Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparative efficacy and safety of bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (VTd) without and with daratumumab (D-VTd) in CASSIOPEIA versus VTd in PETHEMA/GEM in transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, using propensity score matching.
Moreau, Philippe; Hulin, Cyrille; Zweegman, Sonja; Hashim, Mahmoud; Hu, Yannan; Heeg, Bart; de Boer, Carla; Vanquickelberghe, Veronique; Kampfenkel, Tobias; He, Jianming; Lam, Annette; Cote, Sarah; Sonneveld, Pieter.
Affiliation
  • Moreau P; Nantes University Hospital Hôtel-Dieu Nantes France.
  • Hulin C; Hospital Center University De Bordeaux Bordeaux France.
  • Zweegman S; Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Cancer Center Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands.
  • Hashim M; Ingress Health Rotterdam The Netherlands.
  • Hu Y; Ingress Health Rotterdam The Netherlands.
  • Heeg B; Ingress Health Rotterdam The Netherlands.
  • de Boer C; Janssen Research & Development Leiden The Netherlands.
  • Vanquickelberghe V; Janssen Research & Development Beerse Belgium.
  • Kampfenkel T; Janssen Research & Development Leiden The Netherlands.
  • He J; Janssen Global Services LLC Raritan New Jersey USA.
  • Lam A; Janssen Global Services LLC Raritan New Jersey USA.
  • Cote S; Janssen Global Services LLC Raritan New Jersey USA.
  • Sonneveld P; Erasmus MC Cancer Institute Rotterdam The Netherlands.
EJHaem ; 2(1): 66-80, 2021 Feb.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35846097
ABSTRACT

Background:

Traditional bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (VTd) regimens for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) include doses of thalidomide up to 200 mg/day (VTd-label). Clinical practice has evolved to use a lower dose (100 mg/day) to reduce toxicity (VTd-mod), which was evaluated in the phase III CASSIOPEIA study, without or with daratumumab (D-VTd; an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody). We used propensity score matching to compare efficacy and safety for VTd-mod and D-VTd with VTd-label.

Methods:

Patient-level data for VTd-mod and D-VTd from CASSIOPEIA (NCT02541383) and data for VTd-label from the PETHEMA/GEM study (NCT00461747) were analyzed. Propensity scores were estimated using logistic regression, and nearest-neighbor matching procedure was used. Outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), time to progression (TTP), postinduction and posttransplant responses, as well as rate of treatment discontinuation and grade 3/4 peripheral neuropathy.

Results:

VTd-mod was noninferior to VTd-label for OS, PFS, TTP, postinduction very good partial response or better (≥VGPR) and overall response rate (ORR). VTd-mod was significantly better for posttransplant ≥VGPR and ORR versus VTd-label. VTd-mod safety was not superior to VTd-label despite the lower thalidomide dose. D-VTd was significantly better than VTd-label for OS, PFS, TTP, postinduction and posttransplant ≥VGPR and ORR, and was noninferior to VTd-label for safety outcomes.

Conclusions:

In transplant-eligible patients with NDMM, D-VTd had superior efficacy compared with VTd-label. Despite a lower dose of thalidomide, VTd-mod was noninferior to VTd-label for safety and was significantly better for posttransplant ≥VGPR/ORR. These data further support the first-line use of daratumumab plus VTd.
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Diagnostic_studies Language: En Journal: EJHaem Year: 2021 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Diagnostic_studies Language: En Journal: EJHaem Year: 2021 Type: Article