Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Blood Lead Levels in U.S. Women of Childbearing Age, 1976-2016.
Ettinger, Adrienne S; Egan, Kathryn B; Homa, David M; Brown, Mary Jean.
Affiliation
  • Ettinger AS; Lead Poisoning Prevention and Environmental Health Tracking Branch, Division of Environmental Health Science and Practice, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
  • Egan KB; Lead Poisoning Prevention and Environmental Health Tracking Branch, Division of Environmental Health Science and Practice, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
  • Homa DM; Office on Smoking and Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
  • Brown MJ; Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Environ Health Perspect ; 128(1): 17012, 2020 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31944143
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Lead can adversely affect maternal and child health across a wide range of exposures; developing fetuses and breastfeeding infants may be particularly vulnerable. We describe the distribution of blood lead levels (BLLs) in U.S. women of childbearing age and associations with sociodemographic, reproductive, smoking, and housing characteristics over a 40-y period.

METHODS:

Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) II, NHANES III Phase I and Phase II, and 1999-2016 continuous NHANES were used to describe the distribution of BLLs (given in micrograms per deciliter; 1µg/dL=0.0483µmol/L) in U.S. women 15-49 years of age between 1976 and 2016. For all women with valid BLLs (n=22,408), geometric mean (GM) BLLs and estimated prevalence of BLLs ≥5µg/dL were calculated overall and by selected demographic characteristics. For NHANES II, estimated prevalence of BLLs ≥10 and ≥20µg/dL were also calculated.

RESULTS:

The most recent GM BLLs (2007-2010 and 2011-2016, respectively) were 0.81µg/dL [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.79, 0.84] and 0.61µg/dL (95% CI 0.59, 0.64). In comparison, GM BLLs in earlier periods (1976-1980, 1988-1991, and 1991-1994) were 10.37µg/dL (95% CI 9.95, 10.79), 1.85µg/dL (95% CI 1.75, 1.94), and 1.53µg/dL (95% CI 1.45, 1.60), respectively. In 2011-2016, 0.7% of women of childbearing age had BLLs ≥5µg/dL, and higher BLLs were associated with older age, other race/ethnicity, birthplace outside the United States, four or more live births, exposure to secondhand tobacco smoke, and ever pregnant or not currently pregnant.

DISCUSSION:

Lead exposure in U.S. women of childbearing age is generally low and has substantially decreased over this 40-y period. However, based on these estimates, there are still at least 500,000 U.S. women being exposed to lead at levels that may harm developing fetuses or breastfeeding infants. Identifying high-risk women who are or intend to become pregnant remains an important public health issue. https//doi.org/10.1289/EHP5925.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Maternal Exposure / Environmental Pollutants / Lead / Lead Poisoning Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: Environ Health Perspect Year: 2020 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Maternal Exposure / Environmental Pollutants / Lead / Lead Poisoning Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: Environ Health Perspect Year: 2020 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States