Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
An EPIC predictor of gestational age and its application to newborns conceived by assisted reproductive technologies.
Haftorn, Kristine L; Lee, Yunsung; Denault, William R P; Page, Christian M; Nustad, Haakon E; Lyle, Robert; Gjessing, Håkon K; Malmberg, Anni; Magnus, Maria C; Næss, Øyvind; Czamara, Darina; Räikkönen, Katri; Lahti, Jari; Magnus, Per; Håberg, Siri E; Jugessur, Astanand; Bohlin, Jon.
Affiliation
  • Haftorn KL; Department of Genetics and Bioinformatics, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway. KristineLokas.Haftorn@fhi.no.
  • Lee Y; Centre for Fertility and Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway. KristineLokas.Haftorn@fhi.no.
  • Denault WRP; Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. KristineLokas.Haftorn@fhi.no.
  • Page CM; Department of Genetics and Bioinformatics, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
  • Nustad HE; Centre for Fertility and Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
  • Lyle R; Department of Genetics and Bioinformatics, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
  • Gjessing HK; Centre for Fertility and Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
  • Malmberg A; Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
  • Magnus MC; Centre for Fertility and Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
  • Næss Ø; Department of Mathematics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
  • Czamara D; Centre for Fertility and Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
  • Räikkönen K; Deepinsight, Karl Johans Gate 8, Oslo, Norway.
  • Lahti J; Centre for Fertility and Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
  • Magnus P; Department of Medical Genetics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
  • Håberg SE; Centre for Fertility and Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
  • Jugessur A; Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
  • Bohlin J; Department of Psychology and Logopedics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Clin Epigenetics ; 13(1): 82, 2021 04 19.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33875015
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Gestational age is a useful proxy for assessing developmental maturity, but correct estimation of gestational age is difficult using clinical measures. DNA methylation at birth has proven to be an accurate predictor of gestational age. Previous predictors of epigenetic gestational age were based on DNA methylation data from the Illumina HumanMethylation 27 K or 450 K array, which have subsequently been replaced by the Illumina MethylationEPIC 850 K array (EPIC). Our aims here were to build an epigenetic gestational age clock specific for the EPIC array and to evaluate its precision and accuracy using the embryo transfer date of newborns from the largest EPIC-derived dataset to date on assisted reproductive technologies (ART).

METHODS:

We built an epigenetic gestational age clock using Lasso regression trained on 755 randomly selected non-ART newborns from the Norwegian Study of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (START)-a substudy of the Norwegian Mother, Father, and Child Cohort Study (MoBa). For the ART-conceived newborns, the START dataset had detailed information on the embryo transfer date and the specific ART procedure used for conception. The predicted gestational age was compared to clinically estimated gestational age in 200 non-ART and 838 ART newborns using MM-type robust regression. The performance of the clock was compared to previously published gestational age clocks in an independent replication sample of 148 newborns from the Prediction and Prevention of Preeclampsia and Intrauterine Growth Restrictions (PREDO) study-a prospective pregnancy cohort of Finnish women.

RESULTS:

Our new epigenetic gestational age clock showed higher precision and accuracy in predicting gestational age than previous gestational age clocks (R2 = 0.724, median absolute deviation (MAD) = 3.14 days). Restricting the analysis to CpGs shared between 450 K and EPIC did not reduce the precision of the clock. Furthermore, validating the clock on ART newborns with known embryo transfer date confirmed that DNA methylation is an accurate predictor of gestational age (R2 = 0.767, MAD = 3.7 days).

CONCLUSIONS:

We present the first EPIC-based predictor of gestational age and demonstrate its robustness and precision in ART and non-ART newborns. As more datasets are being generated on the EPIC platform, this clock will be valuable in studies using gestational age to assess neonatal development.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Gestational Age / DNA Methylation / Reproductive Techniques, Assisted / Epigenesis, Genetic / Epigenomics Type of study: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Female / Humans / Male / Newborn Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: Clin Epigenetics Year: 2021 Type: Article Affiliation country: Norway

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Gestational Age / DNA Methylation / Reproductive Techniques, Assisted / Epigenesis, Genetic / Epigenomics Type of study: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Female / Humans / Male / Newborn Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: Clin Epigenetics Year: 2021 Type: Article Affiliation country: Norway