Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Medical Oncology Group of Australia position statement and membership survey on voluntary assisted dying.
Karapetis, Christos S; Stein, Brian; Koczwara, Bogda; Harrup, Rosemary; Milleshkin, Linda; Parente, Phil; Millward, Michael; Haines, Ian; Blinman, Prunella; Olver, Ian.
Affiliation
  • Karapetis CS; Flinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Stein B; Department of Medical Oncology, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Koczwara B; Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Harrup R; Adelaide Cancer Centre, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Milleshkin L; Flinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Parente P; Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
  • Millward M; Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Haines I; Department of Medical Oncology, Eastern Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Blinman P; Department of Medical Oncology, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Olver I; School of Medicine, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Intern Med J ; 48(7): 774-779, 2018 07.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29984513
The controversial topic of voluntary assisted dying (VAD) is receiving significant attention at state government levels and in the community. Acknowledging potential legalisation of VAD, the Medical Oncology Group of Australia (MOGA) undertook a survey of members to inform the development of a position statement on the subject. All MOGA members were invited to complete an anonymous online survey. The survey comprised 12 closed-response categorical questions. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise the survey data. Majority views expressed in the survey would form the basis of a MOGA position statement on VAD. A total of 362 members completed the questionnaire, representing 55% of the membership; 47% of respondents disagreed with VAD; 36% agreed with VAD and the remaining members (17%) were 'neutral'. A clear majority position was not established. Only 14% agreed that physicians involved in VAD should be required personally to administer the lethal medication; 94% supported conscientious objection of physicians to the VAD process; 95% agreed that a palliative care physician consultation should be required and 86% agreed with the need for the involvement of specialist psychiatry medical services before a patient can be deemed as suitable for VAD. The MOGA membership expressed a range of views on the topic of VAD. A clear majority-held view to support a MOGA position that either supports or opposes VAD was not established. The position statement that flows from the survey encourages informed debate on this topic and brings into focus important considerations.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Attitude of Health Personnel / Suicide, Assisted / Euthanasia, Active, Voluntary Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Oceania Language: En Journal: Intern Med J Journal subject: MEDICINA INTERNA Year: 2018 Type: Article Affiliation country: Australia

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Attitude of Health Personnel / Suicide, Assisted / Euthanasia, Active, Voluntary Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Oceania Language: En Journal: Intern Med J Journal subject: MEDICINA INTERNA Year: 2018 Type: Article Affiliation country: Australia