Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Recovery of Clean Water and Ammonia from Domestic Wastewater: Impacts on Embodied Energy and Greenhouse Gas Emissions.
Shin, Chungheon; Szczuka, Aleksandra; Liu, Matthew J; Mendoza, Lorelay; Jiang, Renjing; Tilmans, Sebastien H; Tarpeh, William A; Mitch, William A; Criddle, Craig S.
Affiliation
  • Shin C; Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, 473 Via Ortega, Stanford, California 94305, United States.
  • Szczuka A; National Science Foundation Engineering Research Center for Re-Inventing the Nation's Urban Water Infrastructure (ReNUWIt), 473 Via Ortega, Stanford, California 94305, United States.
  • Liu MJ; Codiga Resource Recovery Center (CR2C), 692 Pampas Lane, Stanford, California 94305, United States.
  • Mendoza L; Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Michigan, 2350 Hayward Street, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States.
  • Jiang R; Department of Chemical Engineering, Stanford University, 433 Via Ortega, Stanford, California 94305, United States.
  • Tilmans SH; Department of Chemical Engineering, Stanford University, 433 Via Ortega, Stanford, California 94305, United States.
  • Tarpeh WA; Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, 205 North Mathews Avenue, Urbana, Illinois 61801, United States.
  • Mitch WA; Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, 473 Via Ortega, Stanford, California 94305, United States.
  • Criddle CS; National Science Foundation Engineering Research Center for Re-Inventing the Nation's Urban Water Infrastructure (ReNUWIt), 473 Via Ortega, Stanford, California 94305, United States.
Environ Sci Technol ; 56(12): 8712-8721, 2022 06 21.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35656915
ABSTRACT
Treatment of domestic wastewater can recover valuable resources, including clean water, energy, and ammonia. Important metrics for these systems are greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and embodied energy, both of which are location- and technology-dependent. Here, we determine the embodied energy and GHG emissions resulting from a conventional process train, and we compare them to a nonconventional process train. The conventional train assumes freshwater conveyance from a pristine source that requires energy for pumping (US average of 0.29 kWh/m3), aerobic secondary treatment with N removal as N2, and Haber-Bosch synthesis of ammonia. Overall, we find that this process train has an embodied energy of 1.02 kWh/m3 and a GHG emission of 0.77 kg-CO2eq/m3. We compare these metrics to those of a nonconventional process train that features anaerobic secondary treatment technology followed by further purification of the effluent by reverse osmosis and air stripping for ammonia recovery. This "short-cut" process train reduces embodied energy to 0.88 kWh/m3 and GHG emissions to 0.42 kg-CO2eq/m3, while offsetting demand for ammonia from the Haber-Bosch process and decreasing reliance upon water transported over long distances. Finally, to assess the potential impacts of nonconventional nitrogen removal technology, we compared the embodied energy and GHG emissions resulting from partial nitritation/anammox coupled to anaerobic secondary treatment. The resulting process train enabled a lower embodied energy but increased GHG emissions, largely due to emissions of N2O, a potent greenhouse gas.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Greenhouse Gases / Wastewater Language: En Journal: Environ Sci Technol Year: 2022 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Greenhouse Gases / Wastewater Language: En Journal: Environ Sci Technol Year: 2022 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States