Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Definitions, measurement and prevalence of sedentary behaviour in adults with intellectual disabilities - A systematic review.
Melville, Craig A; Oppewal, Alyt; Schäfer Elinder, Liselotte; Freiberger, Ellen; Guerra-Balic, Myriam; Hilgenkamp, Thessa I M; Einarsson, Ingi; Izquierdo-Gómez, Rocio H; Sansano-Nadal, Oriol; Rintala, Pauli; Cuesta-Vargas, Antonio; Giné-Garriga, Maria.
Affiliation
  • Melville CA; Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, UK. Electronic address: Craig.Melville@glasgow.ac.uk.
  • Oppewal A; Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
  • Schäfer Elinder L; Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden.
  • Freiberger E; Institute for Biomedicine of Ageing, FAU Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany.
  • Guerra-Balic M; Faculty of Psychology, Education and Sports Sciences, University Ramon Llull, Spain.
  • Hilgenkamp TIM; Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
  • Einarsson I; School of Science and Engineering, University of Reykjavik, Iceland.
  • Izquierdo-Gómez RH; Department of Educational Sciences, Universidad Central de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
  • Sansano-Nadal O; Faculty of Psychology, Education and Sports Sciences, University Ramon Llull, Spain.
  • Rintala P; Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Finland.
  • Cuesta-Vargas A; Department of Physiotherapy, University of Málaga, Spain.
  • Giné-Garriga M; Faculty of Psychology, Education and Sports Sciences, University Ramon Llull, Spain.
Prev Med ; 97: 62-71, 2017 Apr.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28057512
ABSTRACT
Supporting positive change in lifestyle behaviours is a priority in tackling the health inequalities experienced by adults with intellectual disabilities. In this systematic review, we examine the evidence on the definition, measurement and epidemiology of sedentary behaviour of adults with intellectual disabilities. A systematic literature search of PUBMED, EMBASE, MEDLINE and Google Scholar was performed to identify studies published from 1990 up to October 2015. Nineteen papers met the criteria for inclusion in the systematic review. Many researchers do not distinguish between insufficient physical activity and sedentary behaviour. None of the studies reported the reliability and validity of the methods used to measure sedentary behaviour. Sedentary time, assessed objectively, ranged from 522 to 643min/day higher than in adults without intellectual disabilities. This first-ever review of sedentary behaviour and intellectual disabilities found that at present the evidence base is weak. Studies calibrating accelerometer data with criterion measures for sedentary behaviour are needed to determine specific cut-off points to measure sedentary behaviour in adults with intellectual disabilities. Researchers should also examine the reliability and validity of using proxy-report questionnaires to measure sedentary behaviour in this group. A better understanding of sedentary behaviour will inform the design of novel interventions to change lifestyle behaviours of adults with intellectual disabilities.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Exercise / Sedentary Behavior / Intellectual Disability Type of study: Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Prev Med Year: 2017 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Exercise / Sedentary Behavior / Intellectual Disability Type of study: Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Prev Med Year: 2017 Type: Article