Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prediction of emergency department patient disposition decision for proactive resource allocation for admission.
Lee, Seung-Yup; Chinnam, Ratna Babu; Dalkiran, Evrim; Krupp, Seth; Nauss, Michael.
Affiliation
  • Lee SY; Haskayne School of Business, University of Calgary, 2500 University Dr. NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada. seungyup.lee@haskayne.ucalgary.ca.
  • Chinnam RB; Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering, Wayne State University, 4815 Fourth St, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA.
  • Dalkiran E; Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering, Wayne State University, 4815 Fourth St, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA.
  • Krupp S; Department of Emergency Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, 2799 W. Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA.
  • Nauss M; Department of Emergency Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, 2799 W. Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA.
Health Care Manag Sci ; 23(3): 339-359, 2020 Sep.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31444660
ABSTRACT
We investigate the capability of information from electronic health records of an emergency department (ED) to predict patient disposition decisions for reducing "boarding" delays through the proactive initiation of admission processes (e.g., inpatient bed requests, transport, etc.). We model the process of ED disposition decision prediction as a hierarchical multiclass classification while dealing with the progressive accrual of clinical information throughout the ED caregiving process. Multinomial logistic regression as well as machine learning models are built for carrying out the predictions. Utilizing results from just the first set of ED laboratory tests along with other prior information gathered for each patient (2.5 h ahead of the actual disposition decision on average), our model predicts disposition decisions with positive predictive values of 55.4%, 45.1%, 56.9%, and 47.5%, while controlling false positive rates (1.4%, 1.0%, 4.3%, and 1.4%), with AUC values of 0.97, 0.95, 0.89, and 0.84 for the four admission (minor) classes, i.e., intensive care unit (3.6% of the testing samples), telemetry unit (2.2%), general practice unit (11.9%), and observation unit (6.6%) classes, respectively. Moreover, patients destined to intensive care unit present a more drastic increment in prediction quality at triage than others. Disposition decision classification models can provide more actionable information than a binary admission vs. discharge prediction model for the proactive initiation of admission processes for ED patients. Observing the distinct trajectories of information accrual and prediction quality evolvement for ED patients destined to different types of units, proactive coordination strategies should be tailored accordingly for each destination unit.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Triage / Resource Allocation / Emergency Service, Hospital Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Health Care Manag Sci Journal subject: SERVICOS DE SAUDE Year: 2020 Type: Article Affiliation country: Canada

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Triage / Resource Allocation / Emergency Service, Hospital Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Health Care Manag Sci Journal subject: SERVICOS DE SAUDE Year: 2020 Type: Article Affiliation country: Canada