issues in HTA today. This paper describes the top 10 challenges identified by INAHTA members. Addressing these challenges requires a call for action from INAHTA member agencies and the many other actors involved in the HTA ecosystem. In opening this call for action, INAHTA will lead the way; however, a comprehensive undertaking from all players is needed to effectively address these challenges and to continue to evolve HTA in its role as a strong and effective contributor to health systems.
Assuntos
Agências Internacionais/organização & administração , Avaliação da Tecnologia Biomédica/organização & administração , Gerenciamento de Dados/organização & administração , Humanos , Política , Participação dos Interessados , Fatores de Tempo , Pesquisa Translacional Biomédica/organização & administração , Recursos Humanos/organização & administraçãoRESUMO
A key working session, held as part of the Health Technology Assessment international (HTAi) Global Policy Forum meeting asks members to share "What's Keeping Me Up At Night." Members-senior thought leaders from health technology assessment (HTA) agencies, payer organizations, industry, and the HTAi Board-share without fear or favor the thorny issues related to HTA that are challenging them now or likely to do so in the near future. This article contains a reflection on the discussions at this session over the last 2 years and focuses on the recurrent and repeated themes: internal and external stakeholder involvement in HTA processes; globalization of HTA and the future of HTA (namely innovative technologies, tide of data and the "war for talent"). While the aim of these informal sessions is not to produce solutions, it reinforces the importance of developing a truly multi-stakeholder HTA community with working relationships built on mutual trust and long-standing engagement.
Assuntos
Formulação de Políticas , Avaliação da Tecnologia Biomédica/organização & administração , Inteligência Artificial , Gerenciamento de Dados/organização & administração , Tomada de Decisões , Saúde Global , Humanos , Internacionalidade , Participação dos Interessados , Avaliação da Tecnologia Biomédica/normas , Telemedicina/métodos , Recursos Humanos/organização & administraçãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Logging remains one of the most hazardous industries in the United States, despite many safety improvements made in the last decades. Currently, we know little about regional trends in health conditions of logging workers, especially in the Northeast. However, the forest products industry is a critical component of the Northeast's economy, especially in the State of Maine. METHODS: This paper reports on the baseline data of a longitudinal cohort study involving Maine loggers, aimed to assess the health and safety of the industry. RESULTS: Three hundred twenty-five are included in these analyses, 246 mechanized loggers, and 79 conventional. On average mechanized loggers worked longer days (11.8 vs 9.7 hours) and had longer commutes from home to the woodlot (72.6 vs 40.7 minutes) than conventional loggers. For health factors, mechanized and conventional loggers had similar responses. Nearly two-thirds of both mechanized and conventional loggers had an annual physical in the previous year, and 36.3% had seen a health specialist during that same time period. The overall work-related injury and illness rate is 6.8 of 100 workers for this cohort. CONCLUSIONS: These factors contribute to a need to work with the community on transforming logging into a safer and healthier profession for the current workforce, as well as the workforce of the future. This study provides the basis for an appropriate intervention, in collaboration with the loggers and industry stakeholders, to improve the lives of these vital workers.