Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Hydatidiform molar pregnancy following assisted reproduction.
Nickkho-Amiry, M; Horne, G; Akhtar, M; Mathur, R; Brison, D R.
Affiliation
  • Nickkho-Amiry M; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust, Ashton-under-lyne, OL6 9RW, UK. mamiry@me.com.
  • Horne G; Department of Reproductive Medicine, Saint Mary's Hospital, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK.
  • Akhtar M; Department of Reproductive Medicine, Saint Mary's Hospital, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK.
  • Mathur R; Department of Reproductive Medicine, Saint Mary's Hospital, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK.
  • Brison DR; Department of Reproductive Medicine, Saint Mary's Hospital, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK.
J Assist Reprod Genet ; 36(4): 667-671, 2019 Apr.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30612209
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

The use of assisted reproduction techniques (ART) is increasing; however, reports of molar pregnancy following ART remain scarce. Currently, the Human Fertility and Embryology Authority (HFEA) collates data on the molar pregnancies that have resulted through the use of ART. Recently, they have indicated that they will no longer collect these data.

AIM:

This paper aimed to examine the incidence of molar pregnancy amongst patients undergoing assisted reproduction.

METHODS:

We contacted HFEA and placed a request under the Freedom of Information Act (2000) for the number of molar pregnancies that resulted from fresh/frozen embryo transfer since HFEA started collecting data in 1991 to February 2018. We also asked how many patients who had suffered a molar pregnancy went on to have a normal pregnancy and how many had subsequent molar pregnancies, in subsequent treatment cycles.

RESULTS:

Between 68 and 76 molar pregnancies occurred within this period using ART (n = 274,655). The incidence of molar pregnancy using fresh intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) (1/4302) and fresh in vitro fertilisation (IVF) (1/4333) was similar. The risk of recurrence of molar pregnancy following a previous molar was higher following ART compared to spontaneous conceptions.

CONCLUSION:

The use of ICSI should be protective against triploidy; however, the retrospective data suggests that molar pregnancy is not eliminated with the use of ART. It is pertinent to continue to record this data, through the gestational trophoblastic disease centres, in order to ensure no further increase in incidence, appropriate follow-up, and transparency in communication.
Subject(s)
Key words
ART; HFEA; HM

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Hydatidiform Mole / Chorionic Villi / Reproductive Techniques, Assisted / Gestational Trophoblastic Disease Type of study: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Pregnancy Language: En Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Journal subject: GENETICA / MEDICINA REPRODUTIVA Year: 2019 Type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Hydatidiform Mole / Chorionic Villi / Reproductive Techniques, Assisted / Gestational Trophoblastic Disease Type of study: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Pregnancy Language: En Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Journal subject: GENETICA / MEDICINA REPRODUTIVA Year: 2019 Type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom