Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cutaneous Reactions to Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion Devices in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus.
Rigo, Rachel S; Levin, Laura E; Belsito, Donald V; Garzon, Maria C; Gandica, Rachelle; Williams, Kristen M.
Affiliation
  • Rigo RS; Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Levin LE; Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Belsito DV; Department of Dermatology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Garzon MC; Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Gandica R; Department of Dermatology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Williams KM; Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
J Diabetes Sci Technol ; 15(4): 786-791, 2021 07.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32389062
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) are the standard of care for type 1 diabetes in children. There is little reported on device-related skin complications and treatment options. This study documents cutaneous reactions to CGM and CSII devices in children and young adults with type 1 diabetes.

METHODS:

One hundred and twenty-one subjects (3-25 years) with type 1 diabetes and CGM and/or CSII use were recruited over a three-month period from the Naomi Berrie Diabetes Center at Columbia University Irving Medical Center. A five-question survey was completed for each subject detailing demographic data, diabetes management, and device-related skin complications.

RESULTS:

Sixty percent of subjects reported skin complications related to CGM and/or CSII use. Terms most frequently used to describe cutaneous reactions were "red," "itchy," "painful," and "rash." Subjects who used both CGM and CSII were more likely to report skin problems than those who used only CSII (odds ratio 2.9, [95% confidence interval 1.2-6.7]; P = .015). There were no associations between skin complications and sex or race/ethnicity. Twenty-two percent of subjects with adverse skin event(s) discontinued use of a device due to their skin problem. Seven percent were evaluated by a dermatologist. Eighty-one percent used a range of products to treat their symptoms, with variable perceived clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS:

Skin complications related to CSII or CGM devices are commonly reported in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes and may lead to interruption or discontinuation of device use. Future studies are needed to elucidate the causes of these reactions and determine the best methods for prevention.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 Limits: Adult / Child / Humans Language: En Journal: J Diabetes Sci Technol Journal subject: ENDOCRINOLOGIA Year: 2021 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 Limits: Adult / Child / Humans Language: En Journal: J Diabetes Sci Technol Journal subject: ENDOCRINOLOGIA Year: 2021 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States