Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Long-term surgical complications following pelvic exenteration: Operative management of the empty pelvis syndrome.
Sutton, Paul A; Brown, Kilian G M; Ebrahimi, Nargus; Solomon, Michael J; Austin, Kirk K S; Lee, Peter J.
Affiliation
  • Sutton PA; Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Brown KGM; Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Ebrahimi N; Institute of Academic Surgery at RPA, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Solomon MJ; Colorectal and Peritoneal Oncology Centre, The Christie Hospital, Manchester, UK.
  • Austin KKS; Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
  • Lee PJ; Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Colorectal Dis ; 24(12): 1491-1497, 2022 12.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35766998
ABSTRACT

AIM:

Pelvic exenteration (PE) has become the standard of care for locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer. The high short-term morbidity reported from this procedure is well established; however, longer term complications of such radical surgery and their management have not been fully addressed. This study aimed to investigate the incidence, indications and outcomes of long-term (more than 90-day) reoperative surgery in this group of patients, with a focus on the empty pelvis syndrome (EPS).

METHODS:

Clinical data were extracted from a prospectively maintained database, with additional data pertaining to indications, operative details and outcomes of reoperative surgery obtained from electronic medical records. Patients were excluded if reoperative surgery was endoscopic or radiologically guided, was for the investigation or treatment of recurrent disease, or was clearly unrelated to previous surgery.

RESULTS:

Of 716 patients who underwent PE, 75 (11%) required 101 reoperative abdominal or perineal procedures, 52 (51%) of which were in 40 (6%) patients for complications of EPS. This group were more likely to have undergone a total PE (65% vs. 43%; P < 0.01) with either major bony (70% vs. 50%; P < 0.01) and/or nerve (40% vs. 25%; P = 0.03) resections at index exenteration. The patho-anatomy, surgical management and outcomes of these patients are described herein, considering separately complications of entero-cutaneous fistula, entero-perineal fistula, small bowel obstruction and local management of perineal wound complications.

CONCLUSION:

Six per cent of PE patients will require re-intervention for the management of EPS. Reliable strategies for preventing EPS remain elusive; however, surgical management is feasible with acceptable short-term outcomes with the optimum strategy to be selected on an individual patient basis.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pelvic Exenteration / Rectal Neoplasms Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Colorectal Dis Journal subject: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Year: 2022 Type: Article Affiliation country: Australia

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pelvic Exenteration / Rectal Neoplasms Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Colorectal Dis Journal subject: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Year: 2022 Type: Article Affiliation country: Australia