Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Contemporary use of real-world data for clinical trial conduct in the United States: a scoping review.
Rogers, James R; Lee, Junghwan; Zhou, Ziheng; Cheung, Ying Kuen; Hripcsak, George; Weng, Chunhua.
Affiliation
  • Rogers JR; Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
  • Lee J; Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
  • Zhou Z; Institute of Human Nutrition, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
  • Cheung YK; Department of Biostatistics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA, and.
  • Hripcsak G; Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
  • Weng C; Medical Informatics Services, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA.
J Am Med Inform Assoc ; 28(1): 144-154, 2021 01 15.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33164065
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Real-world data (RWD), defined as routinely collected healthcare data, can be a potential catalyst for addressing challenges faced in clinical trials. We performed a scoping review of database-specific RWD applications within clinical trial contexts, synthesizing prominent uses and themes. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Querying 3 biomedical literature databases, research articles using electronic health records, administrative claims databases, or clinical registries either within a clinical trial or in tandem with methodology related to clinical trials were included. Articles were required to use at least 1 US RWD source. All abstract screening, full-text screening, and data extraction was performed by 1 reviewer. Two reviewers independently verified all decisions.

RESULTS:

Of 2020 screened articles, 89 qualified 59 articles used electronic health records, 29 used administrative claims, and 26 used registries. Our synthesis was driven by the general life cycle of a clinical trial, culminating into 3 major themes trial process tasks (51 articles); dissemination strategies (6); and generalizability assessments (34). Despite a diverse set of diseases studied, <10% of trials using RWD for trial process tasks evaluated medications or procedures (5/51). All articles highlighted data-related challenges, such as missing values.

DISCUSSION:

Database-specific RWD have been occasionally leveraged for various clinical trial tasks. We observed underuse of RWD within conducted medication or procedure trials, though it is subject to the confounder of implicit report of RWD use.

CONCLUSION:

Enhanced incorporation of RWD should be further explored for medication or procedure trials, including better understanding of how to handle related data quality issues to facilitate RWD use.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Registries / Clinical Trials as Topic / Databases as Topic / Electronic Health Records Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Journal subject: INFORMATICA MEDICA Year: 2021 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Registries / Clinical Trials as Topic / Databases as Topic / Electronic Health Records Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Journal subject: INFORMATICA MEDICA Year: 2021 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States