Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A randomized, controlled, multi-center trial of the efficacy and safety of the Occlutech Figulla Flex-II Occluder compared to the Amplatzer Septal Occluder for transcatheter closure of secundum atrial septal defects.
Kenny, Damien; Eicken, Andreas; Dähnert, Ingo; Boudjemline, Younes; Sievert, Horst; Schneider, Martin Be; Gori, Tommaso; Hijazi, Ziyad M.
Affiliation
  • Kenny D; Department of Cardiology, Our Lady's Children's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Eicken A; German Heart Center, Munich, Germany.
  • Dähnert I; Department of Pediatric Cardiology Heart Centre, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
  • Boudjemline Y; Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Centre de reference des Malformations Cardiaques Congénitales Complexes, Necker Hospital, Paris, France.
  • Sievert H; CardioVascular Center Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany & Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford, United Kingdom.
  • Schneider MB; Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Charitè Medical Center, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany.
  • Gori T; Zentrum für Kardiologie, Kardiologie I, University Medical Center, and DZHK Standort Rhein-Main, Mainz, Germany.
  • Hijazi ZM; Sidra Cardiovascular Center of Excellence, Weil Cornell Medical College, Doha, Qatar.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 93(2): 316-321, 2019 02 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30719850
ABSTRACT

AIMS:

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of the Occlutech Figulla Flex II Occluder (OFFII) with the Amplatzer Septal Occluder (ASO) in patients > 8kg undergoing transcatheter ASD closure. METHODS AND

RESULTS:

Randomized, controlled, multi-center prospective clinical trial with randomization 21 in favor of the OFFII. Primary efficacy endpoint was the rate of successful device placement and defect closure without major complications at hospital discharge. All data were assessed through a core laboratory. Interim analysis was performed when 70% of the patients were treated to evaluate for noninferiority. From a total of 176 randomized subjects, interim analysis was performed on the first 158 patients (65.2% female) (107 OFFII/51 ASO) undergoing device closure at a median weight of 42 kg (range 13-125 kg). Seventy-six percent (120 patients) completed 6-month follow-up. Successful device placement (first attempt) was achieved in 99.1% of the OFF group vs 90.2% of the ASO group (P < 0.05). Early efficacy success was achieved in 94.4% of the OFFII group vs 90.2% of the ASO group (P < 0.001). The incidence of major complications was 5.6% for the OFFII group compared to 9.8% for the ASO.

CONCLUSIONS:

The OFFII device was not inferior to the ASO with less complications and greater efficacy than the ASO.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Cardiac Catheterization / Septal Occluder Device / Heart Septal Defects, Atrial Type of study: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Journal subject: CARDIOLOGIA Year: 2019 Type: Article Affiliation country: Ireland

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Cardiac Catheterization / Septal Occluder Device / Heart Septal Defects, Atrial Type of study: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Journal subject: CARDIOLOGIA Year: 2019 Type: Article Affiliation country: Ireland