Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mendelian randomisation analysis of clustered causal effects of body mass on cardiometabolic biomarkers.
Conde, Susana; Xu, Xiaoguang; Guo, Hui; Perola, Markus; Fazia, Teresa; Bernardinelli, Luisa; Berzuini, Carlo.
Affiliation
  • Conde S; Centre for Biostatistics, University of Manchester, University Place, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
  • Xu X; Centre for Biostatistics, University of Manchester, University Place, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
  • Guo H; Centre for Biostatistics, University of Manchester, University Place, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
  • Perola M; National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), P.O. Box 30 (Mannerheimintie 166), Helsinki, FI-00271, Finland.
  • Fazia T; Department of Brain and Behavioural Sciences, University of Pavia, Via Bassi 21, Pavia, 27100, Italy.
  • Bernardinelli L; Department of Brain and Behavioural Sciences, University of Pavia, Via Bassi 21, Pavia, 27100, Italy.
  • Berzuini C; Centre for Biostatistics, University of Manchester, University Place, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK. carlo.berzuini@manchester.ac.uk.
BMC Bioinformatics ; 19(Suppl 7): 195, 2018 07 09.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30066639
BACKGROUND: Recent advances in data analysis methods based on principles of Mendelian Randomisation, such as Egger regression and the weighted median estimator, add to the researcher's ability to infer cause-effect links from observational data. Now is the time to gauge the potential of these methods within specific areas of biomedical research. In this paper, we choose a study in metabolomics as an illustrative testbed. We apply Mendelian Randomisation methods in the analysis of data from the DILGOM (Dietary, Lifestyle and Genetic determinants of Obesity and Metabolic syndrome) study, in the context of an effort to identify molecular pathways of cardiovascular disease. In particular, our illustrative analysis addresses the question whether body mass, as measured by body mass index (BMI), exerts a causal effect on the concentrations of a collection of 137 cardiometabolic markers with different degrees of atherogenic power, such as the (highly atherogenic) lipoprotein metabolites with very low density (VLDLs) and the (protective) high density lipoprotein metabolites. RESULTS: We found strongest evidence of a positive BMI effect (that is, evidence that an increase in BMI causes an increase in the metabolite concentration) on those metabolites known to represent strong risk factors for coronary artery disease, such as the VLDLs, and evidence of a negative effect on protective biomarkers. CONCLUSIONS: The methods discussed represent a useful scientific tool, although they assume the validity of conditions that are (at best) only partially verifiable. This paper provides a rigorous account of such conditions. The results of our analysis provide a proof-of-concept illustration of the potential usefulness of Mendelian Randomisation in genomic biobank studies aiming to dissect the molecular causes of disease, and to identify candidate pharmacological targets.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Body Weight / Biomarkers / Mendelian Randomization Analysis / Metabolic Diseases Type of study: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Female / Humans Language: En Journal: BMC Bioinformatics Journal subject: INFORMATICA MEDICA Year: 2018 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Body Weight / Biomarkers / Mendelian Randomization Analysis / Metabolic Diseases Type of study: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Female / Humans Language: En Journal: BMC Bioinformatics Journal subject: INFORMATICA MEDICA Year: 2018 Type: Article