Radiographic assessment of the relationship between root canal treatment quality, coronal restoration quality, and periapical status.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this cross-sectional study was to assess the prevalence of apical periodontitis in root canal treated teeth in Turkish subpopulation and to evaluate the effects of both coronal restoration quality and root canal treatment (RCT) quality on apical periodontitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Panoramic images of individuals who applied to our department for different diagnostic reasons were randomly and retrospectively scanned. Total RCT number, RCT quality, type of coronal restoration, restoration quality, periapical status, and total number of teeth were recorded. The criteria used for coronal restorations quality and RCT quality were defined by De Moor et al. and slightly modified by Gunduz et al. Periapical status was assessed by the periapical index developed by Orstavik et al. Pearson's Chi-square test was used for statistical analysis, and the intraobserver agreements were assessed by Kappa coefficients. Values of P < 0.05 were accepted to be meaningful. RESULTS: The total examined teeth number was 6064, of which had 541 (8.9%) RCT. The prevelance of apical periodontitis was 40.5%. The number of adequate RCT was 178 (32.9%), and 138 (77.5%) of them were healthy. The number of adequate coronal restoration was 334, and 62.3% of them were healthy. For the cases that have adequate coronal restorations, there was statistically significant relationship between adequate RCT and periapical status (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The prevelance of apical periodontitis was 40.5% and there was statistically significant relationship between adequate RCT and periapical status.

Technical quality of root canal treatment performed by undergraduate students using hand instrumentation: a meta-analysis.

The technical quality of root canal treatment (RCT) may impact on the outcome. The quality of education received during undergraduate school may be linked to the quality of treatment provided in general dental practice. In this context, the aim of this systematic review was to answer the following focused questions: (i) What is the frequency of acceptable technical quality of root fillings, assessed radiographically, performed by undergraduate students? (ii) What are the most common errors assessed radiographically and reported in these treatments? For this purpose, articles that evaluated the quality of root fillings performed by undergraduate students were selected. Data were collected based on predetermined criteria. The key features from the included studies were extracted. GRADE-tool assessed the quality of the evidence. MAStARI evaluated the methodological quality, and a meta-analysis on all studies was conducted. At the end of the screening, 24 articles were identified. Overall frequency of acceptable technical quality of root fillings was 48%. From this total, 52% related to anterior teeth, 49% to premolars and 26% to molars. The main procedural errors reported were ledge formation, furcation perforation, apical transportation and apical perforation. The heterogeneity amongst the studies was high (84-99%). Five studies had a high risk of bias, eight had a moderate risk, and 11 had low risk. The overall quality of evidence identified was very low. The conclusion was that technical quality of root fillings performed by undergraduate students is low, which may reveal that endodontic education has limited achievement at undergraduate level. A plan to improve the quality of root fillings, and by extrapolation the overall quality of root canal treatment, should be discussed by the staff responsible for endodontic education and training.

Clinical audit training improves undergraduates' performance in root canal therapy.

AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness of clinical audit-feedback cycle as an educational tool in improving the technical quality of root canal therapy (RCT) and compliance with record keeping performed by dental undergraduates. METHODS: Clinical audit learning was introduced in Year 3 of a 5-year curriculum for dental undergraduates. During classroom activities, students were briefed on clinical audit, selected their audit topics in groups of 5 or 6 students, and prepared and presented their audit protocols. One chosen topic was RCT, in which 3 different cohorts of Year 3 students conducted retrospective audits of patients' records in 2012, 2014 and 2015 for their compliance with recommended record keeping criteria and their performance in RCT. Students were trained by and calibrated against an endodontist (κ ≥ 0.8). After each audit, the findings were reported in class, and recommendations were made for improvement in performance of RCT and record keeping. Students' compliance with published guidelines was presented and their RCT performances in each year were compared using the chi-square test. RESULTS: Overall compliance with of record keeping guidelines was 44.1% in 2012, 79.6% in 2014 and 94.6% in 2015 (P = .001). In the 2012 audit, acceptable extension, condensation and the absence of mishap were observed in 72.4, 75.7% and 91.5%; in the 2014 audit, 95.1%, 64.8% and 51.4%; and in 2015 audit, 96.4%, 82.1% and 92.8% of cases, respectively. In 2015, 76.8% of root canal fillings met all 3 technical quality criteria when compared to 48.6% in 2014 and 44.7% in 2012 (P = .001). CONCLUSION: Clinical audit-feedback cycle is an effective educational tool for improving dental undergraduates' compliance with record keeping and performance in the technical quality of RCT.

Development of quality measurement instruments for root canal treatment.

AIM: To devise measurement instruments for 'quality' of root canal treatment to assess training and outcome of general dental practitioners working within primary care settings. METHOD: Scoring systems relating to quality of root canal treatment were developed using expert consensus and published literature. Domains scored included the Treatment Process, Quality of the Obturation, Clinical Healing, Radiographic Healing and Tooth Complexity. Scoring systems were applied to 10 clinical cases treated by each dentist at the beginning and 10 cases treated at the end of their clinical training and 135 cases treated after completion of training. The dentists recorded the treatment process and clinical healing in clinical logs. Two examiners independently scored the radiographs after undertaking calibration and training. Inter- and intra-examiner reliability of scoring radiographic outcomes was tested using Cohen's Kappa statistics. RESULTS: An instrument was created with four domains to assess quality (two for process and two for outcome of root canal treatment), and a measure of case complexity. Domains of treatment process (n = 240 teeth), outcome (n = 32 teeth) and complexity (n = 215 teeth) were scored using radiographs. The Kappa scores for intra-examiner reliability between 0.22 and 1, whilst inter-examiner reliability ranged between 0.18 and 0.99. CONCLUSION: Evidence-based scores for assessment of the quality (process and outcome) and complexity (structure) of root canal treatment were devised. They were reliable, provided that clinicians were trained in record keeping and examiners have in depth training and calibration in the use of the instruments.

'Working in the dark': Swedish general dental practitioners on the complexity of root canal treatment.

AIM: To explore elements of reasoning and understanding that might obstruct the performance of good-quality root canal treatment (RCT) and make general dental practitioners (GDPs) produce and accept root fillings of inferior quality. METHODOLOGY: The study was designed as a qualitative and explorative study based on seven videotaped focus group interviews analysed by means of qualitative content analysis. Nine predetermined questions were followed. Thirty-three GDPs (4-6 dentists/interview), employed in the Public Dental Health Service in Gothenburg, Sweden, participated. RESULTS: Feelings such as anxiety, frustration, stress or exhaustion were associated with RCT. In general, RCT was regarded as complex, mysterious and embedded in uncertainty. A feeling of loss of control was frequently described in relation to all procedural steps from negotiating the canal to prognostic deliberations. Reasons could include challenging canals, complicated instruments and the fact that treatment had to be performed in a concealed space without visible insight. Several dentists questioned the requirements for correctly performing RCT, and some indicated that striving towards optimal technical root filling quality should not be expected in each case in general practice. Most of the GDPs were unable to complete a case within the remuneration system, and they therefore either spent more time than the set fee allowed for or accepted a suboptimal root filling when the time limit was reached. CONCLUSIONS: High levels of stress and frustration in relation to RCT were reported by the GDPs. RCT was regarded as complex and was often performed with an overall sense of lack of control.

A re-audit of the technical quality of undergraduate root canal treatment after the introduction of new technology and teaching practices.

AIM: To revaluate through re-audit the technical quality of undergraduate nonsurgical root canal treatment (RCTx) in a dental teaching hospital as a result of recommended changes to teaching practices. METHODOLOGY: The technical quality of undergraduate RCTx was evaluated radiographically after educational changes and the mandatory introduction of new technologies (nickel-titanium files, apex locators, greater taper gutta-percha points) in 182 root canals. Evaluation was based on four criteria: presence of voids, root canal filling termination (0-2 mm of radiographic apex), all roots filled and the prepared canal contained the original anatomy. Chi-squared analysis was used to determine statistically significant improvements in quality between the respective audits (P < 0.05). RESULTS: Twenty-three of the 40 canals in single-rooted teeth (57.5%) and 68 of the 129 (52.7%) canals in multirooted teeth analysed had an acceptable root filling. This compared with 48% of canals in single-rooted teeth and 38% of canals in multirooted teeth in the original audit. Specifically, the frequency of root canal voids and unsatisfactory apical root filling termination were reduced in multirooted teeth by 23% and 14% and in single-rooted teeth by 11% and 12%, respectively, compared with the original audit. When multirooted teeth were taken as one unit, 45.2% were considered to be acceptable, significantly better than the 18.8% multirooted teeth in the original audit (P = 0.042). Deviations from the canal anatomy on radiographic examination were rare findings in both audits. CONCLUSIONS: Changes to endodontic teaching practices significantly improved the technical standards of undergraduate root filling in multirooted teeth. The regular auditing of undergraduate teaching practice is necessary to inform current teaching, instigate change and improve standards.

Prevalence of apical periodontitis in root filled teeth: findings from a nationwide survey in Finland.

AIM: To assess the prevalence of apical periodontitis in the Finnish population aged 30 years and older and relate it to the technical quality of root filling by the type of tooth. METHODOLOGY: As part of the Finnish nationwide Health 2000 study, panoramic radiographs were used of the dentate subjects (n = 5335) aged 30-95 years (mean 50.2 years) to assess the apical and endodontic status of their teeth (n = 120635). Apical periodontitis (AP) was recorded when the periodontal ligament space was more than double in width, or loss of lamina dura or a periapical radiolucent lesion was seen. Technically, adequate root fillings had a gap of 0-3 mm from the apex; all others were defined as inadequate. Statistical methods included chi-square tests and anova. Risk of AP was estimated as cross-product odds ratio and its 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: Teeth with AP occurred in 27% of the dentate subjects being more prevalent in subjects with root filled teeth than in those without (39% vs. 9%; P < 0.001; OR = 6.3; 95% CI 5.3, 7.4). AP was more prevalent in men than in women (31% vs. 23%). At a tooth level, AP was most frequent in mandibular molars with inadequate root fillings. For all root filled teeth, an inadequate root filling doubled the risk of AP for both women (OR = 2.0; 95% CI 1.7, 2.4) and men (OR = 2.5; 95% CI 2.1, 2.9). CONCLUSIONS: AP occurred principally in subjects and teeth with root fillings. Inadequate root fillings doubled the risk of AP. An improvement in the technical quality of root canal treatment is essential.

Digitally Scanned Radiographs versus Conventional Films for Determining Clarity of Periapical Lesions and Quality of Root Canal Treatment.

AIM: To compare digital images of conventional radiographs with the original radiographs for perceived clarity of periapical lesions and the quality of root canal treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and four intraoral periapical radiographs of patients with endodontically treated teeth were randomly selected. The radiographs were digitized using an MD300 USB X-ray Reader. The digital images were transferred to an HP laptop. Three evaluators compared each conventional radiograph with the matching digital image. The images were ranked for clarity and assessed for diagnostic quality; data were analyzed using the Reliability Calculation "ReCal." Results. Both the digital images and conventional films had comparable clarity and diagnostic quality. Results indicated a moderate agreement between the evaluators. CONCLUSIONS: Conventional radiographs digitized using an MD300 USB X-ray Reader have similar clarity and diagnostic quality in comparison to the original radiographs.

Endodontic treatment.

The Finnish guideline on endodontics emphasizes good quality of endodontic treatment and coronal seal of the restoration. For prevention of endodontic treatment need caries control is essential. For deep carious lesions stepwise excavation or partial caries removal are recommended. Partial pulpotomy can be used if bleeding can be controlled. The decision for root canal treatment is based on prognosis, occlusion and general health of the patient. The use of kofferdam is essential in aseptic working. Chemomechanical preparation with NaOCI and root canal filling within 0-2 mm from the apex improve prognosis. Healing should be controlled annually up to four years.

Modern Endodontic Principles. Part 8: The Future of Endodontics.

Although the principles of endodontics have remained unchanged for many decades, root canal treatment has been subject to major changes in the past few years. This paper outlines the cutting-edge advances including the materials and techniques used. CPD/Clinical Relevance: This article provides an overview of bioactive materials and insight into regenerative endodontics, vital pulp therapy and intentional replantation.

Endodontic performance by Flemish dentists: have they evolved?

AIM: To gather information on aspects of endodontic practice and referral behaviour by Flemish (Dutch-speaking Belgian) dentists and to compare the results with an earlier investigation. METHODOLOGY: A postal questionnaire was distributed to 4468 active Flemish dentists. It consisted of multiple-choice questions on endodontic practice and endodontic referral need. Basic information on age, gender, year of qualification and clinical specialty was also obtained. The questionnaire was free of charge to return. Data were imported in a database, subjected to descriptive and analytical statistics and compared to those of an earlier, comparable survey. RESULTS: The response rate was 18.5%. Of all respondents, 95% were general practitioners. More than half (56%) of the respondents never or seldom used rubber dam during endodontic treatment. The use of sodium hypochlorite as an irrigant was well established (80% of respondents using it), whereas the use of EDTA was limited. Female respondents were more likely to refer to an endodontist than male (70 versus 49%). Referrals for treatment of root canal obstruction (48%), perforations and root resorption (42%) and retreatment (39%) were rated 'very important'. Younger respondents more frequently made use of magnification, rotary instruments and rubber dam. Activation of irrigants was incorporated by a small number of respondents (50% never, 12.6% seldom). Cold lateral condensation was used by most GDPs (35.3% always, 19.5% frequently). CONCLUSIONS: Endodontic practice of general dentists in Flanders did not always comply with quality guidelines. However, when comparing the present data with those of a previous study, an obvious trend towards a more present-day treatment protocol is noticeable, as well as an increased appeal for endodontic referral.

Is apical periodontitis in root filled teeth associated with the type of restoration?

OBJECTIVE: To study the association between type of restoration and apical periodontitis (AP) in root filled teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present study used data from surveys conducted in 1983, 1993 and 2003. In 1983, 130 randomly selected subjects aged 3-80 years in the city of Jönköping, Sweden, were invited for a clinical and radiological examination. The study was repeated in 1993 and 2003. New participants were, thus, recruited with the same sampling criteria and sample size in the same geographical area in 1993 and 2003, respectively. In the present study, only dentate individuals aged 20-70 years with ≥1 root filled tooth were included, yielding a sample of 788 subjects with 2634 root filled teeth. Apical periodontitis on the tooth level was the dependent variable. Periapical status was assessed according to Periapical Index (PAI). Independent variables were root filling quality, recurrent caries, type of restoration, number of teeth with apical periodontitis, age and gender. Root fillings appearing homogenous and ending within 2 mm from radiographic apex were regarded as adequate, otherwise inadequate. All radiographs were re-studied by one observer regarding periapical status and root filling quality. Risk was analyzed by means of a GEE model. RESULTS: Type of restoration, root filling quality, number of teeth with apical periodontitis within the individual and age were found to be predictors of AP in root filled teeth. Presence of recurrent caries and gender were not found to be associated with AP. CONCLUSIONS: According to the present study, root filling quality and type of restoration may be predictive of AP in root filled teeth.

Root canal treatment and prevalence of apical periodontitis in a nigerian adult subpopulation: a radiographic study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the frequency, distribution and quality of root canal treatment in an adult Nigerian subpopulation and to determine the prevalence of apical periodontitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The periapical status and length of root fillings of 756 patients attending Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospital, Ile-Ife, Nigeria for the first time were evaluated using full mouth periapical radiographs. The length of the root canal filling was considered 'adequate' if it was ≤ 2 mm from the radiographic apex, 'under-filled' if it was > 2 mm short of the apex, and 'overfilled' if filling material extended beyond the radiographic apex. Periapical status was assessed using the periapical index (PAI) with teeth classified as having apical periodontitis if the score was over 2. RESULTS: Overall, 61.2% of the patients had root-filled teeth and 67.2% featured apical periodontitis. Of the 21,468 teeth examined, 12.2% had been root filled, and of these 41% exhibited apical periodontitis. The prevalence of root-filled teeth was higher in the younger patients, while the prevalence of apical periodontitis in root-filled teeth was similar between age groups. Root-treated teeth that were overfilled or were mandibular incisors had the highest prevalence of apical disease. Overfilled teeth were more prone to developing an apical radiolucency than were under-filled teeth (P < 0.001 and P < 0.05, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalences of endodontically treated teeth and apical periodontitis were within the range reported for other countries; however, a very large number of patients required treatment or retreatment.

The confidence of undergraduate dental students when performing root canal treatment and their perception of the quality of endodontic education.

AIM: This article aims to gain understanding into the perception of undergraduate dental students in terms of their confidence and competence at performing root canal treatment and their perception of the quality of endodontic education. METHODS: An online questionnaire was distributed to all 3rd, 4th and 5th year dental students at Cardiff University via their academic e-mail addresses. The questionnaire utilised both scaled response and open questions to gain an insight into undergraduate opinion. RESULTS: Out of a possible 208 students, 98 responses were obtained (response rate = 47%). Perception of competence and confidence were significantly greater amongst the more senior year groups (P < 0.01). However, 49% (n = 38) of participants did not feel competent performing root canal treatment on anterior, single-rooted teeth, whilst 74% (n = 70) did not feel competent performing root canal treatment on posterior, multirooted teeth. Free comments from participants indicated that this was due to a lack of clinical experience. Approximately, 80% of participants ranked education in endodontics at Cardiff University as ≤5 on a Likert scale (1 = inadequate to 10 = good), indicating that improvement was required. Improvements that were suggested by the students included the provision of further information within lectures, a broader range of lecturers, an increased number of shorter, more organised practical sessions, additional training equipment, greater supervision and online reference guides to root canal treatment. CONCLUSION: Enhancing undergraduate education in endodontics is necessary to increase students' perception of their confidence and competence when performing root canal treatment.

SUCCESS RATE OF OVERFILLED ROOT CANAL TREATMENT.

BACKGROUND: Traditionally, poor obturation has been considered the primary cause of root canal treatment failures. The purpose of this study was to assess the success rate of overfilled root canal treatment cases in order to decide whether a definitive restoration can be placed immediately following treatment in an overfilled case or whether the patient needs to be kept on a follow up prior to the placement of a definitive restoration. METHODS: A total of 1242 patient's periapical radiographs (1748 teeth) were assessed, out of which 397 teeth (in 285 patients) were found to be overfilled. Out of these 285 patients, 111 (128 cases) agreed to participate in this cross sectional study and were recalled for clinical and radiographic examination. Success was evaluated clinically by absence of symptoms (pain, swelling, tenderness to percussion and sinus tract) and radiograhically by the decrease in size of periapical lesion or no change in size. Increase in size of periapical lesion was deemed to be a failure. RESULTS: Our findings revealed that despite overfill, the treatment was successful in 115 cases and failure was noted in 13 cases showing an overall success rate of 89.8% and failure rate of 10.2%. Out of 13 cases of failure, all 13 showed an increase in periapical lesion size, out of which 10 were accompanied with pain. CONCLUSION: We have determined that there is no need to delay placement of a permanent restoration on overfilled teeth (ruling out the presence of other procedural errors) nor is there any need to pursue any further surgical or non-surgical endodontic treatment. However we would suggest that patients should be kept on follow-up after placement of permanent restoration.

Regulators and regulations: who will guard the guards? (or 'Quis custodiet ipsos custodes' as old Juvenal used to say).

Overbearing regulators with their various labyrinthine regulations have had adverse impacts on dentists and their teams' behaviours. This has produced the perverse outcomes of demoralizing dental teams as well as reducing their capacity and/or desire to deliver compassionate oral healthcare. These adverse outcomes do not seem to have benefited patients, or dentists, or their teams, in any sensible or measurable way. CPD/CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The vastly increased burdens on the UK dental profession of intrusive, bullying regulations, emanating from the various UK agencies, such as the supposedly fair and independent GDC, but including the increasingly politically controlled NHS and the CQC, have had unfortunate, perverse, effects on many dentists' clinical practices and affected dental teams' desires, or willingness, to be as compassionate as they used to be about helping to solve some patients' dental or oral problems.

Technical quality of root fillings performed by undergraduate students: a radiographic study.

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the radiographic technical quality of endodontic treatment performed by undergraduate students at the School of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Serbia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Electronic records of 220 patients treated by final-year undergraduate students during the school year 2011/2012 were examined, and the final sample consisted of 212 patients, 322 teeth, and 565 root canals. The criteria for overall radiographic adequacy of root canal fillings were defined as the presence of adequate length and density and absence of iatrogenic errors (ledge, fractured instrument, untreated canal, and apical transportation). Chi-square test was used to determine statistical significance between different parameters. RESULTS: Adequate root canal fillings were found in 74.22% of the teeth. The percentage of root fillings with adequate length and density was 89.73% and 92.6%, respectively. Fractured instruments and ledges were present in 16 root canals (2.8%), while the presence of missed canal and apical transportation was observed in 2 cases, each (0.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the technical quality of root canal fillings performed by undergraduate students was satisfactory.

Periapical status of root-filled teeth in Norwegian children and adolescents.

OBJECTIVE: To study the periapical status of root-filled permanent teeth of 9-17-year-olds in Møre & Romsdal county, Norway. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All permanent teeth with endodontic treatment in patients born in 1994-2001 were identified in the dental records of the Public Dental Service. The data collected consisted of chart entries and radiographs. Of 1182 teeth, 174 teeth in 155 patients met further inclusion criteria, i.e. completed endodontic treatment and a follow-up with a readable radiograph of at least 1 year. Periapical status was assessed with the Periapical Index (PAI) and the technical quality of the root fillings was also quantified on a 4-grade visual scale. RESULTS: Apical periodontitis was found on follow-up radiographs in 25% of all teeth and in 48% of the teeth with pre-operative apical periodontitis. Forty-two per cent of root fillings were of adequate technical quality. Adequate technical quality of the root filling was significantly correlated with radiographic success. CONCLUSIONS: About one fourth of all root-filled teeth and almost half of the teeth with pre-operative apical periodontitis showed clear signs of the disease at recall.

Radiographic technical quality of root canal treatment performed ex vivo by dental students at Valencia University Medical and Dental School, Spain.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate radiographically the quality of root canal fillings and compare manual and rotary preparation performed on extracted teeth by undergraduate dental students. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 561 premolars and molars extracted teeth were prepared using nickel-titanium rotary files or manual instrumentation and filled with gutta-percha using a cold lateral condensation technique, by 4th grade undergraduate students. Periapical radiographs were used to assess the technical quality of the root canal filling, evaluating three variables: length, density and taper. These data were recorded, scored and used to study the "technical success rate" and the "overall score". The length of each root canal filling was classified as acceptable, short and overfilled, based on their relationship with the radiographic apex. Density and taper of filling were evaluated based on the presence of voids and the uniform tapering of the filling, respectively. Statistical analysis was used to evaluate the quality of root canal treatment, considering p < 0.05 as a statistical significant level. RESULTS: The percentage of technical success was 44% and the overall score was 7.8 out of 10. Technical success and overall score were greater with rotary instruments (52% against 28% with a manual one, p < 0.001; 8.3 against 6.7 respectively, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: It appears that inexperienced operators perform better root canal treatment (RCT) with the use of rotary instrumentation.

Guidelines for non-surgical root canal treatment.

Guidelines were developed by the Australian Society of Endodontology Inc. with the intent to describe relevant aspects of contemporary evidence-based root canal treatment. The document aims to support clinicians by describing a Standard of Practice in the Australian context. The presented guidelines refer to Competence criteria and Quality standards for the main steps in root canal treatment. While the intent is not to replace individual clinical decision-making, it is envisaged that these periodically reviewable guidelines may help to improve clinical outcomes.