Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Pediatric retransplantation of the liver: A prognostic scoring tool.
Vock, David M; Kuehne, Alexander; Northrop, Elise F; Matas, Arthur J; Larson Nath, Catherine; Chinnakotla, Srinath.
Affiliation
  • Vock DM; Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
  • Kuehne A; Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
  • Northrop EF; Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
  • Matas AJ; Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
  • Larson Nath C; Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
  • Chinnakotla S; Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Pediatr Transplant ; 24(7): e13775, 2020 11.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32794255
ABSTRACT
Few prognostic models have been created in children that receive liver retransplantation (rLT). We examined the SRTR database of 731 children that underwent second liver transplant between 2002 and 2018. Proportional hazards models using backward variable selection were used to identify recipient, donor, and surgical characteristics associated with survival. A simple prognostic scoring system or nomogram (ie, each risk factor was weighted on a five-point scale) was constructed based on the fitted model. Recipient age (P < .001), MELD/PELD (P < .001), recipient ventilated (P = .003), donor cause of death (P = .024), graft type (P = .045), first graft loss due to biliary tract complications (P = .048), and survival time of the first graft (P = .006) were significant predictors of retransplant survival. The bias-corrected Harrell's C-index for the multivariable model was 0.63. Survival was significantly different (P < .001) for those at low risk (0-4 points), medium risk (5-7 points), and high risk (8+ points). Survival was equivalent between low risk pediatric second transplant recipients and pediatric primary liver transplant recipients (P = .67) but significantly worse for medium- (P < .001) and high-risk (P < .001) recipients. With simple clinical characteristics, this scoring tool can modestly discriminate between those children at high risk and those children at low risk of poor outcomes after second liver transplant.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Registries / Liver Transplantation / Retreatment / Propensity Score / Transplant Recipients / Graft Rejection Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male / Newborn Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: Pediatr Transplant Journal subject: PEDIATRIA / TRANSPLANTE Year: 2020 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Registries / Liver Transplantation / Retreatment / Propensity Score / Transplant Recipients / Graft Rejection Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male / Newborn Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: Pediatr Transplant Journal subject: PEDIATRIA / TRANSPLANTE Year: 2020 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States