Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Deep learning-based denoising algorithm in comparison to iterative reconstruction and filtered back projection: a 12-reader phantom study.
Kim, Youngjune; Oh, Dong Yul; Chang, Won; Kang, Eunhee; Ye, Jong Chul; Lee, Kyeorye; Kim, Hae Young; Kim, Young Hoon; Park, Ji Hoon; Lee, Yoon Jin; Lee, Kyoung Ho.
Affiliation
  • Kim Y; Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
  • Oh DY; Aerospace Medical Group, Air Force Education and Training Command, Jinju, Republic of Korea.
  • Chang W; Interdisciplinary Program in Bioengineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Kang E; Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea. changwon1981@gmail.com.
  • Ye JC; Bio Imaging and Signal Processing Lab, Department of Bio and Brain Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
  • Lee K; Bio Imaging and Signal Processing Lab, Department of Bio and Brain Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim HY; Interdisciplinary Program in Bioengineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim YH; Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
  • Park JH; Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
  • Lee YJ; Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
  • Lee KH; Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Eur Radiol ; 31(11): 8755-8764, 2021 Nov.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33885958
OBJECTIVES: (1) To compare low-contrast detectability of a deep learning-based denoising algorithm (DLA) with ADMIRE and FBP, and (2) to compare image quality parameters of DLA with those of reconstruction methods from two different CT vendors (ADMIRE, IMR, and FBP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using abdominal CT images of 100 patients reconstructed via ADMIRE and FBP, we trained DLA by feeding FBP images as input and ADMIRE images as the ground truth. To measure the low-contrast detectability, the randomized repeat scans of Catphan® phantom were performed under various conditions of radiation exposures. Twelve radiologists evaluated the presence/absence of a target on a five-point confidence scale. The multi-reader multi-case area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was calculated, and non-inferiority tests were performed. Using American College of Radiology CT accreditation phantom, contrast-to-noise ratio, target transfer function, noise magnitude, and detectability index (d') of DLA, ADMIRE, IMR, and FBPs were computed. RESULTS: The AUC of DLA in low-contrast detectability was non-inferior to that of ADMIRE (p < .001) and superior to that of FBP (p < .001). DLA improved the image quality in terms of all physical measurements compared to FBPs from both CT vendors and showed profiles of physical measurements similar to those of ADMIRE. CONCLUSIONS: The low-contrast detectability of the proposed deep learning-based denoising algorithm was non-inferior to that of ADMIRE and superior to that of FBP. The DLA could successfully improve image quality compared with FBP while showing the similar physical profiles of ADMIRE. KEY POINTS: • Low-contrast detectability in the images denoised using the deep learning algorithm was non-inferior to that in the images reconstructed using standard algorithms. • The proposed deep learning algorithm showed similar profiles of physical measurements to advanced iterative reconstruction algorithm (ADMIRE).
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Deep Learning Type of study: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Eur Radiol Journal subject: RADIOLOGIA Year: 2021 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Deep Learning Type of study: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Eur Radiol Journal subject: RADIOLOGIA Year: 2021 Type: Article