Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Epidemiology of Bearing Dislocations After Mobile-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Multicenter Analysis of 67 Bearing Dislocations.
Bae, Ji-Hoon; Kim, Jae Gyoon; Lee, Seung-Yup; Lim, Hong Chul; In, Yong.
Affiliation
  • Bae JH; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim JG; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
  • Lee SY; Yonsei Namu Orthopedic Clinic, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Lim HC; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul Barunsesang Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • In Y; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
J Arthroplasty ; 35(1): 265-271, 2020 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31471182
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

This study investigated the epidemiology and causes of bearing dislocations following mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (MUKA) and determined whether the incidence of primary bearing dislocations decreases as surgeon experience increases.

METHODS:

We retrospectively reviewed the bearing dislocations following MUKAs performed by 14 surgeons with variable experience levels. Causes of bearing dislocations were determined based on the surgical records, radiographs, and operator's suggestion. Using a chi-squared test, the incidence of bearing dislocation was compared between the first 50, the second 50, and the next 100 unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (UKAs) of each surgeon's cohort.

RESULTS:

There were 67 (3.6%) bearing dislocations from 1853 MUKAs. The mean time to bearing dislocations after index MUKAs was 33 months (range, 1-144 months); 55% of the bearing dislocations occurred within 2 years after the index MUKAs. Primary bearing dislocations (n = 58) were the most common, followed by secondary (n = 6) and traumatic dislocations (n = 3). There was no significant difference in the incidence of bearing dislocation between the first 50 and second 50 UKAs for each surgeon. Two surgeons showed a significant decrease in bearing dislocations in their second 100 UKAs, while the other surgeons did not show a difference between their first 100 and second 100 UKAs.

CONCLUSION:

Most bearing dislocations after MUKAs were related to technical errors such as component malposition or gap imbalance. This study did not confirm that the incidence of bearing dislocations decreases as the number of cases increases. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV, Case series.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee / Osteoarthritis, Knee / Knee Prosthesis Type of study: Observational_studies / Screening_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Arthroplasty Journal subject: ORTOPEDIA Year: 2020 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee / Osteoarthritis, Knee / Knee Prosthesis Type of study: Observational_studies / Screening_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Arthroplasty Journal subject: ORTOPEDIA Year: 2020 Type: Article