Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Appl Clin Med Phys ; 25(7): e14348, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38561975

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Daily quality assurance is an integral part of a radiotherapy workflow to ensure the dose is delivered safely and accurately to the patient. It is performed before the first treatment of the day and needs to be time and cost efficient for a multiple gantries proton center. In this study, we introduced an efficient method to perform QA for output constancy, range verification, spot positioning accuracy and imaging and proton beam isocenter coincidence with DailyQA3. METHODS: A stepped acrylic block of specific dimensions is fabricated and placed on top of the DailyQA3 device. Treatment plans comprising of two different spread-out Bragg peaks and five individual spots of 1.0 MU each are designed to be delivered to the device. A mathematical framework to measure the 2D distance between the detectors and individual spot is introduced and play an important role in realizing the spot positioning and centering QA. Lastly, a 5 months trends of the QA for two gantries are presented. RESULTS: The outputs are monitored by two ion chambers in the DailyQA3 and a tolerance of ± 3 % $ \pm 3\% $ are used. The range of the SOBPs are monitored by the ratio of ion chamber signals and a tolerance of ± 1 mm $ \pm 1\ {\mathrm{mm}}$ is used. Four diodes at ± 10 cm $ \pm 10\ {\mathrm{cm}}$ from the central ion chambers are used for spot positioning QA, while the central ion chamber is used for imaging and proton beam isocenter coincidence QA. Using the framework, we determined the absolute signal threshold corresponding to the offset tolerance between the individual proton spot and the detector. A 1.5 mm $1.5\ {\mathrm{mm}}$ tolerances are used for both the positioning and centering QA. No violation of the tolerances is observed in the 5 months trends for both gantries. CONCLUSION: With the proposed approach, we can perform four QA items in the TG224 within 10 min.


Assuntos
Terapia com Prótons , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador , Terapia com Prótons/métodos , Terapia com Prótons/normas , Humanos , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/normas , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador/métodos , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador/normas , Neoplasias/radioterapia , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada/métodos , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada/normas , Imagens de Fantasmas , Algoritmos , Radiometria/métodos
2.
J Appl Clin Med Phys ; 25(8): e14400, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38831639

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Quality assurance (QA) for ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) irradiation is a crucial aspect in the emerging field of FLASH radiotherapy (FLASH-RT). This innovative treatment approach delivers radiation at UHDR, demanding careful adoption of QA protocols and procedures. A comprehensive understanding of beam properties and dosimetry consistency is vital to ensure the safe and effective delivery of FLASH-RT. PURPOSE: To develop a comprehensive pre-treatment QA program for cyclotron-based proton pencil beam scanning (PBS) FLASH-RT. Establish appropriate tolerances for QA items based on this study's outcomes and TG-224 recommendations. METHODS: A 250 MeV proton spot pattern was designed and implemented using UHDR with a 215nA nozzle beam current. The QA pattern that covers a central uniform field area, various spot spacings, spot delivery modes and scanning directions, and enabling the assessment of absolute, relative and temporal dosimetry QA parameters. A strip ionization chamber array (SICA) and an Advanced Markus chamber were utilized in conjunction with a 2 cm polyethylene slab and a range (R80) verification wedge. The data have been monitored for over 3 months. RESULTS: The relative dosimetries were compliant with TG-224. The variations of temporal dosimetry for scanning speed, spot dwell time, and spot transition time were within ± 1 mm/ms, ± 0.2 ms, and ± 0.2 ms, respectively. While the beam-to-beam absolute output on the same day reached up to 2.14%, the day-to-day variation was as high as 9.69%. High correlation between the absolute dose and dose rate fluctuations were identified. The dose rate of the central 5 × 5 cm2 field exhibited variations within 5% of the baseline value (155 Gy/s) during an experimental session. CONCLUSIONS: A comprehensive QA program for FLASH-RT was developed and effectively assesses the performance of a UHDR delivery system. Establishing tolerances to unify standards and offering direction for future advancements in the evolving FLASH-RT field.


Assuntos
Terapia com Prótons , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/normas , Terapia com Prótons/métodos , Terapia com Prótons/normas , Humanos , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador/métodos , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador/normas , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada/métodos , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada/normas , Radiometria/métodos , Órgãos em Risco/efeitos da radiação , Neoplasias/radioterapia , Imagens de Fantasmas
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA