Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy and safety of polyethylene glycol dural sealant system in cranial and spinal neurosurgical procedures: Meta-analysis.
Diab, Ahmed; Al-Shami, Hieder; Negida, Ahmed; Gadallah, Ahmed; Farag, Hossam; Elkadi, Doaa Mahmoud; Gaber, Mo'tasem Muhamed; Ebada, Mahmoud Ahmed.
Affiliation
  • Diab A; Department of Medicine, Demerdash Hospital, Cairo, Egypt.
  • Al-Shami H; Department of Neurosurgery, Al-Ahly Bank Hospital, Nasr City, Egypt.
  • Negida A; Department of Medicine, Zagazig University Hospitals, Zagazig, Egypt.
  • Gadallah A; Department of Surgery, Demerdash Hospital, Cairo, Egypt.
  • Farag H; Department of Medicine, Zagazig University Hospitals, Zagazig, Egypt.
  • Elkadi DM; Department of Medicine, Fayoum University, Fayoum, Egypt.
  • Gaber MM; Department of Surgery, Demerdash Hospital, Cairo, Egypt.
  • Ebada MA; Department of Medicine, Zagazig University Hospitals, Zagazig, Egypt.
Surg Neurol Int ; 12: 182, 2021.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34084610
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

We aimed to assess the efficacy of polyethylene glycol (PEG) dura sealant to achieve watertight closure, prevention of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak and to investigate its possible side effects.

METHODS:

We searched Medline (through PubMed), Scopus, and the Cochrane Library through December 2019. We included articles demonstrating cranial or spinal procedures with the use of PEG material as a dural sealant. Data on intraoperative watertight closure, CSF leak, and surgical complications were extracted and pooled in a meta-analysis model using RevMan version 5.3 and OpenMeta (Analyst).

RESULTS:

Pooling the controlled trials showed that PEG resulted in significantly more intraoperative watertight closures than standard care (risk ratio [RR] = 1.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.24, 1.66]). However, the combined effect estimate did not reveal any significant difference between both groups in terms of CSF leaks, the incidence of surgical site infections, and neurological deficits (P = 0.7, 0.45, and 0.92, respectively). On the other hand, pooling both controlled and noncontrolled trials showed significance in terms of leak and neurological complications (RR = 0.0238, 95% CI [0.0102, 0.0373] and RR = 0.035, 95% CI [0.018, 0.052]). Regarding intraoperative watertight closure, the overall effect estimate showed no significant results (RR=0.994, 95% CI [0.986, 1.002]).

CONCLUSION:

Dura seal material is an acceptable adjuvant for dural closure when the integrity of the dura is questionable. However, marketing it as a factor for the prevention of surgical site infection is not scientifically proved. We suggest that, for neurosurgeons, using the dural sealants are highly recommended for duraplasty, skull base approaches, and in keyhole approaches.
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Language: En Journal: Surg Neurol Int Year: 2021 Type: Article Affiliation country: Egypt

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Language: En Journal: Surg Neurol Int Year: 2021 Type: Article Affiliation country: Egypt