Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin versus gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin as first-line therapy for advanced biliary tract cancers: a multicenter, open-label, randomized, phase III, noninferiority trial.
Kim, S T; Kang, J H; Lee, J; Lee, H W; Oh, S Y; Jang, J S; Lee, M A; Sohn, B S; Yoon, S Y; Choi, H J; Hong, J H; Kim, M-J; Kim, S; Park, Y S; Park, J O; Lim, H Y.
Affiliation
  • Kim ST; Division of Hemato-oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul.
  • Kang JH; Division of Hemato-oncology, Department of Medicine, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Jinju.
  • Lee J; Division of Hemato-oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul.
  • Lee HW; Division of Hemato-oncology, Department of Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon.
  • Oh SY; Division of Hemato-oncology, Department of Medicine, Dong-A University School of Medicine, Busan.
  • Jang JS; Division of Hemato-oncology, Department of Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul.
  • Lee MA; Division of Hemato-oncology, Department of Medicine, Seoul St Mary's Hospital, Catholic University, Seoul.
  • Sohn BS; Division of Hemato-oncology, Department of Medicine, Sanggye Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Seoul.
  • Yoon SY; Division of Hemato-oncology, Department of Medicine, Konkuk University Medical Center, Seoul.
  • Choi HJ; Division of Hemato-oncology, Department of Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul.
  • Hong JH; Division of Hemato-oncology, Department of Medicine, Incheon St Mary's Hospital, Catholic University, Incheon.
  • Kim MJ; Statistics and Data Center, Research Institute for Future Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Kim S; Statistics and Data Center, Research Institute for Future Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Park YS; Division of Hemato-oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul.
  • Park JO; Division of Hemato-oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul. Electronic address: oncopark@skku.edu.
  • Lim HY; Division of Hemato-oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul. Electronic address: hoylim@skku.edu.
Ann Oncol ; 30(5): 788-795, 2019 05 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30785198
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) has shown modest activity and tolerable toxicity in a phase II trial for biliary tract cancers (BTCs). Meanwhile, gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin (GEMOX) has been the reference arm in recent phase II and III trials for BTCs. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of XELOX versus GEMOX as first-line therapy for advanced BCTs. PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

In this open-label, randomized, phase III, noninferiority trial, we randomly selected patients with metastatic BCTs to receive GEMOX (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, and oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2 on day 1) or XELOX (capecitabine 1000 mg/m2, twice daily, on days 1-14 and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day 1) as first-line treatment, given every 3 weeks, totaling eight cycles. The primary end point was to prove the noninferiority of XELOX to GEMOX in terms of 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate.

RESULTS:

In total, 114 patients randomly received GEMOX and 108 randomly received XELOX. The median PFS was 5.3 months for the GEMOX group and 5.8 months for the XELOX group. The 6-month PFS rate was 44.5% for the GEMOX group and 46.7% for the XELOX group. The 95% confidence interval of the 6-month PFS rate difference between both groups was -12% to 16%, meeting the criteria for noninferiority of XELOX to GEMOX. There was no difference in objective response (P=0.171) and median overall survival (P=0.131) between both groups. The most common grade three to four adverse events were neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. No patient died of treatment-related causes. The XELOX group had significantly lower frequencies of hospital visits than the GEMOX group (P<0.001).

CONCLUSION:

XELOX showed significant noninferiority to GEMOX in terms of 6-month PFS rate. Thus, XELOX could be an alternative first-line treatment of BCTs. TRIAL REGISTRATION This study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (number NCT01470443).
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Biliary Tract Neoplasms / Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols Type of study: Clinical_trials Limits: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Ann Oncol Journal subject: NEOPLASIAS Year: 2019 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Biliary Tract Neoplasms / Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols Type of study: Clinical_trials Limits: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Ann Oncol Journal subject: NEOPLASIAS Year: 2019 Type: Article