Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Shortening deactivation: quantifying a critical component of cyclical muscle contraction.
Loya, Amy K; Van Houten, Sarah K; Glasheen, Bernadette M; Swank, Douglas M.
Affiliation
  • Loya AK; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Center for Biotechnology and Interdisciplinary Studies, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York.
  • Van Houten SK; Department of Electrical, Computer, and Biomedical Engineering, Union College, Schenectady, New York.
  • Glasheen BM; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Center for Biotechnology and Interdisciplinary Studies, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York.
  • Swank DM; Department of Biological Sciences, Center for Biotechnology and Interdisciplinary Studies, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York.
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol ; 322(4): C653-C665, 2022 04 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34965153
A muscle undergoing cyclical contractions requires fast and efficient muscle activation and relaxation to generate high power with relatively low energetic cost. To enhance activation and increase force levels during shortening, some muscle types have evolved stretch activation (SA), a delayed increased in force following rapid muscle lengthening. SA's complementary phenomenon is shortening deactivation (SD), a delayed decrease in force following muscle shortening. SD increases muscle relaxation, which decreases resistance to subsequent muscle lengthening. Although it might be just as important to cyclical power output, SD has received less investigation than SA. To enable mechanistic investigations into SD and quantitatively compare it to SA, we developed a protocol to elicit SA and SD from Drosophila and Lethocerus indirect flight muscles (IFM) and Drosophila jump muscle. When normalized to isometric tension, Drosophila IFM exhibited a 118% SD tension decrease, Lethocerus IFM dropped by 97%, and Drosophila jump muscle decreased by 37%. The same order was found for normalized SA tension: Drosophila IFM increased by 233%, Lethocerus IFM by 76%, and Drosophila jump muscle by only 11%. SD occurred slightly earlier than SA, relative to the respective length change, for both IFMs; but SD was exceedingly earlier than SA for jump muscle. Our results suggest SA and SD evolved to enable highly efficient IFM cyclical power generation and may be caused by the same mechanism. However, jump muscle SA and SD mechanisms are likely different, and may have evolved for a role other than to increase the power output of cyclical contractions.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Drosophila / Muscle Contraction Limits: Animals Language: En Journal: Am J Physiol Cell Physiol Journal subject: FISIOLOGIA Year: 2022 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Drosophila / Muscle Contraction Limits: Animals Language: En Journal: Am J Physiol Cell Physiol Journal subject: FISIOLOGIA Year: 2022 Type: Article