The Usefulness of the APACHE II Score in Obstetric Critical Care: A Structured Review.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can
; 38(10): 909-918, 2016 10.
Article
in En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-27720089
OBJECTIVE: To assess the performance of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) mortality prediction model in pregnant and recently pregnant women receiving critical care in low-, middle-, and high-income countries during the study period (1985-2015), using a structured literature review. DATA SOURCES: Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews, searched for articles published between 1985 and 2015. STUDY SELECTION: Twenty-five studies (24 publications), of which two were prospective, were included in the analyses. Ten studies were from high-income countries (HICs), and 15 were from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Median study duration and size were six years and 124 women, respectively. DATA SYNTHESIS: ICU admission complicates 0.48% of deliveries, and pregnant and recently pregnant women account for 1.49% of ICU admissions. One quarter were admitted while pregnant, three quarters of these for an obstetric indication and for a median of three days. The median APACHE II score was 10.9, with a median APACHE II-predicted mortality of 16.6%. Observed mortality was 4.6%, and the median standardized mortality ratio was 0.36 (interquartile range 0.23 to 0.73). The standardized mortality ratio was < 0.9 in 24 of 25 studies. Women in HICs were more frequently admitted with a medical comorbidity but were less likely to die than were women in LMICs. CONCLUSION: The APACHE II score consistently overestimates mortality risks for pregnant and recently pregnant women receiving critical care, whether they reside in HICs or LMICs. There is a need for a pregnancy-specific outcome prediction model for these women.
Key words
Full text:
1
Database:
MEDLINE
Main subject:
Pregnancy Complications
/
Obstetric Surgical Procedures
/
APACHE
/
Critical Care
Type of study:
Prognostic_studies
/
Systematic_reviews
Limits:
Female
/
Humans
/
Pregnancy
Language:
En
Journal:
J Obstet Gynaecol Can
Journal subject:
GINECOLOGIA
/
OBSTETRICIA
Year:
2016
Type:
Article