Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Venous Size Discrepancy Is a Critical Factor When Using Superficial Temporal Vessels as Recipient Vessels for Free Flaps.
Mata Ribeiro, Luís; Tsao, Chung-Kan; Hung, Yu-Liang; Chu, Chun-Hui; Lin, Li-Ching; Lin, Mo-Han; Peng, Chi; Cheong, David Chon-Fok; Hung, Shao-Yu; Liao, Chun-Ta.
Affiliation
  • Mata Ribeiro L; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital; Chang Gung University and Medical College, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
  • Tsao CK; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, São José Hospital, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal.
  • Hung YL; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung Medical College, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
  • Chu CH; Center for Tissue Engineering, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
  • Lin LC; Department of General Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
  • Lin MH; Department of General Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
  • Peng C; Department of General Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
  • Cheong DC; Center of Tissue Engineering, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
  • Hung SY; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung Medical College, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
  • Liao CT; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung Medical College, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
J Reconstr Microsurg ; 38(8): 654-663, 2022 Oct.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35213928
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Superficial temporal vessels have been used successfully as recipient vessels for head and neck reconstruction. This study evaluates the impact of several treatment variables on flap failure and take-back rate when using these recipient vessels.

METHODS:

We conducted a retrospective study of all microsurgical reconstructions using superficial temporal vessels as recipient vessels in a period of 10 years. Variables collected included previous treatments (radiotherapy, chemotherapy, neck dissection, free flap reconstruction), type of flaps used (soft tissue, osteocutaneous), and vessel size discrepancy between donor and recipient vessels.

RESULTS:

A total of 132 patients were included in the study. The flap success rate was 98.5%. The take-back rate was 10.6%. The most frequent reason for take-back was venous congestion secondary to thrombosis. None of the studied variables was associated with flap failure. Reconstructions using osteocutaneous flaps and vein diameter discrepancy (ratio ≥ 21) had significantly higher take-back rates.

CONCLUSION:

Flaps with a significant size discrepancy between donor and recipient veins (ratio ≥ 21) and fibula flaps (compared with soft tissue flaps) were associated with a higher risk of take-back. It is crucial to minimize venous engorgement during flap harvest and anastomosis, and limit vein redundancy during flap in-setting.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Plastic Surgery Procedures / Free Tissue Flaps Type of study: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Reconstr Microsurg Journal subject: NEUROCIRURGIA Year: 2022 Type: Article Affiliation country: Taiwan

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Plastic Surgery Procedures / Free Tissue Flaps Type of study: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Reconstr Microsurg Journal subject: NEUROCIRURGIA Year: 2022 Type: Article Affiliation country: Taiwan