Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Computerized 4-choice reaction time test for the measurement of psychomotor recovery after general anesthesia.
Usichenko, Taras I; Städing, Danika; Boesche, Michael; Janner, Henriette; Hesse, Thomas; Lehmann, Robert; Pavlovic, Dragan; Nowak, Andreas.
Affiliation
  • Usichenko TI; Department of Anesthesiology, University Medicine of Greifswald, Sauerbruchstrasse, 17475, Greifswald, Germany. taras@uni-greifswald.de.
  • Städing D; Department of Anesthesia, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada. taras@uni-greifswald.de.
  • Boesche M; Department of Anesthesiology, University Medicine of Greifswald, Sauerbruchstrasse, 17475, Greifswald, Germany.
  • Janner H; Department of Internal Medicine, University Medicine of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
  • Hesse T; Department of Anesthesiology, University Medicine of Greifswald, Sauerbruchstrasse, 17475, Greifswald, Germany.
  • Lehmann R; Department of Anesthesiology, University Medicine of Greifswald, Sauerbruchstrasse, 17475, Greifswald, Germany.
  • Pavlovic D; Hasso Plattner Institute, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
  • Nowak A; Department of Anesthesia, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.
J Clin Monit Comput ; 34(4): 833-841, 2020 Aug.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31342306
ABSTRACT
The recovery of patients after general anesthesia is usually estimated by using clinical scores. Since there is a lack of objective methods for assessing psychomotor recovery, the aim of this study was to evaluate three psychological tests for this purpose. Patients, scheduled for ambulatory gynecological surgery, underwent 3 standard psychological tests before (T1), 15 min after the surgery (T2) and on discharge from the recovery room (T3). The tests used were Wechsler memory scale (test 1, working memory capacity), d2-test (test 2, concentration endurance) and computer-based 4-choice-reaction time (4CRT, test 3, reaction time) as well as Postanesthesia Discharge Scoring System (PADSS). The same test battery was used in healthy female volunteers, all test results were compared at the different time points. In 109 patients, working memory capacity and concentration (tests 1 and 2) decreased, the reaction time (test 3) was prolonged at T2 in comparison with T1 and T3 (P < 0.01). PADSS increased from 8 (T2) to 10 (T3) (medians, P < 0.001). Fifty-seven healthy volunteers demonstrated a practice effect in all 3 tests through the course of the study (P <0.01). 4CRT test had shortest duration and enabled computerized data processing. All three tests objectively assess the recovery of psychomotor function in patients after general anesthesia, the computer-based 4CRT seems to be the most convenient for the clinical routine.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Patient Discharge / Gynecologic Surgical Procedures / Anesthesia Recovery Period / Anesthesia, General Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged Language: En Journal: J Clin Monit Comput Journal subject: INFORMATICA MEDICA / MEDICINA Year: 2020 Type: Article Affiliation country: Germany

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Patient Discharge / Gynecologic Surgical Procedures / Anesthesia Recovery Period / Anesthesia, General Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged Language: En Journal: J Clin Monit Comput Journal subject: INFORMATICA MEDICA / MEDICINA Year: 2020 Type: Article Affiliation country: Germany