Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Malaria Parasite Density in Individuals with Different Rapid Diagnostic Test Results and Concentrations of HRP2 Antigen.
Plucinski, Mateusz M; Dimbu, Pedro Rafael; Fortes, Filomeno; Murphy, Sean C; Smith, Nahum T; Cruz, Kurtis R; Seilie, Annette M; Halsey, Eric S; Aidoo, Michael; Rogier, Eric.
Affiliation
  • Plucinski MM; Malaria Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
  • Dimbu PR; U.S. President's Malaria Initiative, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
  • Fortes F; National Malaria Control Program, Ministry of Health, Luanda, Angola.
  • Murphy SC; National Malaria Control Program, Ministry of Health, Luanda, Angola.
  • Smith NT; Center for Emerging and Re-emerging Infectious Diseases, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
  • Cruz KR; Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
  • Seilie AM; Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
  • Halsey ES; Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
  • Aidoo M; Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
  • Rogier E; U.S. President's Malaria Initiative, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 100(5): 1202-1203, 2019 05.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30915959
ABSTRACT
Low-density malaria infections are a source of human morbidity in endemic settings and potentially contribute to ongoing malaria transmission. Conventional rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) were designed to detect clinically relevant parasite and antigen levels, but it is largely unknown what proportion of parasite (and antigen positive) infections are missed by conventional RDTs. Furthermore, RDTs can also provide false positives from lingering histidine-rich protein 2 (HRP2) antigenemia from a past infection. We analyzed 207 samples from Angolan outpatients with a bead-based HRP2 antigen assay and by qRT-PCR for the presence of parasite nucleic acids. Among patients HRP2 positive but negative by conventional RDT, the rate of quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) positivity was 45% (95% CI 35-56%), with a median parasitemia of 3.4 parasites/µL (interquartile range 0.14-4.8). Only 15% (7-26%) of HRP2-negative samples were found to have parasite nucleic acids. A substantial proportion of persons with blood HRP2 antigen concentrations not detected by the conventional RDT were found to have evidence of active infection, but at low parasite density levels.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Plasmodium falciparum / Protozoan Proteins / Malaria, Falciparum / Diagnostic Tests, Routine / Antigens, Protozoan Type of study: Diagnostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Year: 2019 Type: Article Affiliation country: Georgia

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Plasmodium falciparum / Protozoan Proteins / Malaria, Falciparum / Diagnostic Tests, Routine / Antigens, Protozoan Type of study: Diagnostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Year: 2019 Type: Article Affiliation country: Georgia