Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Reclassification of Treatment Strategy with Fractional Flow Reserve in Cancer Patients with Coronary Artery Disease.
Kim, Jin Wan; Dayah, Tariq J; Javaid, Awad; Monlezun, Dominique J; Balanescu, Dinu V; Donisan, Teodora; Karimzad, Kaveh; Hakeem, Abdul; Boone, David L; Palaskas, Nicolas; Lopez-Mattei, Juan; Kim, Peter Y; Durand, Jean-Bernard; Song, Juhee; Balanescu, Serban M; Yang, Eric H; Herrmann, Joerg; Marmagkiolis, Konstantinos; Toutouzas, Konstantinos; Johnson, Nils P; Iliescu, Cezar A.
Affiliation
  • Kim JW; Department of Cardiology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
  • Dayah TJ; Department of Cardiology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
  • Javaid A; Department of Cardiology, Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV 89154, USA.
  • Monlezun DJ; Department of Cardiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
  • Balanescu DV; Department of Cardiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
  • Donisan T; Department of Cardiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
  • Karimzad K; Department of Cardiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
  • Hakeem A; Robert Wood Johnson Hospital, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA.
  • Boone DL; Department of Cardiology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
  • Palaskas N; Department of Cardiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
  • Lopez-Mattei J; Department of Cardiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
  • Kim PY; Department of Cardiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
  • Durand JB; Department of Cardiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
  • Song J; Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
  • Balanescu SM; Department of Cardiology, Elias Emergency University Hospital, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.
  • Yang EH; Department of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
  • Herrmann J; Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
  • Marmagkiolis K; Pepin Heart Institute Florida Hospital, Tampa, FL 33613, USA.
  • Toutouzas K; First Department of Cardiology, Athens Medical School, Hippokration Hospital, 11527 Athens, Greece.
  • Johnson NP; Department of Cardiology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
  • Iliescu CA; Department of Cardiology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 58(7)2022 Jul 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35888603
Background and Objectives: Cancer and coronary artery disease (CAD) often coexist. Compared to quantitative coronary angiography (QCA), fractional flow reserve (FFR) has emerged as a more reliable method of identifying significant coronary stenoses. We aimed to assess the specific management, safety and outcomes of FFR-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in cancer patients with stable CAD. Materials and Methods: FFR was used to assess cancer patients that underwent coronary angiography for stable CAD between September 2008 and May 2016, and were found to have ≥50% stenosis by QCA. Patients with lesions with an FFR > 0.75 received medical therapy alone, while those with FFR ≤ 0.75 were revascularized. Procedure-related complications, all-cause mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or urgent revascularizations were analyzed. Results: Fifty-seven patients with stable CAD underwent FFR on 57 lesions. Out of 31 patients with ≥70% stenosis as measured by QCA, 14 (45.1%) had an FFR ≥ 0.75 and lesions were reclassified as moderate and did not receive PCI nor DAPT. Out of 26 patients with <70% stenosis as measured by QCA, 6 (23%) had an FFR < 0.75 and were reclassified as severe and were treated with PCI and associated DAPT. No periprocedural complications, urgent revascularization, acute coronary syndromes, or cardiovascular deaths were noted. There was a 22.8% mortality at 1 year, all cancer related. Patients who received a stent by FFR assessment showed a significant association with decreased risk of all-cause death (HR: 0.37, 95% CI 0.15−0.90, p = 0.03). Conclusions: Further studies are needed to define the optimal therapeutic approach for cancer patients with CAD. Using an FFR cut-off point of 0.75 to guide PCI translates into fewer interventions and can facilitate cancer care. There was an overall reduction in mortality in patients that received a stent, suggesting increased resilience to cancer therapy and progression.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Coronary Artery Disease / Coronary Stenosis / Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial / Percutaneous Coronary Intervention / Neoplasms Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Medicina (Kaunas) Journal subject: MEDICINA Year: 2022 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Coronary Artery Disease / Coronary Stenosis / Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial / Percutaneous Coronary Intervention / Neoplasms Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Medicina (Kaunas) Journal subject: MEDICINA Year: 2022 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States