Statins affect human iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes by interfering with mitochondrial function and intracellular acidification.

Statins are effective drugs in reducing cardiovascular morbidity and mortality by inhibiting cholesterol synthesis. These effects are primarily beneficial for the patient's vascular system. A significant number of statin users suffer from muscle complaints probably due to mitochondrial dysfunction, a mechanism that has recently been elucidated. This has raised our interest in exploring the effects of statins on cardiac muscle cells in an era where the elderly and patients with poorer functioning hearts and less metabolic spare capacity start dominating our patient population. Here, we investigated the effects of statins on human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-derived CMs). hiPSC-derived CMs were exposed to simvastatin, atorvastatin, rosuvastatin, and cerivastatin at increasing concentrations. Metabolic assays and fluorescent microscopy were employed to evaluate cellular viability, metabolic capacity, respiration, intracellular acidity, and mitochondrial membrane potential and morphology. Over a concentration range of 0.3-100 µM, simvastatin lactone and atorvastatin acid showed a significant reduction in cellular viability by 42-64%. Simvastatin lactone was the most potent inhibitor of basal and maximal respiration by 56% and 73%, respectively, whereas simvastatin acid and cerivastatin acid only reduced maximal respiration by 50% and 42%, respectively. Simvastatin acid and lactone and atorvastatin acid significantly decreased mitochondrial membrane potential by 20%, 6% and 3%, respectively. The more hydrophilic atorvastatin acid did not seem to affect cardiomyocyte metabolism. This calls for further research on the translatability to the clinical setting, in which a more conscientious approach to statin prescribing might be considered, especially regarding the current shift in population toward older patients with poor cardiac function.

A validated LC-MS/MS method for simultaneous quantification of simvastatin and simvastatin acid in beagle plasma: Application to an absolute bioavailability study.

A highly sensitive LC-MS/MS method for simultaneous detection of both simvastatin (SV) and simvastatin acid (SVA) in beagle plasma was developed and successfully applied to an absolute bioavailability study. Lovastatin (LV) was used as internal standard (IS). The analysis was performed using electrospray ionization and selective reaction monitoring in positive mode at m/z 441.0 → 325.0 for SV, 459.0 → 343.0 for SVA and 427.0 → 325.0 for the IS, respectively. The assay procedure involved a simple liquid-liquid extraction of SV, SVA and LV from beagle plasma into methyl tert-butyl ether. Separation of SV, SVA and the IS was achieved on a Shim-pack VP-ODS column (150 × 2.0 mm, 5 µm) with a binary gradient solvent system of 0.1% formic acid in water and methanol (15:85, v/v) as the mobile phase. The method was validated over the range of 0.25-500 ng/ml for SV (r2 ≥ 0.9923) and 0.24-481.23 ng/ml for SVA (r2 ≥ 0.9987). The results of method validation for accuracy, precision, extraction recovery, matrix effect and stability were within the acceptance criteria. The values of absolute bioavailability of SV and SVA in beagles were 2.97 and 25.40%, respectively. It is the first study developed for the measurement of absolute bioavailability of SV and SVA acid in beagles.

Mechanistic In Vitro Studies Indicate that the Clinical Drug-Drug Interaction between Telithromycin and Simvastatin Acid Is Driven by Time-Dependent Inhibition of CYP3A4 with Minimal Effect on OATP1B1.

A previous attempt to accurately quantify the increased simvastatin acid exposure due to drug-drug interaction (DDI) with coadministered telithromycin, using a mechanistic static model, substantially underpredicted the magnitude of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve ratio (AUCR) based on reversible inhibition of CYP3A4 and organic anion transporting polypeptide 1B1 (OATP1B1). To reconcile this disconnect between predicted and clinically observed AUCR, telithromycin was evaluated as a time-dependent inhibitor of CYP3A4 in vitro, as well as an inhibitor of OATP1B1. Telithromycin inhibited OATP1B1-mediated [3H]-estradiol 17ß-d-glucuronide (0.02 µM) transport with a mean IC50 of 12.0 ± 1.45 µM and was determined by IC50 shift and kinetic analyses to be a competitive reversible inhibitor of CYP3A4-mediated midazolam1- hydroxylation with a mean absolute inhibition constant (Ki) value of 3.65 ± 0.531 µM. The 2.83-fold shift in IC50 (10.4-3.68 µM) after a 30-minute metabolic preincubation confirmed telithromycin as a time-dependent inhibitor of CYP3A4; the mean inhibitor concentration that causes half-maximal inactivation of enzyme (KI) and maximal rate of inactivation of enzyme (kinact) values determined for inactivation were 1.05 ± 0.226 µM and 0.02772 ± 0.00272 min-1, respectively. After the integration of an enzyme time-dependent inhibition component into the previous mechanistic static model using the in vitro inhibitory kinetic parameters determined above, the newly predicted simvastatin acid AUCR (10.8 or 5.4) resulting from perturbation of its critical disposition pathways matched the clinically observed AUCR (10.8 or 4.3) after coadministration, or staggered administration, with telithromycin, respectively. These results indicate the time-dependent inhibition of CYP3A4 by telithromycin as the primary driver underlying its clinical DDI with simvastatin acid.

Local Application of Pyrophosphorylated Simvastatin Prevents Experimental Periodontitis.

PURPOSE: Simvastatin (SIM), a HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor widely prescribed for hypercholesterolemia, has been reported to ameliorate inflammation and promote osteogenesis. Its clinical applications on these potential secondary indications, however, have been hampered by its lack of osteotropicity and poor water solubility. To address this challenge, we propose to design and evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of a novel simvastatin prodrug with better water solubility and bone affinity. METHOD: The prodrug (SIM-PPi) was synthesized by directly conjugating a SIM trimer to a pyrophosphate (PPi). It was characterized and evaluated in vitro for its water solubility, osteotropicity, toxicity, anti-inflammatory and osteoinductive properties. It was then tested for anti-inflammatory and osteoinductive properties in vivo by three weekly injections into gingiva of a ligature-induced experimental periodontitis rat model. RESULTS: In vitro studies showed that SIM-PPi has greatly improved water-solubility of SIM and shows strong binding to hydroxyapatite (HA). In macrophage culture, SIM-PPi inhibited LPS-induced pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1ß, IL-6). In osteoblast culture, it was found to significantly increase alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity with accelerated mineral deposition, confirming the osteogenic potential of SIM-PPi. When tested in vivo on an experimental periodontal bone-loss model, SIM-PPi exhibited a superior prophylactic effect compared to dose equivalent SIM in reducing inflammatory cells and in preserving alveolar bone structure, as shown in the histological and micro-CT data. CONCLUSION: SIM-PPi may have the potential to be further developed for better clinical management of bone loss associated with periodontitis.

In vitro antibacterial effects of statins against bacterial pathogens causing skin infections.

With financial considerations impeding research and development of new antibiotics, drug repurposing (finding new indications for old drugs) emerges as a feasible alternative. Statins are extensively prescribed around the world to lower cholesterol, but they also possess inherent antimicrobial properties. This study identifies statins with the greatest potential to be repurposed as topical antibiotics and postulates a mechanism of action for statins' antibacterial activity. Using broth microdilution, the direct antibacterial effects of all seven parent statins currently registered for human use and three selected statin metabolites were tested against bacterial skin pathogens Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Serratia marcescens. Simvastatin and pitavastatin lactone exerted the greatest antibacterial effects (minimum inhibitory concentrations of 64 and 128 µg/mL, respectively) against S. aureus. None of the statins tested were effective against E. coli, P. aeruginosa, or S. marcescens, but simvastatin hydroxy acid acid might be active against S. aureus, E. coli, and S. marcescens at drug concentrations > 256 µg/mL. It was found that S. aureus may exhibit a paradoxical growth effect when exposed to simvastatin; thus, treatment failure at high drug concentrations is theoretically probable. Through structure-activity relationship analysis, we postulate that statins' antibacterial action may involve disrupting the teichoic acid structures or decreasing the number of alanine residues present on Gram-positive bacterial cell surfaces, which could reduce biofilm formation, diminish bacterial adhesion to environmental surfaces, or impede S. aureus cell division.

Epigallocatechin-3-gallate decreases the transport and metabolism of simvastatin in rats.

1. This study aimed to investigate the potential impact of epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) on the pharmacokinetic behaviors of simvastatin and its metabolite simvastatin acid and explored the possible role of metabolizing enzymes and transporters of this food-drug interaction. 2. Female SD rats were intravenously administered with EGCG (5 mg/kg), ketoconazole (10 mg/kg) and rifampin (10 mg/kg), followed by intravenous administration of 2 mg/kg simvastatin. In vitro, the effects of EGCG on Cytochrome P450 enzymes (CYP450) and organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs) were studied using human hepatic microsomes and human embryonic kidney 293 (HEK293) cells overexpressing OATP1B1 or OATP1B3. The results showed that areas under concentration-time (AUC) curves of simvastatin and simvastatin acid increased by 2.21- and 1.4-fold while the clearance was reduced by 2.29- and 1.4-fold, respectively, when co-administered with EGCG. In vitro experiments suggested the inhibitory effect of EGCG on CYP enzymes (IC50: 18.37 ± 1.36 µM, 26.08 ± 1.51 µM for simvastatin and simvastatin acid, respectively). Simvastatin transport by OATP1B1 and OATP1B3 was also inhibited by EGCG (IC50: 8.68 ± 1.27 µM and 22.67 ± 1.42 µM, respectively). 3. The presently reported novel food-drug interaction between EGCG and simvastatin involves the inhibition of not only CYP450 enzymes but also OATPs by EGCG.

Simvastatin Hydroxy Acid Fails to Attain Sufficient Central Nervous System Tumor Exposure to Achieve a Cytotoxic Effect: Results of a Preclinical Cerebral Microdialysis Study.

3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors were potent hits against a mouse ependymoma cell line, but their effectiveness against central nervous system tumors will depend on their ability to cross the blood-brain barrier and attain a sufficient exposure at the tumor. Among 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A inhibitors that had activity in vitro, we prioritized simvastatin (SV) as the lead compound for preclinical pharmacokinetic studies based on its potential for central nervous system penetration as determined from in silico models. Furthermore, we performed systemic plasma disposition and cerebral microdialysis studies of SV (100 mg/kg, p.o.) in a murine model of ependymoma to characterize plasma and tumor extracellular fluid (tECF) pharmacokinetic properties. The murine dosage of SV (100 mg/kg, p.o.) was equivalent to the maximum tolerated dose in patients (7.5 mg/kg, p.o.) based on equivalent plasma exposure of simvastatin acid (SVA) between the two species. SV is rapidly metabolized in murine plasma with 15 times lower exposure compared with human plasma. SVA exposure in tECF was <33.8 ± 11.9 µg/l per hour, whereas the tumor to plasma partition coefficient of SVA was <0.084 ± 0.008. Compared with in vitro washout IC50 values, we did not achieve sufficient exposure of SVA in tECF to suggest tumor growth inhibition; therefore, SV was not carried forward in subsequent preclinical efficacy studies.

In vitro and clinical evaluation of OATP-mediated drug interaction potential of sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696).

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696) has been recently approved for the treatment of heart failure (HF) patients with reduced ejection fraction. Several HF patients receive statins as co-medication. METHODS: Because clearance of statins is meditated via OATP1B1/1B3, the inhibition potential of these transporters by LCZ696 analytes was evaluated in vitro. Furthermore, an open-label, fixed-sequence clinical study was conducted to determine the effect of LCZ696 on the exposure of simvastatin and its active metabolite simvastatin acid. In this clinical study, 26 healthy subjects received simvastatin 40 mg alone or in combination with LCZ696 or after 1 or 2 h of LCZ696 dosing. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Although no significant inhibition by LBQ657 (an active metabolite of sacubitril) and valsartan was observed, sacubitril inhibited OATP1B1 and OATP1B3 in vitro, with IC50 of 1·91 and 3·81 µm, respectively. Upon co-administration of simvastatin with LCZ696, the Cmax of simvastatin and simvastatin acid decreased by 7% and 13%, respectively. When administered 1 h after LCZ696 dosing, the corresponding Cmax of simvastatin and simvastatin acid decreased by 16% and 4%, respectively. When administered 2 h after LCZ696 dosing, the Cmax of simvastatin decreased by 33% and that of simvastatin acid increased by 16%. However, no notable changes were observed in the AUCs of simvastatin or simvastatin acid upon co-administration or time-separated administration with LCZ696. No notable impact of simvastatin co-administration was observed on the pharmacokinetics of LCZ696 analytes. LCZ696 and simvastatin were generally well tolerated when administered alone or in combination. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the results of this study suggest that although sacubitril inhibited OATP1B1 and OATP1B3 in vitro, it does not translate into any clinically relevant in vivo effect.

Impact of CYP2D6, CYP3A5, CYP2C19, CYP2A6, SLCO1B1, ABCB1, and ABCG2 gene polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetics of simvastatin and simvastatin acid.

OBJECTIVE: The effects of various polymorphisms in cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme and transporter genes on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of simvastatin were evaluated in healthy Korean men. METHODS: Plasma concentration data for simvastatin and simvastatin acid were pooled from four phase I studies comprising 133 participants. The polymorphisms CYP2D6*4, CYP2D6*5, CYP2D6*14, CYP2D6*41, CYP3A5*3, CYP2C19*2, CYP2C19*3, CYP2A6*7, and CYP2A6*9; SLCO1B1 rs4149056, rs2306283, and rs4149015; ABCB1 rs1128503, rs2032582, and rs1045642; and ABCG2 rs2231142 were evaluated in each participant. Noncompartmental PK results were compared by genotype. RESULTS: CYP2D6*5 and CYP2D6*14 were found to be associated with a higher area under the curve (AUC) for simvastatin, whereas the AUC of simvastatin acid was significantly increased in patients with the SLCO1B1 rs4149056, ABCG2 rs2231142, and CYP2D6*41 allele variants. Patients with the CYP2D6*41 variant showed a higher peak serum concentration (Cmax) of both simvastatin and simvastatin acid. The SLCO1B1 rs4149056 and rs4149015 polymorphisms were associated with an increased AUC ratio (i.e. ratio of simvastatin acid to simvastatin), whereas the SLCO1B1 rs4149056 and CYP2D6*5 variants were related to a higher Cmax ratio. CONCLUSION: The CYP2D6*5, CYP2D6*14, CYP2D6*41, CYP3A5*3, SLCO1B1 rs4149056 and rs4149015, and ABCG2 rs2231142 genetic polymorphisms are associated with the PK of both simvastatin and simvastatin acid. This could potentially be used as a basis for individualized simvastatin therapy by predicting the clinical outcomes of this treatment.

Development and Application of a Mechanistic Pharmacokinetic Model for Simvastatin and its Active Metabolite Simvastatin Acid Using an Integrated Population PBPK Approach.

PURPOSE: To develop a population physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model for simvastatin (SV) and its active metabolite, simvastatin acid (SVA), that allows extrapolation and prediction of their concentration profiles in liver (efficacy) and muscle (toxicity). METHODS: SV/SVA plasma concentrations (34 healthy volunteers) were simultaneously analysed with NONMEM 7.2. The implemented mechanistic model has a complex compartmental structure allowing inter-conversion between SV and SVA in different tissues. Prior information for model parameters was extracted from different sources to construct appropriate prior distributions that support parameter estimation. The model was employed to provide predictions regarding the effects of a range of clinically important conditions on the SV and SVA disposition. RESULTS: The developed model offered a very good description of the available plasma SV/SVA data. It was also able to describe previously observed effects of an OATP1B1 polymorphism (c.521 T > C) and a range of drug-drug interactions (CYP inhibition) on SV/SVA plasma concentrations. The predicted SV/SVA liver and muscle tissue concentrations were in agreement with the clinically observed efficacy and toxicity outcomes of the investigated conditions. CONCLUSIONS: A mechanistically sound SV/SVA population model with clinical applications (e.g., assessment of drug-drug interaction and myopathy risk) was developed, illustrating the advantages of an integrated population PBPK approach.

Individual and Combined Associations of Genetic Variants in CYP3A4, CYP3A5, and SLCO1B1 With Simvastatin and Simvastatin Acid Plasma Concentrations.

Our objective was to evaluate the associations of genetic variants affecting simvastatin (SV) and simvastatin acid (SVA) metabolism [the gene encoding cytochrome P450, family 3, subfamily A, polypeptide 4 (CYP3A4)*22 and the gene encoding cytochrome P450, family 3, subfamily A, polypeptide 5 (CYP3A5)*3] and transport [the gene encoding solute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1 (SLCO1B1) T521C] with 12-hour plasma SV and SVA concentrations. The variants were genotyped, and the concentrations were quantified by high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry in 646 participants of the Cholesterol and Pharmacogenetics clinical trial of 40 mg/d SV for 6 weeks. The genetic variants were tested for association with 12-hour plasma SV, SVA, or the SVA/SV ratio using general linear models. CYP3A5*3 was not significantly associated with 12-hour plasma SV or SVA concentration. CYP3A4*1/*22 participants had 58% higher 12-hour plasma SV concentration compared with CYP3A4*1/*1 participants (P = 0.006). SLCO1B1 521T/C and 521C/C participants had 71% (P < 0.001) and 248% (P < 0.001) higher 12-hour plasma SVA compared with SLCO1B1 521T/T participants, respectively. CYP3A4 and SLCO1B1 genotypes combined categorized participants into low (<1), intermediate (≈1), and high (>1) SVA/SV ratio groups (P = 0.001). In conclusion, CYP3A4*22 and SLCO1B1 521C were significantly associated with increased 12-hour plasma SV and SVA concentrations, respectively. CYP3A5*3 was not significantly associated with 12-hour plasma SV or SVA concentrations. The combination of CYP3A4*22 and SLCO1B1 521C was significantly associated with SVA/SV ratio, which may translate into different clinical SV risk/benefit profiles.

Pharmacokinetic interactions between simvastatin and setipiprant, a CRTH2 antagonist.

PURPOSE: Setipiprant, a selective oral CRTH2 antagonist, has been investigated for the treatment of allergic rhinitis and asthma. In vitro data showed that setipiprant has a weak induction potential on CYP3A4. An interaction at the hepatic level between setipiprant and CYP3A4 substrates was not expected even at the dosing regimen of 1,000 mg setipiprant b.i.d. due to the high plasma protein binding. However, at this dosing regimen, interactions at the gut level could not be excluded. METHODS: In this single-center, open-label study, 40 mg of simvastatin was administered orally on Day 1, and then concomitantly with setipiprant on Day 10 following 9 days of setipiprant 1,000 mg b.i.d. to 22 healthy male subjects. RESULTS: In the presence of setipiprant, the simvastatin concentration-time profile was similar to that of simvastatin alone. The concentrations of simvastatin were, however, slightly lower, resulting in a 9 % decrease in C max (geometric mean ratio (GMR) 0.91, 90 % confidence interval (CI) (0.73, 1.13)) and in a 16 % lower AUC0-∞ (GMR 0.84, 90 % CI (0.72, 0.99)). Exposure to simvastatin acid was similar when comparing simvastatin with or without setipiprant. The GMR and 90 % CI for AUC0-∞ were within the 0.8 to 1.25 limits, whereas those for C max were outside (GMR 2.73, 90 % CI (2.11, 3.53)). Moreover, the median t max of simvastatin acid occurred earlier (1.8 h) when combined compared to 3.0 h when administered alone. CONCLUSIONS: As setipiprant has little impact on simvastatin pharmacokinetics, it does not modulate CYP3A4 in a clinically relevant manner.

Impact of ABCG2 and SLCO1B1 polymorphisms on pharmacokinetics of rosuvastatin, atorvastatin and simvastatin acid in Caucasian and Asian subjects: a class effect?

PURPOSE: Systemic exposure to rosuvastatin is approximately double that of Caucasians in Asian subjects. We investigated whether this pattern of increased exposure exists for other statins. METHODS: Plasma exposure following single-dose rosuvastatin 20 mg, atorvastatin 40 mg or simvastatin 40 mg was studied in Chinese, Japanese and Caucasian subjects. Plasma concentrations were determined using LC-MS methods. Impact of polymorphisms in SLCO1B1 (T521>C and A388>G) and in ABCG2 (C421>A) on exposure to rosuvastatin, atorvastatin, simvastatin and simvastatin acid was assessed. RESULTS: Relative to Caucasians, geometric mean area under the curve from time zero to time of last quantifiable concentration was 86 % (90 % confidence interval (CI), 51-130 %) and 55 % (26-91 %) higher for rosuvastatin in Chinese and Japanese subjects, respectively, 53 % (25-88 %) and 69 % (37-108 %) higher for atorvastatin, 23 % (0-52 %) and 12 % (-0.9-39 %) higher for simvastatin and 28 % (5-56 %) and 34 % (10-64 %) higher for simvastatin acid. Geometric mean maximum drug concentration was also proportionally higher for each statin. Polymorphisms in SLCO1B1 T521>C or ABCG2 C421>A were associated with higher exposure to rosuvastatin, atorvastatin and simvastatin acid (but not simvastatin) within a population, but only the ABCG2 C421>A polymorphism contributed towards between-population exposure differences. In individuals carrying wild-type alleles for both SLCO1B1 and ABCG2, area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) still appeared to be higher for rosuvastatin, atorvastatin and simvastatin acid in Chinese and Japanese subjects compared with Caucasians, respectively. CONCLUSION: Increased exposure to statins in Asian subjects versus Caucasians may represent a more general class phenomenon than previously recognized.

Effects of four traditional Chinese medicines on the pharmacokinetics of simvastatin.

1. Concomitant traditional Chinese medicines (TCMs) could be the reason for relative poor efficacy of statins in dyslipidemia patients in China. 2. An open-label, randomized, 5-period crossover study in healthy Chinese was designed to evaluate the pharmacokinetic interaction and tolerability of multiple doses of certain TCMs on a single dose of simvastatin. In each period, subjects received one of five treatments. In Treatment A, subjects received a single dose of 20 mg simvastatin. In Treatment B, C, D or E, subjects received Tong Xin Luo, Nao Xin Tong, Guan Mai Ning or Yin Xing Ye for 7 days and a single dose of 20 mg simvastatin on Day 7. The washout period was 7 days. 3. The 97.5% confidence interval of the AUC0-48 h geometric mean ratio of simvastatin acid and simvastatin for simvastatin given after multiple oral doses of one of the TCMs versus simvastatin given alone were fully contained within the prespecified bounds of (0.50, 2.00). 4. Exposures to simvastatin acid and simvastatin following a single dose of simvastatin alone were similar to those following coadministration of a single dose of simvastatin with multiple doses of each of the TCM preparations tested. Simvastatin and these TCMs were well tolerated.

Effect of vitamin D on bioavailability and lipid lowering efficacy of simvastatin.

The 3-hydroxy 3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase (HMG-CoA reductase) inhibitors known as "statins" are widely prescribed for the management of dyslipidemia. In spite of their muscle toxicity, use of statins has alarmingly increased worldwide. A recent report suggests that vitamin D (VD) levels are closely associated with lipid lowering activity and muscular toxicity of statins. However, data are limited and inconclusive. The present study was undertaken to investigate the effect of VD supplementation on the bioavailability and lipid lowering effect of simvastatin (ST). Adult Sprague-Dawley male rats (250 ± 10 g) were divided into four groups including control, ST (100 mg/kg/day), VD (100 µg/kg/day) and ST + VD group, respectively. After the dosing period of 8 days the animals were sacrificed and the blood was collected for the analysis of ST, its active metabolite simvastatin acid (STA), total cholesterol, triglyceride and liver enzymes including aspartate transaminase and alanine transaminase. The result of this study showed a significant decrease in the level of cholesterol and triglyceride in ST alone treated group, whereas VD alone failed to alter the blood lipid levels. Concomitant treatment with VD produced significant decrease in the bioavailability of ST and STA. However, there was no significant difference in the level of cholesterol in ST alone and in ST + VD treated group. Our results on the liver enzyme suggest that ST alone or in combination with VD does not produce any hepatotoxicity. Further studies using VD along with various statins for a longer duration are suggested.

Experimental nonalcoholic steatohepatitis increases exposure to simvastatin hydroxy acid by decreasing hepatic organic anion transporting polypeptide expression.

Simvastatin (SIM)-induced myopathy is a dose-dependent adverse drug reaction (ADR) that has been reported to occur in 18.2% of patients receiving a 40- to 80-mg dose. The pharmacokinetics of SIM hydroxy acid (SIMA), the bioactive form of SIM, and the occurrence of SIM-induced myopathy are linked to the function of the organic anion transporting polypeptide (Oatp) hepatic uptake transporters. Genetic polymorphisms in SLCO1B1, the gene for human hepatic OATP1B1, cause decreased elimination of SIMA and increased risk of developing myopathy. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is the most severe form of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, and is known to alter drug transporter expression and drug disposition. The purpose of this study was to assess the metabolism and disposition of SIM in a diet-induced rodent model of NASH. Rats were fed a methionine- and choline-deficient diet for 8 weeks to induce NASH and SIM was administered intravenously. Diet-induced NASH caused increased plasma retention and decreased biliary excretion of SIMA due to decreased protein expression of multiple hepatic Oatps. SIM exhibited increased volume of distribution in NASH as evidenced by increased muscle, decreased plasma, and no change in biliary concentrations. Although Cyp3a and Cyp2c11 proteins were decreased in NASH, no alterations in SIM metabolism were observed. These data, in conjunction with our previous data showing that human NASH causes a coordinated downregulation of hepatic uptake transporters, suggest that NASH-mediated transporter regulation may play a role in altered SIMA disposition and the occurrence of myopathy.

Population pharmacokinetic analysis of simvastatin and its active metabolite with the characterization of atypical complex absorption kinetics.

PURPOSE: The pharmacokinetics of simvastatin is complex with multiple peaks in the absorption phase, which cannot be adequately described by a conventional first order absorption model. The biotransformation of simvastatin into simvastatin acid, an active metabolite, is reversible. This study evaluated the pharmacokinetics of simvastatin and simvastatin acid, focusing on the absorption kinetics. METHODS: Data were collected from three bioequivalence studies, in which subjects were administered 60 mg simvastatin, and from one crossover study, in which subjects were administered two doses randomly selected from 10, 20, 30, 40 to 80 mg simvastatin with washout period. The pharmacokinetics of simvastatin was assessed in 133 healthy males. Plasma concentrations of simvastatin and simvastatin acid were measured in 2,182 and 2,130 samples, respectively, and the pharmacokinetic data were analyzed using NONMEM. RESULTS: The time course of changes in the plasma simvastatin concentration was best described by a two-compartment linear model with three parallel absorption processes, each of which consisted of mixed zero-and first order absorption. Additions of inter-occasional variability to the absorption parameters significantly improved the model's fit. The disposition parameter estimates were significantly different when different absorption models were applied, indicating the importance of the appropriate absorption modeling. Pharmacokinetic modeling preferred the inter-conversion between simvastatin and simvastatin acid. CONCLUSION: A pharmacokinetic model describing the complex, multiple peak, absorption kinetics of simvastatin was formulated using three parallel, mixed zero and first-order absorptions. This type of absorption model may be applicable to other drugs that show irregular, multiple-peak concentrations during their absorption phase.

Decreased exposure of simvastatin and simvastatin acid in a rat model of type 2 diabetes.

AIM: Simvastatin is frequently administered to diabetic patients with hypercholesterolemia. The aim of the study was to investigate the pharmacokinetics of simvastatin and its hydrolysate simvastatin acid in a rat model of type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Diabetes was induced in 4-week-old rats by a treatment of high-fat diet combined with streptozotocin. After the rats received a single dose of simvastatin (20 mg/kg, po, or 2 mg/kg, iv), the plasma concentrations of simvastatin and simvastatin acid were determined. Simvastatin metabolism and cytochrome P4503A (Cyp3a) activity were assessed in hepatic microsomes, and its uptake was studied in freshly isolated hepatocytes. The expression of Cyp3a1, organic anion transporting polypeptide 2 (Oatp2), multidrug resistance-associated protein 2 (Mrp2) and breast cancer resistance protein (Bcrp) in livers was measured using qRT-PCR. RESULTS: After oral or intravenous administration, the plasma concentrations and areas under concentrations of simvastatin and simvastatin acid were markedly decreased in diabetic rats. Both simvastatin metabolism and Cyp3a activity were markedly increased in hepatocytes of diabetic rats, accompanied by increased expression of hepatic Cyp3a1 mRNA. Furthermore, the uptake of simvastatin by hepatocytes of diabetic rats was markedly increased, which was associated with increased expression of the influx transporter Oatp2, and decreased expression of the efflux transporters Mrp2 and Bcrp. CONCLUSION: Diabetes enhances the metabolism of simvastatin and simvastatin acid in rats via up-regulating hepatic Cyp3a activity and expression and increasing hepatic uptake.

Pharmacokinetics of simvastatin lactone and its active metabolite simvastatin hydroxy acid in healthy Chinese male and female volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Gender differences in pharmacokinetics have been reported to have important clinical consequences; however, no information about differences in the pharmacokinetics of the cholesterol-lowering drug simvastatin lactone and its metabolite, simvastatin hydroxy acid, in males and females is available. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of gender on the pharmacokinetics of simvastatin lactone and simvastatin hydroxy acid in healthy Han Chinese volunteers. METHODS: 16 healthy volunteers (8 males and 8 females) were orally administered a single dose of 40 mg simvastatin lactone after an overnight fast. Plasma was then collected 24 hours after simvastatin lactone administration. Concentrations of simvastatin lactone and simvastatin hydroxy acid were measured by high performance liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry (HPLC/MS/MS). RESULTS: There were no significant associations between the pharmacokinetic parameters of simvastatin lactone and gender. For simvastatin hydroxy acid, peak plasma concentrations (Cmax) and dose-normalized by the subject weight Cmax (NCmax) were higher in females than in males. Furthermore, NCmax and dose-normalized by the subject weight AUC (NAUC0-24h, NAUC0-∞) ratios of simvastatin hydroxy acid to simvastatin lactone in females were higher than in males. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that gender affects the plasma concentrations of active simvastatin hydroxy acid, but has no significant effect on parent simvastatin lactone. Raised plasma concentrations of simvastatin hydroxy acid in females may enhance the risk of systemic adverse effects during simvastatin lactone treatment.

Pharmacokinetics of empagliflozin, a sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, and simvastatin following co-administration in healthy volunteers.

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to investigate potential drugdrug interactions between the sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor empagliflozin and simvastatin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this open-label, randomized crossover trial, healthy volunteers (median (range) age 36.5 (20 - 50) years) received 3 single-dose treatments: 25 mg empagliflozin (n = 18), 40 mg simvastatin (n = 17), and 25 mg empagliflozin with 40 mg simvastatin (n = 18). RESULTS: Based on standard criteria, simvastatin had no effect on empagliflozin area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC(0-∞), adjusted geometric mean ratio (GMR): 102.05; 90% CI: 98.90 - 105.29) or maximum plasma concentration (C(max), GMR: 109.49; 90% CI: 96.91 - 123.69). There were only minor deviations in simvastatin AUC(0-∞) (GMR: 101.26; 90% CI: 80.06 - 128.07) and C(max) (GMR: 97.18; 90% CI: 76.30 - 123.77) when co-administered with empagliflozin. Empagliflozin had no effect on AUC(0-∞) (GMR: 104.87; 90% CI: 90.09 - 122.07) or C(max) (GMR: 97.27; 90% CI: 84.90 - 111.44) of simvastatin acid, the active metabolite of simvastatin. Adverse events (AEs) were reported for 6 subjects on empagliflozin, 4 on simvastatin, and 5 on co-administered treatment. No serious AEs or investigator-defined drug-related AEs were reported. CONCLUSION: No relevant drug-drug interaction was observed, and pharmacokinetic results suggest that no dose adjustments for either drug are necessary when empagliflozin and simvastatin are co-administered. Empagliflozin was well tolerated when administered alone or in combination with simvastatin.