Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
There is insufficient evidence to recommend lens extraction as a treatment for primary open-angle glaucoma: an evidence-based perspective.
Walland, Mark J; Parikh, Rajul S; Thomas, Ravi.
Affiliation
  • Walland MJ; Glaucoma Investigation and Research Unit, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. mwalland@unimelb.edu.au
Clin Exp Ophthalmol ; 40(4): 400-7, 2012.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21668783
ABSTRACT
Cataract extraction in primary open-angle glaucoma has not been thought to provide a clinically useful or predictable decrease in IOP. This concept has now been challenged, with the opposite belief being promulgated namely, that lens exchange should be considered as treatment for glaucoma. This revelation could bring a significant change in the glaucoma treatment paradigm. There are no randomised controlled trials to guide the role of lens extraction in primary open-angle glaucoma. The available evidence suggests at most a modest reduction in IOP from cataract extraction - greater in the presence of pseudoexfoliation - which is likely to be of marginal benefit, and only in milder forms of open-angle glaucoma. There is currently no evidence of any quality to suggest that lens extraction routinely represents a clinically useful treatment for primary open-angle glaucoma.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Glaucoma, Open-Angle / Lens, Crystalline Type of study: Clinical_trials Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Clin Exp Ophthalmol Journal subject: OFTALMOLOGIA Year: 2012 Type: Article Affiliation country: Australia

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Glaucoma, Open-Angle / Lens, Crystalline Type of study: Clinical_trials Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Clin Exp Ophthalmol Journal subject: OFTALMOLOGIA Year: 2012 Type: Article Affiliation country: Australia