Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Why sequence all eukaryotes?
Blaxter, Mark; Archibald, John M; Childers, Anna K; Coddington, Jonathan A; Crandall, Keith A; Di Palma, Federica; Durbin, Richard; Edwards, Scott V; Graves, Jennifer A M; Hackett, Kevin J; Hall, Neil; Jarvis, Erich D; Johnson, Rebecca N; Karlsson, Elinor K; Kress, W John; Kuraku, Shigehiro; Lawniczak, Mara K N; Lindblad-Toh, Kerstin; Lopez, Jose V; Moran, Nancy A; Robinson, Gene E; Ryder, Oliver A; Shapiro, Beth; Soltis, Pamela S; Warnow, Tandy; Zhang, Guojie; Lewin, Harris A.
Affiliation
  • Blaxter M; Wellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SA, United Kingdom; mb35@sanger.ac.uk.
  • Archibald JM; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4H7, Canada.
  • Childers AK; Bee Research Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, US Department of Agriculture (USDA), Beltsville, MD 20705.
  • Coddington JA; Global Genome Initiative, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20560.
  • Crandall KA; Computational Biology Institute, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052.
  • Di Palma F; Department of Invertebrate Zoology, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20013.
  • Durbin R; School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, United Kingdom.
  • Edwards SV; Wellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SA, United Kingdom.
  • Graves JAM; Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EH, United Kingdom.
  • Hackett KJ; Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138.
  • Hall N; Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138.
  • Jarvis ED; School of Life Sciences, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC 751 23, Australia.
  • Johnson RN; University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT 2617, Australia.
  • Karlsson EK; Crop Production and Protection, Office of National Programs, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD 20705.
  • Kress WJ; Earlham Institute, Norwich, Norfolk NR4 7UZ, United Kingdom.
  • Kuraku S; Laboratory of the Neurogenetics of Language, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065.
  • Lawniczak MKN; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, MD 20815.
  • Lindblad-Toh K; National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20560.
  • Lopez JV; Bioinformatics and Integrative Biology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01605.
  • Moran NA; Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142.
  • Robinson GE; Botany, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20013-7012.
  • Ryder OA; Department of Genomics and Evolutionary Biology, National Institute of Genetics, Mishima, Shizuoka 411-8540, Japan.
  • Shapiro B; Laboratory for Phyloinformatics, RIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research, Kobe, Hyogo 650-0047, Japan.
  • Soltis PS; Wellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SA, United Kingdom.
  • Warnow T; Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142.
  • Zhang G; Science for Life Laboratory, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala 751 23, Sweden.
  • Lewin HA; Department of Biological Sciences, Halmos College of Arts and Sciences, Nova Southeastern University, Dania Beach, FL 33004.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 119(4)2022 01 25.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35042801
Life on Earth has evolved from initial simplicity to the astounding complexity we experience today. Bacteria and archaea have largely excelled in metabolic diversification, but eukaryotes additionally display abundant morphological innovation. How have these innovations come about and what constraints are there on the origins of novelty and the continuing maintenance of biodiversity on Earth? The history of life and the code for the working parts of cells and systems are written in the genome. The Earth BioGenome Project has proposed that the genomes of all extant, named eukaryotes-about 2 million species-should be sequenced to high quality to produce a digital library of life on Earth, beginning with strategic phylogenetic, ecological, and high-impact priorities. Here we discuss why we should sequence all eukaryotic species, not just a representative few scattered across the many branches of the tree of life. We suggest that many questions of evolutionary and ecological significance will only be addressable when whole-genome data representing divergences at all of the branchings in the tree of life or all species in natural ecosystems are available. We envisage that a genomic tree of life will foster understanding of the ongoing processes of speciation, adaptation, and organismal dependencies within entire ecosystems. These explorations will resolve long-standing problems in phylogenetics, evolution, ecology, conservation, agriculture, bioindustry, and medicine.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Base Sequence / Genomics / Eukaryota Limits: Animals / Humans Language: En Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Year: 2022 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Base Sequence / Genomics / Eukaryota Limits: Animals / Humans Language: En Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Year: 2022 Type: Article